Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-041-4 | CAS number: 102-60-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
In vitro, the mutagenicity of ethylenediamine, +4PO was studied in an GLP and OECD guideline conform Ames test including both a standard plate test and a preincubation test (BASF, 40M0530/884153, 1988). The S. typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535 and TA1537 and the E.coli strain Wp2 uvrA were exposed to six concentration levels ranging from 0 -5000 μg/plate with and without metabolic activation by S9-mix. Negative and positive controls (2-aminoanthracene, N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine, 4-nitro-o-phenylendiamine, 9-aminoacridine) were included. The number of revertants did not increase when treated with the different test substance concentrations. According to the Ames test, ethylenediamine, +4PO is non-mutagenic.
To fullfil the requirements for genotoxicity of REACH Annex VIII-X, a grouping approach for NLP Polyols has been adapted. It is based on the report of Paul Illing Consultancy Services Ltd. and Marlin Consultancy (Illing and Barratt, 2007 & 2009) which identifies common breakdown products and functionalities within a given grouping category of NLP polyols. Accordingly, a read-across from ethylenediamine, +EO +PO (CAS# 26316 -40 -5) to ethylenediamine, +4PO (CAS# 102 -60 -3) is justified, as both polyols are grouped within the same NLP polyol category by Illing and Barrett.
For the GLP and OECD guideline conform chromosome aberration assay, V79 chinese hamster lung fibroblasts were exposed to five dose levels from 0 -2800 μg/ml with or without S9 -mix (ISOPA AT04950, 2008). Negative (vehicle) and positive controls (mitomycin c, cyclophosphamide) were included. Cytotoxicity was observed in the absence of S9 metabolic activation at 2100
μg/ml. None of the cultures treated with the polyol showed biologically relevant or statistically significant increased number of aberrant metaphases. Thus, under the experimental conditions chosen here ethylenediamine, +EO +PO is considered to be non-clastogenic in V79 cells.
For the GLP and OECD guideline conform HPRT, chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79) were exposed to seven dose levels (0 - 2800 μg/ml) of ethylenediamine, +EO +PO with and without S9 -mix (ISOPA T 0078744, 2009). Negative (vehicle) and positive controls (ethylmethansulfonate, dimethylbenzanthracene) were included. In the presence of metabolic activation, ethylenediamine, ethoxylated and propoxylated was not cytotoxic up to the highest dose tested which is equivalent to the limit dose of 10 mM. On the basis of the present study, the test substance does not cause an increase of the mutant frequencies in two independent experiments. According to the conditions chosen in the HPRT test, ethylenediamine, +EO +PO is non-mutagenic.
Overall, the available GLP and OECD guideline conform in vitro studies (Ames test, Chromosome Aberration Assay, HPRT) on genotoxicity are negative. Therefore, ethylenediamine, +4PO is considered to be non-mutagenic. According to REACH Annex VIII, an in vivo method was not applied to monitor genotoxicity, as all three conducted in vitro tests yielded negative results.
Short description of key information:
Genetic toxicity in vitro:
Ames test (GLP & OECD 421/422): not-mutagenic with and without S9-mix (S.typhimurium TA98, TA100; TA1535; TA1537 and E.coli Wpa2 uvrA(BASF SE 40M0530/884153; 1988)
CA assay (GLP & OECD 473): non-clastogenic with and without S9-mix in V79 cells (ISOPA, AT04950, 2008)
HPRT (GLP & OECD 476): non-mutagenic with and without S9-mix in V79 cells (ISOPA T 0078744, 2009)
Endpoint Conclusion: No adverse effect observed (negative)
Justification for classification or non-classification
The available studies are considered reliable and suitable for classification purposes under 67/548/EEC and 1272/2008/EEC. In conclusion, classification of ethylenediamine, +4PO is not warranted.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.