Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

The skin sensitisation potential of Reaction mass of 2-Propenoic acid, 2-methyl-, 2-dodecylhexadecyl ester and 2-Propenoic acid, 2-methyl-, 2-tetradecyloctadecyl ester (EC 946-978-0) was assessed using the In Chemico Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay (DPRA) method according to OECD Test Guideline 442C. After a 24h incubation with both Cysteine and Lysine containing peptides, the percent peptide depletion was measured by High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC).

For assessment of Reaction mass of 2-Propenoic acid, 2-methyl-, 2-dodecylhexadecyl ester and 2-Propenoic acid, 2-methyl-, 2-tetradecyloctadecyl ester (EC 946-978-0) the Cysteine peptide 1:10 prediction model was used. The final mean % peptide depletion observed using this model was 2.983%.

Therefore, Reaction mass of 2-Propenoic acid, 2-methyl-, 2-dodecylhexadecyl ester and 2-Propenoic acid, 2-methyl-, 2-tetradecyloctadecyl ester (EC 946-978-0) was classified as Negative with No or minimal reactivity as per the prediction model.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vitro
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2019
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 442C (In Chemico Skin Sensitisation: Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay (DPRA))
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA)
Details on the study design:
The DPRA is proposed to address the molecular initiating event of the skin sensitisation Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP), namely protein reactivity, by quantifying the reactivity of test and reference items towards model synthetic peptides containing either Lysine or Cysteine. Cysteine and Lysine percent peptide depletion values are then used to categorise a substance in one of four classes of reactivity for supporting the discrimination between skin sensitisers and non-sensitisers.
Key result
Run / experiment:
other: final mean % peptide depletion
Parameter:
other: % peptide depletion
Value:
2.983
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Other effects / acceptance of results:
OTHER EFFECTS:
- Visible damage on test system: None reported

ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: YES
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: YES
- Acceptance criteria met for variability between replicate measurements: YES

Prior to the main test, the test item was assessed for solubility and was found to be soluble in Isopropanol at 100mM.

Name

Test Item ID

% Cysteine Peptide Depletion

% Lysine Peptide Depletion

Mean % Peptide Depletion
(Cys + Lys)

DPRA Prediction based on Cysteine 1 :10 prediction model

 

DPRA

Reactivity Class

Reaction mass of 2-Propenoic acid, 2-methyl-, 2-dodecylhexadecyl ester and 2-Propenoic acid, 2-methyl-, 2-tetradecyloctadecyl ester (EC 946-978-0)

TA1

2.983

Acceptance criteria not met, not included in the analysis

Not applicable

Negative

No or minimal reactivity

Interpretation of results:
other: Negative with No or minimal reactivity
Conclusions:
Reaction mass of 2-Propenoic acid, 2-methyl-, 2-dodecylhexadecyl ester and 2-Propenoic acid, 2-methyl-, 2-tetradecyloctadecyl ester (EC 946-978-0) was classified as Negative with No or minimal reactivity as per the prediction model for skin sensitisation.
Executive summary:

The skin sensitisation potential of Reaction mass of 2-Propenoic acid, 2-methyl-, 2-dodecylhexadecyl ester and 2-Propenoic acid, 2-methyl-, 2-tetradecyloctadecyl ester (EC 946-978-0) was assessed using the In Chemico Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay (DPRA) method according to OECD Test Guideline 442C. After a 24h incubation with both Cysteine and Lysine containing peptides, the percent peptide depletion was measured by High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC).

For assessment of Reaction mass of 2-Propenoic acid, 2-methyl-, 2-dodecylhexadecyl ester and 2-Propenoic acid, 2-methyl-, 2-tetradecyloctadecyl ester (EC 946-978-0) the Cysteine peptide 1:10 prediction model was used. The final mean % peptide depletion observed using this model was 2.983%.

Therefore, Reaction mass of 2-Propenoic acid, 2-methyl-, 2-dodecylhexadecyl ester and 2-Propenoic acid, 2-methyl-, 2-tetradecyloctadecyl ester (EC 946-978-0) was classified as Negative with No or minimal reactivity as per the prediction model.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)
Additional information:

In accordance with Annex VII of REACH, a batch of three in vitro skin sensitisation studies shall be conducted. However, it was not technically feasible to perform an OECD 442D due to an insufficient solubility in the exposure medium and an OECD 442E due to the high Log Kow (> 6.5) of the registered substance.

Justification for classification or non-classification

An OECD 442C conducted on the registered substance returned a negative result, indicating no or minimal reactivity. It was not technically feasible to conduct OECD 442D and OECD 442E due to the physicochemical properties of the substance. Based on the available information, it is concluded that the substance does not meet the criteria for classification according to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008.