Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Environmental fate & pathways

Adsorption / desorption

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
adsorption / desorption: screening
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
02.04.93 - 07.04.93
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Adsorption coefficients were determined for the partitioning of the test substance at two different concentrations between an aqueous phase and a known mass of activated sewage sludge either pre-exposed to the test substance (adapted) or not (nonadapted). Inactivation (sterilisation) of incubations containing adapted sludge was attempted using sodium azide (Na3N) to prevent biodegradative losses of the test substance during equilibration. However, Na3N was not an effective sterilant with respect to microorganisms capable of degrading the test substance and as such biodegradative losses of the test substance from these incubations resulted in low recoveries and inaccurate determinations of adsorption coefficients. The ineffectiveness of Na3N to inactivate the adapted sludge was assessed in a parallel study in which biodegradative mineralisation of radiolabelled test substance was quantified by liquid scintillation counting (LSC) of evolved 14C-CO2 trapped in ethanolamine.

Adapted and nonadapted sludge which had been incubated with the test substance during the adsorption tests was subsequently used to determine coefficents of desorption.

Liquid-solid partitioning in adsorption and desorption tests was assessed using a mixture of radiolabelled and non-radiolabelled test substance with quantification of test substance concentrations of both the liquid phase and sludge suspended solid phase by LSC.

A preliminary study (equivalent to test controls containing no sludge) concluded adsorption of the test compound to labware (e.g. glass vessels used for incubations, pipettes etc) was insignificant.

Methodological weaknesses arise from the following:
- no report of tests undertaken to establish equilibration time between test substance and sludge
- no report of pH measurment or control
- no report of blank tests (i.e. sludge + aqueous phase only)
- no report of control of ionic strength of aqueous phase
- no report of temperature control
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of method:
batch equilibrium method
Media:
sewage sludge
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Details on properties of test surrogate or analogue material (migrated information):
no data
Radiolabelling:
yes
Test temperature:
no data
Details on study design: HPLC method:
not applicable
Analytical monitoring:
yes
Details on sampling:
Adsorption tests:

1. Centrifugation of 100 mL test substance/sludge after 3 h incubation.
2. 2 x 2 mL supernatent samples taken by pipette and added to 17 mL Lumagel (scintillation cocktail) for liquid scintillation counting (LSC).
3. Supernatent discarded and sludge solids resuspended in 100 mL water.
4. 2 x 1 mL suspended sludge solids samples taken by pipette and added to 9 mL deionised water and 10 mL Lumagel for LSC analysis.

Desorption tests:

5. Centrifugation of 100 mL water/sludge after 3 hrs incubation.
6. 2x 2 mL supernatant samples taken by pipette and added to 17 mL Lumagel (scintillation fluid) for LSC.
7. Supernatent discarded and sludge solids resuspended in 100 mL water.
8. 2 x 1 mL suspended sludge solids samples taken by pipette and added to 9 mL deionised water and 10 mL Lumagel for LSC analysis.
Details on matrix:
- Type of sludge: activated domestic sewage sludge either pre-exposed or non-exposed to the test substance.
- Source of sludge: adapted sludge: obtained from previous CAS- test ECM ETS 465/03; non-adapted sludge: obtained from Bocholt Waste Water Treatement Works, Belgium.
- Pretreatment: none reported

PREPARATION OF SLUDGE SOLIDS
- Separation from wastewater: no data
- Further preparation procedures: no data
- Details of lyophilization: not performed
- Details of desiccation: not performed
Details on test conditions:
PRELIMINARY STUDY

To assess losses of test substance to test vessels (glass centrifuge tube) and pipette tips:

Preliminary vessels 1 and 2:

100 mL of 0.1 mg/L non-radiolabelled test substance
+ 0.050 mL radiolabelled test substance stock solution

The test container was rinsed with 3 x 10 mL of methanol to give a total rinse volume of 30 mL from which 10 mL was analysed by LSC.
The pipette tip was rinsed with 3 x 1 mL methanol and the 3 mL total rinse volume was analysed by LSC.

TEST CONDITIONS
- Buffer: none
- pH: not reported
- Suspended solids concentration: determined at 105 oC: adapted sludge = 1.89 g/L and non-adapted sludge = 2.35 g/L; determined at 550 oC: adapted sludge = 1.53 g/L and non-adapted sludge = 1.92 g/L

TEST SYSTEM
- Type, size and further details on reaction vessel: 200 mL glass centrifuge tube
- Water filtered (i.e. yes/no; type of size of filter used, if any): no data
- Amount of sludge and water per treatment: 100 mL
- Measuring equipment: LSC
- Test performed in closed vessels due to significant volatility of test substance: no data
- Test performed in open system: no data
- Method of agitation: continuous aeration
- Method of preparation of test solution:

The test solutions were prepared by mixing the appropriate volumes of activated sludge, radiolabelled test substance, stock solution of non-labelled test substance and sodium azlde solution (20 mg/mL) as per the following:

vessels 1 and 2:

100 mL non-adapted activated sludge
+ 0.050 mL radiolabelled test substance stock solution
+ 0.1 mL non-radiolabelled test sustance stock solution


vessels 3 and 4:

100 ml non-adapted activated sludge
+ 0.050 mL radiolabelled test susbtance stock solution
+ 1.0 mL stock solution of the non-labelled test substance stock solution


vessels 5 and 6:

100 ml adapted activated sludge
+ 0.050 mL radiolabelled test substance stock solution
+ 0.1 mL non-radiolabelled test substance stock solution
+ 1 mL sodium azide solution


vessels 7 and 8:

100 mL activated sludge
+ 0.050 mL labeled test matertal
+1.000 mL stock solution of the non-labeled test matertal
+ 1 mL sodium azide solution

- Are the residues from the adsorption phase used for desorption: yes. After centrifugation and sampling, supernatants from adsorption tests were discarded and vessels refilled with 100 mL water. After 3 hours incubation, desorption coefficients were determined by analysis of aqueous and soilid phases for test substance.
Computational methods:
Sorption Coefficient
Kd = Concentration of test material on solids/Concentration of test materials in water = (DPM on solids/DPM in water) x (Wt of water/Wt of solids)
Key result
Sample No.:
#1
Type:
Kd
Value:
388 dimensionless
% Org. carbon:
100
Sample No.:
#2
Type:
Kd
Value:
455 dimensionless
% Org. carbon:
100
Sample No.:
#3
Type:
Kd
Value:
372 dimensionless
% Org. carbon:
100
Sample No.:
#4
Type:
Kd
Value:
295 dimensionless
% Org. carbon:
100
Details on results (HPLC method):
not applicable
Adsorption and desorption constants:
Adsorption coefficients (Kd abs)

Vessels 1 & 2 (0.1 mg/L test substance + non-adapted sludge): mean Kd abs = 40

Vessels 3 & 4 (1.0 mg/L test substance + non-adapted sludge): mean Kd abs = 37

Vessels 5 & 6 (0.1 mg/L test substance + adapted sludge): mean Kd abs = 71 ((low mass balance (see Table 2) indicates biodegradative loss of test substance and inaccurate adsorption coefficient)

Vessels 7 & 8 (1.0 mg/L test substance + adapted sludge): mean Kd abs = 90 (low mass balance (see Table 2) indicates biodegradative loss of test substance and inaccurate adsorption coefficient)


Desorption coefficients (Kd des)

Vessels 1 & 2 (0.1 mg/L test substance + non-adapted sludge): mean Kd des = 421

Vessels 3 & 4 (1.0 mg/L test substance + non-adapted sludge): mean Kd des = 334

Vessels 5 & 6 (0.1 mg/L test substance + adapted sludge): mean Kd des = 1034 ((low mass balance (see Table 2) indicates biodegradative loss of test substance giving inaccurate desorption coefficient)

Vessels 7 & 8 (1.0 mg/L test substance + adapted sludge): mean Kd des = 1298 (low mass balance (see Table 2) indicates biodegradative loss of test substance giving inaccurate desorption coefficient)

Also See Table 2
Recovery of test material:
See Table 2
Concentration of test substance at end of adsorption equilibration period:
See Table 2
Concentration of test substance at end of desorption equilibration period:
See Table 2
Transformation products:
not specified
Details on results (Batch equilibrium method):
- Preliminary tests assessed adsorption of the test substance onto labware to be insignificant (see Table 1).
- Losses of test substance from vessels 5 to 8 in which the test substance was incubated with adapted sludge were attributed to biodegradation. The adsorption coefficients determined for these incubations were therefore unreliable (see Table 2).

Table 1:

 

Preliminary vessel 1

Preliminary vessel 2

test substance concentration (mg/L)

0.1

0.1

t0spike (dpm)

214382

214382

supernatant

dpm

218370

208677

% of t0

101.86

97.34

test vessel rinses

dpm

1035

695

% of t0

0.48

0.32

pipette tip rinses

dpm

35

22

% of t0

0.02

0.01

% recovery

102

98

Table 2: LSC measurements for the adsorption/desorption test and calculations of the Kd values.

 Vessel # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
t0-spike (dpm) 214382 214382 214382 214382 214382 214382 214382 214382
ADSORPTION  
dpm on solids (dpm/g) 79894 82011 74603 75661 71489 75745 80000 81702
dpm In water (dpm/g) 1953 2055 1978 2086 1262 894 1146 740
Kd abs 41 40 38 36 57 85 70 110
% recovery 98 103 99 104 67 50 62 43
DESORPTION  
dpm on solids (dpm/g) 46561 48677 37566 35450 47660 62979 50638 63830
dpm In water (dpm/g) 120 107 101 120 63 48 43 45
Kd des 388 455 372 295 757 1312 1178 1418
% recovery 138 128 122 131 104 no 86 102

NOTE: Adsorption coefficents (Kd abs) and desorption coefficients (Kd des) for vessels 5 to 8 are not reliable due to biodegradative losses of the test compound.

Validity criteria fulfilled:
not applicable
Conclusions:
In a GLP study, adsorption of trisodium EDDS to activated sludge was considered minimal.
Executive summary:

In a GLP study, adsorption (Kd abs) and desorption (Kd des) coefficients were determined (using the batch equilibrium method) for incubations of two different concentrations (0.1 and 1.0 mg/L) of trisodium EDDS with activated domestic sewage sludge that had either been pre-exposed (adapted) to the test substance or not (non-adapted). The addition of sodium azide to incubations with adapted sludge was ineffective in preventing the biodegradation of the test substance and therefore Kd abs and Kd des values derived from these tests were considered unreliable. Incubations of the test substance at concentrations of 0.1 and 1.0 mg/L with non-adapted sludge yielded K abs values of 40 and 37, respectively. Corresponding Kd des values of 421 and 334 were determined using the sludge residues from these adsorption tests. A 14C-radiolabelled test substance tracer was used to assess partitioning between the aqueous and suspended solid phases of the sludge. A preliminary study determined the adsorption of test substance, trisodium EDDS, to labware (i.e. glass test vessel and pipette tips) to be insignificant.

From the Kd abs and Kd des values derived, it was concluded that adsorption of trisodium -EDDS to activated sewage sludge was minimal.

Endpoint:
adsorption / desorption: screening
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
From May 24, to June 01, 1993
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 106 (Adsorption - Desorption Using a Batch Equilibrium Method)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
See section 'Any other information on materials and methods'
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of method:
batch equilibrium method
Media:
soil
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Details on properties of test surrogate or analogue material (migrated information):
No data
Radiolabelling:
no
Test temperature:
Room temperature
Details on study design: HPLC method:
Not applicable
Analytical monitoring:
yes
Details on sampling:
Concentrations of test sample: 25.1 mg/L in 0.01 M CaCl2
Details on matrix:
Soil I (Samples #1 and #2):
COLLECTION AND STORAGE
- Geographic location: Wageningen, The Netherlands.
- Collection procedures: no data
- Sampling depth (cm): no data
- Storage conditions: no data
- Storage length: no data
- Soil preparation (e.g.: 2 mm sieved; air dried etc.): 2 mm sieved and air dried

PROPERTIES
- Soil texture
- % sand: 81.3
- % silt: 11.1
- % clay: 6.0
- Horizon: 0-30 cm
- Soil taxonomic classification: strong silty sand
- Soil classification system: no data
- Soil series: no data
- Soil order: no data
- pH: 4.0
- Dry weight content (%) - 99.6
- Organic carbon (%): 1.4
- CEC (meq/100 g): 4.7
- Carbonate as CaCO3: 0.2 %
- Insoluble carbonates (%): no data
- Extractable Cations (Ca, Mg, Na, K, H) (MEQ/100 g): Ca: 1.33; Mg: 0.17; Na: <0.01; K: 0.23; H: 5.5
- Special chemical/mineralogical features: no data
- Clay fraction mineralogy: no data
- Moisture at 1/3 atm (%): no data
- Bulk density (g/cm3): no data
- Biomass (e.g. in mg microbial C/100 mg, CFU or other): no data

Soil II (Samples #3 and #4):
COLLECTION AND STORAGE
- Geographic location: Kloosterburen, The Netherlands.
Collection procedures: no data
- Sampling depth (cm): no data
- Storage conditions: no data
- Storage length: no data
- Soil preparation (e.g.: 2 mm sieved; air dried etc.): 2 mm sieved and air dried

PROPERTIES
- Soil texture
- % sand: 41.7
- % silt: 39.8
- % clay: 13.6
- Horizon: 0-30 cm
- Soil taxonomic classification: strong sandy loam
- Soil classification system: no data
- Soil series: no data
- Soil order: no data
- pH: 7.5
- Dry weight content (%) - 99.9
- Organic carbon (%): 1.8
- CEC (meq/100 g): 10.9
- Carbonate as CaCO3: 3.1 %
- Insoluble carbonates (%): no data
- Extractable Cations (Ca, Mg, Na, K, H) (MEQ/100 g): Ca: 9.06; Mg: 1.0; Na: 0.15; K: 0.96; H: 0.6
- Special chemical/mineralogical features: no data
- Clay fraction mineralogy: no data
- Moisture at 1/3 atm (%): no data
- Bulk density (g/cm3): no data
- Biomass (e.g. in mg microbial C/100 mg, CFU or other): no data

Soil III (Samples #5 and #6):
COLLECTION AND STORAGE
- Geographic location: Beek, The Netherlands.
- Collection procedures: no data
- Sampling depth (cm): no data
- Storage conditions: no data
- Storage length: no data
- Soil preparation (e.g.: 2 mm sieved; air dried etc.): 2 mm sieved and air dried

PROPERTIES
- Soil texture
- % sand: 11.9
- % silt: 74.7
- % clay: 12.1
- Horizon: 0-30 cm
- Soil taxonomic classification: weak sandy loam
- Soil classification system: no data
- Soil series: no data
- Soil order: no data
- pH: 6.6
- Dry weight content (%) - 99.9
- Organic carbon (%): 1.1
- CEC (meq/100 g): 7.5
- Carbonate as CaCO3: 0.2%
- Insoluble carbonates (%): no data
- Extractable Cations (Ca, Mg, Na, K, H) (MEQ/100 g): Ca: 5.93; Mg: 0.61; Na: 0.22; K: 0.17; H: 1.0
- Special chemical/mineralogical features: no data
- Clay fraction mineralogy: no data
- Moisture at 1/3 atm (%): no data
- bulk density (g/cm3): no data
- Biomass (e.g. in mg microbial C/100 mg, CFU or other): no data
Details on test conditions:
TEST CONDITIONS
Three soil types were tested (Soil I, Soil II and Soil III). per soil type, triplicate 5 g samples of soil were pre-equilibrated/washed with 10 mL of distilled water in 50 mL glass vials for 5 days at room temperature with continuous agitation by tumbling. Thereafter, vials were centrifuged for 10 minutes at 170 g and 20oC and most of the supernatants removed. Adsorption/desorption screening was performed on the soil precipitates at room temperature. A 16 h equilibration time was used in adsorption and desorption testing. Soil residues used in adsorption testing were used.

TEST SYSTEM
- Buffer: no buffers used
- pH: pH of the test soils was measured prior to equilibration with test substance (method of pH measurment not reported). pH of test vessels (soil + test substance solution) was not measured.
- Suspended solids concentration: 5 g air dried soil

Adsorption screening test:
- Preparation of test solution: test substance dissolved in 0.01 M CaCl2
- Reaction vessel: 50 mL glass vial
- Water filtered: no data
- Amount of soil/water per treatment: 5 g soil (air-dried weight) per 25 mL test substance solution (25.1 test substance in 0.01 M CaCl2)
- Soil/solution ratio: 1:5
- Reaction vessels/concentration: per soil type (i.e. soil I, II and III) duplicate vessels contained 5 g soil (air-dried weight) and 25 mL of 25.1 mg/L test substance in 0.01 M CaCl2. Also per soil type a singular blank contained 5 g soil (air-dried weight) and 25 mL of 0.01 M CaCl2. A singular control contained 25 mL of 25.1 mg/L test substance in 0.01 M CaCl2 only to assess loss of the test substance due to adsorption to the interior of the vessel.
- Measuring equipment: for the liquid phase (i.e. test substance and CaCl2 solutions) quantities were determined gravimetrically. pH measurement prior to and after equilibration of test substance with soil was not reported.
- Test performed in closed vessels for agitation by continuous tumbling.
- Equilibration time: 16 h
- Cetrifugation: test vessels centrifuged for 10 minutes at 170 x g and 20oC for separation of soil and solution phases.
- Supernatants analysed by HPLC for test substance concentration.
- Soil residues from adsorption tests were used for desorption tests.

Desorption screening test:
- Reaction vessel: same 50 mL glass vial used in adsorption tests.
- Amount of soil/water per treatment: same 5 g soil (air-dried weight) used in adsorption tests per 25 mL 0.01 M CalCl2.
- Soil/solution ratio: 1:5
- Extractions: two sequential extractions
- Cetrifugation: test vessels centrifuged for 10 minutes at 170 x g and 20 oC for separation of soil and solution phases.
- Supernatents analysed by HPLC for test substance concentration.
Sample No.:
#1
Duration:
16 h
Initial conc. measured:
130.97 mg/kg soil d.w.
Sample No.:
#2
Duration:
16 h
Initial conc. measured:
135.84 mg/kg soil d.w.
Sample No.:
#3
Duration:
16 h
Initial conc. measured:
142.47 mg/kg soil d.w.
Sample No.:
#4
Duration:
16 h
Initial conc. measured:
142.82 mg/kg soil d.w.
Sample No.:
#5
Duration:
16 h
Initial conc. measured:
135.39 mg/kg soil d.w.
Sample No.:
#6
Duration:
16 h
Initial conc. measured:
137.05 mg/kg soil d.w.
Sample no.:
#1
Duration:
32 h
Conc. of adsorbed test mat.:
128.35 mg/kg soil d.w.
Sample no.:
#2
Duration:
32 h
Conc. of adsorbed test mat.:
133.12 mg/kg soil d.w.
Sample no.:
#3
Duration:
32 h
Conc. of adsorbed test mat.:
117.97 mg/kg soil d.w.
Sample no.:
#4
Duration:
32 h
Conc. of adsorbed test mat.:
119.83 mg/kg soil d.w.
Sample no.:
#5
Duration:
32 h
Conc. of adsorbed test mat.:
121.04 mg/kg soil d.w.
Sample no.:
#6
Duration:
32 h
Conc. of adsorbed test mat.:
121.56 mg/kg soil d.w.
Computational methods:
Adsorption screening test:
The percent of the test substance adsorbed was calculated as:
A = 100 * (G - (Ce * Vo))/G = 100 * (X/G)
The adsorption coefficient for the determination was calculated as:
K' =( X/M)/Ce

The adsorption coefficient was also calculated as a function of the organic carbon content of the soil:
K'oc =. (K'/% organic carbon) * 100

Desorption screening test:
The percent of the adsorbed test substance which was desorbed was calculated as:
D=100 x ((((Cl + C2) * V) - ((Vo - V) * Ce))/X)

The percent of the adsorbed test substance which was not desorbed was calculated as:
R= 100 x ((G - (Ce + Cl + C2) * V)/X)

where,
G = quantity of materlal employed (ug) (corrected for the recovery of the blank without soil)
Ce = concentration of test substance remaining in the solution after adsorption (ug/mL)
Vo = original volume of solution employed (mL)
M = dry weight of soil employed (g)
C1 = concentration of test substance in the solution after the first wash (ug/mL)
C2 = concentration of test substance in the solution after the second wash (ug/mL)
V = voIume of solution obtained after the adsorption step (mL)
X = amount of test substance adsorbed (ug)
Type:
Kd
Remarks:
Sample #1 (Soil I)
Value:
253
% Org. carbon:
1.4
Remarks on result:
other: room temperature
Type:
Kd
Remarks:
Sample #2 (Soil I)
Value:
264
% Org. carbon:
1.4
Remarks on result:
other: room temperature
Type:
Kd
Remarks:
Sample #3 (Soil II)
Value:
27.3
% Org. carbon:
1.8
Remarks on result:
other: room temperature
Type:
Kd
Remarks:
Sample #4 (Soil II)
Value:
29.5
% Org. carbon:
1.8
Remarks on result:
other: room temperature
Type:
Kd
Remarks:
Sample #5 (Soil III)
Value:
45.6
% Org. carbon:
1.1
Remarks on result:
other: room temperature
Type:
Kd
Remarks:
Sample #6 (Soil III)
Value:
42.3
% Org. carbon:
1.1
Remarks on result:
other: room temperature
Adsorption and desorption constants:
Sample # Soil Kd Koc
1 I 253 18100
2 I 264 18900
3 II 27.3 1510
4 II 29.5 1640
5 III 45.6 4150
6 III 42.3 3850
Concentration of test substance at end of adsorption equilibration period:
See Table 2
Concentration of test substance at end of desorption equilibration period:
See Table 2
Sample no.:
#1
Duration:
16 h
% Adsorption:
98
Sample no.:
#2
Duration:
16 h
% Adsorption:
98
Sample no.:
#3
Duration:
16 h
% Adsorption:
82.8
Sample no.:
#4
Duration:
16 h
% Adsorption:
83.9
Sample no.:
#5
Duration:
16 h
% Adsorption:
89.4
Sample no.:
#6
Duration:
16 h
% Adsorption:
88.7
Sample no.:
#1
Duration:
32 h
% Desorption:
< 3.65
Sample no.:
#2
Duration:
32 h
% Desorption:
< 3.64
Sample no.:
#3
Duration:
32 h
% Desorption:
< 3.72
Sample no.:
#4
Duration:
32 h
% Desorption:
< 3.25
Sample no.:
#5
Duration:
32 h
% Desorption:
< 4
Sample no.:
#6
Duration:
32 h
% Desorption:
< 3.58
Transformation products:
not measured
Details on results (Batch equilibrium method):
See Table 2

Table 2: Measurements of the screening adsorption/desorption test of trisodium EDDS at room temperature

Sample #

1

2

3

4

5

6

Soil

I

I

II

II

III

III

G (µg)

518

542

528

529

528

533

Ce (µg/mL)

0.4

0.4

3.2

3.0

2.1

2.2

V0 (mL)

26.09

27.06

28.38

28.45

26.97

27.30

M (g)

5.02

5.03

5.02

5.01

5.01

5.05

A (%)

98.0

98.0

82.8

83.9

89.4

88.7

Kd

253

264

27.3

29.5

45.6

42.3

Koc

18100

18900

1510

1640

4150

3850

V (mL)

24.09

25.11

24.82

24.82

24.68

24.97

C1 (µg/mL)

<0.4

<0.4

0.71

0.62

0.56

0.49

C2 (µg/mL)

<0.4

<0.4

<0.4

<0.4

<0.4

<0.4

D (%)

<3.65

<3.64

<3.72

<3.25

<4.00

<3.58

R (%)

>96.4

>96.4

>96.3

>96.8

>96.0

>96.4

 

G ¿ quantity of test substance employed (corrected for the recovery of the blank without soil)

Ce ¿ concentration of test substance remaining in solution after adsorption

V0 ¿ original volume of test substance solution employed

M ¿ dry weight of soil employed

A ¿ percentage of test substance adsorbed

Kd ¿ adsorption coefficient

Koc¿ Kd as a function of organic carbon content

V ¿ volume of solution obtained after the adsorption step

C1 ¿ concentration of test substance in the solution after the first extraction/wash

C2 ¿ concentration of test substance in the solution after the second extraction/wash

D ¿ percentage of test substance desorbed from soil

R ¿ percentage of test substance not desorbed from soil

Table 3: Results of the screening adsorption/desorption test of trisodium EDDS at room temperature (average of duplicates of each test soil)

 

Soil I

Soil II

Soil III

A[%]

98

83

89

O[%]

< 4

< 3

< 4

R [%]

> 96

> 97

> 96

Kd

2.6 x 102

28

44

Koc

1.9 x 104

1.6 x 103

4.0 x 103

 

Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Conclusions:
In a GLP study similar to OECD Guideline 106, the amount of adsorption (A) of trisodium EDDS was determined to be 98%, 83% and 89% for Soil I, II and III, respectively, and the corresponding desorption (D) was determined to be <4%, <3% and <4%. Therefore, under the conditions of this test, it can be concluded that trisodium EDDS has a high affinity for soil.
Executive summary:

A batch equilibrium screening study was conducted to assess adsorption/desorption of trisodium-EDDS with three different soils. The study methology was based on OECD Guideline 106 available at the time (1981), however the study has several deviations from the current version adopted in 2000. The test soils were - Soil I; Strong silty sand (pH 4.0, 6% clay, 1.4% organic matter); Soil II: Strong sandy loam (pH 7.5, 13.6% clay, 1.8% organic matter); Soil III; Weak sandy loam (pH 6.6, 12.1% clay, 1.1% organic matter).

The test substance had high affinity for the test soils with adsorption (A) determined as 98%, 83% and 89% for soil I, II and III, respectively, with corresponding Kd values of 260, 28 and 44. Desorption (D) of the test substance from the soil was low with values determined as <4%, <3% and <4% for soil I, II and III respectively. The amount of adsorbed material which was not desorbed (R) was determined to be >96%, >97% and >96% for Soil I, II and III, respectively. The corresponding K' values were calculated to be 2.6 x 102, 28 and 44 for Soil I, II and III, respectively, and Koc values of about 1.9 x 104, 1.6 x 103 and 4 x 103.

Therefore, under the conditions of this test, it can be concluded that trisodium EDDS has a high affinity for soil.

Description of key information

In reliable GLP studies (using the batch equilibrium method), adsorption of trisodium EDDS to activated sewage sludge was considered minimal (Geukens, 1993c), whereas the test substance had a high affinity for soil (de Vries, 1993d). 

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Additional information

In a GLP study, adsorption (Kd abs) and desorption (Kd des) coefficients were determined (using the batch equilibrium method) for incubations of two different concentrations (0.1 and 1.0 mg/L) of trisodium EDDS with activated domestic sewage sludge that had not been pre-exposed to the test substance (non-adapted). Incubations of the test substance at concentrations of 0.1 and 1.0 mg/L with non-adapted sludge yielded K abs values of 40 and 37, respectively. Corresponding Kd des values of 421 and 334 were determined using the sludge residues from these adsorption tests. A 14C-radiolabelled test substance tracer was used to assess partitioning between the aqueous and suspended solid phases of the sludge. A preliminary study determined the adsorption of trisodium EDDS to labware (i.e. glass test vessel and pipette tips) to be insignificant. From the Kd abs and Kd des values derived, it was concluded that adsorption of trisodium EDDS to activated sewage sludge was minimal (Geukens, 1993c).

A batch equilibrium screening study was conducted to assess the adsorption/desorption of trisodium EDDS with three different soils. The study methodology was based on OECD Guideline 106 (1981) available at the time, however the study has several deviations from the current version adopted in 2000. The test soils were - Soil I; Strong silty sand (pH 4.0, 6% clay, 1.4% organic matter); Soil II: Strong sandy loam (pH 7.5, 13.6% clay, 1.8% organic matter); Soil III; Weak sandy loam (pH 6.6, 12.1% clay, 1.1% organic matter). The test substance had high affinity for the test soils with adsorption (A) determined as 98%, 83% and 89% for soil I, II and III, respectively, with corresponding Kd values of 260, 28 and 44. Desorption (D) of the test substance from the soil was low with values determined as <4%, <3% and <4% for soil I, II and III, respectively. The amount of adsorbed material which was not desorbed (R) was determined to be >96%, >97% and >96% for Soil I, II and III, respectively. The corresponding K' values were calculated to be 2.6 x 102, 28 and 44 for Soil I, II and III, respectively, and Koc values of about 1.9 x 104, 1.6 x 103 and 4 x 103 [log koc ranging from 3.6 to 4.28]. Therefore, under the conditions of this test, it can be concluded that trisodium EDDS has a high affinity for soil (de Vries, 1993d).