Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
In an Ames test, performed according to OECD Guideline 471 and in accordance with GLP principles, the test substance was found to be not mutagenic with or without metabolic activation.
In addition, in a Mouse Lymphoma Assay, performed according to OECD Guideline 490 and in accordance with GLP principles, the test substance the test substance was found to be not mutagenic with or without metabolic activation.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 17 August 2020 - 7 September 2020
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Version / remarks:
- 31 May 2008
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- 26 June 2020
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Physical Description: Brown liquid
Storage Conditions: At room temperature - Target gene:
- Histidine locus and tryptophan locus
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Remarks:
- Histidine mutations: TA1537 hisC3076; TA98 hisD3052/R-factor; TA1535 hisG46; TA100 hisG46/R-factor
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Type and composition of metabolic activation system:
- source of S9: Trinova Biochem GmbH, Giessen, Germany
- method of preparation of S9 mix: rat liver microsomal enzymes (S9 homogenate) prepared from male Sprague Dawley rats that had been injected intraperitoneally with Aroclor 1254 (500 mg/kg body weight). S9-mix was prepared immediately before use and kept refrigerated. S9-mix contained per 10 mL: 30 mg NADP and 15.2 mg glucose-6-phosphate in 5.5 mL or 5.0 mL Milli-Q
water (first or second experiment respectively); 2 mL 0.5 M sodium phosphate buffer pH 7.4; 1 mL 0.08 M MgCl2 solution; 1 mL 0.33 M KCl solution. The above solution was filter (0.22 μm)-sterilized.
- concentration of S9 mix: 5% (v/v) S9-fraction (first experiment); 10% (v/v) S9-fraction (second experiment) - Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Dose-range finding test: 1.7, 5.4, 17, 52, 164, 512, 1600 and 5000 μg/plate
First mutation experiment: 17, 52, 164, 512, 1600 and 5000 μg/plate
Second mutation experiment: 10, 50, 100, 500, 1000, and 5000 μg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle used: DMSO
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- With S9-mix
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- 2-nitrofluorene
- sodium azide
- methylmethanesulfonate
- other: ICR-191
- Remarks:
- Without metabolic activation
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
- Number of cultures per concentration: triplicates
- Number of independent experiments: 2
METHOD OF TREATMENT/ EXPOSURE:
- Test substance added in agar (plate incorporation)
TREATMENT AND HARVEST SCHEDULE:
- Exposure duration/duration of treatment: 48 ± 4 h at 37.0 ± 1.0 °C
- Harvest time after the end of treatment: Not reported
METHODS FOR MEASUREMENT OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: the reduction of the bacterial background lawn, the increase in the size of the microcolonies and the reduction of the revertant colonies were examined. - Evaluation criteria:
- No formal hypothesis testing was done.
In addition to the criteria stated below, any increase in the total number of revertants should be evaluated for its biological relevance including a comparison of the results with the historical control data range.
A test item is considered negative (not mutagenic) in the test if:
a) The total number of revertants in the tester strain TA100 or WP2uvrA is not greater than two times the concurrent vehicle control, and the total number of revertants in tester strains TA1535, TA1537 or TA98 is not greater than three times the concurrent vehicle control.
b) The negative response should be reproducible in at least one follow-up experiment.
A test item is considered positive (mutagenic) in the test if:
a) The total number of revertants in the tester strain TA100 or WP2uvrA is greater than two times the concurrent vehicle control, or the total number of revertants in tester strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98 is greater than three times the concurrent vehicle control.
b) In case a follow up experiment is performed when a positive response is observed in one of the tester strains, the positive response should be reproducible in at least one follow-up experiment. - Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Remarks:
- Second mutation experiment
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- Absence of S9-mix
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Remarks:
- Second mutation experiment
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- Presence of S9-mix
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Remarks:
- Second mutation experiment
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- Absence of S9-mix
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Remarks:
- Second mutation experiment
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- Absence of S9-mix
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Remarks:
- Second mutation experiment
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- Absence of S9-mix
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Remarks:
- First mutation experiment
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- Presence of S9-mix
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Remarks:
- First mutation experiment
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- Presence of S9-mix
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Remarks:
- First mutation experiment
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- With and without S9-mix
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Remarks:
- First mutation experiment
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- With and without S9-mix
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Remarks:
- First experiment
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- With and without S9-mix
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- Dose-range Finding test/First Mutation Experiment
- Precipitation of the test item on the plates was observed in tester strains TA1535, TA1537 and TA98 in the absence of S9-mix.
- Cytotoxicity, as evidenced by a decrease in the number of revertants and/or the presence of microcolonies, was observed in all tester strains in the absence and presence of S9-mix, except in tester strains WP2uvrA and TA1537 (presence of S9-mix).
- No increase in the number of revertants was observed upon treatment with the test item under all conditions tested.
Second mutation experiment
- In tester strain TA1537, the test item precipitated on the plates at the highest tested dose level in the presence of S9-mix.
- In the second mutation assay, cytotoxicity, as evidenced by a decrease in the number of revertants, reduction of the bacterial background lawn and/or the presence of microcolonies, was observed in the absence of S9-mix in tester strains TA1535, TA98, TA100 and WP2uvrA, and in the presence of S9-mix in tester strains TA1537 and TA100.
- In the second mutation assay, no increase in the number of revertants was observed upon treatment with X-21415 under all conditions tested. - Conclusions:
- In an Ames test, performed according to OECD guideline 471 and in accordance with GLP principles, X-21415 was found to be not mutagenic with or without metabolic activation.
- Executive summary:
An Ames test was performed according to OECD guideline 471 and in accordance with GLP principles. The test item did not induce a dose-related increase in the number of revertant (His+) colonies in each of the four tester strains (TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100) and in the number of revertant (Trp+) colonies in the tester strain WP2uvrA both in the absence and presence of S9-metabolic activation. These results were confirmed in a follow-up experiment.
The negative and strain-specific positive control values were within the laboratory historical control data ranges indicating that the test conditions were adequate, and that the metabolic activation system functioned properly.
Based on the results of this study it is concluded that X-21415 is not mutagenic in the Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay and in the Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay with or without metabolic activation. Since all acceptibility criteria were met, the study was considered valid.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Experimental start date: 9th November 2021 Experimental completion date: 13th December 2021
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 490 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Tests Using the Thymidine Kinase Gene)
- Version / remarks:
- 29th July 2016
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation tests using the thymidine kinase gene
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Identification: X-21415
Chemical Name: Benzenesulfonic acid, C14-24-branched and linear alkyl derivs
CAS Number: 115829-36-2
Batch Number: 0921SA107S
Purity: UVCB* – 100% purity
Molecular Weight: N/A (UVCB)
Expiry Date: 1st September 2022
Appearance: Brown liquid
Storage Conditions: Room temperature in the dark - Target gene:
- thymidine kinase, TK +/-, locus of the L5178Y mouse lymphoma cell line.
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Source: cell line:
The L5178Y TK+/- 3.7.2c mouse lymphoma cell line was obtained from the MRC Cell Mutation Unit at the University of Sussex, Brighton, UK. The cells were originally obtained from Burroughs Wellcome (USA) in October 1978 and were frozen in liquid nitrogen at that time. Master stocks of cells were tested and found to be free of mycoplasma.
Cell culture:
The stocks of cells are stored in liquid nitrogen at approximately -196 °C. Cells were routinely cultured in RPMI 1640 medium with Glutamax-1 and HEPES buffer (20 mM) supplemented with Penicillin (100 units/mL), Streptomycin (100 µg/mL), Sodium pyruvate (1 mM), Amphotericin B (2.5 µg/mL) and 10% donor horse serum (giving R10 media) at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in air. The cells have a generation time of approximately 12 hours and were sub-cultured accordingly. RPMI 1640 with 20% donor horse serum (R20), 10% donor horse serum (R10), and without serum (R0), were used during the course of the study. All donor horse serum was purchased heat inactivated from the supplier. - Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Microsomal Enzyme Fraction
Rat S9 Microsomal fraction, adjusted to a final protein content of 20 mg/mL before use.
The S9 mix was prepared by mixing S9 with 100 mM phosphate buffer containing NADP (5 mM), G¬6 P (5 mM), KCl (33 mM) and MgCl2 (8 mM) to give a 20% S9-mix concentration. The final concentration of S9 when dosed at a 10% volume of S9-mix was 2% for the Preliminary Toxicity Test and the Mutagenicity Test. - Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Preliminary Toxicity Test:
The dose range used in the preliminary toxicity test was 19.53 to 5000 µg/mL. The maximum concentration was the maximum recommended concentration.
The final concentration of S9 when dosed at a 10% volume of S9-mix was 2% for the Preliminary Toxicity Test and the Mutagenicity Test.
Mutagenicity Test:
The dose range of test item used in the main test was selected following the results of a preliminary toxicity test.
4-hour without S9: 0, 5, 10, 20, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80 Concentration of X-21415 (µg/mL)
4-hour with S9: 0, 5, 10, 20, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80 Concentration of X-21415 (µg/mL)
24-hour without S9: 0, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40 Concentration of X-21415 (µg/mL)
Due to optimum levels of toxicity not being achieved in any of the three exposure groups, this experiment was abandoned prior to plating and repeated using a revised concentration range
Mutagenicity Test Repeat I:
4-hour without S9: 0, 10, 20, 40, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80 Concentration of X-21415 (µg/mL)
4-hour with S9: 0, 10, 20, 40, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80 Concentration of X-21415 (µg/mL)
24-hour without S9: 0, 5, 10, 20, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50 Concentration of X-21415 (µg/mL)
Due to optimum levels of toxicity not being achieved in the 24-hour exposure group, this exposure group was abandoned prior to plating and repeated using a revised concentration range.
Mutagenicity Test Repeat II:
24-hour with S9: 0, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65 Concentration of X-21415 (µg/mL) - Vehicle / solvent:
- Identity: Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)
Supplier: Fisher
Batch number: 206994
Purity: 99.9%
Expiry date: 1st November 2025 - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- Absence of S9-mix 24 hours exposure
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- Presence of S9-mix 4 hours exposure
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- Absence of S9-mix 4 hours exposure
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Cell Cleansing:
The TK +/- heterozygote cells grown in suspension spontaneously mutate at a low but significant rate. Before the stocks of cells were frozen, they were cleansed of homozygous (TK -/-) mutants by culturing in THMG medium for 24-hours. This medium contained Thymidine (9 µg/mL), Hypoxanthine (15 µg/mL), Methotrexate (0.3 µg/mL) and Glycine (22.5 µg/mL). For the following 24-hours the cells were cultured in THG medium (i.e., THMG without Methotrexate) before being returned to R10 medium.
Test Item Preparation:
The test item was a UVCB (Substances of Unknown or Variable composition, Complex reaction products or Biological materials) and, therefore, no correction for the purity of the test item was applied to the formulations. Consequently, the maximum concentration was initially set at 5000 µg/mL, the maximum recommended concentration. Following solubility checks performed in-house on the same test item (Labcorp Study No. 8483321), the test item was accurately weighed and formulated in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) prior to serial dilutions being prepared.
There was no significant change in pH when the test item was dosed into media and the osmolality did not increase by more than 50 mOsm.
The test item was formulated within two hours of it being applied to the test system; it is assumed that the test item formulation was stable for this duration. No analysis was conducted to determine the homogeneity, concentration, or stability of the test item formulation because it is not a requirement of the guidelines. This is an exception with regard to GLP and has been reflected in the GLP compliance statement.
Test Procedure:
Preliminary Toxicity Test:
A preliminary toxicity test was performed on cell cultures at 5 x 105 cells/mL, using a 4-hour exposure period both with and without metabolic activation (S9), and at 1.5 x 105 cells/mL using a 24-hour exposure period without S9. The dose range used in the preliminary toxicity test was 19.53 to 5000 µg/mL. The maximum concentration was the maximum recommended concentration.
Following the exposure periods, the cells were washed twice with R10, resuspended in R20 medium, counted and then serially diluted to 2 x 105 cells/mL.
The cultures were incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in air and sub-cultured after 24 hours by counting and diluting to 2 x 105 cells/mL. After a further 24 hours, the cultures were counted and then discarded. The cell counts were then used to calculate Suspension Growth (SG) values. The SG values were then adjusted to account for immediate post exposure toxicity, and a comparison of each exposure SG value to the concurrent solvent control performed to give a percentage Relative Suspension Growth (%RSG) value.
Results from the preliminary toxicity test were used to set the test item concentrations for the mutagenicity experiments. Maximum concentrations were selected using the following criteria:
i) For non-toxic test items the upper test item concentrations will be 10 mM, 2 mg/mL or 2 µL/mL whichever is the lowest. When the test item is a substance of unknown or variable composition (UVCB*) the upper concentration may need to be higher, and the maximum concentration will be 5 mg/mL.
ii) Precipitating concentrations will not be tested beyond the onset of precipitation regardless of the presence of toxicity beyond this point.
iii) In the absence of precipitate and if toxicity occurs, the highest concentration should lower the Relative Total Growth (RTG) to approximately 10 to 20 %. This optimum upper level of toxicity was confirmed by an IWGT meeting in New Orleans, USA .
Mutagenicity Test:
Several days before starting the experiment, an exponentially growing stock culture of cells was set up so as to provide an excess of cells on the morning of the experiment. The cells were counted and processed to give 1 x 106 cells/mL in 10 mL aliquots in R10 medium in sterile plastic universals for the 4-hour exposure groups in both the absence and presence of metabolic activation, and 0.3 x 106 cells/mL in 10 mL cultures were established in 25 cm2 tissue culture flasks for the 24-hour exposure group in the absence of metabolic activation. The exposures were performed in duplicate (A + B), both with and without metabolic activation (2% S9 final concentration) using eight concentrations of the test item and solvent and positive controls. To each universal was added 2 mL of S9 mix if required, 0.2 mL of the exposure dilutions, (0.2 mL or 0.15 mL for the positive controls), and sufficient R0 medium to bring the total volume to 20 mL (R10 was used for the 24-hour exposure group).
Three exposure groups were used for the Mutagenicity Test:
i) 4-hour exposure to the test item without S9-mix. The concentrations of test item used were 5 to 80 µg/mL.
ii) 4-hour exposure to the test item with S9-mix (2%). The concentrations of test item used were 5 to 80 µg/mL.
iii) 24-hour exposure to the test item without S9-mix. The concentrations of test item used were 2.5 to 40 µg/mL.
The exposure vessels were incubated for 4 or 24 hours with continuous shaking using an orbital shaker within an incubated hood.
Mutagenicity Test Repeat I:
Several days before starting the experiment, an exponentially growing stock culture of cells was set up so as to provide an excess of cells on the morning of the experiment. The cells were counted and processed to give 1 x 106 cells/mL in 10 mL aliquots in R10 medium in sterile plastic universals for the 4-hour exposure groups in both the absence and presence of metabolic activation, and 0.3 x 106 cells/mL in 10 mL cultures were established in 25 cm2 tissue culture flasks for the 24-hour exposure group in the absence of metabolic activation. The exposures were performed in duplicate (A + B), both with and without metabolic activation (2% S9 final concentration) using up to ten concentrations of the test item and solvent and positive controls. To each universal was added 2 mL of S9 mix if required, 0.2 mL of the exposure dilutions, (0.2 mL or 0.15 mL for the positive controls), and sufficient R0 medium to bring the total volume to 20 mL (R10 was used for the 24-hour exposure group).
Three exposure groups were used for the Mutagenicity Test Repeat I:
i) 4-hour exposure to the test item without S9-mix. The concentrations of test item used were 10 to 80 µg/mL.
ii) 4-hour exposure to the test item with S9-mix (2%). The concentrations of test item used were 10 to 80 µg/mL.
iii) 24-hour exposure to the test item without S9-mix. The concentrations of test item used were 5 to 50 µg/mL.
The exposure vessels were incubated for 4 or 24 hours with continuous shaking using an orbital shaker within an incubated hood.
Mutagenicity Repeat II:
Several days before starting the experiment, an exponentially growing stock culture of cells was set up so as to provide an excess of cells on the morning of the experiment. The cells were counted and processed to give 0.3 x 106 cells/mL in 10 mL cultures in 25 cm2 tissue culture flasks for the 24-hour exposure group in the absence of metabolic activation. The exposures were performed in duplicate (A + B), using ten concentrations of the test item and solvent and positive controls. To each universal was added 0.2 mL of the exposure dilutions, ,0.2 mL of the positive control, and sufficient R10 medium to bring the total volume to 20 mL. The concentrations of test item used were 20 to 65 µg/mL.
Assessments:
Measurement of Survival, Cloning Efficiency and Mutant Frequency:
At the end of the exposure periods, the cells were washed twice using R10 medium then resuspended in R20 medium at a cell density of 2 x 105 cells/mL. The cultures were incubated at 37±2 °C with 5% CO2 in air and sub-cultured daily for the expression period of two days, by counting and dilution to 2 x 105 cells/mL.
On day 2 of the experiment, the cells were counted, diluted to 1x104 cells/mL and plated for mutant frequency (2000 cells/well) in selective medium containing 4 µg/mL 5 trifluorothymidine (TFT) in 96-well plates. Cells were also diluted to 10 cells/mL and plated (2 cells/well) for cloning efficiency (%V) in non-selective medium.
The daily cell counts were used to obtain a Relative Suspension Growth (%RSG) value that gives an indication of post exposure toxicity during the expression period as a comparison to the solvent control, and when combined with the cloning efficiency (%V) data, a Relative Total Growth (RTG) value.
Plate Scoring:
Microtitre plates were scored using a magnifying mirror box after eleven to thirteen days incubation at 37±2 °C with 5% CO2 in air. The number of positive wells (wells with colonies) was recorded together with the total number of scorable wells (normally 96 per plate). The numbers of small and large colonies seen in the TFT mutant plates were also recorded as the additional information may contribute to an understanding of the mechanism of action of the test item. Colonies are scored manually by eye using qualitative judgment. Large colonies are defined as those that cover approximately ¼ to ¾ of the surface of the well and are generally no more than one or two cells thick. In general, all colonies less than 25% of the average area of the large colonies are scored as small colonies. Small colonies are normally observed to be more than two cells thick. To assist the scoring of the TFT mutant colonies 0.025 mL of thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide (MTT) solution, 2.5 mg/mL in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), was added to each well of the mutant plates. The plates were incubated for approximately two hours. MTT is a vital stain that is taken up by viable cells and metabolised to give a brown/black colour, thus aiding the visualisation of the mutant colonies, particularly the small colonies.
Calculation of Percentage Relative Suspension Growth (%RSG):
The cell counts obtained immediately post treatment and over the 2-day expression period were used to calculate the Percentage Relative Suspension Growth.
4-Hour Suspension Growth (SG) = (24-hour cell count/2) x (48-hour cell count/2)
24-Hour Suspension Growth (SG) = (0-hour cell count/1.5) x (24-hour cell count/2) x (48-hours cell count/2)
Day 0 Factor = dose 0-hour cell count/solvent control 0-hour cell count
%RSG = [(dose SG x dose Day 0 Factor)/solvent control SG] x 100 - Rationale for test conditions:
- Dose selection for the mutagenicity experiments was made using data from the preliminary toxicity test in an attempt to obtain the desired levels of toxicity. This optimum toxicity is approximately 20% survival (80% toxicity), but no less than 10% survival (90% toxicity). Relative Total Growth (RTG) values are the primary factor used to designate the level of toxicity achieved by the test item for any individual concentration. However, under certain circumstances, %RSG values may also be taken into account when designating the level of toxicity achieved. Concentrations that have RTG survival values markedly less than 10% are excluded from the mutagenicity data analysis, as any response they give would be considered to have no biological or toxicological relevance.
An approach for defining positive and negative responses is recommended to assure that the increased MF is biologically relevant. In place of statistical analysis generally used for other tests, it relies on the use of a predefined induced mutant frequency (i.e., increase in MF above the concurrent control), designated the Global Evaluation Factor (GEF) of 126 x 10-6, i.e., the mutant frequency of the concurrent solvent control plus 126, which is based on the analysis of the distribution of the solvent control MF data from participating laboratories.
Providing that all acceptability criteria are fulfilled, a test chemical is considered to be clearly positive if, in any of the experimental conditions examined, the increase in MF above the concurrent background exceeds the GEF and the increase is concentration related (e.g., using a trend test). The test chemical is then considered able to induce mutation in this test system.
Providing that all acceptability criteria are fulfilled, a test chemical is considered to be clearly negative if, in all experimental conditions examined there is no concentration related response or, if there is an increase in MF, it does not exceed the GEF. The test chemical is - Evaluation criteria:
- Acceptability of the Assay:
This mutation assay is considered acceptable as it meets the following acceptability criteria, the current recommendations of the IWGT will be considered. Please go to section: Any other information on materials and methods incl. tables. - Key result
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- The test item, X-21415, did not induce any increases in the mutant frequency at the TK +/- locus in L5178Y cells that exceeded the GEF, consequently it is considered to be non mutagenic in this assay
- Executive summary:
Introduction
The study was conducted according to a method that was designed to assess the potential mutagenicity of the test item on the thymidine kinase, TK +/-, locus of the L5178Y mouse lymphoma cell line. The method was designed to be compatible with the OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals No 490 "In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Tests Using the Thymidine Kinase Gene" adopted 29 July 2016.
Methods
Initially one main Mutagenicity Test was performed. In this main test, L5178Y TK +/- 3.7.2c mouse lymphoma cells (heterozygous at the thymidine kinase locus) were treated with the test item at eight concentrations in duplicate, together with solvent (dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)), and positive controls using 4-hour exposure groups both in the absence and presence of metabolic activation (S9) and a 24-hour exposure group in the absence of metabolic activation.
The dose range of test item used in the main test was selected following the results of a preliminary toxicity test. The concentrations selected for the Main Experiment for the 4-hour exposures and 24-hour exposure were as follows:
Mutagenicity Test
Group
Concentration of X-21415 (µg/mL)
4-hour without S9
0, 5, 10, 20, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80
4-hour with S9
0, 5, 10, 20, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80
24-hour without S9
0, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40
Due to optimum levels of toxicity not being achieved in any of the three exposure groups, this experiment was abandoned prior to plating and repeated using a revised concentration range.
Mutagenicity Test Repeat I
Group
Concentration of X-21415 (µg/mL)
4-hour without S9
0, 10, 20, 40, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80
4-hour with S9
0, 10, 20, 40, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80
24-hour without S9
0, 5, 10, 20, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50
Due to optimum levels of toxicity not being achieved in the 24-hour exposure group, this exposure group was abandoned prior to plating and repeated using a revised concentration range.
Mutagenicity Test Repeat II
Group
Concentration of X-21415 (µg/mL)
24-hour with S9
0, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65
Results
Mutagenicity Test
No reportable data was generated.
Mutagenicity Test Repeat I
No reportable data was generated for the 24-hour exposure group.
The maximum concentration used in the 4-hour exposure groups was limited by test item‑induced toxicity. No precipitate of test item was observed at any of the concentrations at the end of the exposure period.
The solvent control cultures had mutant frequency values that were acceptable for the L5178Y cell line at the TK +/- locus. The positive controls produced marked increases in the mutant frequency per viable cell, achieving the acceptability criterion recommended by the OECD guideline, indicating that the test system was operating satisfactorily, and that the metabolic activation system was functional.
The test item did not induce any increases in the mutant frequency at any of the concentrations in the main test that exceeded the Global Evaluation Factor (GEF), using a concentration range that achieved optimum levels of toxicity in both the absence and presence of metabolic activation, and at least four analysable concentrations in each exposure group, as recommended by the OECD 490 guideline. The results observed in both of the 4‑hour exposure groups were considered to fulfil the criteria for a clearly negative outcome.
Mutagenicity Test Repeat II
The maximum concentration used in the 24-hour exposure group was limited by test item‑induced toxicity. No precipitate of test item was observed at any of the concentrations at the end of the exposure period.
The solvent control cultures had mutant frequency values that were acceptable for the L5178Y cell line at the TK +/- locus. The positive control produced marked increases in the mutant frequency per viable cell, achieving the acceptability criterion recommended by the OECD guideline, indicating that the test system was operating satisfactorily, and that the metabolic activation system was functional.
The test item did not induce any increases in the mutant frequency at any of the concentrations in the main test that exceeded the Global Evaluation Factor (GEF), using a concentration range that achieved optimum levels of toxicity, and at least four analysable concentrations, as recommended by the OECD 490 guideline. The results observed in the 24‑hour exposure group were considered to fulfil the criteria for a clearly negative outcome
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 1 Dose-Range Finding Test: Mutagenic Response of X-21415 in the Salmonella typhimurium Reverse Mutation Assay and in the Escherichia coli Reverse Mutation Assay
(µg/plate) |
|
||
|
|
|
|
Without S9-mix
Positive control |
1668 |
± |
62 |
|
428 |
± |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Solvent control |
97 |
± |
6 |
|
21 |
± |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
109 |
± |
15 |
|
23 |
± |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.4 |
105 |
± |
20 |
|
19 |
± |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
98 |
± |
9 |
|
24 |
± |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
100 |
± |
6 |
|
20 |
± |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
164 |
125 |
± |
14 |
|
15 |
± |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
512 |
117 |
± |
19 |
|
16 |
± |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
1600 |
71 |
± |
5 |
|
9 |
± |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
5000 |
6 |
± |
4 |
n NP |
11 |
± |
5 |
n NP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With S9-mix1
Positive control |
830 |
± |
24 |
|
1192 |
± |
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
Solvent control |
85 |
± |
19 |
|
16 |
± |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
94 |
± |
6 |
|
15 |
± |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.4 |
96 |
± |
22 |
|
14 |
± |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
93 |
± |
6 |
|
12 |
± |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
100 |
± |
14 |
|
14 |
± |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
164 |
51 |
± |
1 |
n |
13 |
± |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
512 |
12 |
± |
5 |
s |
15 |
± |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
1600 |
|
|
e MC |
13 |
± |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5000 |
|
|
e NP MC |
15 |
± |
1 |
n NP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Plate incorporation assay (5% S9) |
MC |
Microcolonies |
NP |
No precipitate |
e |
Bacterial background lawn extremely reduced |
n |
Normal bacterial background lawn |
s |
Bacterial background lawn slightly reduced |
Table 2. Experiment 1: Mutagenic Response of X-21415 in the Salmonella typhimurium Reverse Mutation Assay
(µg/plate) |
|
||
|
|
|
|
Without S9-mix
Positive control |
767 |
± |
5 |
|
1009 |
± |
101 |
|
1290 |
± |
138 |
|
Solvent control |
10 |
± |
2 |
|
3 |
± |
2 |
|
15 |
± |
5 |
|
17 |
7 |
± |
3 |
|
5 |
± |
2 |
|
16 |
± |
7 |
|
52 |
8 |
± |
3 |
|
2 |
± |
2 |
|
16 |
± |
3 |
|
164 |
7 |
± |
3 |
|
0 |
± |
1 |
|
13 |
± |
7 |
|
512 |
3 |
± |
1 |
|
1 |
± |
0 |
|
11 |
± |
3 |
|
1600 |
0 |
± |
1 |
NP |
1 |
± |
1 |
NP |
4 |
± |
3 |
NP |
5000 |
0 |
± |
1 |
n SP |
1 |
± |
1 |
n SP |
0 |
± |
0 |
n SP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With S9-mix1
Positive control |
320 |
± |
24 |
|
251 |
± |
14 |
|
1035 |
± |
45 |
|
Solvent control |
6 |
± |
3 |
|
5 |
± |
2 |
|
18 |
± |
5 |
|
17 |
8 |
± |
1 |
|
3 |
± |
2 |
|
21 |
± |
4 |
|
52 |
7 |
± |
5 |
|
4 |
± |
1 |
|
19 |
± |
3 |
|
164 |
10 |
± |
2 |
|
6 |
± |
3 |
|
15 |
± |
1 |
|
512 |
7 |
± |
3 |
|
5 |
± |
5 |
|
23 |
± |
1 |
|
1000 |
6 |
± |
5 |
|
2 |
± |
2 |
|
16 |
± |
7 |
|
5000 |
2 |
± |
2 |
n NP |
11 |
± |
1 |
n NP |
2 |
± |
2 |
n NP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Plate incorporation assay (5% S9) |
NP |
No precipitate |
SP |
Slight Precipitate |
n |
Normal bacterial background lawn |
Table 3. Experiment 2: Mutagenic Response of X-21415 in the Salmonella typhimurium Reverse Mutation Assay and in the Escherichia coli Reverse Mutation Assay
(µg/plate) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without S9-mix
Positive control |
913 |
± |
42 |
|
956 |
± |
80 |
|
1485 |
± |
83 |
|
609 |
± |
15 |
|
925 |
± |
50 |
|
Solvent control |
5 |
± |
3 |
|
4 |
± |
3 |
|
7 |
± |
0 |
|
85 |
± |
8 |
|
17 |
± |
2 |
|
10 |
10 |
± |
4 |
|
3 |
± |
2 |
|
6 |
± |
3 |
|
67 |
± |
10 |
|
14 |
± |
5 |
|
50 |
5 |
± |
5 |
|
3 |
± |
2 |
|
10 |
± |
6 |
|
71 |
± |
17 |
|
14 |
± |
2 |
|
100 |
7 |
± |
3 |
|
4 |
± |
1 |
|
6 |
± |
5 |
|
68 |
± |
9 |
|
18 |
± |
3 |
|
500 |
2 |
± |
1 |
|
4 |
± |
5 |
|
7 |
± |
4 |
|
9 |
± |
9 |
|
12 |
± |
2 |
|
1000 |
3 |
± |
2 |
|
3 |
± |
4 |
|
4 |
± |
1 |
n |
2 |
± |
1 |
n |
16 |
± |
7 |
|
5000 |
0 |
± |
0 |
n NP |
4 |
± |
3 |
n NP |
|
|
e NP MC |
|
|
e NP MC |
9 |
± |
2 |
n NP |
With S9-mix1
Positive control |
246 |
± |
12 |
|
254 |
± |
46 |
|
666 |
± |
105 |
|
1327 |
± |
255 |
|
195 |
± |
27 |
|
Solvent control |
8 |
± |
2 |
|
4 |
± |
1 |
|
17 |
± |
6 |
|
73 |
± |
6 |
|
20 |
± |
3 |
|
10 |
10 |
± |
3 |
|
4 |
± |
1 |
|
14 |
± |
6 |
|
62 |
± |
3 |
|
23 |
± |
8 |
|
50 |
8 |
± |
2 |
|
3 |
± |
2 |
|
18 |
± |
2 |
|
78 |
± |
2 |
|
20 |
± |
3 |
|
100 |
8 |
± |
6 |
|
2 |
± |
1 |
|
13 |
± |
3 |
|
80 |
± |
19 |
|
25 |
± |
12 |
|
500 |
9 |
± |
2 |
|
4 |
± |
2 |
|
13 |
± |
3 |
|
79 |
± |
5 |
|
15 |
± |
1 |
|
1000 |
8 |
± |
3 |
|
2 |
± |
2 |
NP |
19 |
± |
5 |
|
81 |
± |
15 |
|
19 |
± |
6 |
|
5000 |
5 |
± |
2 |
n NP |
0 |
± |
0 |
n SP |
9 |
± |
6 |
n NP |
45 |
± |
7 |
n NP |
19 |
± |
4 |
n NP |
1 |
Plate incorporation assay (10% S9) |
MC |
Microcolonies |
NP |
No precipitate |
SP |
Slight Precipitate |
e |
Bacterial background lawn extremely reduced |
n |
Normal bacterial background lawn |
Preliminary Cytotoxicity Test
The dose range of the test item used in the preliminary toxicity test was 19.53 to 5000 µg/mL. The results for the Relative Suspension Growth (%RSG) were as follows:
Dose (mg/mL) |
% RSG (-S9) 4-Hour Exposure |
% RSG (+S9) 4-Hour Exposure |
% RSG (-S9) 24-Hour Exposure |
0 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
19.53 |
90 |
74 |
94 |
39.06 |
34 |
46 |
6 |
78.13 |
5 |
7 |
0 |
156.25 |
1 |
0 P |
- |
312.5 |
- |
1 P |
- |
625 |
- |
- P |
- |
1250 |
- |
- P |
- |
2500 |
- P |
- P |
- |
5000 |
- P |
- P |
- P |
P = A precipitate of the Test Item observed at the end of the exposure
period
- = No data generated
treated with the test item when compared to the concurrent solvent controls in all three of the exposure groups. The steep nature of the toxicity curve was taken to indicate that achieving optimum toxicity would be difficult.
At the end of the exposure periods a precipitate of the test item was observed at and above 2500 µg/mL in the 4-hour exposure group in the absence of metabolic activation, at and above 156.25 µg/mL in the 4-hour exposure group in the presence of metabolic activation, and at 5000 µg/mL in the 24-hour exposure group. In the subsequent mutagenicity test, the maximum concentration was limited by test item-induced toxicity as recommended by the OECD 490 guideline.
Mutagenicity Test – Main Experiments
Mutagenicity Test
No reportable data was generated.
Mutagenicity Test Repeat I
No reportable data was generated from the 24-hour exposure group
Summary of Results
Concentration (µg/mL) |
4-hours-S9 Repeat I |
Concentration (µg/mL) |
4-hours+S9 Repeat I |
|||||
%RSG |
RTG |
MF§ |
%RSG |
RTG |
MF§ |
|||
0 |
100 |
1.00 |
107.51 |
0 |
100 |
1.00 |
107.60 |
|
10 |
104 |
- |
- |
10 |
91 |
- |
- |
|
20 |
101 |
- |
- |
20 |
87 |
- |
- |
|
40 |
95 |
0.80 |
224.33 |
40 |
96 |
- |
- |
|
50 |
99 |
0.97 |
146.22 |
50 |
86 |
- |
- |
|
55 |
48 |
0.34 |
195.97 |
55 |
67 |
0.59 |
146.51 |
|
60 |
31 |
0.26 |
229.82 |
60 |
63 |
0.67 |
119.02 |
|
65 |
21 |
0.17 |
219.84 |
65 |
59 |
0.54 |
115.75 |
|
70 |
X |
X |
X |
70 |
40 |
0.40 |
137.65 |
|
75 |
X |
- |
- |
75 |
31 |
0.30 |
125.12 |
|
80 |
- |
- |
- |
80 |
15 |
0.14 |
109.32 |
|
MF threshold for a positive response= |
233.51 |
MF threshold for a positive response= |
233.60 |
|||||
Positive control |
Positive control |
|||||||
EMS |
|
|
|
CP |
|
|
|
|
400 |
73 |
0.48 |
1014.68 |
1.5 |
117 |
1.16 |
399.62 |
|
Concentration (µg/mL) |
24-hours-S9 Repeat II |
|||||||
%RSG |
RTG |
MF§ |
||||||
0 |
100 |
1.00 |
148.86 |
|||||
20 |
86 |
- |
- |
|||||
25 |
68 |
- |
- |
|||||
30 |
85 |
0.88 |
134.78 |
|||||
35 |
67 |
0.51 |
171.45 |
|||||
40 |
61 |
0.71 |
121.07 |
|||||
45 |
40 |
0.39 |
123.52 |
|||||
50 |
37 |
0.36 |
139.22 |
|||||
55 |
28 |
0.29 |
129.27 |
|||||
60 |
11 |
0.10 |
110.75 |
|||||
65 |
5 |
- |
- |
|||||
MF threshold for a positive response= |
274.86 |
|||||||
Positive control |
||||||||
EMS |
|
|
|
|||||
150 |
56 |
0.40 |
1144.08 |
Solvent Control Mutant Frequencies per survivor x 10-6 |
|||
Without S9 |
With S9 |
||
Vehicle Control 95% control limits |
66.59 – 188.91 |
78.27 – 176.07 |
|
Positive Control 95% control limits |
861.41 – 1462.99 |
310.76 – 1491.16 |
As was seen previously, there was evidence of marked toxicity following exposure to the test item in both the absence and presence of metabolic activation, as indicated by the %RSG and RTG values. There was no evidence of any marked reductions in cloning efficiency (%V), therefore indicating that no residual toxicity occurred in either of the exposure groups
Based on the RTG and %RSG values, it was considered that optimum levels of toxicity were achieved in both the absence and presence of metabolic activation. The excessive toxicity observed at and above 75 µg/mL in the absence of metabolic activation resulted in these concentrations not being plated for cloning efficiency or 5-TFT resistance. Acceptable levels of toxicity were seen with both positive control substances.
The solvent controls had mutant frequency values that were considered acceptable for the L5178Y cell line at the TK +/- locus. The positive controls produced marked increases in the mutant frequency per viable cell achieving the acceptability criterion, indicating that the test system was operating satisfactorily, and that the metabolic activation system was functional.
The test item did not induce any increases in the mutant frequency at any of the concentrations in the main test that exceeded the Global Evaluation Factor (GEF). Although the concentration range used did not achieve optimum levels of toxicity in both the absence and presence of metabolic activation, optimum levels of toxicity were achieved in the presence of metabolic activation, and there were at least four analysable concentrations in each exposure group, as recommended by the OECD 490 guideline. The results observed in both of the 4‑hour exposure groups were considered to fulfil the criteria for a clearly negative outcome.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
Due to the lack of observed mutagenic potential, classification for germ cell mutagenicity is not required under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on the classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.