Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 609-276-2 | CAS number: 3663-80-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Skin irritation / corrosion:
Two in vitro studies are available.
One in vitro skin corrosion test was performed in accordance with OECD Guideline 431. The test substance is not corrosive.
Another in vitro skin irritation study was performed in accordance with OECD Guideline 439. The test substance is non-irritant.
Eye irritation:
The study was performed in accordance with OECD Guideline 437. The test substance induces serious eye damage.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin corrosion: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- From 2018-12-17 to 2018-12-21
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- Study performed to current OECD guidelines with no significant deviations and run in OECD GLP certified lab.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 431 (In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RHE) Test Method)
- Version / remarks:
- 2016
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Purity: 99.7%
Batch No.: 80031745a - Test system:
- human skin model
- Source species:
- human
- Cell type:
- non-transformed keratinocytes
- Justification for test system used:
- Recommended test system in international guidelines (OECD and EC).
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on test system:
- RECONSTRUCTED HUMAN EPIDERMIS (RHE) TISSUE
- Model used: EpiDerm Skin Model
- Tissue batch number(s): 29674 Kit K and L
TEMPERATURE USED FOR TEST SYSTEM
- Temperature used during treatment / exposure: at room temperature
- Temperature of post-treatment incubation (if applicable): 36.8 - 37.6 °C (actual range)
REMOVAL OF TEST MATERIAL AND CONTROLS: washed with phosphate buffered saline to remove residual test item, rinsed tissues were kept in 24 well plates on 300 μL DMEM until 6 tissues (= one application time) were dosed and rinsed.
MTT DYE USED TO MEASURE TISSUE VIABILITY AFTER TREATMENT / EXPOSURE
- MTT concentration: 5 mg/mL diluted (1:5)
- Incubation time: 3 hours
- Spectrophotometer: TECAN Infinite® 1200 Pro Plate Reader.
- Wavelength: 570 nm
- Linear OD range of spectrophotometer: 0.8 - 2.8
FUNCTIONAL MODEL CONDITIONS WITH REFERENCE TO HISTORICAL DATA
- Viability: 20 - 100%
NUMBER OF REPLICATE TISSUES: two tissues for 3-minute exposure and two for a 1-hour exposure, 2 tissues for the negative and positive controls for both the 3-minute and 1-hour time point
DECISION CRITERIA
- The test substance is considered to be corrosive to skin if [complete, e.g. the viability after 3 minutes exposure is less than 50%, or if the viability after 3 minutes exposure is greater than or equal to 50 % and the viability after 1 hour exposure is less than 15%.]
- The test substance is considered to be non-corrosive to skin if [complete, e.g. the viability after 3 minutes exposure is greater than or equal to 50% and the viability after 1 hour exposure is greater than or equal to 15%.] - Control samples:
- yes, concurrent negative control
- yes, concurrent positive control
- Amount/concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 27.0 - 32.3 mg
NEGATIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight): 50 μL Milli-Q water
POSITIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight): 50 μL 8N KOH - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 3 minutes and 1 hour
- Number of replicates:
- two tissues for 3-minute exposure and two for a 1-hour exposure, 2 tissues for the negative and positive controls for both the 3-minute and 1-hour time point
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Value:
- 93
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: mean tissue viability at 3-minute application
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Value:
- 53
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: mean tissue viability at 1-hour application
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- - OTHER EFFECTS:
- Colour interference with MTT: the test item did not interfere with the MTT endpoint.
ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: The absolute mean OD570 (optical density at 570 nm) of the negative control tissues was within the acceptance limits of OECD 431 (lower acceptance limit ≥0.8 and upper acceptance limit ≤2.8) and the laboratory historical control data range.
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: The positive control had a mean relative tissue viability of 6.6% after the 1-hour exposure.
- Acceptance criteria met for variability between replicate measurements: In the range of 20 - 100% viability the Coefficient of Variation between tissue replicates was ≤13% - Interpretation of results:
- other: unclassified
- Conclusions:
- In conclusion, the test substance is not corrosive in the in vitro skin corrosion test under the experimental conditions described in this report.
- Executive summary:
The objective of this study was to evaluate the test substance for its ability to induce skin corrosion in accordance with OECD Guideline 431 (In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RHE) Test Method).
The possible corrosive potential of the test substance was tested through topical application for 3 minutes and 1 hour. Skin tissue was moistened with 25 μL of Milli-Q water and at least 25 mg of the test substance was applied directly on top of the skin tissue.
The positive control had a mean relative tissue viability of 6.6% after the 1-hour exposure. The absolute mean OD570 (optical density at 570 nm) of the negative control tissues was within the acceptance limits of OECD 431 (lower acceptance limit ≥0.8 and upper acceptance limit ≤2.8) and the laboratory historical control data range. In the range of 20 - 100% viability the Coefficient of Variation between tissue replicates was ≤ 13%, indicating that the test system functioned properly.
The relative mean tissue viability obtained after 3-minute and 1-hour treatments with the test item compared to the negative control tissues was 93% and 53%, respectively. The mean relative tissue viability for the test substance was not below 50% after the 3-minute treatment and not below 15% after the 1-hour treatment.
In conclusion, the test substance is not corrosive in the in vitro skin corrosion test under the experimental conditions described in this report.
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- From 2019-02-12 to 2019-02-18
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- Study performed to current OECD guidelines with no significant deviations and run in OECD GLP certified lab.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
- Version / remarks:
- 2015
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Purity: 99.7%
Batch No.: 80031745a - Test system:
- human skin model
- Source species:
- human
- Cell type:
- non-transformed keratinocytes
- Justification for test system used:
- In the interest of sound science and animal welfare, a sequential testing strategy is recommended to minimize the need of in vivo testing. One of the validated in vitro skin irritation tests is the EPISKIN test, which is recommended in international guidelines (e.g. OECD and EC).
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on test system:
- RECONSTRUCTED HUMAN EPIDERMIS (RHE) TISSUE
- Model used: EPISKIN Small Model TM
- Tissue batch number(s): 19-EKIN-007
TEMPERATURE USED FOR TEST SYSTEM
- Temperature used during treatment / exposure: at room temperature
- Temperature of post-treatment incubation (if applicable): actual range 37.0 - 37.5°C
REMOVAL OF TEST MATERIAL AND CONTROLS : washed with phosphate buffered saline to remove residual test item. After rinsing, the cell culture inserts were each dried carefully and moved to a new well on 2 mL pre-warmed maintenance medium until all tissues were dosed and rinsed.
MTT DYE USED TO MEASURE TISSUE VIABILITY AFTER TREATMENT / EXPOSURE
- MTT concentration: final concentration 0.3 mg/mL
- Incubation time: 3 h
- Spectrophotometer: TECAN Infinite® M200 Pro Plate Reader
- Wavelength: 570 nm
FUNCTIONAL MODEL CONDITIONS WITH REFERENCE TO HISTORICAL DATA
- Viability: The mean relative tissue viability of the positive control should be ≤ 40% relative to the negative control
NUMBER OF REPLICATE TISSUES: three tissues each for test item treatment, negative and positive control
PREDICTION MODEL / DECISION CRITERIA (choose relevant statement)
- A test item is considered irritant in the skin irritation test if:
The relative mean tissue viability of three individual tissues after 15 minutes of exposure to the test item and 42 hours of post incubation is ≤ 50% of the mean viability of the negative controls.
- A test item is considered non-irritant in the in vitro skin irritation test if:
The relative mean tissue viability of three individual tissues after 15 minutes of exposure to the test item and 42 hours of post incubation is > 50% of the mean viability of the negative controls. - Control samples:
- yes, concurrent negative control
- yes, concurrent positive control
- Amount/concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 16.8 to 18.9 mg
NEGATIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight): 25 µL
POSITIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight): 25 µL
- Concentration (if solution): 5% - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 15 ± 0.5 minutes
- Duration of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):
- 42 hours
- Number of replicates:
- 3 tissues per test item together with negative and positive controls.
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Value:
- 100
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: mean tissue viability after 15 ± 0.5 minutes treatment
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- - OTHER EFFECTS:
- Colour interference with MTT: the test item did not interfere with the MTT endpoint
ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: The absolute mean OD570 of the negative control tissues was within the laboratory historical control data rang
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: The positive control had a mean cell viability after 15 ± 0.5 minutes exposure of 7.3%.
- Acceptance criteria met for variability between replicate measurements: The standard deviation value of the percentage viability of three tissues treated identically was ≤ 7.0%, indicating that the test system functioned properly. - Interpretation of results:
- other: unclassified
- Conclusions:
- In conclusion, the test substance is non-irritant in the in vitro skin irritation test under the experimental conditions.
- Executive summary:
The objective of this study was to evaluate the test substance for its ability to induce skin irritation according to Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method).
The possible skin irritation potential of the test item was tested through topical application for 15 minutes. After a 42 hour post-incubation period, determination of the cytotoxic (irritancy) effect was performed. Cytotoxicity is expressed as the reduction of mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity measured by formazan production from MTT at the end of the treatment. Skin irritation is expressed as the remaining cell viability after exposure to the test item.
The positive control had a mean cell viability of 7.3% after 15 ± 0.5 minutes exposure. The absolute mean OD570 (optical density at 570 nm) of the negative control tissues was within the laboratory historical control data range. The standard deviation value of the percentage viability of three tissues treated identically was ≤ 7.0%, indicating that the test system functioned properly.
The relative mean tissue viability obtained after 15 ± 0.5 minutes treatment with the test item compared to the negative control tissues was 100%.
In conclusion, the test substance is non-irritant in the in vitro skin irritation test under the experimental conditions.
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From 2018-12-17 to 2018-12-18
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- Study performed to current OECD guidelines with no significant deviations and run in OECD GLP certified lab.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
- Version / remarks:
- 2017
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Purity: 99.7%
Batch No.: 80031745a - Species:
- cattle
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- SOURCE OF COLLECTED EYES
- Source: Bovine eyes from young cattle were obtained from the slaughterhouse, where the eyes were excised by a slaughterhouse employee as soon as possible after slaughter.
- Storage, temperature and transport conditions of ocular tissue (e.g. transport time, transport media and temperature, and other conditions):
Storage: The isolated corneas were stored in a petri dish with cMEM (Earle’s Minimum Essential Medium containing 1% (v/v) L-glutamine and 1% (v/v) Fetal Bovine Serum).
Transport: Eyes were collected and transported in physiological saline in a suitable container under cooled conditions. - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent positive control
- yes, concurrent negative control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 352.5 to 383.3 mg - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 240 ± 10 minutes
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- three corneas for each treatment group.
- Details on study design:
- SELECTION AND PREPARATION OF CORNEAS :
- Preparation of Corneas: The isolated corneas were stored in a petri dish with cMEM (Earle’s Minimum Essential Medium containing 1% (v/v) L-glutamine and 1% (v/v) Fetal Bovine Serum). The isolated corneas were mounted in a corneal holder (one cornea per holder) with the endothelial side against the O-ring of the posterior half of the holder. The anterior half of the holder was positioned on top of the cornea and tightened with screws. The compartments of the corneal holder were filled with cMEM of 32 ± 1°C. The corneas were incubated for the minimum of 1 hour at 32 ± 1°C.
- Cornea Selection: After the incubation period, the medium was removed from both compartments and replaced with fresh cMEM. Opacity determinations were performed on each of the corneas using an opacitometer. Corneas that had an initial opacity reading higher than 7 were not used. Three corneas were selected at random for each treatment group.
QUALITY CHECK OF THE ISOLATED CORNEAS : The eyes were checked for unacceptable defects, such as opacity, scratches, pigmentation and neovascularization by removing them from the physiological saline and holding them in the light. Those exhibiting defects were discarded.
NUMBER OF REPLICATES : Three corneas for each treatment group
NEGATIVE CONTROL USED : physiological saline
POSITIVE CONTROL USED : 20% (w/v) Imidazole solution prepared in physiological saline
APPLICATION DOSE AND EXPOSURE TIME
- Dose: 352.5 to 383.3 mg of the test item; 750 μl of the negative control and 20% (w/v) Imidazole solution (positive control)
- Exposure time: 240 ± 10 minutes
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Number of washing steps after exposure period: After the incubation the solutions and the test compound were removed and the epithelium was washed at least three times with MEM with phenol red
METHODS FOR MEASURED ENDPOINTS:
- Corneal opacity: measured by the diminution of light passing through the cornea
- Corneal permeability: passage of sodium fluorescein dye measured with the aid of microtiter plate reader (OD490)
SCORING SYSTEM: In Vitro Irritancy Score (IVIS)
DECISION CRITERIA: the decision criteria as indicated in the TG was used. - Irritation parameter:
- in vitro irritation score
- Value:
- 251
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Irritation parameter:
- in vitro irritation score
- Value:
- 271
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Irritation parameter:
- in vitro irritation score
- Value:
- 297
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: The mean opacity and mean permeability for the negative controls are 0.5 and 0.014, respectively, which are less than the upper limits of the laboratory historical range.
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: The mean in vitro irritancy score for the positive controls is 138 that falls within two standard deviations of the current historical mean. - Interpretation of results:
- Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- In conclusion, since the test substance induced an IVIS ≥55, it is concluded that the test item induces serious eye damage in the Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability test under the experimental conditions described in this report.
- Executive summary:
The objective of this study was to evaluate the eye hazard potential of the test substance as measured by its ability to induce opacity and increase permeability in an isolated bovine cornea according to OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage).
This report describes the potency of chemicals to induce serious eye damage using isolated bovine corneas. The eye damage of the test item was tested through topical application for approximately 240 minutes.
The individual in vitro irritancy scores for the negative controls ranged from -0.4 to 1.7. The corneas treated with the negative control item were clear after the 240 minutes of treatment. The individual positive control in vitro irritancy scores ranged from 118 to 149. The corneas treated with the positive control were turbid after the 240 minutes of treatment.
The corneas treated with the test item showed opacity values ranging from 242 to 288 and permeability values ranging from 0.166 to 0.599. The corneas were turbid after the 240 minutes of treatment with the test item. A pH effect of the test item was observed on the rinsing medium, the corneas were rinsed until no colour change of the medium was observed. Hence, the in vitro irritancy scores ranged from 251 to 297 after 240 minutes of treatment with the test item. The test item induced serious eye damage through both endpoints, resulting in a mean in vitro irritancy score of 273 after 4 hours of treatment.
In conclusion, since the test substance induced an IVIS≥55, it is concluded that the test item induces serious eye damage in the Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability test under the experimental conditions described in this report.
Reference
The individual in vitro irritancy scores for the negative controls ranged from -0.4 to 1.7. The corneas treated with the negative control item were clear after the 240 minutes of treatment. The individual positive control in vitro irritancy scores ranged from 118 to 149. The corneas treated with the positive control were turbid after the 240 minutes of treatment.
The corneas treated with the test item showed opacity values ranging from 242 to 288 and permeability values ranging from 0.166 to 0.599. The corneas were turbid after the 240 minutes of treatment with the test item. A pH effect of the test item was observed on the rinsing medium, the corneas were rinsed until no colour change of the medium was observed. Hence, the in vitro irritancy scores ranged from 251 to 297 after 240 minutes of treatment with the test item.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irreversible damage)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Skin corrosion:
The objective of this study was to evaluate the test substance for its ability to induce skin corrosion in accordance with OECD Guideline 431 (In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RHE) Test Method).
The possible corrosive potential of the test substance was tested through topical application for 3 minutes and 1 hour. Skin tissue was moistened with 25 μL of Milli-Q water and at least 25 mg of the test substance was applied directly on top of the skin tissue.
The positive control had a mean relative tissue viability of 6.6% after the 1-hour exposure. The absolute mean OD570 (optical density at 570 nm) of the negative control tissues was within the acceptance limits of OECD 431 (lower acceptance limit ≥0.8 and upper acceptance limit ≤2.8) and the laboratory historical control data range. In the range of 20 - 100% viability the Coefficient of Variation between tissue replicates was ≤ 13%, indicating that the test system functioned properly.
The relative mean tissue viability obtained after 3-minute and 1-hour treatments with the test item compared to the negative control tissues was 93% and 53%, respectively. The mean relative tissue viability for the test substance was not below 50% after the 3-minute treatment and not below 15% after the 1-hour treatment.
In conclusion, the test substance is not corrosive in the in vitro skin corrosion test under the experimental conditions described in this report.
Skin irritation:
The objective of this study was to evaluate the test substance for its ability to induce skin irritation according to Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method).
The possible skin irritation potential of the test item was tested through topical application for 15 minutes. After a 42 hour post-incubation period, determination of the cytotoxic (irritancy) effect was performed. Cytotoxicity is expressed as the reduction of mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity measured by formazan production from MTT at the end of the treatment. Skin irritation is expressed as the remaining cell viability after exposure to the test item.
The positive control had a mean cell viability of 7.3% after 15 ± 0.5 minutes exposure. The absolute mean OD570 (optical density at 570 nm) of the negative control tissues was within the laboratory historical control data range. The standard deviation value of the percentage viability of three tissues treated identically was ≤ 7.0%, indicating that the test system functioned properly.
The relative mean tissue viability obtained after 15 ± 0.5 minutes treatment with the test item compared to the negative control tissues was 100%.
In conclusion, the test substance is non-irritant in the in vitro skin irritation test under the experimental conditions.
Eye irritation:
The objective of this study was to evaluate the eye hazard potential of the test substance as measured by its ability to induce opacity and increase permeability in an isolated bovine cornea according to OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage).
This report describes the potency of chemicals to induce serious eye damage using isolated bovine corneas. The eye damage of the test item was tested through topical application for approximately 240 minutes.
The individual in vitro irritancy scores for the negative controls ranged from -0.4 to 1.7. The corneas treated with the negative control item were clear after the 240 minutes of treatment. The individual positive control in vitro irritancy scores ranged from 118 to 149. The corneas treated with the positive control were turbid after the 240 minutes of treatment.
The corneas treated with the test item showed opacity values ranging from 242 to 288 and permeability values ranging from 0.166 to 0.599. The corneas were turbid after the 240 minutes of treatment with the test item. A pH effect of the test item was observed on the rinsing medium, the corneas were rinsed until no colour change of the medium was observed. Hence, the in vitro irritancy scores ranged from 251 to 297 after 240 minutes of treatment with the test item. The test item induced serious eye damage through both endpoints, resulting in a mean in vitro irritancy score of 273 after 4 hours of treatment.
In conclusion, since the test substance induced an IVIS≥55, it is concluded that the test item induces serious eye damage in the Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability test under the experimental conditions described in this report.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Skin irritation / corrosion:
The test item is not corrosive in the in vitro skin corrosion test and non-irritant in the in vitro skin irritation test.
According to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, section 3.2.2.1, this substance should not be classified for this endpoint.
Serious eye damage/eye irritation:
Since the test substance induced an IVIS≥55, it is concluded that the test item induces serious eye damage in the Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability test.
According to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, section 3.3.2.1, this substance should be classified as category 1 for this endpoint.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.