Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
REACH_negative | S. typhimurium TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, E. coli WP2 uvrA | OECD 471 | with and without | #key study#
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- August 2020
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5100 - Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test (August 1998)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A pKM 101
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- phenobarbital/β-naphthoflavone induced rat S9 Mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0.00316, 0.0100, 0.0316, 0.100, 0.316, 1.0 and 2.5 μL/plate
The recommended maximum dose was reached during the experiment as toxicity was observed in the highest concentration used. - Vehicle / solvent:
- The test item was dissolved in DMSO and diluted prior to treatment. The solvent was compatible with the survival of the bacteria and the S9 activity.
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- A. dest
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- methylmethanesulfonate
- other: 4-NOPD (4-nitro-o-phenylene-diamine)
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- A. dest
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-AA (2-aminoanthracene)
- Remarks:
- with metabolic activation
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- In order to investigate the potential of 2-Propenoic acid,2-[[3a,4,5,6,7,7a-hexahydro-4,7-methano-1H-inden-5(or 6)-yl]oxy]ethyl ester; EC Name: Reaction mass of 2-(3a,4,5,6,7,7a-hexahydro-1H-4,7-methanoinden-5-yloxy)ethyl acrylate and 2-(3a,4,5,6,7,7a-hexahydro-1H-4,7-methanoinden-6-yloxy)ethyl acrylate for its ability to induce gene mutations the plate incorporation test was performed with the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and tester strain E. coli WP2 uvrA (pKM101).
In the experiment several concentrations of the test item were used. The assay was conducted with and without metabolic activation. The concentrations, including the controls, were tested in triplicate.
The following concentrations of the test item were prepared and used in the experiment:
0.00316, 0.0100, 0.0316, 0.100, 0.316, 1.0 and 2.5 μL/plate
Using a correction factor of 1.015, the highest concentration of 2.5 μL/plate corresponds to 2.46 μL/plate active component. This difference in concentration can be regarded as negligible. The recommended maximum dose was reached during the experiment as toxicity was observed in the highest concentration used. Therefore, the test item was tested up to a cytotoxic concentration. - Rationale for test conditions:
- The OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals, Section 4, No. 471 – Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test - recommends using a combination of S. typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and E. coli WP2 uvrA (pKM101).
The S. typhimurium histidine (his) reversion system and the E. coli tryptophan (trp) reversion system measures his- -> his+ reversions and trp- -> trp+.
The S. typhimurium strains are constructed to differentiate between base pair (TA100, TA1535) and frameshift (TA98, TA1537) mutations.
The E. coli strain detects only base substitution mutagens. - Evaluation criteria:
- CYTOTOXICITY
Cytotoxicity can be detected by a clearing or rather diminution of the background lawn or a reduction in the number of revertants down to a mutation factor of approximately ≤ 0.5 in relation to the solvent control.
VALIDITY
A test is considered acceptable if for each strain:
- the bacteria demonstrate their typical responses to ampicillin (TA98, TA100, E. coli WP2 uvrA (pKM101))
- the negative control plates (A. dest.) with and without S9 mix are within the following historical control data range
- corresponding background growth on negative control, solvent control and test plates is observed.
- the positive controls show a distinct enhancement of revertant rates over the control plate
- at least five different concentrations of each tester strain are analysable.
MUTAGENICITY
The Mutation Factor is calculated by dividing the mean value of the revertant counts by the mean values of the solvent control (the exact and not the rounded values are used for calculation).
A test item is considered as mutagenic if:
- a clear and dose-related increase in the number of revertants occurs and/or
- a biologically relevant positive response for at least one of the dose groups occurs in at least one tester strain with or without metabolic activation.
A biologically relevant increase is described as follows:
- if in tester strains TA98, TA100 and E. coli WP2 uvrA (pKM101) the number of reversions is at least twice as high
- if in tester strains TA1535 and TA1537 the number of reversions is at least three times higher than the reversion rate of the solvent control - Statistics:
- According to OECD guidelines, the biological relevance of the results is the criterion for the interpretation of results, a statistical evaluation of the results is not regarded as necessary.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A pKM 101
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- In conclusion, it can be stated that during the described mutagenicity test and under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did not cause gene mutations by base pair changes or frameshifts in the genome of the tester strains used.
Therefore, the test item is considered to be non-mutagenic in this bacterial reverse mutation assay, when tested up to a cytotoxic concentration. - Executive summary:
In order to investigate the potential of 2-Propenoic acid,2-[[3a,4,5,6,7,7a-hexahydro-4,7-methano-1H-inden-5(or 6)-yl]oxy]ethyl ester; EC Name: Reaction mass of 2-(3a,4,5,6,7,7a-hexahydro-1H-4,7 -methanoinden-5-yloxy)ethyl acrylate and 2-(3a,4,5,6,7,7a-hexahydro-1H-4,7-methanoinden-6 -yloxy)ethyl acrylate for its ability to induce gene mutations the plate incorporation test was performed with the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and tester strain E. coli WP2 uvrA (pKM101).
In the experiment several concentrations of the test item were used. The assay was conducted with and without metabolic activation. The concentrations, including the controls, were tested in triplicate.
The following concentrations of the test item were prepared and used in the experiment:
0.00316, 0.0100, 0.0316, 0.100, 0.316, 1.0 and 2.5 μL/plate
Using a correction factor of 1.015, the highest concentration of 2.5 μL/plate corresponds to 2.46 μL/plate active component. This difference in concentration can be regarded as negligible. The recommended maximum dose was reached during the experiment as toxicity was observed in the highest concentration used. Therefore, the test item was tested up to a cytotoxic concentration.
Results
No precipitation of the test item was observed in any tester strain used (with and without metabolic activation).
Toxic effects of the test item were noted in all tester strains used:
Toxic effects of the test item were observed at concentrations of 0.1 μL/plate and higher (without metabolic activation) and at concentrations of 0.316 μg/plate and higher (with metabolic activation), depending on the particular tester strain.
No biologically relevant increases in revertant colony numbers of any of the five tester strains were observed following treatment with the test item at any concentration level, neither in the presence nor absence of metabolic activation in the experiment.
All criteria of validity were met.
Conclusion
In conclusion, it can be stated that during the described mutagenicity test and under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did not cause gene mutations by base pair changes or frameshifts in the genome of the tester strains used.
Therefore, the test item is considered to be non-mutagenic in this bacterial reverse mutation assay, when tested up to a cytotoxic concentration.
Reference
No precipitation of the test item was observed in any tester strain used (with and without metabolic activation).
Toxic effects of the test item were noted in all tester strains used.
Toxic effects of the test item were noted in tester strain TA98 at concentrations of 0.100 μL/plate and higher (without metabolic activation) and at concentrations of 1.0 μL/plate and higher (with metabolic activation). Toxic effects of the test item were observed in tester strains TA100, TA1535 and TA1537 at concentrations of 0.316 μL/plate and higher (without metabolic activation) and at concentrations of 1.0 μL/plate and higher (with metabolic activation). In tester strain E. coli WP2 uvrA (pKM101) toxic effects of the test item were noted at concentrations of 0.316 μL/plate and higher (with and without metabolic activation).
No biologically relevant increases in revertant colony numbers of any of the five tester strains were observed following treatment with the test item at any concentration level, neither in the presence nor absence of metabolic activation.
All criteria of validity were met.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
Reaction mass of 2-(3a,4,5,6,7,7a-hexahydro-1H-4,7-methanoinden-5-yloxy)ethyl acrylate and 2-(3a,4,5,6,7,7a-hexahydro-1H-4,7-methanoinden-6-yloxy)ethyl acrylate was submitted to an OECD 471 study. The test item was considered non-mutagenic in the bacterial reverse mutation assay, when tested up to a cytotoxic concentration with and without metabolic activation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.