Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 864-951-0 | CAS number: 2170099-74-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Biodegradation in water: screening tests
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2019-11-07 to 2020-01-28
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.4-D (Determination of the "Ready" Biodegradability - Manometric Respirometry Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 30 May 2008
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 301 F (Ready Biodegradability: Manometric Respirometry Test)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted July 17, 1992
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Inoculum or test system:
- activated sludge, domestic, non-adapted
- Details on inoculum:
- - Source of inoculum/activated sludge: the sewage treatment plant Rossdorf, Germany
- Preparation of inoculum for exposure: The aerobic activated sludge used for this study was deposited for 15 min, washed by centrifugation and the supernatant liquid phase was decanted. The solid material was re-suspended in test water and centrifuged again. This procedure was done three times. An aliquot of the final sludge suspension was weighed, dried and the ratio of wet sludge to its dry weight was determined.
- Pretreatment: Based on this ratio, calculated aliquots of washed sludge suspension, corresponding to 3.5 g dry material per litre were mixed with test water and aerated overnight. This suspension was used for the experiment.
- Water filtered: no, decanted - Duration of test (contact time):
- 28 d
- Initial conc.:
- 101.8 mg/L
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- O2 consumption
- Details on study design:
- TEST CONDITIONS
- Composition of medium: reconstituted water
- Test temperature: 22 °C ± 1 °C
- pH: 7.4 (measured at the start of the test), 7.4 to 9.6 (measured at the end of the test)
- pH adjusted: yes
- Surrounding Type: Climatised chamber
- Continuous darkness: yes
TEST SYSTEM
- Culturing apparatus: Manometric Test System with test flasks containing a volume of approximately 500 mL.
- Number of culture flasks/concentration: 2
- Method used to create anaerobic conditions: The test flasks were closed gas-tight by a measuring head.
- Measuring equipment: BSB/BOD-Sensor-System
- Test performed in closed vessels due to significant volatility of test substance: yes
CONTROL AND BLANK SYSTEM
- Test suspension: 2
- Inoculum blank: 2
- Abiotic sterile control: 1
- Toxicity control: 1
- Procedure control: 1 - Reference substance:
- benzoic acid, sodium salt
- Test performance:
- The amounts of test item and reference item were directly weighed into the test flasks. No emulsifiers or solvents were used, but the solutions were dispersed by stirring to achieve a homogeneous solution of the test item. The closed test flasks were incubated in a climatised chamber under continuous stirring. The consumption of oxygen was determined by measuring the change of pressure in the flasks. Evolved carbon dioxide was absorbed in an aqueous solution (45 %) of potassium hydroxide. The change of pressure in the test flasks was measured by means of a manometric method (BSB/BOD-Sensor-System).
- Key result
- Parameter:
- % degradation (O2 consumption)
- Value:
- 29
- Sampling time:
- 28 d
- Details on results:
- The mean biodegradation percentage at the end of the 28-day exposure period was 29 % (ThODNH4).
- Results with reference substance:
- The reference item sodium benzoate was sufficiently degraded to 88 % after 14 days and to 96 % after 28 days of incubation. The percentage biodegradation of the reference item confirms the suitability of the used aerobic activated sludge inoculum.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Interpretation of results:
- not readily biodegradable
- Conclusions:
- The degradation rate of the test item did not reach 60 % within the 10-day window or after 28 days. Therefore, the test item is considered to be not readily biodegradable based on ThODNH4.
- Executive summary:
The Ready biodegradability of the test item was assessed in a Manometric Respirometry Test according to OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals No. 301 F over a period of 28 days at 22 °C ± 1 °C in darkness. The biodegradation was followed by the oxygen uptake of the microorganisms during exposure. As a reference item, sodium benzoate was tested simultaneously under the same conditions as the test item, and functioned as a procedure control. The test item loading rate was 101.8 mg/L corresponding to an oxygen demand of about 77.7 mg/L (ThODNH4) and reference item loading rate was 102.9 mg/L corresponding to an oxygen demand of about 171.4 mg/L (ThODNH4). The degradation rate of the test item was calculated by the oxygen consumption of the aerobic activated sludge microorganisms after 28 days of incubation. The reference item sodium benzoate was sufficiently degraded to 88 % after 14 days and to 96% after 28 days of incubation, thus confirming the suitability of the aerobic activated sludge inoculum used. In the toxicity control containing both, the test item and the reference item sodium benzoate, 66 % (ThODNH4) biodegradation was noted within 14 days and 70 % (ThODNH4) biodegradation after 28 days of incubation. According to the test guidelines, the test item can be assumed to be not inhibitory to the aerobic activated sludge microorganisms because degradation was > 25 % within 14 days. The mean biodegradation of 10 % of the test item was reached at day 3 (ThODNH4). At the end of the 10-day window at day 13, the mean degradation of the test item was 29 % (ThODNH4). Therefore the 10 day window criterion was not passed. The mean biodegradation at test end after 28 days was 29% (ThODNH4). Therefore, the test item is considered to be not readily biodegradable based on ThODNH4.
Reference
Table 2: Cumulative Biochemical Oxygen Demand (mg O2/L) in Test Flasks during the Test Period of 28 Days
Time (days) | Flask No. | ||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 80 | 0 | 70 |
3 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 95 | 0 | 95 |
4 | 15 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 105 | 0 | 110 |
5 | 15 | 15 | 5 | 5 | 115 | 0 | 130 |
6 | 15 | 20 | 5 | 5 | 125 | 0 | 140 |
7 | 20 | 20 | 5 | 5 | 130 | 0 | 150 |
8 | 20 | 25 | 5 | 5 | 135 | 0 | 160 |
9 | 20 | 25 | 5 | 5 | 140 | 0 | 165 |
10 | 20 | 25 | 5 | 5 | 140 | 0 | 165 |
11 | 20 | 30 | 5 | 5 | 145 | 0 | 165 |
12 | 25 | 30 | 5 | 5 | 150 | 0 | 165 |
13 | 25 | 30 | 5 | 5 | 150 | 0 | 170 |
14 | 25 | 30 | 5 | 5 | 155 | 0 | 170 |
15 | 25 | 30 | 5 | 5 | 155 | 0 | 175 |
16 | 30 | 30 | 5 | 5 | 160 | 0 | 175 |
17 | 30 | 35 | 5 | 5 | 160 | 0 | 175 |
18 | 30 | 35 | 5 | 5 | 160 | 0 | 175 |
19 | 30 | 35 | 5 | 5 | 160 | 0 | 175 |
20 | 30 | 35 | 5 | 5 | 165 | 0 | 180 |
21 | 30 | 35 | 5 | 5 | 165 | 0 | 180 |
22 | 30 | 35 | 5 | 5 | 165 | 0 | 180 |
23 | 30 | 35 | 10 | 10 | 170 | 0 | 185 |
24 | 30 | 35 | 10 | 10 | 170 | 0 | 185 |
25 | 30 | 35 | 10 | 10 | 170 | 0 | 185 |
26 | 30 | 35 | 10 | 10 | 170 | 0 | 185 |
27 | 30 | 35 | 10 | 10 | 175 | 0 | 185 |
28 | 30 | 35 | 10 | 10 | 175 | 0 | 185 |
Flasks 1 and 2: test item
Flasks 3 and 4: inoculum control
Flask 5: reference (procedure control)
Flask 6: abiotic control
Flask 7: toxicity control
Table 3: Percentage Biodegradation of Test Item, of Sodium Benzoate and of the Toxicity Control based on ThODNH4
Time (Days) | Percentage Biodegradation |
| |||
Test Item1 | Sodium Benzoate2 | Toxicity control1,2 | |||
Flask 1 [%] | Flask 2 [%] | Flask 5 [%] | Flask 7 [%] |
| |
1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 6 | |
2 | 7 | 0 | 47 | 28 | |
3 | 13 | 13 | 55 | 38 | |
4 | 16 | 16 | 60 | 43 | |
5 | 13 | 13 | 64 | 50 | |
6 | 13 | 19 | 70 | 54 | |
7 | 20 | 19 | 73 | 58 | |
8 | 20 | 25 | 76 | 62 | |
9 | 20 | 25 | 79 | 64 | |
10 | 20 | 25 | 79 | 64 | |
11 | 20 | 32 | 82 | 64 | |
12 | 26 | 32 | 85 | 64 | |
13 | 26 | 32 | 85 | 66 | |
14 | 26 | 32 | 88 | 66 | |
15 | 26 | 32 | 88 | 68 | |
16 | 33 | 32 | 90 | 68 | |
17 | 33 | 38 | 90 | 68 | |
18 | 33 | 38 | 90 | 68 | |
19 | 33 | 38 | 90 | 68 | |
20 | 33 | 38 | 93 | 70 | |
21 | 33 | 38 | 93 | 70 | |
22 | 33 | 38 | 93 | 70 | |
23 | 26 | 32 | 93 | 70 | |
24 | 26 | 32 | 93 | 70 | |
25 | 26 | 32 | 93 | 70 | |
26 | 26 | 32 | 93 | 70 | |
27 | 26 | 32 | 96 | 70 | |
28 | 26 | 32 | 96 | 70 |
1 ThODNH4 of test item: 0.763 mg O2/mg test item
2 ThODNH4 of sodium benzoate: 1.666 mg O2/mg reference item
Validity Criteria of the Study
Inoculum Control: The oxygen demand of the inoculum control (medium and inoculum) was 10 mg O2/L and thus not greater than 60 mg O2/L within 28 days as required by the test guideline.
pH-Value: The pH-value of the test item flasks at the end of the test was 9.5 and 9.6 and therefore not within the range of pH 6.0 to 8.5 as required by the test guideline.
Reference Item: The percentage degradation of the reference item should reach the level for ready biodegradability (>60 %) within 14 days as required by the test guideline. The reference item sodium benzoate was degraded to more than 60 % after 4 days of incubation.
Test Item: The difference of duplicate values for the degradation of the test item at the plateau, at the end of the test and at the end of the 10-day window was less than 20 %. The difference of duplicate values at day 28 differed by 6 %. The validity criterion was fulfilled.
Toxicity Control: If in a toxicity test, containing both the test item and a reference item less than 25 % biodegradation (based on ThODNH4) occurred within 14 days, the test item can be assumed to be inhibitory. The biodegradation was 66 % at day 14; the test item was not inhibitory.
Description of key information
The degradation rate of the test item did not reach 60 % within the 10-day window or after 28 days. Therefore, the test item is considered to be not readily biodegradable based on ThODNH4 (reference 5.2.1-1).
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Biodegradation in water:
- not biodegradable
- Type of water:
- freshwater
Additional information
The readily biodegradability of the test item was assessed in a Manometric Respirometry Test according to OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals No. 301 F over a period of 28 days at 22 °C ± 1 °C in darkness. The biodegradation was followed by the oxygen uptake of the microorganisms during exposure. As a reference item, sodium benzoate was tested simultaneously under the same conditions as the test item, and functioned as a procedure control. The test item loading rate was 101.8 mg/L corresponding to an oxygen demand of about 77.7 mg/L (ThODNH4) and reference item loading rate was 102.9 mg/L corresponding to an oxygen demand of about 171.4 mg/L (ThODNH4). The degradation rate of the test item was calculated by the oxygen consumption of the aerobic activated sludge microorganisms after 28 days of incubation. The reference item sodium benzoate was sufficiently degraded to 88 % after 14 days and to 96% after 28 days of incubation, thus confirming the suitability of the aerobic activated sludge inoculum used. In the toxicity control containing both, the test item and the reference item sodium benzoate, 66 % (ThODNH4) biodegradation was noted within 14 days and 70 % (ThODNH4) biodegradation after 28 days of incubation. According to the test guidelines, the test item can be assumed to be not inhibitory to the aerobic activated sludge microorganisms because degradation was > 25 % within 14 days. The mean biodegradation of 10 % of the test item was reached at day 3 (ThODNH4). At the end of the 10-day window at day 13, the mean degradation of the test item was 29 % (ThODNH4). Therefore the 10 day window criterion was not passed. The mean biodegradation at test end after 28 days was 29% (ThODNH4). Therefore, the test item is considered to be not readily biodegradable based on ThODNH4.
There are two previously unpublished studies in which the biodegradation of structurally similar substances was investigated. In one study, the atmospheric fate of a substance structurally similar to the test item was investigated. It was shown that this substance was degraded in the air within 2.8 ± 1.3 days with respect to reaction with OH. Since this target substance is structurally very similar to the test item, it can be assumed that this is also the case with the test item (Joudan et al. 2021, study report). For the other study, the aerobic biodegradation of a novel highly functionalized anionic polyfluorinated surfactant using activated sludge from a wastewater treatment plant for up to 84 days was investigated. It was shown that the polyfluorinated surfactant and its first degradation products degrade slowly and consistently in a constantly oxygenated system to terminal products which likely have lower bioaccumulation potential than the parent fluorosurfactant. Since one of the first degradation products is structurally very similar to the test item, it can be assumed that the test item could also be degraded to end products with a lower bioaccumulation potential (Joudan et al. 2021, study report).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.