Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 240-795-3 | CAS number: 16731-55-8
Animal data: taking together the results from the three studies on sodium and potassium metabisulphite (Tanaka et al., 1979; Til et al., 1972; Feron and Wensfoort, 1972) there was no indication that metabisulphite had any carcinogenic effect. The drinking water study by Tanaka et al. (1979) on potassium metabisulphite in mice is considered as most suitable for the assessment of carcinogenicity (read-across info, see `discussion`). Human data: 4 reliable studies on pulp and paper mill workers were available ((Milham and Demers, 1984; Robinson, et al. 1986; Anderson, et al. 1998; Rix, et al. 1997), see section 7.10.2, based upon which no carcinogenic activity must be expected for the sulfites.
The basis for the read-across concept for this project is the equilibrium between sulfites, hydrogensulfites, and metabisulfites in aqueous solutions depending on pH value which is clearly described in published literature and summarised in the following equations:,
SO2+ H2O <->`H2SO3´ H2SO3<->H++ HSO3-<->2H++SO32- 2HSO3-<->H2O +S2O52-
As the nature of the cation should make no significant difference in this case concerning toxicity and solubility (all compounds are very soluble in water), only the chemical and biological properties of the anion are considered relevant. Based on the described equilibrium correlations, we propose unrestricted read-across between the groups of sulfites, hydrogensulfites and metabisulfites.
Additionally, it is known that sodium dithionite disproportionates in water to form sodium hydrogen sulfite and sodium thiosulfate (equation II) so that this substance can also be added to the read-across concept., It is expected for this case that the substance is not stable enough under physiological conditions to fulfil the requirements of study guidelines and so the products of decomposition have to be considered.
2 S2O42-+ H2O→2HSO3-+ S2O32-
Not completely included in this read-across concept is the substance class of thiosulfates. Although thiosulfates may also disproportionate in aqueous solution to form polythionic acids and SO2(HSO3-), the required conditions are somewhat different (more acidic) and are therefore not strictly comparable with physiological conditions, except for the case of oral application where read-across should be considered unrestricted due to the strongly acidic conditions in the stomach:
HS2O3-+ H2S2O3→HS3O3- + SO2+ H2O
Nevertheless, read-across for all other routes (dermal, inhalation) should also be considered.
The proposed read-across concept only applies to toxicological and ecotoxicological/environmental fate endpoints.
Hollemann Wiberg, Lehrbuch der Anorganischen Chemie, 101.Auflage
Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, Ed. Lide, DR, 88thedition, CRC Press
Taken together the results from the three studies on sodium and potassium metabisulphite (Tanaka et al., 1979; Til et al., 1972; Feron and Wensfoort, 1972), there was no evidence that metabisulphite had any carcinogenic effect. The drinking water study by Tanaka et al. (1979) on potassium metabisulphite in mice is considered as most suitable for the assessment of carcinogenicity, because the size of the experimental groups (50 animals of each sex) corresponded to that recommended in the OECD Guidelines for Carcinogenicity studies (451, 453).The highest concentration of 2% potassium metabisulphite, corresponding to an estimated dose of 2500 mg/kg bw/d K2S2O5, did not indicate a carcinogenic potential. However, there is some indication for a possible tumour-promoting potential of metabisulfite in glandular stomach carcinogenesis (Furihata et al., 1989; Takahashi et al., 1986).
Only a few detailed studies of pulp and paper mill workers (Milham and Demers, 1984; Robinson, et al. 1986; Anderson, et al. 1998; Rix, et al. 1997) are available which analysed whether the workers might be at an increased risk for several site-specific malignancies. However, analyses of exposure-response relationships were not possible, because no exposure levels were available in any of the studies.
The retrospective cohort study in Danish sulphite pulp mill workers had a 2-fold increased risk for stomach cancer and pancreatic cancer (Rix et al., 1997). Other cancers with elevated risks were leukaemia (SIR 1.84) and soft-tissue sarcomas (SIR 2.37). The increased risk for stomach cancer found in this study was in accordance with that of other studies from sulphite pulp mills. The stomach cancer risk was increased in a retrospective cohort mortality study among workers in American sulphite mills (Robinson et al., 1986). They found 11 cases out of 523 observed deaths (SMR 149) with an increasing risk by time since the first employment. When process-specific analyses were conducted, the risk of lymphosarcoma and reticulosarcoma was increased only for men who had worked in sulphate mills. A proportionate mortality study among pulp and paper workers in the United States and Canada indicated a statistically significant excess risk of stomach cancer (Milham and Demers, 1984). Higher proportionate mortality ratios (PMRs) for lymphosarcoma (statistically significant) and kidney, pancreatic and rectal cancers were associated with jobs in the sulphite process. Hodgkin´s disease deaths occurred primarily in sulphate (Kraft) process workers.
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC, 1992) has evaluated the evidence for carcinogenicity and concluded: There is limited evidence for sulphur dioxide carcinogenicity in experimental animals. There is however inadequate evidence for sulphites, bisulphites and metabisulphites for carcinogenicity in experimental animals.
Inhalation and dermal route:
There are no reliable studies regarding cancer in experimental animals after inhalation or dermal exposure to any of the sulphite compounds under consideration. Taking into account the negative oral carcinogenicity data it can be predicted that chronic inhalation or dermal exposure to the various sulphite compounds would not result in remote site carcinogenicity. A certain uncertainty may exist with respect to the possibility of the formation of local tumours in the respiratory tract following long-term inhalation. However, SO2 inhalation for 21 weeks did not result in tumour formation in the lung as shown in a study on the potential co-carcinogenic role of SO2 in the induction of lung carcinoma by benzo(a)pyrene,
so that this may reasonably be read across to the entire group of sulfites because of the chemical equilibrium between dissolved SO2 and the sulfites.
The available data on long-term oral exposure of experimental animals to sodium and potassium metabisulphite allow an evaluation of the carcinogenic risks of sulphite compounds for humans exposed via the oral route. There was no indication that metabisulphite had any carcinogenic effect itself. However, there is evidence of a tumour-promoting potential in glandular stomach carcinogenesis in animals and stomach cancer in pulp mill and paper workers.
Taking into account the applicability of the read-across approach between the different sulphites, the carcinogenity assessment of the sulphites and hydrogensulphites (group 1), sodium dithionite (group 3), and thiosulphates (group 4) can be based on the negative findings of the above mentioned study on potassium metabisulphite (read-across group 2) in mice.
The available data on long-term oral exposure of experimental animals to sodium and potassium metabisulphite allow an evaluation of the carcinogenic risks of sulphite compounds for humans exposed via the oral route. There was no indication that metabisulphite had any carcinogenic effect itself.
Taking into account the applicability of the read-across approach for the different sulphites, the carcinogenity assessment of the sulphites and hydrogensulphites (group 1), sodium dithionite (group 3), and thiosulphates (group 4) can be based on the negative findings of the above mentioned study on potassium metabisulphite (read-across group 2) in mice.
No classification of the substance as carcinogenic is required.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
Welcome to the ECHA website. This site is not fully supported in Internet Explorer 7 (and earlier versions). Please upgrade your Internet Explorer to a newer version.
Close Do not show this message again