Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 459-520-5 | CAS number: 132182-92-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Biodegradation in water: screening tests
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 4 Mar - 1 Apr 2004
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 301 D (Ready Biodegradability: Closed Bottle Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: Sumitomo 3M Ltd, lot #1
- Purity: 99.96%
- Synonyms: T-7869
STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature in the dark - Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Inoculum or test system:
- other: secondary effluent
- Details on inoculum:
- - Source of inoculum/activated sludge: Secondary effluent freshly obtained from a municipal sewage treatment plant:
'Kurume central sewage treatment center, Fukuoka, Japan
- Preparation of inoculum for exposure: Secondary effluent was filtered through a No. 2 filter paper. The filtrate was kept aerated until inoculation.
- Inoculation level: One drop filtered effluent per liter - Duration of test (contact time):
- 28 d
- Initial conc.:
- 10 mg/L
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- O2 consumption
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- test mat. analysis
- Details on study design:
- TEST CONDITIONS
- Test vessels: 100 mL in volume, sealed
- Composition of medium: Mineral medium, concentrations as per OECD 301D. Medium was pre-inoculated with one drop effluent per liter.
- Solubilising agent (type and concentration if used): None
- Test temperature: Incubator kept at 20 ± 1 °C
- pH adjusted: No
- Aeration: No, however each vessel was stirred continuously by magnetic stirrer
TEST SYSTEM
- Number of culture flasks/concentration: Two per day.
- Sampling frequency: Inoculum blank: day 0, 7, 14, 21 and 28; test substance, day 7, 14, 21, 28; reference substance: day 7 and 14 only. Test substance analysis by GC was done using separate test bottles from the DO measurement.
- DO analysis: Winkler oxygen method
- Test performed in closed vessels due to significant volatility of test substance: yes
CONTROL AND BLANK SYSTEM
- Inoculum blank: Yes, 10 bottles plus one additional for GC analysis on day 28 only
- Reference substance: Four bottles
- Abiotic sterile control: Two bottles for GC analysis only on day 28 (no DO measurement).
- Toxicity control: None
STATISTICAL METHODS:
ThOD and BOD calculated per OECD guidelines - Reference substance:
- benzoic acid, sodium salt
- Remarks:
- (3.00 mg/L)
- Key result
- Parameter:
- % degradation (O2 consumption)
- Value:
- 0
- Sampling time:
- 28 d
- Parameter:
- % degradation (test mat. analysis)
- Value:
- 0
- Sampling time:
- 28 d
- Details on results:
- Specific results on oxygen concentration and depletion are in Tables 1 and 2. In general, oxygen demand in vessels containing the test substance was less than in the procedural blank throughout the test. Essentially no biodegradation was observed.
After correction for matrix effects, 98-102% of applied test substance was recovered by GC from abiotic blanks and 100-104% recovered from test bottles. - Results with reference substance:
- 67% biodegradation of reference substance on day 7.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- O2 depletion in the inoculum blank was below 1.5 mg O2/l after 28 days, residual O2 in test bottles > 0.5 mg/l at any time, control substance degraded >60% within 14 days, differences of duplicate biodegradation values less than 20% as mg O2/L
- Interpretation of results:
- under test conditions no biodegradation observed
- Conclusions:
- HFE s-601 was not biodegraded in an OECD 301D test
- Executive summary:
Biodegradation of HFE s-601 was assessed in a closed bottle test (OECD TG301D). Sodium benzoate was used as reference. HFE s-601 did not measurably degrade during the test period. In direct analysis by GC, HFE s-601 was recovered from biotic and abiotic test bottles at the same rate (ca. 100%). HFE s-601 is not readily biodegradable.
The study was conducted in accord with internationally accepted guidelines under GLP criteria. It is reliable without restriction and is suitable for use in Risk Assessment, Classification & Labelling, and PBT Analysis.
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 16 Dec 2003 - 13 Jan 2004
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 301 D (Ready Biodegradability: Closed Bottle Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: 41-2601-2240-7 Lot #1
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 30 Nov 2005
- Purity: 99.96%
- Synonyms: T-7869
STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature in the dark - Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Inoculum or test system:
- sewage, predominantly domestic, non-adapted
- Details on inoculum:
- - Source of inoculum/activated sludge: Secondary effluent freshly obtained from a municipal sewage treatment plant:
'Waterschap de Maaskant','s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
- Preparation of inoculum for exposure: Secondary effluent was filtered through a coarse filter paper, the first 200 ml was discarded. The filtrate was kept aerated until inoculation.
- Inoculation level: 4 mL/L, ca 1.2 mL in test bottles - Duration of test (contact time):
- 28 d
- Initial conc.:
- 2 mg/L
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Initial conc.:
- 5 mg/L
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- O2 consumption
- Details on study design:
- TEST CONDITIONS
- Composition of medium: Mineral medium, concentrations as per OECD 301D
- Solubilising agent (type and concentration if used): None
- Test temperature: 19.5 °C to 20.5 °C (test probe in water bottle in same chamber)
- pH: 7.4 - 7.5 at test initiation
- pH adjusted: No
- Aeration of dilution water: Dilution water not used, mineral medium was left at room temperature overnight before test, DO concentration measured before test began to assure saturation.
- Continuous darkness: yes
- Other: Filtered effluent aerated until inoculation, ca. 1.0 - 1.2 mL added per test bottle.
TEST SYSTEM
- Culturing apparatus: ca. 250-300 mL BOD bottles with glass stoppers
- Number of culture flasks/concentration: Two per concentration per sampling day.
- Method used to create aerobic conditions: Aeration of medium before inoculation
- Measuring equipment: WTW Inolab Oxi Level 2 supplied with a WTW CellOx 325 oxygen electrode, electrolyte type ELY/G.
- Test performed in closed vessels due to significant volatility of test substance: yes
SAMPLING
- Sampling frequency: At day 0, 7, 14, 21 and 28. Bottles measured at the start were also measured on day 7. pH in sample bottles measured at start of test only.
CONTROL AND BLANK SYSTEM
- Inoculum blank: Yes (eight bottles)
- Abiotic sterile control: No
- Toxicity control: Yes (eight bottles), same amount of test and reference substances combined as in test substance low concentration (2 mg/L) and reference substance (2 mg/L) bottles separately.
- Reference substance: eight bottles
STATISTICAL METHODS:
ThOD and BOD calculated per OECD guidelines - Reference substance:
- acetic acid, sodium salt
- Remarks:
- (2 mg/L)
- Key result
- Parameter:
- % degradation (O2 consumption)
- Value:
- ca. 0
- Sampling time:
- 28 d
- Remarks on result:
- other: (range, -5 to 9% for low and high concentrations)
- Details on results:
- Specific results on oxygen concentration and depletion are in Tables 1 and 2. In general, oxygen demand in vessels containing the test substance was less than in the procedural blank throughout the test. Essentially no biodegradation was observed.
- Results with reference substance:
- 55% biodegradation of reference substance on day 7.
Toxicity was assessed by comparison of toxicity test bottle BOD with sum of reference substance and low test substance BOD results. Little difference in oxygen consumption was observed (see Table 2), so the test substance was not considered to inhibit activated sludge. - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- O2 depletion in the inoculum blank was below 1.5 mg O2/l after 28 days, residual O2 in test bottles > 0.5 mg/l at any time, control substance degraded >60% within 14 days, differences of duplicate biodegradation values less than 20% as mg O2/L
- Interpretation of results:
- under test conditions no biodegradation observed
- Conclusions:
- HFE s-601 was not biodegraded in an OECD 301D test
- Executive summary:
Biodegradation of HFE s-601 was assessed in a closed bottle test (OECD TG301D). Sodium acetate was used as reference. HFE s-601 did not measurably degrade during the test period. In toxicity controls, HFE s-601 at a concentration of 2 mg/L did not measurably prevent the reference substance from being degraded. HFE s-601 is not readily biodegradable but is not toxic to activated sludge.
The study was conducted in accord with internationally accepted guidelines under GLP criteria. It is reliable without restriction and is suitable for use in Risk Assessment, Classification & Labelling, and PBT Analysis.
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 1, Dissolved oxygen measurements at different points in time
Series |
Flask |
Oxygen |
concentration |
(mg O2/L) |
after |
x days |
day 0 |
day 7 |
day 14 |
day 21 |
day 28 |
||
Inoculum blank |
A |
8.94 |
8.90 |
8.80 |
8.68 |
8.37 |
B |
9.41 |
8.90 |
8.74 |
8.80 |
8.47 |
|
mean |
9.18 |
8.90 |
8.77 |
8.74 |
8.42 |
|
Procedure control |
A |
─ |
5.40 |
5.09 |
─ |
─ |
B |
─ |
5.72 |
5.13 |
─ |
─ |
|
mean |
─ |
|||||
Test substance |
A |
─ |
8.74 |
8.76 |
8.66 |
8.60 |
B |
─ |
8.76 |
8.86 |
8.74 |
8.41 |
Table 2, Mean values of oxygen depletion at different points in time
Series |
Flask |
Oxygen (% BOD) |
depletion |
(mg BOD/L) |
after x days |
day 7 |
day 14 |
day 21 |
day 28 |
||
Procedure control |
A |
3.50 (70%) |
3.68 (74%) |
─ |
─ |
B |
3.18 (64%) |
3.64 (73%) |
─ |
─ |
|
Test substance, low |
A |
0.16 (2%) |
0.01 (0%) |
0.08 (1%) |
0.00 (0%) |
B |
0.14 (2%) |
0.00 (0%) |
0.00 (0%) |
0.01 (0%) |
Table 1, Dissolved oxygen measurements at different points in time
Series |
pH at τ=0 |
Flask No. |
Oxygen |
concentration |
(mg O2/L) |
after |
x days |
0 |
7 |
14 |
21 |
28 |
|||
Inoculum blank |
7.5 |
A |
8.94 |
8.03 |
8.15 |
7.63 |
7.54 |
B |
9.00 |
7.93 |
8.19 |
7.41 |
7.64 |
||
mean |
8.97 |
7.98 |
8.17 |
7.52 |
7.59 |
||
Procedure control |
7.4 |
A |
9.10 |
7.23 |
7.06 |
6.87 |
6.41 |
B |
9.01 |
7.17 |
7.05 |
6.70 |
6.46 |
||
mean |
9.06 |
||||||
Test substance, low |
7.4 |
A |
9.06 |
8.51 |
8.24 |
7.99 |
7.61 |
B |
9.05 |
8.51 |
8.28 |
8.01 |
7.63 |
||
mean |
9.06 |
||||||
Test substance, high |
7.4 |
A |
9.04 |
8.64 |
8.43 |
7.98 |
7.77 |
B |
9.06 |
8.61 |
8.32 |
7.97 |
7.73 |
||
mean |
9.05 |
||||||
Toxicity control |
7.4 |
A |
9.10 |
7.43 |
7.16 |
7.00 |
6.84 |
B |
9.05 |
7.49 |
7.17 |
6.95 |
6.70 |
||
mean |
9.08 |
Table 2, Mean values of oxygen depletion at different points in time
Series |
Flask |
Oxygen |
depletion¹ |
(mg BOD/L) |
after x days |
day 7 |
day 14 |
day 21 |
day 28 |
||
Procedure control |
A |
0.835 (54%) |
1.195 (77%) |
0.735 (47%) |
1.265 (81%) |
B |
0.895 (57%) |
1.205 (77%) |
0.905 (58%) |
1.215 (78%) |
|
Test substance, low |
A |
-0.445² |
0.015 (2 %) |
-0.385² |
0.065 (9%) |
B |
-0.445² |
-0.025² |
-0.405² |
0.045 (6%) |
|
Test substance, high |
A |
-0.580² |
-0.180² |
-0.380² |
-0.100² |
B |
-0.550² |
-0.070² |
-0.370² |
-0.060² |
|
Toxicity control |
A |
0.655 (29%) |
1.115 (49%) |
0.625 (27%) |
0.855 (37%) |
B |
0.595 (26%) |
1.105 (48%) |
0.675 (29%) |
0.995 (43%) |
1, corrected for oxygen depletion in the blank control
2, %BOD not calculated when sample oxygen demand was less than inoculum blankDescription of key information
HFE s-601 is not biodegradable under conditions of a closed bottle test (OECD 301D)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Biodegradation in water:
- under test conditions no biodegradation observed
- Type of water:
- freshwater
Additional information
Biodegradation of HFE s-601 was assessed in two key studies done using a closed bottle method (OECD TG301D). In the first test, sodium acetate was used as reference. HFE s-601 did not measurably degrade during the test period. In toxicity controls, HFE s-601 at a concentration of 2 mg/L did not measurably prevent the reference substance from being degraded. In the second key test, sodium benzoate was used as reference. No biodegradation of HFE s-601 was observed v. control. In direct chemical analysis, measured concentrations of test substance did not change over the course of the test. HFE s-601 was not biodegraded under conditions of either closed bottle test, but is not inhibitory to biodegradation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
