Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 476-890-3 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Biodegradation in water: screening tests
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- from 12 October 2001 to 17 January 2002
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 301 B (Ready Biodegradability: CO2 Evolution Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- The temperature in the culture room dropped below 20°C during short time periods (< 1 hour each) between days 4 and 6 of the test (minimum of 19°C). This minor deviation was not considered to have compromise the validity or the integrity of the study.
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Inoculum or test system:
- activated sludge, domestic, non-adapted
- Details on inoculum:
- - Source of inoculum/activated sludge: inoculum was collected from a water treatment plant (Evreux, france) containing effluent from a predominantly domestic origin.
- Laboratory culture: under laboratory conditions in reconstituted water at 22°C
- Preparation of inoculum for exposure: the inoculum was prepared by initially sieving sewage sludge. The sludge was then centrifuged for 5 minutes, the supernatant was rejected and the pellet was redispersed in the mineral medium.
In order to wash out the dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and to lower the carbon organic content, the inoculum was preconditioned for 6 days before use at 22 +/- 2 °C. Air was bubbled through the inoculum during the preconditioning period.
- Concentration of sludge: 12 mg/L of suspended solids (d.w.)
- Water filtered: yes - Duration of test (contact time):
- 28 d
- Initial conc.:
- 22.7 mg/L
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Initial conc.:
- 10 mg/L
- Based on:
- other: TOC
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- CO2 evolution
- Details on study design:
- TEST CONDITIONS
- Composition of medium: reconstituted water (OECD and EEC recommended) using deionised water.
- Additional substrate: /
- Test temperature: between 19 and 24°C
- pH: 7.54 in the mineral medium before the start of the test, 7.83 to 8.13 measured in the test flasks at the end of the test.
- pH adjusted: no
- Aeration of dilution water: air was bubbled through each parallel at the rate of 30 – 100 mL/min during the test
- Suspended solids concentration: 12 mg/L (dry weight)
- Continuous darkness: yes
TEST SYSTEM
- Culturing apparatus: dark glass bottles fitted with dark glass stoppers
- Number of culture flasks/treatment: 1 (reference item, air control, abiotic sterile control treatments) and 2 (blank and test item treatments)
- Method used to create aerobic conditions: aeration (air bubbled during the test)
- Measuring equipment: titration
SAMPLING
- Sampling frequency: on days 1, 4, 6, 8, 11, 13, 15, 18, 22, 25 and 29
- Sampling method: see "Details on analytical method"
- Sample storage before analysis: data not available
CONTROL AND BLANK SYSTEM
- Inoculum blank: yes (2.4 L of mineral medium + inoculum at 12 mg/L of suspended solids (dry weight))
- Abiotic sterile control: yes (2.4 L of mineral medium + test item at 10 mg TOC/L + sterilizing item (sodium azide) at 30 mg/L)
- Toxicity control: no
- Other:
* procedure control: 2.4 L of mineral medium + inoculum at 12 mg/L of suspended solids (dry weight) + reference item (sodium acetate) at 10 mg TOC/L,
* air control: only 2.4 L mineral medium - Reference substance:
- acetic acid, sodium salt
- Remarks:
- 10 mg TOC/L
- Key result
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- 22.18 - 50.35
- Sampling time:
- 28 d
- Remarks on result:
- other: Flask 1: 50.35 % Flask 2: 22.18 %
- Details on results:
- TEST ITEM TREATMENT:
Biodegradation values of test item replicates deviated by more than 20% at the end of the test (50% and 22% of degradation in the first and second replicates, respectively). The same problem was observed in a previous study. It was probably due to the very low water solubility of the test item (11.9 µg/L). ). It was therefore considered, in view of the hazard assessment, that the test item biodegradation result retained for data interpretation would be those obtained in the replicate where the degradation percentage was the lower after 28 days. The 10-day window started on the 11th day. Biodegradation of the test item cerium and iron oxide isostearate totalled 16% at the end of this 10-day window (21th day) and 22% at the end of the test.
ABIOTIC CONTROL TREATMENT:
The test item degradation percentage reached 24% in the abiotic sterile control at the end of the test and was therefore similar to that obtained in the test solution. Consequently, it was assumed that the degradation of the test item in the test solution (in presence of activated sludge) came completely or at least partly from an abiotic reaction. - Results with reference substance:
- The reference compound degraded normally under the test conditions (81.33 % biodegradation after 28 days). Such results confirmed the presence of an acceptable microbial community and confirmed the system integrity.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- no
- Remarks:
- Biodegradation of reference item and control flasks were valid. However biodegradation values of test item replicates deviated by more than 20% at the end of the test. See more details in results.
- Interpretation of results:
- other: non readily biodegradable
- Conclusions:
- Under the experimental conditions, cerium and iron oxide isostearate is non readily biodegradable in the 28-day modified Sturm test.
- Executive summary:
The ready biodegradability of cerium and iron oxide isostearate was evaluated using a 28-day modified Sturm test according to OECD guideline 301B and GLP.
7 flasks were used to determine the quantity of carbon dioxide evolved by the degradation of the test item: 2 inoculum blanks, 2 inoculum with the test item (10 mg TOC/L), 1 procedure control (with the reference item), 1 air control and one abiotic sterile control.
The inoculum consisted of domestic, non-adapted, activated sludge (12 mg/L dw)
The 10-day window started on the 11th day. Biodegradation of the test item cerium and iron oxide isostearate totalled 16% at the end of this 10-day window (21th day) and 22% at the end of the test.
On the other end, the test item degradation percentage reached 24% in the abiotic sterile control at the end of the test and was therefore similar to that obtained in the test solution. Consequently, it was assumed that the degradation of the test item in the test solution (in presence of activated sludge) came completely or at least partly from an abiotic reaction.
Biodegradation values of test item replicates deviated by more than 20% at the end of the test (50% and 22% of degradation in the first and second replicates, respectively). The same problem was observed in a previous study. It was probably due to the very low water solubility of the test item (11.9 µg/L).
Under the experimental conditions, cerium and iron oxide isostearate is non readily biodegradable in the 28-day modified Sturm test.
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- See attached document in section 13 "Assessment report" for justification and rationale of the analogy approach.
Original letters from the French Competent Authorities requiring the read across to be done with cerium and iron oxide isostearate are attached below. - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Key result
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- 22.18 - 50.35
- Sampling time:
- 28 d
- Remarks on result:
- other: Flask 1: 50.35 % Flask 2: 22.18 %
- Conclusions:
- Iron oxide isostearate is to be considered as cerium and iron oxide isostearate as non readily biodegradable.
- Executive summary:
The source and target substances present similar characterization (nanoparticles of very similar parameters), and similar physico-chemical and ecotoxicological properties (high melting point, low vapour pressure, very low water solubility, no expected bioaccumulation potential when considering cerium and iron elements and isostearate parts, no acute toxicity to daphnids up to and including the saturation concentration). This similarity supports the relevance of the read-across.
Thus, the ready biodegration potential is expected to be the same for the source and target substances.
Iron oxide isostearate is to be considered as cerium and iron oxide isostearate as non readily biodegradable.
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 1: cumulative percentage of biodegradation
|
Test item |
Reference |
Abiotic |
|
Day |
No. 1 |
No. 2 |
item |
Control |
1 4 6 8 11 13 15 18 22 25 28 |
13.79 26.73 35.52 40.51 43.11 44.66 45.91 47.56 49.50 50.20 50.35 |
1.50 7.74 8.34 9.74 10.04 11.29 12.94 14.79 16.93 18.63 22.18 |
1.10 22.83 42.91 54.30 63.39 69.24 73.48 77.83 80.18 80.18 81.33 |
0.40 1.65 5.89 7.49 8.19 8.79 9.79 11.99 15.09 16.78 24.18 |
Description of key information
By analogy with cerium and iron oxide isostearate, iron oxide isostearate should be considered as non readily biodegradable.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Biodegradation in water:
- not biodegradable
Additional information
In the absence of data on iron oxide isostearate and as validated by the French Competent Authorities in September 2005 (see the document attached in the target endpoint study record), the biodegradation was assessed based on data on the analogue cerium and iron oxide isostearate. This GLP-compliant study was performed according to OECD test guideline 301B, quoted as reliability 1 according to Klimisch criteria and flagged as a key study.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.