Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 281-984-0 | CAS number: 84082-36-0 Extractives and their physically modified derivatives such as tinctures, concretes, absolutes, essential oils, oleoresins, terpenes, terpene-free fractions, distillates, residues, etc., obtained from Medicago sativa, Leguminosae.
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 07-25 February 2019
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- The tester strain WP2uvrA was accidentally additionally tested in the dose range finding test.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- The tester strain WP2uvrA was accidentally additionally tested in the dose range finding test.
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: AL01
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 10.09.2019
- Purity test date: not available
STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: refrigerated
- Stability under test conditions: stable
- Solubility and stability of the test substance in the solvent/vehicle: water solubility 5.35 mg/L at 25°C
- Reactivity of the test substance with the solvent/vehicle of the cell culture medium: not applicable
TREATMENT OF TEST MATERIAL PRIOR TO TESTING
- Treatment of test material prior to testing: diluted in Milli-Q water, the stock solution was treated with ultrasonic waves to obtain a homogeneous suspension
- Preliminary purification step (if any): none
- Final dilution of a dissolved solid, stock liquid or gel: not applicable
- Final preparation of a solid: not applicable
OTHER SPECIFICS: none - Target gene:
- his
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Remarks:
- Tested only in direct plate assay
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 1.7, 5.4, 17, 52, 164, 512, 1600 and 5000 µg/plate (TA 100, WP2uvrA; direct plate assay, dose-range finding)
52, 164, 512, 1600 and 5000 µg/plate (TA 98, TA 102, TA1535, TA 1537; direct plate assay)
52, 164, 512, 1600 and 5000 µg/plate (TA 98, TA 100, TA 102, TA1535, TA 1537; pre-incubation assay) - Vehicle / solvent:
- Milli-Q water
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- 2-nitrofluorene
- sodium azide
- methylmethanesulfonate
- other: ICR-191 (-S9 mix), tert-butyl hyperoxide (-S9 mix), 2-aminoanthracene (+S9 mix)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: agar plates, 1st experiment: direct plate assay, 2nd experiment: pre-incubation assay
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 30 ± 2 minutes at 70 rpm at 37 ± 1°C (2nd experiment)
- Exposure duration: 48 ± 4 h at 37 ± 1°C (1st and 2nd experiment)
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: triplicates
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: visual inspection - Rationale for test conditions:
- In accodrance with the OECD Testing Guideline 471.
- Evaluation criteria:
- A test item is considered negative (not mutagenic) in the test if:
1) The total number of revertants in the tester strains TA100, TA102 and WP2uvrA is not greater than two times the concurrent control, and the total number of revertants in tester strain TA1535, TA1537 and TA98 is not greater than three times the concurrent control.
2) The negative response should be reproducible in at least one independently repeated experiment.
A test item is considered positive (mutagenic) in the test if:
1) The total number of revertants in the tester strains TA100, TA102 and WP2uvrA is greater than two times the concurrent control, or the total number of revertants in tester strain TA1535, TA1537 and TA98, is greater than three times the concurrent control.
2) In case a second experiment is performed when a positive response is observed in one of the tester strains, the positive response should be reproducible in at least one independently repeated experiment. - Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Remarks:
- Only direct plate assay
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- In a Bacterial Reverse Mutation assay, conducted according to OECD test guideline 471 and to GLP, Alfalfa, ext. was concluded to have negative mutagenic potential.
- Executive summary:
Bacterial Reverse Mutation assay conducted according to OECD test guideline 471 and to GLP was performed to determine mutagenic potential of Alfalfa, ext.
In the dose-range finding study, the test item was initially tested up to concentrations of 5000 µg/plate in the strains TA100 and WP2uvrA in the direct plate assay. The bacterial background lawn was not reduced at any of the concentrations tested and no biologically relevant decrease in the number of revertants was observed. Results of this dose-range finding test were reported as part of the first mutation assay.
In the first mutation experiment, the test item was tested at a concentration range of 52 to 5000 µg/plate in the strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA102. The test item did not precipitate on the plates at these dose levels. The bacterial background lawn was not reduced at any of the concentrations tested and no biologically relevant decrease in the number of revertants was observed.
In the second mutation experiment, the test item was tested at a concentration range of 52 to 5000 µg/plate in the tester strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100 and TA102 in the pre-incubation assay. The bacterial background lawn was not reduced at any of the concentrations tested and no biologically relevant decrease in the number of revertants was observed.
In this study, acceptable responses were obtained for the negative and strain-specific positive control items indicating that the test conditions were adequate and that the metabolic activation system functioned properly.
The test item did not induce any increase in the number of revertant (His+) colonies in any of the five Salmonella tester strains and in the number of revertant (Trp+) colonies in E. coli tester strain WP2uvrA both in the absence and presence of S9-metabolic activation. These results were confirmed in an independently repeated experiment.
In conclusion, based on the results of this study it is concluded that Alfalfa ext. is not mutagenic in the Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay and in the Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- test performed accoding to the original protocol of B.N. Ames
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: dehydrated alfalfa was purchased from commercial source.
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: not available
- Purity test date: not available
STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature
- Stability under test conditions: stable
- Solubility and stability of the test substance in the solvent/vehicle: stable
- Reactivity of the test substance with the solvent/vehicle of the cell culture medium: not available
TREATMENT OF TEST MATERIAL PRIOR TO TESTING
- Treatment of test material prior to testing: 60 g of plant material was shaken in 300 ml distilled acetone for 48 hours. The liquid portion was filter-sterilized using a Seitz cellulose filter and then stored until refrigeration until used.
- Preliminary purification step (if any): none
- Final dilution of a dissolved solid, stock liquid or gel: test solutions were prepared each day from the stock solution. Initial volumes of stock solution were rotary-evaporated to dryness and then reconstituted to a new volume with filter-sterilized distilled acetone to provide samples of original concentration or increased concentration of plant material. The reconstitution scheme was 21 ml stock solution evaporated to dryness and reconstituted to new volumes of 21, 12, 6 or 3 ml, which was 100, 57.1, 28.6 and 14.3% of the original volume or 1, 2, 3, and 7 times the original concentration of plant material. These were expressed as relative concentrations of 1, 2, 3, and 7, respectively.
- Final preparation of a solid: not applicable
OTHER SPECIFICS: none - Target gene:
- His
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: deficient in excision repair of DNA damage (uvrB)
- Remarks:
- susceptible to frameshift mutagens
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: deficient in excision repair of DNA damage (uvrB)
- Remarks:
- susceptible to base-pair substitution mutagens
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Relative concentratios of 1, 2, 3 and 7
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- acetone
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)
DURATION
- Preincubation period: none
- Exposure duration: 24 hours
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Triplicate plates were used for each determination and all positive (revertant number of at least twice the revertant control number) or toxic (revertant number of 0.5 or less than that of the revertant control number) responses were repeated at least twice. - Evaluation criteria:
- Test results were considered positive when the number of revertants induced by exposure to the test compound was as great or greater than twice the natural spontaneous mutation rate
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- In an in vitro gene mutation test in bacteria performed according to the original Ames protocol an acetone extract of alfalfa was concluded to have negative mutagenic potential in the presence and absence of metabolic activation.
- Executive summary:
The acetone extract of alfalfa was tested in the Ames assay in two Salmonella strains, TA98 and TA100 with and without metabolic activation (S9). It was tested at four different concentrations, 1, 2, 3 and 7 times the original concentration of stock solution prepared from the plant material. Alfalfa extract did not increase the number of revertants in either Salmonella strain.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- test performed according to original protocol of B.N. Ames.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: phytopreparation of alfalfa extract
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: not available
- Purity test date: not available
STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: not available
- Stability under test conditions: stable
- Solubility and stability of the test substance in the solvent/vehicle: stable
- Reactivity of the test substance with the solvent/vehicle of the cell culture medium: not available
TREATMENT OF TEST MATERIAL PRIOR TO TESTING
- Treatment of test material prior to testing: none
- Preliminary purification step (if any): none
- Final dilution of a dissolved solid, stock liquid or gel: 5 – 50 000 µg/plate
- Final preparation of a solid: not applicable
OTHER SPECIFICS: none - Target gene:
- His
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- water
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 2-acetylaminofluorene
- N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
- other: 2,7-diamino-4,9-dioxi-5,10-dioxo-4,5,9,10-tetrahydro-4,9-diazoprene (DDDTDP), 1,6-dinitropyrene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)
DURATION
- Preincubation period: not specified
- Exposure duration: not specified
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2 - Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- In an in vitro gene mutation test in bacteria performed according to the original Ames protocol a phyto-preparation derived from alfalfa extract was concluded to have negative mutagenic potential in the presence and absence of metabolic activation.
- Executive summary:
A phyto-preparation derived from alfalfa extract was tested in the Ames assay in TA 98, TA 100 and TA 1537 strains with and without metabolic activation (S9) at concentrations up to 50'000 µg/plate. The phyto-preparation did not increase the number of revertants in the presence and absence of metabolic activation. In addition, there were no signs of cytotoxicity even at the highest concentration.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro DNA damage and/or repair study
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: original protocol for SOS Chronoplast test (Quillardet & Hofnung, 1985))
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The assay consists of incubating the tester strain with increasing concentrations of the agent to be tested. After a time for protein synthesis, beta-galactosidase activity is assayed by a colorimetric assay.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- SOS/umu assay
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: phytopreparation of alfalfa extract
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: not available
- Purity test date: not available
STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: not available
- Stability under test conditions: stable
- Solubility and stability of the test substance in the solvent/vehicle: stable
- Reactivity of the test substance with the solvent/vehicle of the cell culture medium: not available
TREATMENT OF TEST MATERIAL PRIOR TO TESTING
- Treatment of test material prior to testing: none
- Preliminary purification step (if any): none
- Final dilution of a dissolved solid, stock liquid or gel: up to 38'500 µg/ml
- Final preparation of a solid: not applicable
OTHER SPECIFICS: none - Target gene:
- sfiA::lacZ operon fusion
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli, other: PQ37
- Metabolic activation:
- not applicable
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- The test item was tested at 20 concentrations, from 0.0734 to 38'500 µg/ml.
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Preincubation period: none
- Exposure duration: 2 hours
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: not specified - Evaluation criteria:
- A concentration-dependent increase in the induction factor by at least 2 times served, as an indicator of genotoxicity.
Cytotoxicity was indicated by a decrease, by more than 50%, of the alkaline phosphatase constitutive enzyme activity. - Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli, other: PQ37
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- above 10'000 ug/ml
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- No increase of galactosidase activity was observed up to 38’500 µg/ml. The SOS-induced potential (SOSIP, or the magnitude of the increase in the induction factor par unit mass of the test product) was determined at 0.0000251 per 1 µg. At concentrations above 10’000 µg/ml, the test substance deceased the alkaline phosphatase constitutive enzyme activity. The SOSIP of negative control was 4.06 per 1nmol. The minimum effective concentration of 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide was 2.53 nmol/ml, and the maximum induction of SOS functions was observed at the maximum studied concentration of 20.2 nmol/ml.
- Conclusions:
- The phyto-preparation derived from alfalfa extract did not to induce the SOS functions in Escherichia coli at concentrations up to 38’500 µg/ml indicating that it has no DNA-damaging potential.
- Executive summary:
SOS chromotest in the Escherichia coli PQ37 test strain was performed to determine the DNA-damaging potential of the phyto-preparation derived from alfalfa phyto-preparation. The test sample was tested at 20 different concentrations, from 0.0734 to 38'500 µg/ml and 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide served as a positive control. The duration of exposure was 2 hours.
A concentration-dependent increase in the induction factor by at least 2 times served as an indicator of genotoxicity. Cytotoxicity was indicated by a decrease, by more than 50%, of the alkaline phosphatase constitutive enzyme activity.
No increase of galactosidase activity was observed up to 38’500 µg/ml. The SOS-induced potential (SOSIP) was determined at 0.0000251 per 1 µg. At concentrations above 10’000 µg/ml, the test substance deceased the alkaline phosphatase constitutive enzyme activity. The SOSIP of positive control was 4.06 per 1 nmol.
Under the test conditions, the phyto-preparation derived from alfalfa phyto-preparation did not induce the SOS functions in Escherichia coli, indicating that it has no DNA-damaging potential.
Referenceopen allclose all
The natural mutation rates of the cultures unexposed to alfalfa extract were 14 and 74 per plate for TA 98 and TA 100 without the S9 mix and 20 and 73 with the S9 mix.
See attached additional information on results.
See attached additional information on results.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
Bacterial Reverse Mutation assay conducted according to OECD test guideline 471 and to GLP was performed to determine mutagenic potential of Alfalfa, ext.
In the dose-range finding study, the test item was initially tested up to concentrations of 5000 µg/plate in the strains TA100 and WP2uvrA in the direct plate assay. The bacterial background lawn was not reduced at any of the concentrations tested and no biologically relevant decrease in the number of revertants was observed. Results of this dose-range finding test were reported as part of the first mutation assay.
In the first mutation experiment, the test item was tested at a concentration range of 52 to 5000 µg/plate in the strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA102. The test item did not precipitate on the plates at these dose levels. The bacterial background lawn was not reduced at any of the concentrations tested and no biologically relevant decrease in the number of revertants was observed.
In the second mutation experiment, the test item was tested at a concentration range of 52 to 5000 µg/plate in the tester strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100 and TA102 in the pre-incubation assay. The bacterial background lawn was not reduced at any of the concentrations tested and no biologically relevant decrease in the number of revertants was observed.
The test item did not induce any increase in the number of revertant (His+) colonies in any of the five Salmonella tester strains and in the number of revertant (Trp+) colonies in E. coli tester strain WP2uvrA both in the absence and presence of S9-metabolic activation.
The acetone extract of alfalfa was tested in the Ames assay in two Salmonella strains, TA98 and TA100 with and without metabolic activation (S9). It did not increase the number of revertants in either Salmonella strain.
A phyto-preparation derived from alfalfa extract was tested in the Ames assay in TA98, TA100 and TA1537 strains with and without metabolic activation (S9) at concentrations up to 50’000 µg/plate. It did not increase the number of revertants in the presence and absence of metabolic activation.
SOS chromotest in the Escherichia coli PQ37 test strain was performed to determine the DNA-damaging potential of the phyto-preparation derived from alfalfa extract applied at 20 different concentrations (0.0734 to 38 500 µg/ml). Under the test conditions, the phyto-preparation did not to induce the SOS functions in Escherichia coli, indicating that it has no DNA-damaging potential.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Appropriate tests were performed on the target substance and suitable analogues of Alfalfa, ext. to assess its mutagenic potential. The target and analogue substances did not show any mutagenic potential under the conditions of the studies. Therefore, it is concluded that Alfalfa, ext. is not mutagenic, and it does not need to be classified for mutagenicity according to the criteria outlined in Annex I of CLP Regulation (EC) 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.