Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 695-938-6 | CAS number: 678966-16-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2020
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 020
- Report date:
- 2020
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU method B.47 (Bovine corneal opacity and permeability test method for identifying ocular corrosives and severe irritants)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Lithium bis[ethanedioato(2-)-κO1,κO2]difluorophosphate(1-)
- EC Number:
- 695-938-6
- Cas Number:
- 678966-16-0
- Molecular formula:
- F2C4PLiO8
- IUPAC Name:
- Lithium bis[ethanedioato(2-)-κO1,κO2]difluorophosphate(1-)
Constituent 1
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- cattle
- Strain:
- other: Bos primigenius Taurus (fresh bovine corneas)
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- Fresh bovine eyes were obtained from the slaughterhouse Müller Fleisch GmbH, Industriestraße 42, 75217 Birkenfeld, Germany, on the day of the test. The cattle were between 12 and 60 months old. The eyes were transported to the test facility in Hanks’ Balanced Salt Solution with 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin solution (Penicillin 100 U/mL, Streptomycin 100 µg/mL) in a suitable cooled container within 1 hour and 20 minutes.
Test system
- Vehicle:
- not specified
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent positive control
- yes, concurrent negative control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 750 µL
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 4 hours at 32 ± 1 °C
- Details on study design:
- 1 Preparations
After having carefully cleaned and sterilised the cornea holders, they were kept in the incubation chamber at 32 ± 1 °C.
On the day of the assay, the MEM without phenol red was supplemented with sodium bicarbonate, L-glutamine and 1% fetal calf serum (= complete MEM) and stored in a water bath at 32 ± 1 °C.
The same was performed with the MEM with phenol red, but without addition of sodium bicarbonate.
After the arrival of the corneas, they were examined and only corneas which were free from damages were used. The corneas were excised with a scalpel and cut from the globe with a 2-3 mm ring of sclera around the outside. Each cornea was transferred to a cornea holder in which pre-warmed cMEM (32 ± 1 °C) without phenol red was filled. The holders were then incubated for 1 hour in the incubation chamber at 32 ± 1 °C.
2 Experimental Parameters
Date of treatment 30. Jan. 2020
Incubation time 4 h
Negative control HBSS
Positive control imidazole, 20 % solution in HBSS
3 Method Description
After the initial incubation, the medium was completely changed and the baseline opacity for each cornea was recorded. None of the corneas showed tissue damage; therefore, all corneas were used. For each treatment group (negative control solution, test item or positive control), three replicates were used. After removal of the pre-incubation medium (cMEM without phenol red), 750 µL negative control solution, 750 µL of the test item solution or 750 µL positive control solution were applied to each replicate to the epithelial side of the cornea.
According to the characteristics of the controls and the test item, the following treatment procedure was performed:
3.1 Closed Chamber Method
The respective substance (negative control solution, test item solution or positive control solution) was applied by pipetting 750 µL of the appropriate liquid through the refill hole in the anterior holder on the cornea.
The exposure time of the controls and test item solution on the corneas was 4 hours at 32 ± 1 °C. After thorough rinsing the anterior chambers with cMEM with phenol red and final rinsing with cMEM without phenol red, the anterior chambers were filled with cMEM without phenol red and the final opacity value of each cornea was recorded.
3.2 Permeability Test
After the recording of the final opacity values, the cMEM without phenol red was removed from both chambers of each cornea holder. The posterior chamber, which interfaces with the endothelial side of the cornea was filled with fresh cMEM. Then 1 mL sodium fluorescein solution was added to the front chamber of each cornea holder for the detection of permeability of the corneas.
For the controls and the test item solution a sodium fluorescein solution with a concentration of 5 mg/mL was used.
The chambers were then closed again and incubated for 90 minutes at 32 ± 1 °C in a horizontal position. After incubation, the content of each posterior chamber was thoroughly mixed and pipetted in a 96-well plate. Then, its optical density at 492 nm was measured with the microtiter plate photometer.
Results and discussion
In vitro
Resultsopen allclose all
- Irritation parameter:
- in vitro irritation score
- Value:
- ca. 2.47
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Irritation parameter:
- in vitro irritation score
- Value:
- ca. 65.4
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Irritation parameter:
- in vitro irritation score
- Value:
- ca. 92.88
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- In the negative control, no signs of eye irritation were observed.
The positive control induced serious eye damage, which would be classified as GHS category I.
The test item Lithium difluorobis(oxalate)phosphate induced serious eye damage on the cornea of the bovine eye. The calculated mean IVIS was 65.40.
The experiment is considered as sufficient for the classification of the test item, because all three replicates of the test item lead to the same assessment for the test item.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- This in vitro study was performed to assess corneal damage potential of Lithium difluorobis(oxalate)phosphate by quantitative measurements of changes in opacity and permeability in a bovine cornea.
The test item Lithium difluorobis(oxalate)phosphate was brought onto the cornea of a bovine eye which previously had been incubated with cMEM without phenol red at 32 ± 1 °C for 1 hour and whose opacity had been determined. The test item was incubated on the cornea for 4 hours at 32 ± 1 °C. After removal of the test ite, opacity and permeability values were measured.
The test item was tested as a 20% solution in HBSS.
Under the conditions of this test, the test item Lithium difluorobis(oxalate)phosphate induced serious eye damage on the cornea of the bovine eye. The calculated mean IVIS was 65.40.
According to OECD Guideline no. 437 (Oct. 2017), a substance with an IVIS > 55 induces serious eye damage, that should be classified as UN GHS Category I.
The negative control (HBSS) and the positive control (20% imidazole solution) have met the validity criteria.
No observations were made which might cause doubts concerning the validity of the study outcome. The test is considered valid.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.