Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 215-553-5 | CAS number: 1330-86-5
Toxicological information
Skin sensitisation
Currently viewing:
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Well documented study report, comparable to OECD guideline study with acceptable restrictions (no data on analytical purity of the substance, non-GLP)
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 986
- Report date:
- 1986
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Version / remarks:
- (adopted 1992)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- (the positive control substance DNCB is not one of the substances recommended by the guideline; 10 animals/group instead of 20/group as recommended)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The test procedure was based on the method described by Ritz & Buehler (1980).
Ritz H.L. & Buehler E.V. (1980). Current Concepts in Cutaneous Toxicity. Drill V.A. & Lazar T (Ed.), Academic Press, p. 25 - GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of study:
- Buehler test
- Justification for non-LLNA method:
- A valid Buehler test was available before REACH came into force, therefore no additional LLNA test was performed.
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Bis(tridecyl) adipate
- EC Number:
- 241-029-0
- EC Name:
- Bis(tridecyl) adipate
- Cas Number:
- 16958-92-2
- Molecular formula:
- C32H62O4
- IUPAC Name:
- ditridecyl adipate
Constituent 1
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- Hartley
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Strain: outbred Hartley white
- Source: Charles River Kingston, Route 209, Kingston, NY 12484
- Age at study initiation: approx. 4 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: 360-470 g
- Housing: individually in suspended stainless steel cages
- Diet: standard pellet diet (Purina Laboratory Guinea Pig Chow #5025), ad libitum
- Water: tap water, via automatic watering devices, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 14 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21.1± 5
- Humidity (%): 40-60
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 h dark / 12 h light
Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Inductionopen allclose all
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- other: (Squibb) Mineral Oil
- Concentration / amount:
- - Induction: 0.4 mL of a 50.0% (w/w) test substance solution in Squibb Mineral Oil
- Challenge: 0.4 mL of a 25.0% (w/w) test substance solution in Squibb Mineral Oil
Challengeopen allclose all
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- other: (Squibb) Mineral Oil
- Concentration / amount:
- - Induction: 0.4 mL of a 50.0% (w/w) test substance solution in Squibb Mineral Oil
- Challenge: 0.4 mL of a 25.0% (w/w) test substance solution in Squibb Mineral Oil
- No. of animals per dose:
- - 4 animals for range-finding of primary irritation of the test substance (Irritation group)
- 10 test animals (Induction group)
- 10 control animals (Control group) - Details on study design:
- RANGE FINDING TESTS:
- Primary irritation:
To determine the highest non-irritating concentration of the test material to be used in both the challenge and rechallenge phases of the test, a group of guinea pigs was treated with various concentrations of the test article.
Hair was removed from the entire back of 3 uncommitted guinea pigs using electric clippers. On the following day, patches were applied using a Hill Top Chamber System with a 25 mm Webril swatch moistened with 0.4 mL of either 100.0 (neat) or 75.0, 50.0, and 25.0 (w/w) test substance in Squibb Mineral Oil.
An irritant response was elicited by the 100.0, 75.0, 50.0, and 25.0% concentrations. Since even the lowest concentration of 25.0% (w/w) in mineral oil caused an irritant response, an additional group of 4 animals was used for a second primary irritation test. These animals were treated according to the procedure mentioned above. The concentrations of the test substance used were 50.0, 25.0, 10.0, and 5.0% (w/w) in Squibb Mineral oil.
The positive control material (DNCB) was administered in the same manner as for the test substance Irritation groups. DNCB was administered at a concentration of 0.5, 0.1, or 0.05% (w/v) in acetone. These positiive control irritation animals were also administered acetone via the chamber system.
The guinea pigs were wrapped with a piece of rubber dental dam (approx. 3"x4") that was placed over the patch site and secured with Elastoplast in order to ensure occlusive conditions. After an exposure period of approx. 6 h, the patches were removed and the treated sites wiped with cotton gauze wet with saline.
On the day following application of the test material, the clipped areas were depilated with Neet Cream Hair Remover. The depilatory was allowed to remain on the sites for 5-10 min and then wiped with cotton towels moistened with warm tap water. The patch sites were scored for erythema approx. 2 hours later (24-h reading) and approx. 24 h later (48-h reading) using the Draize scoring system.
MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 3 exposures
- Exposure period: 6 h
- Control group: not treated
- Positive control group: DNCB was administered at a concentration of 0.1% (w/v) in 70% ethanol.
- Site: entire back
- Frequency of applications: once weekly
- Concentrations: 0.4 mL of 50.0% (w/w) in Squibb Mineral Oil
- Application: The patches were applied using a Hill Top Chamber with a 25 mm Webril swatch moistened with the substance. Then, the animals were wrapped with a piece of rubber dental dam (approx. 3"x4") that was placed over the patch site and secured with Elastoplast in order to ensure occlusive conditions.
- Rest period: 19 days
B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 2 exposures (challenge and rechallenge after a 6-day rest period)
- Exposure period: 6 h
- Test group: treated as described
- Control group: treated as test group
- Positive control group: DNCB at 0.05% (w/v) in acetone
- Site: the lower right quadrant of the back for challenge; lower left and upper right quadrants of the back for rechallenge
- Concentrations: 0.4 mL of 25.0% (w/w) in Squibb Mineral Oil for challenge; 0.4 mL of 20.0% or 12.5% (w/w) in Squibb Mineral Oil for rechallenge
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24 h (after depilation for 5-10 min) and 48 h (without additional depilation)
- Application: The patches were applied using a Hill Top Chamber with a 25 mm Webril swatch moistened with the substance. Then, the animals were wrapped with a piece of rubber dental dam (approx. 3"x4") that was placed over the patch site and secured with Elastoplast in order to ensure occlusive conditions. - Challenge controls:
- The control animals were maintained without treatment until primary challenge.
- Positive control substance(s):
- yes
- Remarks:
- 2,4-Dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB)
Results and discussion
In vivo (non-LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- induction: 0%; challenge: 25%
- No. with + reactions:
- 4
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: induction: 0%; challenge: 25%. No with. + reactions: 4.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- induction: 50%; challenge: 25%
- No. with + reactions:
- 9
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: induction: 50%; challenge: 25%. No with. + reactions: 9.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- positive control
- Dose level:
- induction: 0.1%; challenge: 0.05%
- No. with + reactions:
- 10
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: positive control. Dose level: induction: 0.1%; challenge: 0.05%. No with. + reactions: 10.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- induction: 0%; challenge: 25%
- No. with + reactions:
- 2
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: induction: 0%; challenge: 25%. No with. + reactions: 2.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- induction: 50%; challenge: 25%
- No. with + reactions:
- 9
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: induction: 50%; challenge: 25%. No with. + reactions: 9.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- positive control
- Dose level:
- induction: 0.1%; challenge: 0.05%
- No. with + reactions:
- 10
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: positive control. Dose level: induction: 0.1%; challenge: 0.05%. No with. + reactions: 10.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
- Reading:
- rechallenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- other: challenge control
- Dose level:
- induction: 0%; challenge: 12.5%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 5
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: rechallenge. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: other: challenge control. Dose level: induction: 0%; challenge: 12.5%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0.
- Reading:
- rechallenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- induction: 50%; challenge: 12.5%
- No. with + reactions:
- 3
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: rechallenge. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: induction: 50%; challenge: 12.5%. No with. + reactions: 3.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
- Reading:
- rechallenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- other: challenge control
- Dose level:
- Induction: 0%; challenge: 20%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 5
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: rechallenge. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: other: challenge control. Dose level: Induction: 0%; challenge: 20%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0.
- Reading:
- rechallenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- induction: 50%; rechallenge: 20%
- No. with + reactions:
- 4
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: rechallenge. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: induction: 50%; rechallenge: 20%. No with. + reactions: 4.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
- Reading:
- rechallenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- other: challenge control
- Dose level:
- induction: 0%; challenge: 12.5%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 5
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: rechallenge. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: other: challenge control. Dose level: induction: 0%; challenge: 12.5%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0.
- Reading:
- rechallenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- other: challenge control
- Dose level:
- induction: 0%; challenge: 20%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 5
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: rechallenge. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: other: challenge control. Dose level: induction: 0%; challenge: 20%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0.
- Reading:
- rechallenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- induction: 50%; rechallenge: 12.5%
- No. with + reactions:
- 2
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: rechallenge. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: induction: 50%; rechallenge: 12.5%. No with. + reactions: 2.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
- Reading:
- rechallenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- induction: 50%; rechallenge: 20%
- No. with + reactions:
- 4
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: rechallenge. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: induction: 50%; rechallenge: 20%. No with. + reactions: 4.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Primary Irritation Tests:
1. Test:
In the evaluation of the primary irritation potential of the test substance, the 100.0% (neat) as well as the 75.0, 50.0, and 25.0% (w/w) concentrations produced significant irritant responses.
2. Test:
In the second test, significant dermal responses were observed at the highest concentration of 50.0%, but not at the lower concentrations. Based on these data, the 25.0% (w/w) concentration was determined to be the highest non-irritating concentration for challenge.
Challenge:
|
Number of animals showing indicated erythema score |
|||||
|
Score |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
24-h reading |
induced |
1 |
4 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
|
control |
6 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
|
positive control |
0 |
0 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
48-h reading |
induced |
1 |
6 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
|
control |
8 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
positive control |
0 |
1 |
4 |
5 |
0 |
Rechallenge:
|
Number of animals showing indicated erythema score |
|||||
|
Score |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
24-h reading |
induced 12.5% |
7 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
induced 20.0% |
6 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
control |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
48-h reading |
induced 12.5% |
8 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
induced 20.0% |
6 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
|
control |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- sensitising
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- CLP: Skin Sens 1B, H317
DSD: Xi, R43
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
