Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2002-05-30 - 2002-08-08
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2002
Report date:
2002

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.6 (Skin Sensitisation)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
2000-04-26
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
An appropriate guinea pig maximisation test is available which would not justify conducting an additional LLNA due to animal welfare

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
-
EC Number:
443-520-7
EC Name:
-
Cas Number:
33016-77-2
Molecular formula:
C2H4Na4O6P2
IUPAC Name:
tetrasodium (1-phosphonatoethenyl)phosphonate
Test material form:
solid
Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Synonyms: ITC 908, vinylidenephosphonic acid tetrasodium salt (VDPA tetrasodium salt)
- Lot/batch No.of test material: 562CH/646
- Purity: 87.33%
- Storage condition of test material: Room temperature, in the dark

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Dunkin-Hartley
Sex:
male
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: David Hall Limited, Burton-on-Trent, Staffordshire, UK (interdermal and topical induction sighting studies) and Harlan UK Limited, Bicester, Oxon, UK (rest of the study)
- Age at study initiation: 8-12 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: 281 - 336g
- Housing: The animals were housed singly or in pairs in solid-floor polypropylene cages furnished with woodflakes.
- Diet: Certified Guinea Pig Diet supplied by PMI Nutrition International, Nottingham, UK and IPS Product Supplies Limited, Wellingborough, Northants, UK, ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: At least 5 days
- Indication of any skin lesions:

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 17-23
- Humidity (%): 30-70
- Air changes (per hr): at least 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
intradermal
Vehicle:
water
Concentration / amount:
1%
Day(s)/duration:
7
Adequacy of induction:
highest concentration used causing mild-to-moderate skin irritation and well-tolerated systemically
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
water
Concentration / amount:
50%
Day(s)/duration:
2
Adequacy of induction:
highest concentration used causing mild-to-moderate skin irritation and well-tolerated systemically
Challengeopen allclose all
No.:
#1
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
water
Concentration / amount:
5 and 10%
Day(s)/duration:
1
Adequacy of challenge:
other: 10%: highest non-irritant concentration; 5%: verification of the use of the maximum non-irritant concentration
No.:
#2
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
water
Concentration / amount:
2 and 5%
Day(s)/duration:
1
No. of animals per dose:
10
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS:
Selection of concentration for intradermal induction: Intradermal injections (0.1 ml/injection site) were made with two guinea pigs, using concentrations of 1% and 5% w/w in distilled water. The degree of erythema at the injection sites was assessed approximately 24, 48, 72 hours and 7 days after injection. The degree of oedema was not evaluated. The highest concentration that caused only mild to moderate skin irritation, and which was well tolerated systemically, was selected for the intradermal induction stage of the main study.

Selection of concentration for topical induction: Two guinea pigs were treated with four preparations of the test material (50%, 25%, 10% and 5% w/w in distilled water). Applications were made to the clipped flanks under occlusive dressings for an exposure period of 48 hours. The degree of erythema and oedema was assessed approximately 1, 24 and 48 hours after removal.The highest concentration that caused only mild to moderate skin irritation was selected for the topical induction stage of the main study.

Selection of concentration for topical challenge: Four preparations of the test material (25%, 10%, 5% and 2% w/w in distilled water) were applied to two guinea pigs under occlusive dressings for an exposure period of 24 hours. The degree of erythema and oedema was assessed approximately 1, 24 and 48 hours after removal. The highest non-irritant concentration of the test material and one lower concentration were selected for the topical challenge stage of the main study.

MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 2
- Exposure period: 7 days (intradermal), 48 hours (topical)
- Test groups: 1
- Control group: 1
- Site: Should region
- Frequency of applications: 2
- Duration: 21 days
- Concentrations: 1% (intradermal), 50% (topical)

B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1
- Day(s) of challenge: 21
- Exposure period: 24h
- Test groups: 1
- Control group: 1
- Site: flanks
- Concentrations: 10% (right flank), 5% (left flank)
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24 and 48 hours

C. RECHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1
- Day(s) of challenge: 32
- Exposure period: 24h
- Test groups: 1
- Control group: 1 (not previously exposed)
- Site: previously untreated areas
- Concentrations: 2% and 5%
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24 and 48 hours

OTHER:
Positive control substance(s):
yes
Remarks:
2-Mercaptobenzothiazole

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
80% Incidence of sensitisation
(Induction intradermal 5%, topical 50%, Challenge 50 and 25%).

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
5%
No. with + reactions:
5
Total no. in group:
10
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
5%
No. with + reactions:
4
Total no. in group:
10
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
10%
No. with + reactions:
2
Total no. in group:
10
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
10%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Reading:
rechallenge
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
2%
No. with + reactions:
8
Total no. in group:
10
Reading:
rechallenge
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
2%
No. with + reactions:
7
Total no. in group:
10
Reading:
rechallenge
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
5%
No. with + reactions:
7
Total no. in group:
10
Reading:
rechallenge
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
5%
No. with + reactions:
7
Total no. in group:
10
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
5%
No. with + reactions:
3
Total no. in group:
5
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
5%
No. with + reactions:
1
Total no. in group:
5
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
10%
No. with + reactions:
5
Total no. in group:
5
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
10%
No. with + reactions:
5
Total no. in group:
5
Reading:
rechallenge
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
2%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Reading:
rechallenge
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
2%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Reading:
rechallenge
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
5%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Reading:
rechallenge
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
5%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Reading:
other: Not specified
Group:
positive control
Dose level:
50%
No. with + reactions:
8
Total no. in group:
10

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
Category 1A (indication of significant skin sensitising potential) based on GHS criteria
Conclusions:
The test material produced a 70% sensitisation rate after an intradermal induction at 1% indicating that it is a strong sensitiser.
Executive summary:

In a GLP-compliant OECD TG 406 skin sensitisation study according to Magnusson-Kligmann (guinea pig - maximisation test, GPMT), 10 test guinea pigs and 5 control animals were treated with the test material using water as a vehicle.

Based on the results of the pretests, a test substance concentration of 1% was used for intradermal induction (0.1 ml), followed by a 50% concentratio at epidermal induction. Challenge was performed using two concentrations, 5 and 10%. A rechallenge was also performed using 2 and 5% concentrations.

After challenge treatment, skin reactions were observed in 2 to 5 animals after 24 hours and 0 to 4 animals after 48 hours. After rechallenge, skin reactions were observed in 7 to 8 animals after 24 hours and 7 out of 10 animals after 48 hours.

Under the experimental conditions of this study, the test material is considered as a skin sensitiser.