Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Basic toxicokinetics

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

basic toxicokinetics in vivo
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP compliant study, available as unpublished report, no restrictions, fully adequate for assessment.

Data source

Reference Type:
study report
Report date:

Materials and methods

Objective of study:
Test guideline
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
The objectives of the study were to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (in blood) and excretion profiles of the test article in rats. Difluoro [1,1,2,2-tetrafluoro-2-(pentafluoro-ethoxy)] ethoxy acetic acid (EEA) in the vehicle, sterile water for injection, was administered intravenously once to 1 pharmacokintic (blood collection) group and 1 excretion group of Crl:CD(SD) rats.
GLP compliance:

Test material

Constituent 1
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Difluoro [1,1,2,2-tetrafluoro-2-(pentafluoro-ethoxy)] ethoxy acetic acid (EEA)

Test animals


Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
Duration and frequency of treatment / exposure:
Doses / concentrations
Doses / Concentrations:
10 mg/kg bw at a dosage volume of 5 mL/kg
No. of animals per sex per dose / concentration:
The pharmacokinetic group consisted of 9 animals/sex and the excretion group consisted of 3 animals/sex
Control animals:
Positive control reference chemical:
Details on dosing and sampling:
All animals were observed twice daily for mortality and moribundity. Detailed physical examinations were performed at least once during the pre-treatment period. Individual body weights were recorded during acclimation, at pretest initiation, at randomization and on study day 0. Food consumption was recorded during the pretest period only.
For pharmacokinetic assessment, blood samples were collected on wet ice from 3 animals/sex prior to dosing and at approximately 2, 10, 20 and 30 minutes and 1, 3, 5, 7, 24 and 48 hours after dose administration.
For excretion profile, urine samples were collected from 3 animals/sex over the following intervals: 0-6, 6-12 and 12-24 hours post-dosing.
All pharmacokinetic and excretion group animals were euthanized and discarded without further evaluation following the final blood or urine collection.
Serum and urine concentrations of EEA were measured using a validated LCMS/MS method. The concentrations in serum and amounts excreted in urine were used for pharmacokinetic analysis.

Results and discussion

Toxicokinetic / pharmacokinetic studies

Details on distribution in tissues:
After a single intravenous dose of EEA at 10 mg/kg bw, systemic exposure (AUC0-∞) to EEA for male rats was almost 7-fold higher than for female rats. EEA appeared to remain mostly in the circulation in male rats (apparent volume of distribution about 0.2 L/kg), but to have extensive tissue distribution in female rats (apparent volume of distribution of more than 2.5 L/kg).
Details on excretion:
The terminal elimination phase for EEA in serum had a half-life of 9.4 and 5.4 hours for female and male rats, respectively. The half-life for EEA in urine was 1.8 and 3.2 hours, for female and male rats respectively. Nevertheless, the percent of EEA dose eliminated over 24 hours post-dosing in the urine of male rats and female rats was similar (approximately 65%). This can be explained by the lower amounts of EEA available for urinary clearance in the circulation of female rats compared to male rats as suggested by the differences in the apparent volume of distribution.

Metabolite characterisation studies

Metabolites identified:
not measured

Applicant's summary and conclusion