Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-955-3 | CAS number: 112-29-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 26th August to 9th October 2003
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- Study conducted in compliance with agreed protocols, with no deviations from standard test guidelines and no methodological deficiences, which do not affect the quality of the relevant results. The study report was conclusive, done to a valid guideline and the study was conducted under GLP conditions
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 003
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 1-bromodecane
- EC Number:
- 203-955-3
- EC Name:
- 1-bromodecane
- Cas Number:
- 112-29-8
- Molecular formula:
- C10H21Br
- IUPAC Name:
- 1-bromodecane
- Details on test material:
- Description: colorless liquid
Purity: 99.449%
Water: 0.0131%
Storage conditions: at room temperature and protected from light
Expiry date: May 2004
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- Histidine
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 mix in standard co-factors
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- The test item was freely soluble in the vehicule (DMSO) at 50 mg/mL.
Consequently, with a treatment volume of 100 µl/plate, the dose-levels were 10, 100, 500, 1000, 2500 and 5000 µg/plate. - Vehicle / solvent:
- Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), batch K31602850 305 from Merck Eurolab
Controls
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- See details field
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- 2-nitrofluorene
- sodium azide
- mitomycin C
- Remarks:
- 2-Anthramine was used with S9 mix
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
1) Bacterial strains
The five strains of Salmonella typhimurium were supplied by B.N. Ames Laboratory. They are stored in a cryoprotective medium (1 mL nutrient broth and 0.09 ml dimethylsulfoxide) in liquid nitrogen.
The day before treatment, cultures were inoculated from frozen permanents: a scrape was taken under sterile conditions and put into approximately 6 mL of nutient broth. The nutrient broth was placed under agitation in an incubator at 37°C for about 14 hours, to produce bacterial suspensions.
Each strain derived from Salmonella typhimurium LT2 contains one mutation in the histidine operon, resulting in a requirement for histidine.
In addition, to increase their sensitivity to mutagenic items, further mutations have been added:
- the rfa mutation causes partial loss of the lipopolysaccharide barrier that coats the surface of the bacteria and increases permeability to large molecules that do not penetrate the normal bacteria cell wall,
- the uvrB mutation is a deletion of e gene coding for the DNA excision repair system, which renders the bacteria unable to use this repair mechanism to remove the damaged DNA,
- the addition of the plasmid pKM 101 to strains TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102 enhances their sensitivity of detection to some mutagens,
- in case of TA 102 strain, the histidine mutation is located on the multicopy plasmid pAQ1.
The TA 1535, TA 100 and TA 102 strains are reverted by base-pair substitution mutagens and the TA 1537 and TA 98 strains by frameshift mutagens. In addition, the TA 102 stain detects oxidative mutagens.
2) Metabolic activation system
The S9 mix consists of induced enzymatic systems contained in rat liver post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 fraction) and the cofactors necessary for their function. S9 fraction was purchased from Moltox and obtained from the liver of rats treated with Aroclor 1254 (500 mg/kg) by the intraperitoneal route.
The S9 fraction was preserved in sterile tubes at - 80°C, until use.
The S9 mix was prepared at + 4°C immedialtely before use and maintened at this temperature until added to the overlay agar.
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
1) Treatment
The test item was tested in a preliminary test and two mutagenecity experiments.
The preliminary test, both experiments without S9 mix and the first experiment with S9 mix were performed according to the direct plate incorporation method. The second experiment with S9 mix was performed according to the preincubation method.
The direct plate incorporation method was performed as follows: test itemsolution (0.1 mL), S9 mix when required or phosphate buffer pH 7.4 (0.5 mL) and bacterial suspension (0.1 mL) were mixed with 2 mL of overlay agar (containing traces of the relevant aminoacid and biotin and maintained at 45°C). After rapid homogenization, the mixture was overlaid onto a Petri plate containing minimum medium.
The preincubation method was performed as follows: test item solution (0.1 mL), S9 mix (0.5 mL) and the bacterial suspension (0.1 mL) were incubated for 60 minutes at 37°C, under shaking, before adding the overlay agar and pouring onto the surface of a minimum agar plate.
After 48 to 72 hours of incubation at 37°C, revertants were scored with an automatic counter.
2) Preliminary toxicity test
To assess the toxicity of the test item to the bacteria, six dose-levels (one plate/dose-level) were tested in the TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102 strains, with and without S9 mix.
The evaluation of the toxicity was performed on the basis of the observation of the decrease in the number of revertant colonies and/or a thinning of the bacterial lawn.
3) Mutagenecity experiments
In two independant experiments, using three plates/dose-level, each strain was tested, with and without S9 mix, with:
- at least five dose-level of the test item,
- the vehicule control,
- the appropriate positive control.
The sterility of the S9 mix was checked before the beginning and at the end of each experiment and was found to be satisfactory. - Evaluation criteria:
- A reproductible 2-fold increase (for the TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102 strains) or 3-fold increase (for the TA 1535 and TA 1537 strains) in the number of revertants compared with the vehicle controls, in any strain at any dose-level and /or evidence of a dose-relationship was considered as a positive result. Reference to historical data, or other considerations of biological relevance may also be taken in account in the evaluation of the data obtained.
- Statistics:
- Not specified
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not determined
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
PRELIMINARY TOXICITY TEST
The test item was freely soluble in the vehicule (DMSO) at 50 mg/mL.
Consequently, with a treatment volume of 100 µl/plate, the dose-levels were 10, 100, 500, 1000, 2500 and 5000 µg/plate.
A moderate emulsion was observed in the Petri plates when scoring the revertants at dose-levels > 2500 µg/plate.
A moderate to marked toxicity was noted at dose-levels > 100 µg/plate in the TA 100 strain without S9 mix, at dose-levels > 500 µg/plate in the TA 100 strain with S9 mix and at dose-levels > 2500 µg/plate in the TA 98 strain without S9 mix.
No noteworthy toxicity was observed in the TA 98 strain with S9 mix as well as in the TA 102 strain with and without S9 mix.
MUTAGENECITY EXPERIMENTS
The number of revertants for the vehicle and positive controls was as specified in the acceptance criteria. The study was therefore considered valid.
Since the test item was freely soluble and not severely toxic, the highest dose-level for the first experiment was 5000 µg/plate, according to the criteria specified in the international guidelines. For the following treatments, this highest dose-level was decreased when it was judged necessary, on the basis of the toxicity observed.
Experiments without S9 mix:
The selected treatment-levels were as follows:
- 61.73, 185.2, 555.6, 1667 and 5000 µg/plate, for all the strains in the first experiment, and for the TA 1537 and TA 102 strains in the second experiment,
- 20.58, 61.73, 185.2, 555.6 and 1667 µg/plate, for the TA 1535 and TA 98 strains in the second experiment,
- 2.29, 6.86, 20.58, 61.73 and 185.2 µg/plate, for the TA 100 strain in the second experiment.
A moderate emulsion was observed in the Petri plates when scoring the revertants at dose-levels < 1667 µg/plate, with and without S9 mix.
Except for the TA 102 strain where no toxicity was noted, a moderate to marked toxicity was induced at dose-levels > 61.73 µg/plate in the TA 100 strain, > 185.2 µg/plate in the TA 1535 strain and > 555.6 µg/plate in the TA 98 and TA 1537 strains.
Experiments with S9 mix:
The selected treatment-levels were as follows:
- 61.73, 185.2, 555.6, 1667 and 5000µg/plate, for all the strains in the first experiment, and for the TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 102 strains in the second experiment,
- 20.58, 61.73, 185.2, 555.6 and 1667 µg/plate, for the TA 100 strains in the second experiment.
A moderate emulsion was observed in the Petri plates when scoring the revertants at dose-levels < 1667 µg/plate, with and without S9 mix.
Except for the TA 102 strain where no toxicity was noted, a moderate to marked toxicity was induced generally at dose-levels > 555.6 µg/plate.
The test item did not induce any noteworthy increase in the number of revertants, both with and without S9 mix, in any of the five strains.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative All strains with and without activation
Under experimental conditions, 1-bromodecane did not show mutagenic activity in the bacterial reverse mutation test with Salmonella typhimurium. - Executive summary:
The potential of the test material to cause gene mutation in bacteria was assessed in accordance with the following guidelines: OECD 471 and EU Method B. 13/14. Salmonella typhimurium (strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102) were exposed to concentrations of the test material ranging from 15 to 5000 µg/plate with and without metabolic activation (S9 mix derived of rats liver). The test material gave a negative response where none of the assays showed a significant change in revertant colony numbers.
Under the conditions of the test, test material is therefore considered not to cause genetic mutation in bacteria.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.