Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 240-970-4 | CAS number: 16919-31-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
- Skin corrosion: OECD 431, non-corrosive
- Skin irritation: OECD 439, irritant
-EpiOcular: at least eye-irritant
- BCOP:
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin corrosion: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 431 (In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Human Skin Model Test)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.40 (In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Transcutaneous Electrical Resistance Test (TER))
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Test system:
- human skin model
- Source species:
- human
- Cell type:
- non-transformed keratinocytes
- Cell source:
- foreskin from a single donor
- Justification for test system used:
- Standard test system
- Vehicle:
- water
- Details on test system:
- RECONSTRUCTED HUMAN EPIDERMIS (RHE) TISSUE
- Model used: Epiderm kit
- Tissue batch number(s): 25858
- Delivery date: 2017-11-14
TEMPERATURE USED FOR TEST SYSTEM
- Temperature used during treatment / exposure: 37°C
- Temperature of post-treatment incubation (if applicable): 37°C
MTT DYE USED TO MEASURE TISSUE VIABILITY AFTER TREATMENT / EXPOSURE
- MTT concentration: 1 mg/ml
- Incubation time: 1h
- Spectrophotometer: Anthos Reader 2010 Flexi
- Wavelength: 570 nm
NUMBER OF REPLICATE TISSUES: 3
- Control samples:
- yes, concurrent negative control
- yes, concurrent positive control
- Amount/concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 25-26mg
VEHICLE
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 25µl water
NEGATIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight): 50µl water
POSITIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight): 50µl potassium hydroxide
- Concentration (if solution): 8M KOH - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 3 minutes / 60 minutes
- Number of replicates:
- duplicate
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Run / experiment:
- 3 min
- Value:
- ca. 84.7
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Run / experiment:
- 60 min
- Value:
- ca. 45.1
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- The acceptance criteria were fulfilled, the test is considered valid.
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- The test item is considered non-corrosive to skin.
After 3 minutes treatment, the mean value of relative tissue viability of the test item was decreased to 84.7% This value is well above the threshold for corrosivity (50%). After 1 hour treatment the mean value of relative tissue viability of the test item was reduced to 45.1%. This value is above the threshold for cor-rosivity (15%).
The values of the negative control met the required acceptability criterion of mean OD ≥ 0.8 and ≤ 2.8 for both treatment intervals, thus showing the quality of the tissues.
The positive control has met the validity criterion too, thus ensuring the validity of the test system.
For these reasons, the result of the test is considered valid. - Executive summary:
Two tissues of the human skin model EpiDermTMwere treated with the test itemAmmonium hexafluorocirconatefor 3 minutes and 1 hour, respectively. The test item was applied to each tissue and spread to match the tissue size.
Demineralised water was used as negative control, 8 M KOH was used as positive control.
After treatment, the respective substance was rinsed from the tissues. Then, cell viability of the tissues was evaluated by addition of MTT, which can be reduced to a blue formazan. Formazan production was evaluated by measuring the optical density (OD) of the resulting solution.
After treatment with the negative control, the absorbance values were within the required acceptability criterion of mean OD ≥ 0.8 and ≤ 2.8 for both treatment intervals thus showing the quality of the tissues. The OD was 1.7 (3 minutes experiment) and 1.6 (1 hour experiment).
The positive control showed clear corrosive effects for both treatment intervals. The mean relative tissue viability value was reduced to 6.1 % for the 1 hour treatment.
After 3 minutes treatment with the test item, the mean value of relative tissue viability was reduced to 84.7 %. This value is above the threshold for corrosion potential (50%). After 1 hour treatment, the mean value of relative tissue viability was reduced to 45.1 %. This value, too, is above the threshold for corrosion potential (15%).
Therefore, the test item is considered non-corrosive to skin in the Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RHE) Test Method.
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 22.08.2017 - 15.09.2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.46 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Model Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 2009
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
- Version / remarks:
- 2015
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Test system:
- human skin model
- Source species:
- human
- Cell type:
- non-transformed keratinocytes
- Cell source:
- foreskin from a single donor
- Justification for test system used:
- Standard system for OECD 439 test.
- Vehicle:
- other: Dulbecco's Phosphate Buffered Saline (DPBS)
- Details on test system:
- SKIN DISC PREPARATION
- Procedure used: EpiDerm is a ready-to-use, highly differentiated 3D tissue model consisting of normal, human-derived epidermal keratinocytes (NHEK) cultured on specially prepared tissue culture inserts.
TEMPERATURE USED FOR TEST SYSTEM
- Temperature used during treatment / exposure: 37°C
- Temperature post-incubation period: 37°C
NUMBER OF INDEPENDENT TESTING RUNS / EXPERIMENTS TO DERIVE FINAL PREDICTION:
PREDICTION MODEL / DECISION CRITERIA (choose relevant statement)
- The test substance is considered to be corrosive/irritant to skin if the tissue viability is lower or equal to 50% of the negative control.
- The test substance is considered to be non-irritant to skin if the tissue viability is higher than 50% of the negative control. - Control samples:
- yes, concurrent negative control
- Amount/concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 24.8, 25.8 and 25.3 mg
VEHICLE
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 25µl DPBS
NEGATIVE CONTROL
- DPBS, 30µl
POSITIVE CONTROL
- Concentration (if solution): 5% sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 1h
- Duration of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):
- 22 h
- Number of replicates:
- 3 tissues were used per plate
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Run / experiment:
- 60 min (mean)
- Value:
- 2.5
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- All validity criteria were met.
Values for negative control and for positive control were within the range of historical data of the test facility. Therefore, the experiment is considered valid. - Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of the study, the relative tissue viability was reduced to 2.5%. Therefore, the test item is considered irritant to skin.
- Executive summary:
Three tissues of the human skin model EpiDermTMwere treated withAmmonium hexafluorocirconatefor 60 minutes.
The test item was applied directly to each tissue and spread to match the tissue size (0.63 cm2; as indicated by the supplier).
DPBS-buffer was used as negative control and 5% SDS solution was used as positive control.
After treatment with the negative control, the absorbance values were within the required acceptability criterion. The positive control showed clear irritating effects. The mean value of relative tissue viability was reduced to 2.5% .
The variation within the tissue replicates of negative, control, positive control and test item was acceptable.
After the treatment with the test item, the mean value of relative tissue viability was reduced to 2.5 %. This value is below the threshold for skin irritation potential (50%). Values below the threshold of 50% are considered irritant to skin.
Therefore, the test item is considered irritant to skin in the Reconstructed human Epidermis (RhE) Test Method.
Referenceopen allclose all
After 3 minutes treatment with the test item, the mean value of relative tissue viability was reduced to 84.7 %. This value is above the threshold for corrosion potential (50%). After 1 hour treatment, the mean value of relative tissue viability was reduced to 45.1 %. This value, too, is above the threshold for corrosion potential (15%).
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 23.08.-25.10.2018
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying Ocular Corrosives and Severe Irritants)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted 09. Oct. 2017
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Species:
- cattle
- Strain:
- other: Bos primigenius Taurus (fresh bovine corneas)
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- SOURCE OF COLLECTED EYES
- Source: slaughterhouse Müller Fleisch GmbH, Enzstr. 2-4, 75217 Birkenfeld, Germany
- Number of animals:
- Characteristics of donor animals (e.g. age, sex, weight): the cattle were between 12 and 60 months old.
- Storage, temperature and transport conditions of ocular tissue (e.g. transport time, transport media and temperature, and other conditions): the eyes were transported to the test facility in Hanks' Balanced Salt Solution with 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin solution in a suitable cooled container wihtin 1h and 30 minutes. - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent positive control
- yes, concurrent negative control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- The test item was tested neat. The surface of the corneas was completely and evenly covered. The amounts of the test item used where as follows:
replicate 1: 543.7 mg; replicate 2: 557.4 mg; replicate 3: 553.8 mg. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 4 hours
- Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
- 90 minutes
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3 replicates
- Details on study design:
- SELECTION AND PREPARATION OF CORNEAS
After having carefully cleaned and sterilised the cornea holders, they were kept in the incubation chamber at 32 ± 1 °C. On the day of the assay, the MEM without phenol red was supplemented with sodium bicarbonate, L-glutamine and 1% fetal calf serum (= complete MEM) and stored in a water bath at 32 ± 1 °C. The same was performed with the MEM with phenol red, but without addition of sodium bicarbonate. After the arrival of the corneas, they were examined and only corneas which were free
from damages were used. The corneas were excised with a scalpel and cut from the globe with a 2-3 mm ring of sclera around the outside. Each cornea was transferred to a cornea holder in which pre-warmed cMEM (32 ± 1 °C) without phenol red was filled. The holders were then incubated for 1 hour in the incubation chamber at 32 ± 1 °C.
After the initial incubation, the medium was completely changed and the baseline opacity for each cornea was recorded. None of the corneas showed tissue damage; therefore, all corneas were used. For each treatment group (negative control solution, test item and positive control), three replicates were used. After removal of the pre-incubation medium (cMEM without phenol red), 750 μL negative control solution, a defined amount of test item and 750 μL positive control solution were applied to each replicate to the epithelial side of the cornea.
After the recording of the final opacity value, the cMEM without phenol red was removed from both chambers. The posterior chamber, which interfaces with the endothelial side of the cornea was filled with fresh cMEM. Then 1 mL sodium fluorescein solution was added to the front chamber for the detection of permeability of the corneas. For solid non-surfactant test items, a sodium fluorescein solution with a concentration of 5 mg/mL was used. The chambers were then closed again and incubated for 90 minutes at 32 ± 1 °C in a horizontal position. After incubation, the content of the posterior chamber was thoroughly mixed and pipetted in a 96-well plate. Then, its optical density at 492 nm is measured with the microtiter plate photometer.
TREATMENT METHOD: open chamber
In order to apply the test item, the window-locking ring and glass window of the anterior chamber was unscrewed to remove the glass disc. The test item was given on the epithelium that the cornea was evenly covered with test
item. Exposure time of the controls and test item on the corneas was 4 hours at 32 ± 1 °C. After thorough rinsing the anterior chamber with cMEM with phenol red and final rinsing with cMEM without phenol red, the anterior chamber was filled with cMEM without phenol red and the final opacity value of each cornea was recorded.
METHODS FOR MEASURED ENDPOINTS:
- Corneal opacity: The change of opacity value of each treated cornea with test item, positive control and negative control was calculated by subtracting the initial basal opacity from the post treatment opacity reading for each cornea. The average change in opacity of the negative control cornea was calculated and this value was subtracted from the change in opacity of each treated cornea with test item and positive control to obtain a corrected opacity.
- Corneal permeability: The corrected OD492 value of each cornea treated with test item and positive control was calculated by subtracting the mean negative control cornea value from the original permeability value for each cornea. The mean OD492 value for each treatment group (test item, positive control and negative control) was determined by averaging the final corrected OD492 values of the treated corneas for one treatment group.
SCORING SYSTEM: In Vitro Irritancy Score (IVIS) - Irritation parameter:
- in vitro irritation score
- Run / experiment:
- mean of three replicates
- Value:
- 70.7
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Remarks:
- Test item was tested neat.
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- The test item was tested neat. Under the conditions of this test, the test item Ammonium hexafluorozirconate induced serious eye damage on the cornea of the bovine eye. The calculated mean IVIS was 70.70.
According to OECD Guideline no. 437 (Oct. 2017), a substance with an IVIS > 55 induces serious eye damage, that should be classified as UN GHS Category I. - Executive summary:
This in vitro study was performed to assess corneal damage potential of Ammonium hexafluorozirconate by quantitative measurements of changes in opacity and permeability in a bovine cornea.
Six experiments were performed, but two of them were invalid, because one validity criterion of the negative control was not met. These results are not reported but kept with the raw data in the GLP-archive of the test facility. Further three experiments were performed, which led to equivocal results. This is why a sixth experiment was performed with the undiluted test item, because it was assumed that the suspension was not homogeneous. Only this valid experiment is described in detail.
The test item Ammonium hexafluorozirconate was brought onto the cornea of a bovine eye which previously had been incubated with cMEM without phenol red at 32 ± 1 °C for 1 hour and whose opacity had been determined. The test item was incubated on the cornea for 4 hours at 32 ± 1 °C. After removal of the test item, opacity and permeability values were measured.
The test item was tested neat. Under the conditions of this test, the test item Ammonium hexafluorozirconate induced serious eye damage on the cornea of the bovine eye. The calculated mean IVIS was 70.70.
According to OECD Guideline no. 437 (Oct. 2017), a substance with an IVIS > 55 induces serious eye damage, that should be classified as UN GHS Category I.
The negative control (HBSS) and the positive control (20% imidazole solution) have met the validity criteria.
No observations were made which might cause doubts concerning the validity of the study outcome. The test is considered valid.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irreversible damage)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Skin irritation/corrosion:
The test substance was tested for its skin irritation potential in an in-vitro test system according to OECD 439 (Epiderm). Three tissues of the human skin model EpiDermTMwere treated with the test item for 60 minutes. The test item was applied directly to each tissue. DPBS-buffer was used as negative control and 5% SDS solution was used as positive control.
After treatment with the negative control, the absorbance values were within the required acceptability criterion. The positive control showed clear irritating effects. The mean value of relative tissue viability was reduced to 2.5% .
After the treatment with the test item, the mean value of relative tissue viability was reduced to 2.5 %. This value is below the threshold for skin irritation potential (50%). The test item was considered a skin irritant under the conditions of the study.
The test item was tested for skin corrosion potential in an in-vitro test according to OECD 431. Two tissues of the human skin model EpiDermTMwere treated with the test item for 3 minutes and 1 hour, respectively. The test item was applied to each tissue and spread to match the tissue size. Demineralised water was used as negative control, 8 M KOH was used as positive control.
After treatment, the respective substance was rinsed from the tissues. Then, cell viability of the tissues was evaluated by addition of MTT, which can be reduced to a blue formazan. Formazan production was evaluated by measuring the optical density (OD) of the resulting solution. After treatment with the negative control, the absorbance values were within the required acceptability criterion of mean OD ≥ 0.8 and ≤ 2.8 for both treatment intervals thus showing the quality of the tissues. The OD was 1.7 (3 minutes experiment) and 1.6 (1 hour experiment).
The positive control showed clear corrosive effects for both treatment intervals. The mean relative tissue viability value was reduced to 6.1 % for the 1 hour treatment.
After 3 minutes treatment with the test item, the mean value of relative tissue viability was reduced to 84.7 %. This value is above the threshold for corrosion potential (50%). After 1 hour treatment, the mean value of relative tissue viability was reduced to 45.1 %. This value, too, is above the threshold for corrosion potential (15%). Therefore, the test item is considered non-corrosive to skin in the Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RHE) Test Method.
Eye irritation:
EpiOcular:
The test itemwas applied to a three-dimensional human cornea tissue model in duplicate for an exposure time of 6 hours. After treatment, the respective substance was rinsed from the tissue; then, cell viability of the tissues was evaluated by addition of MTT, which can be reduced to formazan. The formazan production was evaluated by measuring the optical density (OD) of the resulting solution. Demineralised water was used as negative control and methyl acetate was used as positive control. The controls showed the following results: After treatment with the negative control, the absorbance values were within the required acceptability criterion of mean OD>0.8 and < 2.5, OD was 1.7. The positive control showed clear eye irritating effects, the mean value of the relative tissue viability was 40.0% (< 50%). Variation within tissue replicates was acceptable (< 20%).
After treatment with the test item, the mean value of relative tissue viability was 1.9%.
This value is well below the threshold for eye irritation potential (≤ 60%). Test items that induce values below the threshold are considered either eye irritant or inducing serious eye damage.
According to the OECD Guideline 492, the EpiOcularTMEye Irritation Test does not allow discrimination between eye irritation/reversible effects on the eye (Category 2) and serious eye damage/irreversible effects on the eye (Category 1). For these purposes, further testing with other suitable test methods is required. Under the conditions of the test,Ammonium hexafluorozirconateis considered either eye irritant or inducing serious eye damage in the EpiOcularTMEye Irritation Test.
BCOP:
This in vitro study was performed to assess corneal damage potential of Ammonium hexafluorozirconate by quantitative measurements of changes in opacity and permeability in a bovine cornea.
Six experiments were performed, but two of them were invalid, because one validity criterion of the negative control was not met. These results are not reported but kept with the raw data in the GLP-archive of the test facility. Further three experiments were performed, which led to equivocal results. This is why a sixth experiment was performed with the undiluted test item, because it was assumed that the suspension was not homogeneous. Only this valid experiment is described in detail.
The test item Ammonium hexafluorozirconatewas brought onto the cornea of a bovine eye which previously had been incubated with cMEM without phenol red at 32 ± 1 °C for 1 hour and whose opacity had been determined. The test item was incubated on the cornea for 4 hoursat32 ± 1 °C. After removal of the test item, opacity and permeability values were measured.
The test item was tested neat. Under the conditions of this test, the test itemAmmonium hexafluorozirconateinduced serious eye damage on the cornea of the bovine eye. The calculated mean IVIS was 70.70.
According to OECD Guideline no. 437 (Oct. 2017), a substance with an IVIS > 55 induces serious eye damage, that should be classified as UN GHS Category I.
Justification for classification or non-classification
According to Regulation (EU) No 1272/2008 (CLP) ammonium hexafluorozirconate is classified in Category 2 regarding skin irritation and Category 1 for eye irritation/damage.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
