Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 226-378-9 | CAS number: 5384-21-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Repeated Dose oral toxicity
Study 1
A rat NOAEL of 1000 mg/kg bw/day was obtained in a study performed according to OECD 407 with the substance.
Study 2
Rat NOAELs of 750 mg/kg bw/day (females) and 1000 mg/kg bw/day (males) were obtained in a study performed according to OECD 408 with the substance.
Repeated dose inhalation toxicity
A short term repeated dose toxicity study doesnot need to be conducted as the exposure of humans via inhalation during production and/or use is highly unlikely based on the provided thorough and rigorous risk assessment. The test substance has very low vapor pressure (2,56 x 10-6 Pa at 25°C). Also, the particle size distribution of the substance was found to vary between 55-250 µm thus the potential for inhalable dust formation is low. Moreover, the normal conditions of use of this substance will not result in aerosols, particles or droplets of an inhalable size, thus exposure to humans via the inhalation route will be unlikely to occur, and therefore acute toxicity by inhalation route was considered to be waived.
Repeated dose dermal toxicity
A short term repeated dose toxicity study doesnot need to be conducted as the exposure of humans via dermal during production and/or use is highly unlikely based on the provided thorough and rigorous risk assessment.The acute dermal toxicity value for (as provided in section 7.2.3) is >2000 mg/kg body weight. Considering this, the end point for repeated dermal toxicity is considered as waiver.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Toxic effect type:
- dose-dependent
Repeated dose toxicity: via oral route - systemic effects
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- short-term repeated dose toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is from study report
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 407 (Repeated Dose 28-Day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Repeated dose oral toxicity study was performed to determine the toxic nature of the test chemical.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: National Institute of Biosciences, Pune.
- Age at study initiation: 6 to 8 weeks old.
- Weight at study initiation:
Male 168.62 g
Female 140.81 g
- Fasting period before study: No data available
- Housing: Animal was housed in polycarbonate cages. Three rats of same sex were housed together in each cage of size 39 cm X 28 cm X 14 cm. Paddy husk was used as bedding material.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Rodent feed supplied by the Nutrivet Life Sciences, Pune, was provided ad libitum from individual feeders on cage top.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Water was provided ad libitum from individual bottles attached to the cages. Water was from a local source and passed through the reverse osmosis membrane before use.
- Acclimation period: 5 days prior to dosing.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 3°C (actual range: 19.7 °C to 24.1 °C)
- Humidity (%):30% to 70% (actual range: 52.8% to 59.7%).
- Air changes (per hr): Ten air changes per hour of 100% fresh air that has been passed through the HEPA filters.
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): An artificial light and dark cycle of 12 hours each were provided. - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- propylene glycol
- Remarks:
- Polyethylene Glycol-400
- Details on oral exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: 4,4’-Methylenebis (2,6 dimethylphenol) was dissolved in Polyethylene Glycol-400 for preparation of dosing solution(s).
DIET PREPARATION
- Rate of preparation of diet (frequency):
No data available
- Mixing appropriate amounts with (Type of food): No data available
- Storage temperature of food: No data available
VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): No data available
Concentration in vehicle: The solution(s) were prepared at concentrations of 0, 25, 50 and 100 mg/ml such that dosage of 0 (vehicle), 250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg body weight.
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 0.00 mg/ml/day, 25.46 mg/ml/day, 49.02 mg/ml/ day and 101.23 mg/ml/day.
- Lot/batch no. (if required): No data available
- Purity: No data available
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Analysis for concentration and stability of the test chemical were conducted at Subcontracted Laboratory. Test item formulation samples prepared day 1 (pre-dosing) were sent to Subcontracted Laboratory.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 28 days consecutively
- Frequency of treatment:
- Once daily
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0 (vehicle), 250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg body weight/day.
Basis:
actual ingested - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Control: 6 male, 6 female
250 mg/kg bw/day: 6 male, 6 female
500 mg/kg bw/day: 6 male, 6 female
100 0mg/kg bw/day: 6 male, 6 female - Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: Based on results from a preliminary 14-day study there was no chenge in the survivel, body weight, Daily clinical observations and Gross pathological examination of 1000 mg/kg/bw/day group. Based on these results, the 28 day study dose levels were finalized as 0 mg/kg, 250 mg/kg, 500 mg/kg and 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
- Rationale for animal assignment (if not random): Animals were randomized by body weight.
- Rationale for selecting satellite groups: No data available
- Post-exposure recovery period in satellite groups: No data available
- Section schedule rationale (if not random): No data available - Positive control:
- No data
- Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: No data available
- Cage side observations checked in table [No.?] were included. : Rats were observed for Behavior, Alterations, Vocalizations, Respiration and Palpebral closure.
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: Once before the start of dose administration and at least once a week thereafter until scheduled sacrifice.
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: On the day of randomization, first day of dosing, weekly thereafter and a fasting body weight at scheduled sacrifice on day 29.
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study): Yes
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: No data available
- Compound intake calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No data available
FOOD EFFICIENCY: No data available
- Body weight gain in kg/food consumption in kg per unit time X 100 calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No data available
WATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if drinking water study): No data available
- Time schedule for examinations: No data available
OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations:
Once a day
- Dose groups that were examined: 0 mg/kg, 250 mg/kg, 500 mg/kg and 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
HAEMATOLOGY: Yes, By using Beckman Coulter haematology analyzer.
- Time schedule for collection of blood: At termination.
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: No data available
- Animals fasted: Yes, overnight fasted prior to sampling.
- How many animals: Blood collected from all rats of 0 mg/kg, 250 mg/kg, 500 mg/kg and 1000 mg/kg bw/day group at termination.
- Parameters checked in table [No.?] were examined. : Hemoglobin, Red Blood Corpuscles, Hematocrit, Mean Corpuscular Volume, Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin, Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration, Platelets, White Blood Corpuscles, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes, Eosinophils, Monocytes, Basophil and Prothrombin time were checked, Table No.H; Appendix No.VII.
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Yes, By using Dimension XpandPlus and Acculyte 5P.
- Time schedule for collection of blood: At termination.
- Animals fasted: Yes, overnight fasted prior to sampling.
- How many animals: Blood collected from all rats of 0 mg/kg, 250 mg/kg, 500 mg/kg and 1000 mg/kg bw/day group at termination.
- Parameters checked in table [No.?] were examined. : Total Protein, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Urea Nitrogen, Alanine Aminotransferase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, Glucose, Calcium, Phosphorous, Albumin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine , Total Cholesterol, Triglycerides, Globulin Calculated
Sodium, Potassium, Chloride were checked, Table No.I; Appendix No.VIII .
URINALYSIS: No data available
- Time schedule for collection of urine: No data available
- Metabolism cages used for collection of urine: No data available
- Animals fasted: No data available
- Parameters checked in table [No.?] were examined. : No data available
NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: - No data available
Time schedule for examinations: No data available
- Dose groups that were examined: No data available
- Battery of functions tested: sensory activity / grip strength / motor activity / other: Yes
OTHER: - Sacrifice and pathology:
- GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes
All the animals of 0 mg/kg, 250 mg/kg, 500 mg/kg and 1000 mg/kg/bw/day group were sacrificed and gross lesions were noted.
HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes
Control and treated at the highest dose level of 1000 mg/kg were subjected to sacrifice.
Organs examined: Stomach, Seminal Vesicles with Coagulation Gland Testes, Thymus, Thyroid, Trachea, Urinary Bladder, Adrenals, Aorta Brain, Caecum Cervix Colon Duodenum Eyes Heart Ileum Jejunum Kidneys, Liver, Lungs and Mesenteric Lymphnodes of 1000 mg/kg/bw/day group. - Statistics:
- Data were analyzed for reporting group means and standard deviations with significance between the controls and treated groups, using in-house developed and validated MS-Excel 2003 based statistical software. All the parameters characterized by continuous data such as body weight, per cent body weight change, feed consumption, organ weight, relative organ weight, haematological and clinical chemistry data were subjected to Bartlett’s test to meet the homogeneity of variance before conducting Analyses of Variance (ANOVA) and Dunnett’s t -test. Where the data did not meet the homogeneity of variance, Student’s t -test was performed to calculate significance.
Significance was calculated at 1% as well as 5% level and indicated in the summary tables as follows:
* = Significant than control at 95% level of confidence (p≤ 0.05).
** = Significant than control at 99% level of confidence (p≤ 0.01). - Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Daily clinical observations did not reveal any signs of toxicity in male and female animals from of 0 mg/kg, 250 mg/kg, 500 mg/kg and 1000 mg/kg bw/day dose groups during the dosing period of 28 days.
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Description (incidence):
- No mortality were observed in any of the traeted groups of 0 mg/kg, 250 mg/kg, 500 mg/kg and 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- All the of 0 mg/kg, 250 mg/kg, 500 mg/kg and 1000 mg/kg bw/day dose groups exhibited normal body weight gain at the end of the study period of 28 days.
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Food intake of animals from control and 250 mg/kg, 500 mg/kg and 1000 mg/kg bw/day dose groups were found to be normale throughout the study period of 28 days.
- Food efficiency:
- not specified
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not specified
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not specified
- Haematological findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Statistically significant increase in the values of MCHC of male rats dosed at 250 mg/kg/bw/day and 1000 mg/kg/bw/day. In addition statistically significant decrease was observed in the values of Hb and HCT of male rats dosed at 1000 mg/kg. The increase / decrease in the values of different parameters were marginal and within the normal laboratory limits.No significant changes were observed in the values of different parameters studied in female animals from different dose groups when compared with that of controls.
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Increase level of Calcium and Sodium in male rats dosed at 250 mg/kg, 500 mg/kg and 1000 mg/kg of the test chemical. Significant increase level of Cholesterol levels in male rats dosed at 250 mg/kg of the test chemical. Decrease level of Phosphorous in male rats dosed at 1000 mg/kg of the test chemical were observed. Decrease level of Chloride in male rats dosed at 250 mg/kg, 500 mg/kg and 1000 mg/kg. Decrease level of Glucose in female rats dosed at 500 mg/kg of the test chemical was observed. Although there was an increase/decrease in the values of various biochemical parameters are within the normal range of limits.
- Urinalysis findings:
- not specified
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not specified
- Immunological findings:
- not specified
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Female animals revealed increased relative weights of liver of animals from 250 mg/kg and 500 mg/kg dose groups, increased relative weights of kidneys of animals from 250 mg/kg dose group and decreased relative weights of spleen of animals from 1000 mg/kg dose group. Although significant change in organ weights were observed in animals from different dose groups, but the effect was not due to the test chemical.
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- In male and female animals from control and 250 mg/kg/bw/day, 500 mg/kg/bw/day and 1000 mg/kg/bw/day of test item. All the treatment groups did not reveal any abnormality.
- Neuropathological findings:
- not specified
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Focal to multifocal periportal mononuclear cell infiltration in the liver; minimal interstitial haemorrhages and/or tubular dilatation in the kidneys; minimal alveolar haemorrhages and/or alveolar histiocytosis in the lungs; minimal multifocal haemosiderosis and/or diffused congestion in spleen; minimal eosinophilic infiltration and/or luminal dilatation and/or endometrial gland dilatation in uterus; minimal dilatation of zona reticularis and/or presence of accessory adrenocortical tissue in adrenals; minimal multifocal haemorrhages in thymus; presence of ultimobranchial cysts in thyroid; in male or female animals from control and high dose group. All the changes observed in the control and 1000 mg/kg/bw/day dose group animals were similar and no toxic effect of the test chemical were observed.
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not specified
- Other effects:
- not specified
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- behaviour (functional findings)
- body weight and weight gain
- clinical biochemistry
- clinical signs
- food consumption and compound intake
- gross pathology
- haematology
- histopathology: non-neoplastic
- mortality
- organ weights and organ / body weight ratios
- urinalysis
- Key result
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- The repeated oral exposure to the test chemical exerted no toxic effects at the doses tested in male and female Sprague-Dawley rats. The No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) was considered to be 1000 mg/kg bw/day when SD rats were exposed to the test chemical for 28 days.
- Executive summary:
A repeated-dose oral toxicity study was performed to assess the toxic nature of the test chemical of the test chemical upon repeated exposure in Sprague-Dawley rats. The test chemical was administered by gavage at the dose levels of 0, 250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg/body weight for 28 days.All animals were examined for clinical signs and general appearance daily throughout the study. Detailed clinical observations were conducted weekly. Body weight gain and food consumption values were recorded weekly.Motor activity of each animal was recorded, and stereotypic activity was calculated. After completion of the study period, animals were sacrificed and blood samples for haematology and clinical biochemistry were collected. All rats from each group were subjected to necropsy and gross lesions were noted. Histopathological examination was carried out on samples of control and 1000 mg/kg-treated animals.All the animals from control and treated dose groups survived throughout the dosing period of 28 days. No changes in body weight gain and food intake due to test chemical administration were noted. No clinical signs and differences in general appearance were seen in any of the treated animals. No dose-dependent and toxicologically relevant alterations in blood parameters were recorded. Although some significant change in organ weights (including liver, kidney and adrenals) were observed in animals from different dose groups, no related gross pathological or histological changes were seen, and findings were not dose-dependent and hence considered to be of no toxicological importance. Gross pathological examination of rats of all dose groups during necropsy did not reveal any abnormality attributable to the treatment. Similarly, histopathological examination conducted in rats of control and high dose groups did not reveal any abnormality attributable to the treatment. Motor activity values observed in male animals for control and different dose groups were comparable. In female animals, higher values for motor activity were observed from 500 mg/kg dose group but this change was within laboratory range and it was considered to be of no toxicological importance. Based on the observations made in the study, the repeated oral exposure ofthe test chemicalexerted no toxicologically significant changes in the morphology and function of a tissue/organ or have produced serious changes to the biochemistry or haematology of the organism. NOAEL was considered as 1000 mg/kg/day when male and female Sprague Dawley rats were orally treated with the test chemical for 28 days.
- Endpoint:
- sub-chronic toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study without detailed documentation
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 408 (Repeated Dose 90-Day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents)
- Version / remarks:
- 1998
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Envigo, Frederick, MD
- Females (if applicable) nulliparous and non-pregnant: [yes/no] : yes
- Age at study initiation: treatment began at 8 weeks of age.
- Housing: Animals were housed in Smithers Avanza Toxicology Services testing facility (Maryland, US). Animals were housed individually in clear polysulfone plastic cages with SaniChip certified hardwood bedding
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Animals were fed Teklad Certified Rodent Diet 2018C (Envigo Teklad Diets, Madison, WI; batch No. 2018CM-102116MA)
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): a light cycle of 12-h light/12-h dark - Route of administration:
- oral: feed
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- The diet preparation and formulation were conducted by Smithers Viscient Caroline Research Center.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 90 days
- Frequency of treatment:
- Daily by diet
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Remarks:
- Control group
- Dose / conc.:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Remarks:
- Low-dose male and females
- Dose / conc.:
- 300 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Remarks:
- Mid-dose male and females
- Dose / conc.:
- 750 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Remarks:
- High-dose females
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Remarks:
- High-dose males
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Main study: 10 rats per sex per dose.
Recovery groups: 5 rats per sex per dose treated at 0 (plain diet), 750 (females) and 1000 mg/kg bw/day (males). - Control animals:
- yes, plain diet
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale:The
dose levels were selected based on dose range-finding study
- Rationale for animal assignment (if not random): The test animals were randomly assigned to the control and treatment groups
- Fasting period before blood sampling for clinical biochemistry:
- Rationale for selecting satellite groups:
- Post-exposure recovery period in satellite groups: 28 days
- Section schedule rationale (if not random):
- Other: - Positive control:
- None.
- Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- Physical examinations, cage-side observations, body weight, food intake, ophthalmologic observations, functional observatory battery, grip strength, locomotor activity, clinical chemistry, hematology, coagulation, and urinalysis. See Table 1 for more details.
- Sacrifice and pathology:
- Not specified.
- Statistics:
- Prior to the ANOVA analysis, untransformed data were tested to determine if the data are normally distributed and have homogeneous variances among all groups using Shapiro-Wilk followed by the Levene’s test. The Dunnett’s t-test was used to determine which groups differed from the control group. Group comparisons were evaluated at the 0.05 (two-tailed) probability level. Statistical significance was considered at p ≤ 0.05
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- no effects observed
- Haematological findings:
- no effects observed
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Statistically significant changes in clinical chemistry included mild decreases in serum creatinine in females (≥100 mg/kg) and males (1000 mg/kg); mild increases in serum cholesterol in males (≥100 mg/kg) and females (≥300 mg/kg); minimal increases in serum total protein and globulin in males (1000 mg/kg); and minimal increases in serum total protein and albumin in females (750 mg/kg). Activated partial thromboplastin times were slightly increased in females (≥100 mg/kg) and males (≥300 mg/kg) however, no associated clinical findings or microscopic observations were made. At the end of the 28-day recovery period, the following statistically significant changes were observed in high-dosed animals: a minimal decrease in serum creatinine in males; a minimal increase in serum cholesterol in females; a minimal increase in serum albumin in females; and a mild decrease in serum alkaline phosphatase in both sexes. None of the statistical changes in clinical chemistry were considered adverse effect of treatment since they were either within normal biological variation, lacked dose-dependency, or lacked associated microscopic findings.
- Urinalysis findings:
- no effects observed
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- no effects observed
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Organ weight changes at study day 91 included increased absolute and relative (body and brain) liver weights in males and females (≥100 mg/kg-bw/d), correlating microscopically with hepatocellular hypertrophy. There was also an increased absolute and relative kidney weight in females (750 mg/kg-bw/d) and males (1000 mg/kg-bw/d), correlating microscopically with tubular dilation and hypertrophy. Absolute and relative kidney weights for males given 1000 mg/kg-bw/d were calculated excluding one animal which had a large renal tumor and the magnitude of increase was still statistically significant. After the recovery period, organ weight changes remained in the liver and kidney of males given 1000 mg/kg-bw/d. Mean absolute and relative kidney weights were increased, correlating microscopically with tubular dilation, while mean absolute and relative liver weights were increased but had no microscopic correlates. Kidney weight changes were similar to study day 91, while the magnitude of change in liver weights for 1000 mg/kg-bw/d was less (up to 28%) than at study day 91, suggesting ongoing recovery.
- Gross pathological findings:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- One male given 1000 mg/kg-bw/d was observed with a firm, red, tan mass in the left kidney, correlating microscopically with renal tubule carcinoma. As hyperplasia and adenomas were not observed in other high-dose animals and there were no tumors observed in recovery animals, it is unlikely that a single occurrence of carcinoma was test chemical-related in a 90-day study.
- Neuropathological findings:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The liver weight changes were accompanied by hepatocellular hypertrophy (minimal/mild) whereas the kidney weight changes were accompanied by tubular dilatation and hypertrophy (minimal/mild). Additional histopathological findings included thymic epithelial proliferation in females treated at ≥300 mg/kg (minimal/mild) and ovarian follicular cysts at 750 mg/kg (minimal/mild). Females at 0 and 750 mg/kg appeared to be cycling normally as oestrogen stages were recorded in all of these animals. At the end of the recovery period, only microscopic evidence of tubular dilatation in both sexes remained.
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Macroscopically, there were no findings attributable to administration of the test chemical. One male given 1000 mg/kg-bw/d was observed with a firm, red, tan mass in the left kidney, correlating microscopically with renal tubule carcinoma. As hyperplasia and adenomas were not observed in other high-dose animals and there were no tumors observed in recovery animals, it is unlikely that a single occurrence of carcinoma was test chemical-related in a 90-day study.
- Other effects:
- not specified
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male
- Basis for effect level:
- behaviour (functional findings)
- body weight and weight gain
- clinical biochemistry
- clinical signs
- food consumption and compound intake
- gross pathology
- haematology
- histopathology: neoplastic
- histopathology: non-neoplastic
- mortality
- ophthalmological examination
- organ weights and organ / body weight ratios
- urinalysis
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 750 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- female
- Basis for effect level:
- behaviour (functional findings)
- body weight and weight gain
- clinical biochemistry
- clinical signs
- food consumption and compound intake
- gross pathology
- haematology
- histopathology: neoplastic
- histopathology: non-neoplastic
- mortality
- ophthalmological examination
- organ weights and organ / body weight ratios
- urinalysis
- Critical effects observed:
- no
- Conclusions:
- The study-derived NOAEL was considered to be 750 mg/kg/day (females) and 1000 mg/kg/day (males).
- Executive summary:
Materials and Methods: The test item, with a purity of >98% of the Substance, i.e. 4,4'-methylenedi-2,6-xylenol (CAS: 5384-21-4; EC: 226-378-9), was tested for sub-chronic toxicity in Sprague Dawley rats according to OECD Test Guideline 408 (adopted in 1998) and GLP standards. Male and female Sprague Dawley rats (obtained from Envigo, Frederick, MD, USA) were randomly assigned to vehicle control and treatment groups. At the age of 8 weeks, the Sprague Dawley rats were exposed to the test item by diet. Male rats in the main study (10 per dose level) were treated at dose levels corresponding to 0 (basal diet), 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day whereas female rats in the main study (10 per dose level) were treated at dose levels corresponding to 0 (basal diet), 100, 300 and 750 mg/kg bw/day. Recovery animals (5 rats/sex/dose) treated at 0 (males/females), 750 (females) and 1000 mg/kg/day (males) for 90 days were also included in the study and these animals were allowed to recover for 28 days after 90 days of treatment. The diet used is the study was of the brand Teklad Certified Rodent Diet (Envigo Teklad Diets, Medison, WI, USA; batch 2018CM-102116MA). The diet preparation and formulation were conducted by Smithers Viscient Caroline Research Center. Dose levels were selected based on the results of a dose range-finding study (details not available). Animals were housed in Smithers Avanza Toxicology Services testing facility (Maryland, USA). They were housed individually in clear polysulfone plastic cages with SaniChip certified hardwood bedding. A light cycle of 12-h light/12-h dark was used. The animals were euthanized by carbon dioxide inhalation followed by exsanguination prior to necropsy. Smithers Avanza’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) reviewed the study protocol for its compliance with provisions of the US Dept of Agricultural Animal Welfare Act of 1996, the Public Health Service Policy on Human Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and the US Interagency Research Animal Committee Principles for the Utilization and Care of Research Animals. Quantitative data (body weights, body weight changes, food consumption, clinical pathology, and organ weights) from the treated groups were compared statistically to the data of the control group using one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) techniques; sexes were analyzed separately. Prior to the ANOVA analysis, untransformed data were tested to determine if the data were normally distributed and had homogeneous variances among all groups using Shapiro-Wilk followed by the Levene’s test. The Dunnett’s t-test was used to determine which groups differed from the control group. Group comparisons were evaluated at the 0.05 (two-tailed) probability level. Statistical significance was considered at p ≤ 0.05.Results and discussions: Main study: No remarkable effects on mortality, cage-side/physical observations, body weight, body weight changes, food intake, ophthalmology, functional observatory battery, grip strength, locomotor activity, or gross pathology were observed up to 750 mg/kg (females) or 1000 mg/kg (males). Statistically significant changes in clinical chemistry included mild decreases in serum creatinine in females (≥100 mg/kg) and males (1000 mg/kg); mild increases in serum cholesterol in males (≥100 mg/kg) and females (≥300 mg/kg); minimal increases in serum total protein and globulin in males (1000 mg/kg); and minimal increases in serum total protein and albumin in females (750 mg/kg). Activated partial thromboplastin times were slightly increased in females (≥100 mg/kg) and males (≥300 mg/kg) however, no associated clinical findings or microscopic observations were made. Statistically significant changes in organ weight included increased absolute and relative liver weights in male and females (≥100 mg/kg) and increased absolute and relative kidney weights in females (750 mg/kg) and males (1000 mg/kg). The liver weight changes were accompanied by hepatocellular hypertrophy (minimal/mild) whereas the kidney weight changes were accompanied by tubular dilatation and hypertrophy (minimal/mild). Additional histopathological findings included thymic epithelial proliferation in females treated at ≥300 mg/kg (minimal/mild) and ovarian follicular cysts at 750 mg/kg (minimal/mild). Females at 0 and 750 mg/kg appeared to be cycling normally as oestrogen stages were recorded in all of these animals.Recovery groups:At the end of the 28-day recovery period, the following statistically significant changes were observed in high-dosed animals: a minimal decrease in serum creatinine in males; a minimal increase in serum cholesterol in females; a minimal increase in serum albumin in females; a mild decrease in serum alkaline phosphatase in both sexes; increased absolute and relative liver weights in both sexes; increased absolute and relative kidney weights in both sexes; and microscopic evidence of tubular dilatation in both sexes. No other remarkable effects were observed at 750 mg/kg (females) or 1000 mg/kg (males).Discussion and conclusions: None of the statistical changes in clinical chemistry were considered adverse effect of treatment by the authors of the study since they were either within normal biological variation, lacked dose-dependency, or lacked associated microscopic findings. The kidney effects (minimal/mild in severity) were not considered adverse effects of treatment by the authors, but rather due to exacerbated chronic progressive nephropathy, which is a common feature in the kidneys of aging rats (1, 2). The liver effects were considered adaptive responses to treatment by the authors. As such, the study-derived NOAEL values were 750 mg/kg/day (females) and 1000 mg/kg/day (males).
References:
1. Palazzi et al.Characterizing "Adversity" of Pathology Findings in Nonclinical Toxicity Studies: Results from the 4th ESTP International Expert Workshop. Toxicol Pathol 2016; 44: 810-824.
2. Pandiri et al. Is It Adverse, Nonadverse, Adaptive, or Artifact? Toxicol Pathol 2017; 45: 238-247.
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 1.Measurements at the end of the 90-day dietary treatment in TMBPF animals compared to controls. Statistically significant findings are marked with*
Endpoint |
Mean ± SD (N = 10 animals/group/sex) |
|||||||
Control (M) |
TMBPF 100 (M) |
TMBPF 300 (M) |
TMBPF 1000 (M) |
Control (F) |
TMBPF 100 (F) |
TMBPF 300 (F) |
TMBPF 750 (F) |
|
Serum creatinine (mg/dL) |
0.59 ± 0.07 |
0.57 ± 0.07 |
0.58 ± 0.06 |
0.49 ±0.07* |
0.76 ± 0.07 |
0.64 ± 0.17* |
0.59 ± 0.07* |
0.56 ± 0.08* |
Cholesterol esters (mg/dL) |
117.4 ± 10.2 |
148.4 ± 20.4* |
163.0 ± 14.8* |
195.7 ± 18.4* |
113.3 ± 9.9 |
113.3 ± 9.10 |
145.2 ± 9.5* |
177.0 ± 13.8* |
Triglycerides (mg/dL) |
42.2 ± 12.0 |
64.0 ± 20.8* |
46.6 ± 22.2 |
51.2 ± 13.2 |
40.7 ± 18.6 |
36.7 ± 14.0 |
36.5 ± 8.6 |
42.4 ± 10.4 |
Total protein (g/dL) |
6.28 ± 0.23 |
6.46 ± 0.20 |
6.54 ± 0.30 |
6.70 ± 0.32* |
6.71 ± 0.32 |
6.69 ± 0.33 |
6.92 ± 0.42 |
7.14± 0.30* |
Albumin (g/dL) |
2.12 ± 0.13 |
2.20 ± 0.11 |
2.28 ± 0.19 |
2.29 ± 0.20 |
2.51 ± 0.20 |
2.60 ± 0.21 |
2.64 ± 0.24 |
2.73 ± 0.18* |
Globulin (g/dL) |
4.16 ± 0.19 |
4.26 ± 0.16 |
4.26 ± 0.26 |
4.41 ± 0.25* |
4.20 ± 0.17 |
4.09 ± 0.20 |
4.28 ± 0.29 |
4.41 ± 0.25* |
Hemoglobin (g/dL) |
16.48 ± 0.39 |
16.05 ± 0.72 |
16.19 ± 0.59 |
16.05 ± 0.60 |
15.43 ± 0.46 |
15.36 ± 0.49 |
15.00 ± 0.41 |
14.93 ± 0.40* |
Red cell distribution width (%) |
12.47 ± 0.16 |
12.62 ± 0.29 |
12.68 ± 0.27 |
12.82 ± 0.20* |
11.32 ± 0.27 |
11.33 ± 0.21 |
11.16 ± 0.24 |
11.31 ± 0.19 |
Activated partial thromboplastin time (sec) |
16.63 ± 1.10 |
19.04 ± 3.82 |
22.93 ± 7.48* |
20.03 ± 3.19* |
17.04 ± 2.57 |
19.99 ± 3.0* |
18.86 ± 1.29 |
23.44 ± 2.98* |
Heart weight, body weight relative (g) |
0.37 ± 0.02 |
0.35 ± 0.02 |
0.36 ± 0.04 |
0.38 ± 0.02 |
0.38 ± 0.02 |
0.42 ± 0.041 |
0.40 ± 0.03 |
0.42 ± 0.04* |
Heart weight, brain weight relative (g) |
0.83 ± 0.04 |
0.82 ± 0.06 |
0.80 ± 0.08 |
0.81 ± 0.07 |
0.54 ± 0.04 |
0.60 ± 0.06* |
0.55 ± 0.03 |
0.59 ± 0.07 |
Kidney weight, absolute (g) |
2.52 ± 0.19 |
2.65 ± 0.24 |
2.56 ± 0.17 |
2.82 ± 0.24* |
1.51 ± 0.12 |
1.60 ± 0.13 |
1.60 ± 0.11 |
1.66 ± 0.11* |
Kidney weight, body weight relative (g) |
0.58 ± 0.03 |
0.61 ± 0.05 |
0.60 ± 0.03 |
0.64 ± 0.04* |
0.58 ± 0.03 |
0.62 ± 0.05 |
0.64 ± 0.05* |
0.66 ± 0.03* |
Kidney weight, brain relative (g) |
1.31 ± 0.09 |
1.41 ± 0.11 |
1.35 ± 0.11 |
1.47 ± 0.09* |
0.83 ± 0.07 |
0.90 ± 0.07 |
0.89 ± 0.06 |
0.92 ± 0.07* |
Liver weight, absolute (g) |
11.03 ± 0.99 |
13.62 ± 1.45* |
14.36 ± 1.77* |
16.83 ± 0.94* |
5.99 ± 0.47 |
6.59 ± 0.56* |
7.06 ± 0.56* |
8.61 ± 0.56* |
Liver weight, body weight relative (g) |
2.53 ± 0.13 |
3.14 ± 0.25* |
3.36 ± 0.28* |
3.85 ± 0.16* |
2.32 ± 0.15 |
2.56 ± 0.14* |
2.83 ± 0.17* |
3.40 ± 0.16* |
Liver weight, brain relative (g) |
5.74 ± 0.49 |
7.23 ± 0.69* |
7.60 ± 0.94* |
8.73 ± 0.37* |
3.28 ± 0.29 |
3.69 ± 0.34* |
3.91 ± 0.31* |
4.76 ± 0.40* |
*Statistical significance was considered at a p ≤ 0.05. M: male; F: Female 1The not-rounded value is 0.41983 ± 0.04385 and it is not statistically significant compared to control. |
||||||||
|
||||||||
Organ Histopathology (Incidence) |
||||||||
Liver |
||||||||
Hepatocellular hypertrophy |
||||||||
Minimal |
FNO |
4 |
5 |
1 |
FNO |
FNO |
1 |
6 |
Mild |
FNO |
FNO |
FNO |
6 |
FNO |
FNO |
FNO |
3 |
Kidney |
||||||||
Tubular dilation |
||||||||
Minimal |
8 |
5 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
7 |
Mild |
FNO |
3 |
3 |
5 |
FNO |
2 |
FNO |
2 |
Tubular hypertrophy |
||||||||
Minimal |
FNO |
3 |
4 |
5 |
FNO |
1 |
FNO |
3 |
Mild |
FNO |
FNO |
FNO |
1 |
FNO |
FNO |
FNO |
FNO |
Thymus |
||||||||
Epithelial proliferation |
||||||||
Minimal |
1 |
NE |
NE |
1 |
FNO |
2 |
4 |
5 |
Mild |
FNO |
NE |
NE |
FNO |
FNO |
FNO |
FNO |
1 |
Ovary |
||||||||
Follicular cyst(s) |
||||||||
Minimal |
FNO |
FNO |
FNO |
FNO |
2 |
2 |
3 |
6 |
Mild |
FNO |
FNO |
FNO |
FNO |
FNO |
FNO |
FNO |
1 |
Incidence expressed as number of animals with findings; 10 males/female per group FNO: finding was not observed; NE: not examined |
Table 2.List of findings in endocrine-related organs at the end of the exposure period and 28-day recovery period
|
TMBPF Dose level (mg/kg-bw/day |
|||||
|
90-days dietary exposure |
90-days plus 28-days recovery |
||||
0 |
100 |
300 |
1000 |
0 |
1000 |
|
MALES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Absolute and relative organ weights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Testes + epididymides (g) |
5.2840 ± 0.4550 |
5.0792 ± 0.7636 |
5.1579 ± 0.8963 |
5.5039 ± 0.3516 |
5.5446 ± 0.3184 |
5.8558 ± 0.3130 |
Testes + epididymides:BdW |
1.21242 ± 0.06231 |
1.17388 ± 0.18480 |
1.21367 ± 0.22182 |
1.26020 ± 0.06276 |
1.29478 ± 0.15283 |
1.28292 ± 0.13141 |
Testes + epididymides:BrW |
2.74828 ± 0.20426 |
2.69644 ± 0.38493 |
2.72460 ± 0.45800 |
2.85557 ± 0.14398 |
2.82936 ± 0.15144 |
2.91722 ± 0.17377 |
Adrenal glands (g) |
0.04958 ± 0.00543 |
0.05079 ± 0.00831 |
0.04948 ± 0.00599 |
0.05692 ± 0.01185 |
0.05156 ± 0.00648 |
0.05280 ± 0.00720 |
Adrenal glands:BdW |
0.01139 ± 0.00128 |
0.01176 ± 0.00225 |
0.01162 ± 0.00158 |
0.01305 ± 0.00272 |
0.01196 ± 0.00104 |
0.01146 ± 0.00080 |
Adrenal glands:BrW |
0.02581 ± 0.00274 |
0.02700 ± 0.00459 |
0.02622 ± 0.00372 |
0.02956 ± 0.00608 |
0.02628 ± 0.00274 |
0.02622 ± 0.00273 |
Thyroid gland + parathyroids (g) |
0.02175 ± 0.00472 |
0.02086 ± 0.00722 |
0.02302 ± 0.00478 |
0.02352 ± 0.00242 |
0.02162 ± 0.00449 |
0.02696 ± 0.00563 |
Thyroid gland + parathyroids:BdW |
0.00499 ± 0.00101 |
0.00479 ± 0.00148 |
0.00539 ± 0.00113 |
0.00540 ± 0.00068 |
0.00498 ± 0.00076 |
0.00598 ± 0.00165 |
Thyroid gland + parathyroids:BrW |
0.01132 ± 0.00245 |
0.01105 ± 0.00366 |
0.01219 ± 0.00260 |
0.01222 ± 0.00137 |
0.01100 ± 0.00199 |
0.01356 ± 0.00353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organ histopathology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thyroid gland |
GO: NVL; HP: WNL |
GO: NVL |
GO: NVL |
GO: NVL; HP: WNL |
GO: NVL |
GO: NVL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90-days dietary exposure |
90-days plus 28-days recovery |
||||
|
0 |
100 |
300 |
1000 |
0 |
1000 |
Parathyroid gland |
GO: NVL; HP: not examined, not present (2) |
GO: NVL |
GO: NVL |
GO: NVL; HP: not examined, not present (1) |
GO: NVL |
GO: NVL |
Adrenal gland |
GO: NVL; HP: WNL |
GO: NVL |
GO: NVL |
GO: NVL; HP: WNL |
GO: NVL |
GO: NVL |
Pituitary gland |
GO: NVL; HP: WNL |
GO: NVL |
GO: NVL |
GO: NVL; HP: WNL |
GO: NVL |
GO: NVL |
Testis |
GO: NVL; HP: minimal hypospermatogenesis (1) |
GO: NVL |
GO: NVL |
GO: NVL; HP: WNL |
GO: NVL |
GO: NVL |
Epididymides |
GO: NVL; HP: WNL |
GO: NVL |
GO: NVL |
GO: NVL; HP: minimal mononuclear cell infiltrate (2) |
GO: NVL |
GO: NVL |
Prostate |
GO: NVL; HP: minimal mononuclear cell infiltrate (2) |
GO: NVL |
GO: NVL |
GO: NVL; HP: minimal mononuclear cell infiltrate (5) |
GO: NVL |
GO: NVL |
Seminal vesicles |
GO: NVL; HP: WNL |
GO: NVL |
GO: NVL |
GO: NVL; HP: WNL |
GO: NVL |
GO: NVL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FEMALES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Absolute and relative organ weights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uterus + cervix (g) |
0.7352 ± 0.4447 |
0.6084 ± 0.1524 |
0.6436 ± 0.1768 |
0.5082 ± 0.1239 |
0.7054 ± 0.0858 |
0.6132 ± 0.0407 |
Uterus + cervix:BdW |
0.28813 ± 0.18735 |
0.23692 ± 0.05814 |
0.25822 ± 0.06718 |
0.20295 ± 0.05974 |
0.26728 ± 0.03310 |
0.24268 ± 0.02747 |
Uterus + cervix:BrW |
0.39892 ± 0.22758 |
0.34062 ± 0.08429 |
0.35660 ± 0.09568 |
0.28104 ± 0.06968 |
0.38648 ± 0.05899 |
0.33780 ± 0.02962 |
Adrenal glands (g) |
0.06322 ± 0.00533 |
0.06317 ± 0.00562 |
0.06357 ± 0.01262 |
0.05939 ± 0.00545 |
0.06314 ± 0.01247 |
0.06192 ± 0.00729 |
Adrenal glands:BdW |
0.02451 ± 0.00245 |
0.02459 ± 0.00196 |
0.02565 ± 0.00557 |
0.02358 ± 0.00302 |
0.02394 ± 0.00482 |
0.02440 ± 0.00240 |
Adrenal glands:BrW |
0.03462 ± 0.00339 |
0.03541 ± 0.00367 |
0.03524 ± 0.00692 |
0.03280 ± 0.00319 |
0.03458 ± 0.00730 |
0.03402 ± 0.00364 |
Thyroid gland + parathyroids (g) |
0.01875 ± 0.00581 |
0.02127 ± 0.00613 |
0.01824 ± 0.00154 |
0.01998 ± 0.00273 |
0.01738 ± 0.00365 |
0.01914 ± 0.00309 |
Thyroid gland + parathyroids:BdW |
0.00732 ± 0.00241 |
0.00831 ± 0.00257 |
0.00736 ± 0.00074 |
0.00790 ± 0.00099 |
0.00660 ± 0.00141 |
0.00758 ± 0.00151 |
Thyroid gland + parathyroids:BrW |
0.01024 ± 0.00312 |
0.01186 ± 0.00320 |
0.01013 ± 0.00103 |
0.01104 ± 0.00156 |
0.00948 ± 0.00186 |
0.01058 ± 0.00194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organ histopathology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thyroid gland |
GO: NVL; HP: WNL |
GO: NVL |
GO: NVL |
GO: NVL; HP: WNL |
GO: NVL |
GO: NVL |
Parathyroid gland |
GO: NVL; HP: WNL |
GO: NVL |
GO: NVL |
GO: NVL; HP: not examined, not present (4) |
GO: NVL |
GO: NVL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adrenal glands |
GO: NVL; HP: accessory adrenocortical nodule present (2) |
GO: NVL |
GO: NVL |
GO: NVL; HP: accessory adrenocortical nodule present (1) |
GO: NVL |
GO: NVL |
Pituitary gland |
GO: NVL; HP: WNL |
GO: NVL |
GO: NVL |
GO: NVL; HP: WNL |
GO: NVL |
GO: NVL |
Ovaries
|
GO: NVL; HP: minimal atrophy (1), minimal follicular cyst (2)
|
GO: NVL; HP: minimal follicular cyst (2), mild angiectasis (1)
|
GO: NVL; HP: mild atrophy (1), minimal follicular cyst (3),
|
GO: NVL; minimal follicular cyst (6), mild follicular cyst (1)
|
GO: NVL; HP: minimal atrophy (1), mild atrophy (1), minimal follicular cyst (2), mild follicular cyst (2)
|
GO: NVL; HP: minimal atrophy (1), mild atrophy (1), moderate atrophy (1), minimal follicular cyst (3), moderate follicular cyst (1) |
Cervix
|
GO: NVL; HP: mild epithelium atrophy (1), mild epithelium mucification (1) |
GO: NVL |
GO: NVL |
GO: NVL; HP: WNL |
GO: NVL |
GO: NVL |
Vagina
|
GO: NVL; HP: mild epithelium atrophy (1), mild epithelium mucification (1) |
GO: NVL |
GO: NVL |
GO: NVL; HP: WNL |
GO: NVL |
GO: NVL |
Uterus
|
GO: distention, fluid-filled, bilateral (2); HP: mild lumen dilation (2), moderate lumen dilation (2) |
GO: distention, fluid-filled, bilateral (1) ; HP: moderate lumen dilation (1)
|
GO: distention, fluid-filled, bilateral (1) ; HP: mild lumen dilation (1)
|
GO: NVL; HP: mild lumen dilation (2)
|
GO: NVL |
GO: NVL |
Mammary glands |
GO: NVL; HP: WNL |
GO: NVL; HP: WNL |
GO: NVL; HP: WNL |
GO: NVL; HP: WNL |
GO: NVL; HP: WNL |
GO: NVL; HP: WNL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SD, standard deviation; BrW, brain weight; BdW, body weight; GO, gross observations; NVL, no visible lesions; HP, histopathology observations; WNL: within normal limits |
Table 3.Selected mean (±SD) hematology, coagulation, and clinical chemistry parameters for 90-day repeated dose dietary toxicity study in Sprague-Dawley rats, followed by a 28-day recovery.
|
Dose level (mg/kg bw/day) |
|
|
0 |
1000 |
Males |
|
|
Serum creatinine (mg/dL) |
0.64 ± 0.05 |
0.56 ± 0.05* |
Alanine aminotransferase (U/L) |
41.8 ± 4.8 |
35.2 ± 3.0* |
Alkaline phosphatase (U/L) |
75.2 ± 6.8 |
55.0 ± 4.2* |
Fibrinogen (mg/dL) |
360.0 ± 48.50 |
431.6 ± 24.3* |
SD, standard deviation. *p ≤ 0.05
Table 4.Selected mean (±SD) hematology, coagulation, and clinical chemistry parameters for 90-day repeated dose dietary toxicity study in Sprague-Dawley rats, followed by a 28-day recovery.
|
Dose level (mg/kg bw/day) |
|
|
0 |
750 |
Females |
|
|
Phosphorus (mg/dL) |
8.60 ± 0.42 |
7.76 ± 0.25* |
Cholesterol esters (mg/dL) |
118.2 ± 10.10 |
152.2 ± 15.80* |
Albumin (g/dL) |
3.32 ± 0.13 |
3.58 ± 0.16* |
Aspartate aminotransferase (U/L) |
95.6 ± 18.20 |
73.2 ± 4.20* |
Alkaline phosphatase (U/L) |
49.2 ± 13.9 |
32.2 ± 6.50* |
Mean platelet volume (fL) |
7.48 ± 0.18 |
7.10 ± 0.19* |
SD, standard deviation. *p ≤ 0.05
Table 5.Selected mean (±SD) absolute and relative organ weights for 90-day repeated dose dietary toxicity in male Sprague Dawley rats, followed by a 28-day recovery.
|
Dose level (mg/kg bw/day) |
|
|
0 |
1000 |
Males |
|
|
Kidney (g) |
2.49 ± 0.19 |
2.81 ± 0.16* |
Kidney:BdW |
0.578 ± 0.03 |
0.613 ± 0.03 |
Kidney:BrW |
1.27 ± 0.09 |
1.40 ± 0.06* |
Liver (g) |
9.93 ± 1.59 |
12.43 ± 1.11* |
Liver:BdW |
2.89 ± 0.16 |
2.71 ± 0.10* |
Liver:BrW |
5.06 ± 0.16 |
6.18 ± 0.37* |
SD, standard deviation. *p ≤ 0.05
Tabular data on terminal body weights were not provided in the article, however these can be estimated by using tabular data for absolute and relative organ weight. That is, by dividing e.g. absolute liver weight with relative liver weight, approximate terminal body weights can be estimated, as presented in the tables below.
Table 6.Estimated male terminal body weight (g):
|
Control |
100 mg/kg |
300 mg/kg |
1000 mg/kg |
Data set 1† |
435,97 |
433,76 |
427,38 |
437,14 |
Data set 2‡ |
434,48 |
434,43 |
426,67 |
440,63 |
†Based on absolute and relative liver weight. Calculated based on supplemental data using the following formula: (Liver weight absolute) / (Liver weight, body weight relative) × 100.
‡Based on absolute and relative kidney weights. Calculated based on supplemental data using the following formula: (Kidney weight absolute) / (Kidney weight, body weight relative) × 100.
|
Table 9.Estimated female terminal body weight (g):
|
Control |
100 mg/kg |
300 mg/kg |
750 mg/kg |
Data set 1† |
258,19 |
257,42 |
249,47 |
253,23 |
Data set 2‡ |
260,34 |
258,06 |
250,00 |
251,52 |
†Based on absolute and relative liver weights. Calculated based on supplemental data using the following formula: (Liver weight absolute) / (Liver weight, body weight relative) × 100.
‡Based on absolute and relative kidney weight. Calculated based on supplemental data using the following formula: (Kidney weight absolute) / (Kidney weight, body weight relative) × 100.
|
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 750 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subchronic
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- Klimisch 2
Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - systemic effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
- Quality of whole database:
- Waiver
Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - local effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - systemic effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
- Quality of whole database:
- Waiver
Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - local effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Repeated Dose oral toxicity
Two studies have been performed to evaluate the oral toxicity of the test chemical when dosed repeatedly for longer durations. The executive summaries are presented below:
Study 1
A repeated-dose oral toxicity study was performed to assess the toxic nature of the test chemical of the test chemical upon repeated exposure in Sprague-Dawley rats. The test chemical was administered by gavage at the dose levels of 0, 250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg/body weight for 28 days.All animals were examined for clinical signs and general appearance daily throughout the study. Detailed clinical observations were conducted weekly. Body weight gain and food consumption values were recorded weekly.Motor activity of each animal was recorded, and stereotypic activity was calculated. After completion of the study period, animals were sacrificed and blood samples for haematology and clinical biochemistry were collected. All rats from each group were subjected to necropsy and gross lesions were noted. Histopathological examination was carried out on samples of control and 1000 mg/kg-treated animals.All the animals from control and treated dose groups survived throughout the dosing period of 28 days. No changes in body weight gain and food intake due to test chemical administration were noted. No clinical signs and differences in general appearance were seen in any of the treated animals. No dose-dependent and toxicologically relevant alterations in blood parameters were recorded. Although some significant change in organ weights (including liver, kidney and adrenals) were observed in animals from different dose groups, no related gross pathological or histological changes were seen, and findings were not dose-dependent and hence considered to be of no toxicological importance. Gross pathological examination of rats of all dose groups during necropsy did not reveal any abnormality attributable to the treatment. Similarly, histopathological examination conducted in rats of control and high dose groups did not reveal any abnormality attributable to the treatment. Motor activity values observed in male animals for control and different dose groups were comparable. In female animals, higher values for motor activity were observed from 500 mg/kg dose group but this change was within laboratory range and it was considered to be of no toxicological importance. Based on the observations made in the study, the repeated oral exposure of the test chemical exerted no toxicologically significant changes in the morphology and function of a tissue/organ or have produced serious changes to the biochemistry or haematology of the organism. NOAEL was considered as 1000 mg/kg/day when male and female Sprague Dawley rats were orally treated with the test chemical for 28 days.
Study 2:
The test chemical was given by diet to 10 rats per sex per dose for a total of 90 days. Males were treated at doses corresponding to 0, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day whereas female rats were treated at doses corresponding to 0, 100, 300 and 750 mg/kg/day. Recovery animals (5 rats/sex/dose) treated at 0 and 750 (females) and 1000 mg/kg/day (males) for 90 days were also included in the study and these animals were allowed to recover for 28 days after the final dose. Dose levels were selected based on the results of a dose range-finding study. The study followed OECD 408 (adopted in 1998) and was conducted in compliance with GLP standards as per information provided by the authors of the study report.Results (main study):No remarkable effects on mortality, cage-side/physical observations, body weight, body weight changes, food intake, ophthalmology, functional observatory battery, grip strength, locomotor activity, or gross pathology were observed up to 750 mg/kg (females) or 1000 mg/kg (males). Statistically significant changes in clinical chemistry included mild decreases in serum creatinine in females (≥100 mg/kg) and males (1000 mg/kg); mild increases in serum cholesterol in males (≥100 mg/kg) and females (≥300 mg/kg); minimal increases in serum total protein and globulin in males (1000 mg/kg); and minimal increases in serum total protein and albumin in females (750 mg/kg). Activated partial thromboplastin times were slightly increased in females (≥100 mg/kg) and males (≥300 mg/kg) however, no associated clinical findings or microscopic observations were made. Statistically significant changes in organ weight included increased absolute and relative liver weights in male and females (≥100 mg/kg) and increased absolute and relative kidney weights in females (750 mg/kg) and males (1000 mg/kg). The liver weight changes were accompanied by hepatocellular hypertrophy (minimal/mild) whereas the kidney weight changes were accompanied by tubular dilatation and hypertrophy (minimal/mild). Additional histopathological findings included thymic epithelial proliferation in females treated at ≥300 mg/kg (minimal/mild) and ovarian follicular cysts at 750 mg/kg (minimal/mild). Females at 0 and 750 mg/kg appeared to be cycling normally as oestrogen stages were recorded in all of these animals.Results (recovery groups):At the end of the 28-day recovery period, the following statistically significant changes were observed in high-dosed animals: a minimal decrease in serum creatinine in males; a minimal increase in serum cholesterol in females; a minimal increase in serum albumin in females; a mild decrease in serum alkaline phosphatase in both sexes; increased absolute and relative liver weights in both sexes; increased absolute and relative kidney weights in both sexes; and microscopic evidence of tubular dilatation in both sexes. No other remarkable effects were observed at 750 mg/kg (females) or 1000 mg/kg (males).Discussion:None of the statistical changes in clinical chemistry were considered adverse effect of treatment since they were either within normal biological variation, lacked dose-dependency, or lacked associated microscopic findings. The kidney effects (minimal/mild in severity) were not considered adverse effects of treatment but rather due to exacerbated chronic progressive nephropathy, which is a common feature in the kidneys of aging rats. The liver effects were considered adaptive responses to treatment.Conclusion:The study-derived NOAEL was considered to be 750 mg/kg/day (females) and 1000 mg/kg/day (males).
Repeated dose inhalation toxicity
A short term repeated dose toxicity study doesnot need to be conducted as the exposure of humans via inhalation during production and/or use is highly unlikely based on the provided thorough and rigorous risk assessment. The test substance has very low vapor pressure (2,56 x 10-6 Pa at 25°C). Also, the particle size distribution of the substance was found to vary between 55-250 µm thus the potential for inhalable dust formation is low. Moreover, the normal conditions of use of this substance will not result in aerosols, particles or droplets of an inhalable size, thus exposure to humans via the inhalation route will be unlikely to occur, and therefore acute toxicity by inhalation route was considered to be waived.
Repeated dose dermal toxicity
A short term repeated dose toxicity study doesnot need to be conducted as the exposure of humans via dermal during production and/or use is highly unlikely based on the provided thorough and rigorous risk assessment.The acute dermal toxicity value for (as provided in section 7.2.3) is >2000 mg/kg body weight. Considering this, the end point for repeated dermal toxicity is considered as waiver.
Justification for classification or non-classification
The substance is regarded to be classified as Not Classified for STOT RE as per Regulation EC 1907/2006 based on a rat NOAEL of 1000 mg/kg bw/day in a study performed according to OECD 407, a female rat NOAEL of 750 mg/kg bw/day in a study performed according to OECD 408, and a male rat NOAEL of 1000 mg/kg bw/day in a study performed according to OECD 408.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.