Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
21 - 24 Oct 2013
Reliability:
3 (not reliable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
significant methodological deficiencies

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2013
Report date:
2013

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
The test substance was applied to the right eye of one male rabbit; the left eye was untreated and served as a control. The eyes were observed, in accordance with the Draize test (1944), 1, 24, 48 and 72 h after application, and evaluation was performed in accordance with the Kay and Calandra method (1962).
GLP compliance:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
(3R-)1,1,3-trimethylindan-4-amine
EC Number:
836-285-0
Cas Number:
125349-37-3
Molecular formula:
C12H17N
IUPAC Name:
(3R-)1,1,3-trimethylindan-4-amine

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Kitayama Labes Co., Ltd.
- Sex: male
- Age at study initiation: 16 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 2975 g
- Housing: The animal was housed individually in a suspended stainless-steel cage comprising stainless steel wire mesh front and floor, and aluminium walls (W590 × D636 × H430 mm, Clea Japan, Inc.). Once every 2 weeks, the cage was changed for a washed, sterilised cage.
- Diet: Solid rabbit feed (LRC4, Oriental Yeast) was freely available at ca. 120 g/day.
- Water: Tap water was provided freely available via an automatic water dispensing device (Lab Engineering Co., Ltd).
- Acclimation period: 14 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 - 24
- Humidity (%): 30 - 70
- Air changes (per hr): ≥ 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes, concurrent no treatment
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 mL unchanged test substance
Duration of treatment / exposure:
single application without washing
Observation period (in vivo):
72 h
(Reading points: 1, 24, 48, 72 h after application)
Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
not applicable
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
1 male
Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: not performed

SCORING SYSTEM:
The eyes were monitored in accordance with the criteria of Draize (1944), and evaluated in accordance with the method of Kay and Calandra (1962).

TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: not specified

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.3
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 48 h
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.3
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 48 h
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.7
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 72 h
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.7
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 72 h
Irritant / corrosive response data:
In observations 24 h after application, corneal clouding (evaluations: severity 1, size 1), iris hyperaemia (evaluation: 1), flushing of the conjunctiva (evaluation: 1), oedema (evaluation: 1) and rheumy discharge (evaluation: 1) were observed. These local reactions had completely disappeared 72 h after application. The maximum value (MMTS) up to 72 h after application was 16 (reached after 24 h application).

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: Results of the eye irritation study


























































































































Rabbit #



Time



Conjunctivae



Iris



Cornea



Total Score (MTS)



Flushing



Oedema



Rheumy discharge



 



 



 



Hyperaemia



 Clouding severity



Clouding size



 



1



1 h



P



1



1



1



1



0



0



S



 



 



6



5



 



0



11



24 h



P



1



1



1



1



1



1



 



S



 



 



6



5



 



5



16



48 h



P



1



1



0



0



0



0



 



S



 



 



4



0



 



0



4



72 h



P



0



0



0



0



0



0



 



S



 



 



0



0



 



0



0



average


(P 24 / 48 / 72 h)


 



0.7



0.7



 



0.3



0.3



 



 



P= Intensity (score); S = Score

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: CLP/GHS criteria not met, no classification required according to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008
Conclusions:
Under the present test conditions, the test substance (3R-)2,3-dihydro-1,1,3-trimethyl-1H-inden-4amine was assessed to be mildly irritant to the eye according to Kay and Calandra criteria, and to fall under the category of "no classification" according to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.