Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Genetic toxicity in vitro

Description of key information

- Ames, +S9 negative, -S9 negative, S. typhimurium: TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and E. coli WP2uvrA, OECD 471, Thompson 2018

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
11 May 2018 to 25 May 2018
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Version / remarks:
21 July 1997
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
Version / remarks:
30 May 2008
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.5100 - Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test (August 1998)
Version / remarks:
August 1998
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare and Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
Version / remarks:
24 November 2000
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: ICH S2(R1) guideline adopted June 2012 (ICH S2(R1) Federal Register. 77:33748-33749)
Version / remarks:
Adopted 2012
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Envigo Research Limited, Shardlow Business Park ,Shardlow, Derbyshire, DE72 2GD, UK
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay
Target gene:
histidine and tryptophan locus
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Species / strain / cell type:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
S9 Microsomal fractions (CD Sprague-Dawley)
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Mutagenicity: Experiment 1 (with and without metabolic activation): 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 μg/plate. The maximum concentration was 5000 μg/plate (the OECD TG 471 maximum recommended dose level).
Mutagenicity: Experiment 2 (with and without metabolic activation): 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 μg/plate. The dose range used for Experiment 2 was determined by the results of Experiment 1.
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle/solvent used: Dimethyl formamide (purity: 99.98%)
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The test item formed the best doseable suspension in dimethyl formamide, therefore, this solvent was selected as the vehicle.
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Remarks:
Untreated
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
Dimethyl formamide
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
9-aminoacridine
N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
benzo(a)pyrene
other: 2-Aminoanthracene (2AA)
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION:
- Experiment 1: in agar (plate incorporation)
- Experiment 2: preincubation

DURATION
- Exposure duration: approximately 48 hours at 37°C
- Expression time: none

SELECTION METHOD:
The strains used will not grow on media which does not contain histidine. When large numbers of these organisms are exposed to a mutagen, reverse mutation to the original histidine independent form takes place. These are readily detectable due to their ability to grow on a histidine deficient medium.

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: triplicates

METHOD:
Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100 and Escherichia coli strain WP2uvrA were treated with suspensions of the test item using both the Ames plate incorporation and pre-incubation methods at up to eight dose levels, in triplicate, both with and without the addition of a rat liver homogenate metabolizing system (10% liver S9 in standard co-factors).

Experiment 1 – plate incorporation
The dose range for Experiment 1 was based on OECD TG 471 and was 1.5 to 5000 μg/plate.
A 0.1 mL aliquot of the appropriate concentration of test item, solvent vehicle or 0.1 mL of the appropriate positive control was added together with 0.1 mL of the bacterial strain culture, 0.5 mL of phosphate buffer (or 0,5 mL of S9-mix for the metabolic activation) and 2 mL of molten, trace amino-acid supplemented media. These were then mixed and overlayed onto a Vogel-Bonner agar plate. Negative (untreated) controls were also performed on the same day as the mutation test. Each concentration of the test item, appropriate positive, vehicle and negative controls, and each bacterial strain, was assayed using triplicate plates.
All of the plates were incubated at 37 ± 3 °C for approximately 48 hours and scored for the presence of revertant colonies using an automated colony counting system. The plates were viewed microscopically for evidence of thinning (toxicity). Manual counts were performed at 5000 μg/plate because of test item precipitation. Further sporadic manual counts were also performed due to spreading colonies which prevented an accurate automated count.

Experiment 2 – pre-incubation method
The experiment was repeated on a separate day using fresh cultures of the bacterial strains and fresh test item formulations. The dose range was amended following the results of Experiment 1 and was 15 to 5000 μg/plate. Six test item concentrations per bacterial strain were selected in Experiment 2 in order to achieve both four non-toxic dose levels and the potential toxicity of the test item following the change in test methodology.
A 0.1 mL aliquot of the appropriate bacterial strain culture, 0.5 mL of phosphate buffer (or 0,5 mL of S9-mix for the metabolic activation) and 0.1 mL of the appropriate concentration of test item formulation, solvent vehicle or 0.1 mL of appropriate positive control were incubated at 37 ± 3 °C for 20 minutes (with shaking) prior to addition of 2 mL of molten, trace amino-acid supplemented media and subsequent plating onto Vogel-Bonner plates. Negative (untreated) controls were also performed on the same day as the mutation test employing the plate incorporation method. All testing for this experiment was performed in triplicate.
All of the plates were incubated at 37 ± 3 °C for approximately 48 hours and scored for the presence of revertant colonies using an automated colony counting system. The plates were viewed microscopically for evidence of thinning (toxicity). Manual counts were performed at 5000 μg/plate because of test item precipitation. Further sporadic manual counts were also performed due to spreading colonies which prevented an accurate automated count.
Evaluation criteria:
There are several criteria for determining a positive result. Any, one, or all of the following can be used to determine the overall result of the study:
1. A dose-related increase in mutant frequency over the dose range tested (De Serres and Shelby, 1979).
2. A reproducible increase at one or more concentrations.
3. Biological relevance against in-house historical control ranges.
4. A fold increase greater than two times the concurrent solvent control for TA100, TA98 and WP2uvrA or a three-fold increase for TA1535 and TA1537 (especially if accompanied by an out-of-historical range response (Cariello and Piegorsch, 1996)).
5. Statistical analysis of data as determined by UKEMS (Mahon et al., 1989).

A test item will be considered non-mutagenic (negative) in the test system if the above criteria are not met.

Although most experiments will give clear positive or negative results, in some instances the data generated will prohibit making a definite judgment about test item activity. Results of this type will be reported as equivocal.

Acceptability criteria are listed in 'Any other information on materials incl. methods'.
Statistics:
Statistical significance was confirmed by using Dunnetts Regression Analysis (* = p < 0.05) for those values that indicate statistically significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies compared to the concurrent solvent control. Values that are statistically significant but are within the in-house historical vehicle/untreated control range are not reported in the tables section.
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium, other: TA1535, TA100, TA1537, TA98
Remarks:
Experiment 1 (plate incorporation)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Remarks:
Experiment 1 (plate incorporation)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium, other: TA1535, TA100, TA1537, TA98
Remarks:
Experiment 2 (pre-incubation)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Remarks:
Experiment 2 (pre-incubation)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
MAIN TEST: Test results for experiment 1 can be found in Table 2,3 and experiment 2 in Table 3,4 in 'Any other information on results incl. tables'.

TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: tested up to levels of precipitation (above 500 μg/plate)

HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA (with ranges, means and standard deviation and confidence interval (e.g. 95%)
- Positive historical control data: see Table 1 in ‘Any other information on results incl. tables’.
- Negative (solvent/vehicle) historical control data: see Table 1 in ‘Any other information on results incl. tables’.

Table 1. Historical positive control and vehicle/negative control values 2017

TA100

 

 

TA1535

 

 

WP2uvrA

 

 

TA98

 

 

TA1537

 

 

 

-S9

+S9

-S9

+S9

-S9

+S9

-S9

+S9

-S9

+S9

Combined vehicle and untreated control values

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Values

472

463

950

477

862

431

935

462

918

449

Mean

92

92

18

17

25

31

22

26

13

14

SD

14.4

15.4

6.5

7.1

7.0

7.4

6.9

6.8

3.4

3.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Positive control values

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Values

472

463

475

472

431

431

468

462

459

448

Mean

769

1415

773

260

682

257

224

191

305

380

SD

353.2

553.3

5.66

71.1

231.3

132.5

62.9

83.9

132.9

113.8

Table 2. Experiment 1 – Without Metabolic Activation (Plate Incorporation)

Test Period

From: 17 May 2018

To: 20 May 2018

 

S9-Mix (-)

Dose Level Per Plate

Number of revertants (mean) +/- SD

Base-pair substitution strains

Frameshift strains

TA100

TA1535

WP2uvrA

TA98

TA1537

Solvent Control (DMF)

150

125

118

(131)

16.8#

13

18

29

(20)

8.2

30

24

20

(25)

5.0

31

15

19

(22)

8.3

15

6

8

(10)

4.7

 

1.5 µg

116

127

133

(125)

8.6

24

34

14

(24)

10.0

29

23

22

(25)

3.8

25

24

17

(22)

4.4

10

12

7

(10)

2.5

 

5 µg

132

96

130

(119)

20.2

18

21

13

(17)

4.0

45

25

30

(33)

10.4

22

21

18

(20)

2.1

4

11

7

(7)

3.5

 

15 µg

109

132

119

(120)

11.5

13

14

25

(17)

6.7

19

20

27

(22)

4.4

15

22

27

(21)

6.0

4

6

16

(9)

6.4

 

50 µg

128

108

126

(121)

11.0

16

10

9

(12)

3.8

20

20

28

(23)

4.6

16

25

26

(22)

5.5

8

8

11

(9)

1.7

 

150 µg

105

116

150

(124)

23.5

13

10

9

(11)

2.1

28

26

32

(29)

3.1

25

32

31

(29)

3.8

5

13

24

(14)

9.5

 

500 µg

102 P

138 P

128 P

(123)

18.6

13 P

11 P

18 P

(14)

3.6

22 P

39 P

34 P

(32)

8.7

19 P

13 P

15 P

(16)

3.1

11 P

7 P

14 P

(11)

3.5

 

1500 µg

149 P

127 P

98 P

(125)

25.6

11 P

18 P

12 P

(14)

3.8

30 P

21 P

23 P

(25)

4.7

16 P

23 P

19 P

(19)

3.5

15P

16P

25 P

(19)

5.5

 

5000 µg

103 P

99 P

118 P

(107)

10.0

22 P

12 P

15 P

(16)

5.1

27 P

28 P

22 P

(26)

3.2

28 P

23 P

17 P

(23)

5.5

12 P

14 P

13 P

(13)

1.0

Positive controls S9-Mix (-)

 

Name Dose Level

No. of Revertants

ENNG

ENNG

ENNG

4NQO

9AA

3 µg

5 µg

2 µg

0.2 µg

80 µg

404

549

541

(498)

81.5

866

905

708

(826)

104.3

341

389

421

(384)

40.3

206

224

253

(228)

23.7

272

439

425

(379)

92.6

ENNG N-ethyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine

4NQO 4-Nitroquinoline-1-oxide

9AA 9-Aminoacridine

P Test item precipitate

# Standard deviation

 

Table 3. Test Results: Experiment 1 – With Metabolic Activation (Plate Incorporation)

Test Period

From: 17 May 2018

To: 20 May 2018

 

S9-Mix (+)

Dose Level Per Plate

Number of revertants (mean) +/- SD

Base-pair substitution strains

Frameshift strains

TA100

TA1535

WP2uvrA

TA98

TA1537

Solvent Control (DMF)

147

125

141

(138)

11.4#

26

20

18

(21)

4.2

29

29

19

(26)

5.8

19

27

25

(24)

4.2

5

8

9

(7)

2.1

 

1.5 µg

112

95

99

(102)

8.9

22

24

23

(23)

1.0

26

14

30

(23)

8.3

26

18

21

(22)

4.0

3

8

8

(6)

2.9

 

5 µg

150

106

114

(123)

23.4

16

26

23

(22)

5.1

23

22

36

(27)

7.8

21

28

21

(23)

4.0

3

8

6

(6)

2.5

 

15 µg

114

138

140

(131)

14.5

12

21

17

(17)

4.5

28

22

35

(28)

6.5

24

14

35

(24)

10.5

7

10

5

(7)

2.5

 

50 µg

153

128

134

(138)

13.1

14

10

14

(13)

2.3

27

37

34

(33)

5.1

29

15

33

(26)

9.5

8

12

11

(10)

2.1

 

150 µg

147

139

101

(129)

24.6

10

10

23

(14)

7.5

27

23

27

(26)

2.3

19

20

32

(24)

7.2

13

10

16

(13)

3.0

 

500 µg

83 P

93 P

102 P

(93)

9.5

12 P

8 P

17 P

(12)

4.5

32 P

27 P

40 P

(33)

6.6

26 P

28 P

36 P

(30)

5.3

7 P

15 P

19 P

(14)

6.1

 

1500 µg

124 P

17P

18P

(109)

13.0

15 P

21 P

7 P

(14)

7.0

33 P

29 P

30 P

(27)

5.5

17 P

36 P

21 P

(25)

10.0

9 P

9 P

11 P

(10)

1.2

 

5000 µg

100 P

102 P

110 P

(104)

5.3

13 P

17 P

16 P

(15)

2.1

30 P

30 P

24 P

(28)

3.5

24 P

20 P

22 P

(22)

2.0

12 P

12 P

11 P

(12)

0.6

Positive controls S9-Mix (+)

 

Name Dose Level

No. of Revertants

2AA

2AA

2AA

BP

2AA

1 µg

2 µg

10 µg

5 µg

2 µg

2441

1766

2256

(2154)

348.8

386

360

356

(367)

16.3

217

221

183

(207)

20.9

133

130

133

(132)

1.7

371

290

333

(331)

40.5

BP Benzo(a)pyrene

2AA 2-Aminoanthracene

P Test item precipitate

# Standard deviation

 

Table 4. Experiment 2 – Without Metabolic Activation (Pre-Incubation)

Test Period

From: 22 May 2018

To: 25 May 2018

 

S9-Mix (-)

Dose Level Per Plate

Number of revertants (mean) +/- SD

Base-pair substitution strains

Frameshift strains

TA100

TA1535

WP2uvrA

TA98

TA1537

Solvent Control (DMF)

104

103

107

(105)

2.1#

9

8

17

(11)

4.9

21

19

26

(22)

3.6

14

18

13

(15)

2.6

13

7

5

(8)

4.2

 

15 µg

120

116

121

(119)

2.6

12

14

19

(15)

3.6

29

25

19

(24)

5.0

15

13

15

(14)

1.2

4

6

3

(4)

1.5

 

50 µg

105

101

92

(99)

6.7

12

9

14

(12)

2.5

25

9

15

(16)

8.1

18

13

7

(13)

5.5

12

5

3

(7)

4.7

 

150 µg

103

111

110

(108)

4.4

12

7

18

(12)

5.5

20

21

28

(23)

4.4

17

18

16

(17)

1.0

7

8

3

(6)

2.6

 

500 µg

105 P

109 P

97 P

(104)

6.1

18 P

10 P

9 P

(12)

4.9

31 P

29 P

15 P

(25)

8.7

16 P

21 P

19 P

(19)

2.5

4 P

10 P

16 P

(10)

6.0

 

1500 µg

86 P

98 P

97 P

(94)

6.7

14 P

9 P

11 P

(11)

2.5

20 P

18 P

18 P

(19)

1.2

15 P

23 P

13 P

(17)

5.3

6 P

5 P

8 P

(6)

1.5

 

5000 µg

89 P

88 P

91 P

(89)

1.5

16 P

13 P

9 P

(13)

3.5

24 P

27 P

18 P

(23)

4.6

11 P

17 P

14 P

(14)

3.0

8 P

10 P

12 P

(10)

2.0

Positive controls S9-Mix (-)

 

Name Dose Level

No. of Revertants

ENNG

ENNG

ENNG

4NQO

9AA

3 µg

5 µg

2 µg

0.2 µg

80 µg

947

811

852

(870)

69.8

687

535

665

(629)

82.1

554

543

412

(503)

79.0

160

150

130

(147)

15.3

412

356

266

(345)

73.7

ENNG N-ethyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine

4NQO 4-Nitroquinoline-1-oxide

9AA 9-Aminoacridine

P Test item precipitate

# Standard deviation

 

Table 5. Experiment 2 – With Metabolic Activation (Pre-Incubation)

Test Period

From: 22 May 2018

To: 25 May 2018

 

S9-Mix (+)

Dose Level Per Plate

Number of revertants (mean) +/- SD

Base-pair substitution strains

Frameshift strains

TA100

TA1535

WP2uvrA

TA98

TA1537

Solvent Control (DMF)

118

117

125

(120)

4.4#

9

10

9

(9)

0.6

39

26

37

(34)

7.0

25

19

29

(24)

5.0

10

10

18

(13)

4.6

 

15 µg

125

111

112

(116)

7.8

7

9

13

(10)

3.1

21

36

29

(29)

7.5

21

30

27

(26)

4.6

21

12

16

(16)

4.5

 

50 µg

120

125

134

(126)

7.1

17

11

8

(12)

4.6

28

22

28

(26)

3.5

27

25

30

(27)

2.5

6

11

11

(9)

2.9

 

150 µg

113

118

111

(114)

3.6

9

14

18

(14)

4.5

23

29

25

(26)

3.1

21

32

26

(26)

5.5

12

14

17

(14)

2.5

 

500 µg

131 P

121 P

111 P

(121)

10.0

11 P

11 P

14 P

(12)

1.7

29 P

38 P

31 P

(33)

4.7

30 P

28 P

23 P

(27)

3.6

19P

20P

10 P

(16)

5.5

 

1500 µg

100 P

124 P

84 P

(103)

20.1

15 P

17 P

13 P

(15)

2.0

19 P

16 P

14 P

(16)

2.5

21 P

32 P

19 P

(24)

7.0

8 P

17 P

14 P

(13)

4.6

 

5000 µg

93 P

97 P

101 P

(97)

4.0

10 P

31 P

32 P

(12)

1.5

30 P

21 P

23 P

(25)

4.7

24 P

25 P

19 P

(23)

3.2

14 P

12 P

4 P

(10)

5.3

Positive controls S9-Mix (+)

 

Name Dose Level

No. of Revertants

2AA

2AA

2AA

BP

2AA

1 µg

2 µg

10 µg

5 µg

2 µg

1701

2056

1818

(1858)

180.9

262

207

233

(234)

27.5

156

161

163

(160)

3.6

160

175

148

(161)

13.5

310

256

262

(276)

29.6

BP Benzo(a)pyrene

2AA 2-Aminoanthracene

P Test item precipitate

# Standard deviation

Conclusions:
In this GLP compliant study, performed according to OECD 471, the test substance and its metabolites did not induce gene mutations in the tested strains of S. typhimurium and E. coli
Executive summary:

In this GLP compliant study, performed according to OECD 471, the mutagenic potential of the test substance was evaluated in vitro inSalmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100 and Escherichia coli strain WP2uvrA. These strains were treated with suspensions of the test item using both the Ames plate incorporation and pre-incubation methods at up to eight dose levels, in triplicate, both with and without the addition of a rat liver homogenate metabolizing system (10% liver S9 in standard co-factors). The dose range for Experiment 1 (plate incorporation) was based on OECD TG 471 and was 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate. The experiment was repeated on a separate day (pre-incubation method) using fresh cultures of the bacterial strains and fresh test item formulations. The dose range was amended following the results of Experiment 1 and was 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate. Six test item concentrations per bacterial strain were selected in Experiment 2 in order to achieve both four non-toxic dose levels and the potential toxicity of the test item following the change in test methodology. All of the plates were incubated at 37 ± 3oC for approximately 48 hours and scored for the presence of revertant colonies using an automated colony counting system. The plates were viewed microscopically for evidence of thinning (toxicity). Manual counts were performed at 5000 µg/plate because of test item precipitation. A single manual count was also performed due to spreading colonies which prevented an accurate automated count.

The vehicle (dimethyl formamide) control plates gave counts of revertant colonies within the normal range. All of the positive control chemicals used in the test induced marked increases

in the frequency of revertant colonies, both with and without metabolic activation. Thus, the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the S9-mix were validated.There was no visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawn at any dose level, either in the presence or absence of metabolic activation (S9-mix), in the first mutation test (plate incorporation method). No biologically relevant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test item, either with or without metabolic activation (S9-mix) in Experiment 2 (pre-incubation method). Minor statistical values were noted in Experiment 2 (TA100 at 15 μg/plate in the absence of S9-mix), however this response was within the in-house historical vehicle/untreated control range for the strain and was, therefore considered of no biological relevance. In conclusion, the test substance was considered to be non-mutagenic under the conditions of this test.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (negative)

Additional information

In vitro gene mutation in bacteria

In this GLP compliant study, performed according to OECD 471, the mutagenic potential of the test substance was evaluated in vitro in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100 and Escherichia coli strain WP2uvrA. These strains were treated with suspensions of the test item using both the Ames plate incorporation and pre-incubation methods at up to eight dose levels, in triplicate, both with and without the addition of a rat liver homogenate metabolising system (10% liver S9 in standard co-factors). The dose range for Experiment 1 (plate incorporation) was based on OECD TG 471 and was 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate. A second experiment was done on a separate day (pre-incubation method) using fresh cultures of the bacterial strains and fresh test item formulations. The dose range was amended following the results of Experiment 1 and was 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate. Six test item concentrations per bacterial strain were selected in Experiment 2 in order to achieve both four non-toxic dose levels and the potential toxicity of the test item following the change in test methodology. All of the plates were incubated at 37 ± 3 oC for approximately 48 hours and scored for the presence of revertant colonies using an automated colony counting system. The plates were viewed microscopically for evidence of thinning (toxicity). Manual counts were performed at 5000 µg/plate because of test item precipitation. A single manual count was also performed due to spreading colonies which prevented an accurate automated count.

The vehicle (dimethyl formamide) control plates gave counts of revertant colonies within the normal range. All of the positive control chemicals used in the test induced marked increases

in the frequency of revertant colonies, both with and without metabolic activation. Thus, the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the S9-mix were validated. There was no visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawn at any dose level, either in the presence or absence of metabolic activation (S9-mix), in the first mutation test (plate incorporation method). No biologically relevant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test item, either with or without metabolic activation (S9-mix) in Experiment 2 (pre-incubation method). Minor statistically significant differences were noted in Experiment 2 (TA100 at 15 μg/plate in the absence of S9-mix), however this response was within the in-house historical vehicle/untreated control range for the strain and was, therefore considered of no biological relevance. In conclusion, the test substance was considered to be non-mutagenic under the conditions of this test.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on the available data classification for genetic toxicity is not warranted in accordance with EU Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (CLP) Regulation No. 1272/2008.