Registration Dossier

Administrative data

Workers - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
3 mg/m³
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
3 mg/m³
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
3 mg/m³
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
3 mg/m³
DNEL related information

Workers - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information

Workers - Hazard for the eyes

Additional information - workers

Workers might be exposed to aluminatesilicate during the manufacturing process.

Workplace exposure to aluminatesilicate is neither regulated on the EU level nor in any of the member states. Therefore, the limits of inhalation exposure to aluminatesilicate at the workplace are based on the general limit values for dust (TRGS 900, June 2008):The existing OEL for dust is 3 mg/m³ (alveolar fraction) and 10 mg/m³ (respirable fraction). It is proposed to adopt the more critical value of 3 mg/m³ as DNEL. This approach is in compliance with the ECHA "Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Chapter R.8: Characterisation of dose [concentration]-response for human health", May 2008.

 

General Population - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information

Local effects

Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard via oral route

Systemic effects

Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard for the eyes

Additional information - General Population

A risk potential to the general population is not expected at all. Since exposure of the general public is not relevant, DNELs for the general population were not derived.