Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
12.09.2018 to 31.10.2018
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2018
Report date:
2019

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Version / remarks:
July 22, 2010
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.42 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Version / remarks:
30 May, 2008
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.2600 (Skin Sensitisation)
Version / remarks:
March 2003
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Didodecyl 1,4-dihydro-2,6-dimethylpyridine-3,5-dicarboxylate
EC Number:
252-939-2
EC Name:
Didodecyl 1,4-dihydro-2,6-dimethylpyridine-3,5-dicarboxylate
Cas Number:
36265-41-5
Molecular formula:
C33H59NO4
IUPAC Name:
didodecyl 1,4-dihydro-2,6-dimethylpyridine-3,5-dicarboxylate
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
other: CBA/CaOlaHsd
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
Sex: female (nulliparous and non-pregnant)
Age at the
beginning of the study: 9 - 10 weeks
Number of animals: 5 mice / group
5 mice / prescreen test

Study design: in vivo (LLNA)

Vehicle:
acetone/olive oil (4:1 v/v)
Concentration:
3%, 6.25%, 12.5%
No. of animals per dose:
5
Positive control substance(s):
other:

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
not sensitising

In vivo (LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
>= 1.6 - <= 2.1
Test group / Remarks:
The DPM at a concentration of 3% was 1490.8
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation based on QSAR/QSPR prediction
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
>= 1.1 - <= 1.4
Test group / Remarks:
The DPM at a concentration of 6.25 % was 1033.5
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation based on QSAR/QSPR prediction
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
>= 1 - <= 1.6
Test group / Remarks:
The DPM at a concentration of 12.5% was 937.2
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation based on QSAR/QSPR prediction
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
1
Test group / Remarks:
The DPM for the negative control was 928.4
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation based on QSAR/QSPR prediction

Any other information on results incl. tables

There was no mortality and there were no significant clinical observations or effects on body weights.

None of the three tested concentrations of the test item reached the stimulation index of 3.

The stimulation index at a concentration of       3%        was        1.6

The stimulation index at a concentration of       6.25%  was        1.1

The stimulation index at a concentration of       12.5%  was        1.0

There were no relevant increases in lymph node weight in any of the test groups.

The mean weight of the lymph nodes

for the 3% test group was                       2.5 mg

for the 6.25% test group was                  2.3 mg

for the 12.5% test group was                  2.1 mg

for the negative-control group was          2.2 mg

Applicant's summary and conclusion