Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
The LLNA study is performed according to OECD Guideline 429 under GLP. In this study Stimulation Indices of 0.80, 0.33, and 0.59 were determined with the test item at concentrations of 5, 10, and 25% in dimethylsulfoxide. The test item was not a skin sensitiser under the described conditions.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin sensitisation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From March 31, 2009 to April 29, 2009
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of study:
- mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Test material name in the study: PF-03394197-00
Batch-No.: JFB80003
Purity: 97.17% - Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- CBA/Ca
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Laboratories B.V.
- Females (if applicable) nulliparous and non-pregnant: yes
- Microbiological status of animals, when known:
- Age at study initiation: 8- 12 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 17.7-23.1 g
- Housing: Group housing (where relevant)
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Pelleted standard diet, ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: At least 5 days
- Indication of any skin lesions:
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19 - 24°C
- Humidity (%): 35-65%
- Air changes (per hr):
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): Artificial light 6.00 a.m. - 6.00 p.m. - Vehicle:
- dimethyl sulphoxide
- Concentration:
- 5, 10, and 25% (w/v)
- No. of animals per dose:
- 5 females
- Details on study design:
- PRE-SCREEN TESTS:
- Compound solubility: A solubility experiment was performed according to the recommendations given by OECD 429. The highest test item concentration, which can be technically used, was a 25 % (w/v) solution in dimethylsulfoxide after warming to 37°C and vortexing.
- Irritation:To determine the highest non-irritant test concentration, a pre-test was performed in two animals. Two mice were treated with concentrations of 10 and 25% each on three consecutive days. In the pre-test clinical signs were recorded within 1 hour and 24 ± 4 hours after each application as well as on Day 7 after treatment begin. At the tested concentrations the animals did not show any signs of irritation or systemic toxicity.
MAIN STUDY
Each test group of mice was treated by topical (epidermal) application to the dorsal surface of each ear lobe (left and right) with different test item concentrations of 5, 10, and 25% (w/v) in dimethylsulfoxide. The application volume, 25 ul, was spread over the entire dorsal surface (0 - 8 mm) of each ear lobe once daily for three consecutive days. A further group of mice was treated with an equivalent volume of the relevant vehicle alone (control animals).
ANIMAL ASSIGNMENT AND TREATMENT
- Criteria used to consider a positive response:
A test item is regarded as a sensitiser in the LLNA if the following criteria are fulfilled:
First, that exposure to at least one concentration of the test item resulted in an incorporation of 3HTdR at least 3-fold or greater than that recorded in control mice, as indicated by the Stimulation Index.
- Second, that the data are compatible with a conventional dose response, although allowance must be made (especially at high topical concentrations) for either local toxicity or immunological suppression.
TREATMENT PREPARATION AND ADMINISTRATION: The test item was placed into a volumetric flask on a tared balance and dimethylsulfoxide was quantitatively added. The different concentrations were prepared by serial dilution. - Positive control substance(s):
- hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)
- Statistics:
- The mean values and standard deviations were calculated in the body weight tables.
The ANOVA (Dunnett-test) was conducted to assess whether the difference is statistically significant between test item groups and negative control (vehicle) group. Statistical significance was at the five per cent level (p < 0.05). However, both biological and statistical significance were considered together. - Key result
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 0.8
- Test group / Remarks:
- 5% w/v
- Key result
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 0.33
- Test group / Remarks:
- 10% w/v
- Key result
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 0.59
- Test group / Remarks:
- 25% w/v
- Cellular proliferation data / Observations:
- No deaths occurred during the study period.
No symptoms of local toxicity at the ears of the animals and no systemic findings were observed during the study period.
The body weight of the animals, recorded prior to the first application and prior to treatment with 3HTdR, was within the range commonly recorded for animals of this strain and age. - Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- The test item was not a skin sensitiser under the described conditions.
- Executive summary:
The LLNA study is performed according to OECD Guideline 429 under GLP. In this study Stimulation Indices of 0.80, 0.33, and 0.59 were determined with the test item at concentrations of 5, 10, and 25% in dimethylsulfoxide. The test item was not a skin sensitiser under the described conditions.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)
Respiratory sensitisation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
Skin sensitisation:
LLNA study give negative result with max SI value of 0.8.
According to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, table 3.4.2, this substance should not be classified for this endpoint.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.