Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 237-048-9 | CAS number: 13597-46-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Repeated dose toxicity: oral
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- sub-chronic toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Nodular regenerative hyperplasia in the rat induced by a selenium-enriched diet: Study of a model.
- Author:
- Bioulac-Sage P.; et al.
- Year:
- 1 992
- Bibliographic source:
- Hepatology 16, 418-425
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Weaned male rats were fed diets containing 0.4 (control), 2 or 4 ppm selenium for 2 months.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Sodium selenite
- EC Number:
- 233-267-9
- EC Name:
- Sodium selenite
- Cas Number:
- 10102-18-8
- Molecular formula:
- H2O3Se.2Na
- IUPAC Name:
- disodium selenite
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Na2SeO3
- Molecular formula (if other than submission substance): Na2SeO3
- Molecular weight (if other than submission substance): 172.96 g/mol
- Physical state: solid
- no further information given
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Breeding Laboratories, Orleans, France
- Age at study initiation: not stated
- Weight at study initiation: 50 g
- Housing: in plastic cages (5/cage)
- Diet: free access to food
- Water: free access to water
- Acclimation period: not stated
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C):
- Humidity (%):
- Air changes (per hr):
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light):
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: feed
- Vehicle:
- other: diet
- Details on oral exposure:
- DIET PREPARATION
The composition of the diet (INRA, Jouy-en-Josas, France) was the following: cornstarch, 44.26%; purified casein, 22%; saccharose, 22.13%; cellulose, 2%; peanut oil, 2.5%; colza oil, 2.5%; minerals, 3.5%; vitamins, 1%; D-L methionine, 0.13%; and Selenium (sodium selenite, Na2S2O3) (group 1: 0.4 ppm, group 2: 2 ppm, group 3: 4 ppm). - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- not specified
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 2 months
- Frequency of treatment:
- continuously (in diet)
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0.4 ppm Se (group 1, control diet)
Basis:
nominal in diet
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
2 ppm Se (group 2)
Basis:
nominal in diet
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
4 ppm Se (group 3)
Basis:
nominal in diet
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- group 1: n=5; group 2: n=8; group 3: n=8
- Control animals:
- yes
Examinations
- Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: No data
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: No data
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: weekly.
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study):
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: No data.
- Compound intake calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No data.
FOOD EFFICIENCY:
- Body weight gain in kg/food consumption in kg per unit time X 100 calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No data.
WATER CONSUMPTION: No data
OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: No
HAEMATOLOGY: No
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Yes
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: under pentobarbital anaesthesia.
- Animals fasted: No data.
- Parameters checked: total bilirubin, AST, ALT, alkaline phosphatase and y-glutamyltransferase portal
URINALYSIS: No
NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: No
OTHER: Yes
- Portal pressure was measured on a manometer with a 3F infusion catheter inserted through the mesocolic vein into the portal vein. - Sacrifice and pathology:
- All rats were killed two months after the start of the experiment.
GROSS PATHOLOGY : Yes
- Livers were immediately removed and weighed. Part was fixed in 10% neutral formalin and routinely processed for light microscopy.
- Spleens were then removed and weighed.
HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes
- Slides were stained with haematoxylin-eosinsaffron (HES), reticulin and picro Sirius red. Part of a lobe was perfusion-fixed through a hepatic vein (10 cm H,O) with 1.5% glutaraldehyde and then routinely processed for electron microscopy. One-micrometer sections were stained with toluidine blue. Selected areas from nodular (nodules and atrophic hepatocytes) and nonnodular zones were used for ultrathin sections. Grids were double-contrasted with uranyl acetate and lead citrate and examined under a Philips CMlO electron microscope (Centre de Microscopie Electronique, Universite de Bordeaux II).
- When it became apparent that in group 3 some liver lobes were atrophic whereas others were hypertrophic, lobes were weighed and fixed separately for light microscopy only. - Other examinations:
- MORPHOMETRICAL STUDIES
A camera lucida was used, magnification x125, connected to an IBAS semiautomatic image analysis system (Karl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) to examine individual HES-stained sections. The surface areas of each identifiable portal tract and those of the portal vein it contained were computed. Longitudinally cut portal tracts, those with surface areas greater than 0.5 mm2 and those with no recognizable bile ducts were excluded. After establishing a ratio portal vein area (PV)/portal space area (PSI for each case, we determined a mean ratio. These surface areas were then classed into three categories (class 1 < 0.04 mm2, class 2 > 0.04 < 0.17 mm2, class 3 > 0.17 mm2), and a mean PVPS ratio was calculated for each. - Statistics:
- Results were expressed as mean ± S.D. and statistically compared with the control group with an ANOVA test for repeated measurements (p < 0.05).
Results and discussion
Results of examinations
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- only temporarily affected
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not specified
- Food efficiency:
- not specified
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- no effects observed
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Gross pathological findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Details on results:
- CLINICAL SIGNS AND MORTALITY
- No mortality was observed in animals fed 2 or 4 ppm in the diet.
BODY WEIGHT AND WEIGHT GAIN
- Growth depression occurred during the first 2 weeks in animals of the 4 ppm group; final body weight was not significantly affected.
- Rats of the 2ppm grew normally.
CLINICASL CHEMISTRY
- Liver function (total bilirubin; AST, ALT, AP and GGT) was in the control range for both groups.
ORGAN WEIGHTS
- Slight but significant increase in liver weight (absolute and related to body weight) was observed in the 4 ppm but not the 2 ppm group.
- Spleen weights were not significantly increased.
GROSS PATHOLOGY
- Gross pathological changes were observed in livers of the 4 ppm animals: atrophic micronodular, reddish lobes with occasionally clearly visible veins on the surface alongside other changes including hypertrophy with only a slight irregular surface.
HISTOPATHOLOGY:
- In the 4 ppm group, atrophic lobes displaying a peripheral nodular zone with micronodules separated by rows of atrophic hepatocytes without fibrosis, characteristics of nodular regenerative hyperplasia, and a central atrophic zone that was sometimes peliotic.
- Hypertrophic lobes and livers in the less severe cases (4 ppm) had only minor and relatively localised evidence of nodular regenerative hyperplasia; occasionally peliosis was seen.
- In all cases (4 ppm), portal veins, hepatic veins and arteries were normal; by electron microscopy, in nodular zones with no obvious evidence of parenchymal atrophy, the endothelial wall showed signs of complete or incomplete capillarization with frequent enlargement of the Disse space.
- Only minor and inconsistent changes were observed at 2ppm.
OTHER FINDINGS
- No obvious signs of clinical hypertension, but portal pressure increased by a factor of 1.8 in the 4 ppm group.
Effect levels
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 0.12 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- Se
- Sex:
- male
- Basis for effect level:
- gross pathology
- histopathology: non-neoplastic
- organ weights and organ / body weight ratios
Target system / organ toxicity
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Based on effects on liver weights, gross and histopathological findings observed at 4 ppm (0.24 mg Se/kg bw/d), the NOAEL for hepatotoxicity can be established at the lower dose level of 2 ppm selenium (0.12 mg Se/kg bw/d) in the diet.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.