Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 618-312-6 | CAS number: 898566-17-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2010-05-26 to 2010-06-25
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study
- Remarks:
- Well documented study report, GLP compliant, and according to Japanese Guidelines for Screening Mutagenicity Testing Of Chemicals. No deviations from the study protocol were recorded.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 010
- Report date:
- 2010
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- JAPAN: Guidelines for Screening Mutagenicity Testing Of Chemicals
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- not specified
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2-(4-fluorophenyl)-5-(5-iodo-2-methylbenzyl)thiophene
- EC Number:
- 618-312-6
- Cas Number:
- 898566-17-1
- Molecular formula:
- C18H14FIS
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-(4-fluorophenyl)-5-(5-iodo-2-methylbenzyl)thiophene
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study reports): JNJ-39453193-AAA (T003063)
- Physical state: solid (powder)
- Appearance: white to almost white powder
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and batch No.of test material: Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, 00541426
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: Not specified
- Purity test date: Not specified
- Purity: 100%
- Physical description: Pale yellow-white crystalline powder
STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: Not indicated
- Stability under test conditions: Stable at room temperature (under the airtight condition)
- Solubility and stability of the test substance in the solvent/vehicle: in DMSO: 50 mg/mL
- Reactivity of the test substance with the solvent/vehicle of the cell culture medium: Not indicated
OTHER SPECIFICS: The test substance was handled under the yellow light condition and stored under the light-shielded condition, because information about stability of the test substance under the light condition was not provided from sponsor.
Method
- Target gene:
- histidine locus (histidine-dependent S. typhimurium strains); tryptophan locus (tryptophan-dependent E.coli strain)
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Phenobarbital/5,6-benzoflavone induced rat liver (S9) from male Sprague-Dawley rats
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Dose-finding assay: 0, 1.2, 4.9, 20, 78, 313, 1250, 5000 µg/plate (maximum dose recommended by the guideline)
Main assay: 156, 313, 625, 1250, 2500, 5000 µg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: According to the information provided by the sponsor, the solubility in DMSO is 50 mg/mL or more, and the test substance is stable in DMSO. DMSO was selected as the solvent for the test substance, because the preliminary test on solvent selection in the test facility revealed that the test substance was soluble at 5% (w/v) in DMSO and the solution was stable. DMSO was dehydrated using Molecular Sieves 4A just before use.
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- With S9-mix, all strains, 0.5 µg/plate (TA98), 1.0 µg/plate (TA100), 2.0 µg/plate (TA1535, TA1537), 10.0 µg/plate (WP2 uvrA)
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-(2-Furyl)-3-(5-nitro-2-furyl)acrylamide
- Remarks:
- Without S9-mix, 0.01 µg/plate (TA100, WP2 uvrA), 0.1 µg/plate (TA98)
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- Remarks:
- Without S9-mix, 0.5 µg/plate (TA1535)
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 6-Chloro-9-[3-(2-chloroethylamino)-propylamino]-2-methoxyacridine dihydrochloride
- Remarks:
- Without S9-mix, 1.0 µg/plate (TA1537)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: preincubation method
The 0.5 mL of 0.1 M Na-phosphate buffer with pH 7.4 (or 0.5 mL of S9 Mix in case of metabolic activation assay) was added to 0.1 mL of the test substance solution, and then 0.1 mL each of bacterial culture was added. The mixture was incubated at 37ºC for 20 minutes with shaking (“pre-incubation”). The 2.0 mL of top agar was added to the mixture, and the resultant mixture was overlaid onto a minimum glucose agar plate. The agar solution [0.6% agar (Bacto-Agar DIFCO), 0.5% NaCl] supplemented with 0.5 mM L-histidine and 0.5 mM D-biotin solution for S. typhimurium or with 0.5 mM L-tryptophan solution for E. coli at a volume ratio of 10:1 was used as a top agar.
The plates were incubated at 37ºC for 48 hours, and stored at 4ºC until colony counting if the incubation finished on a holiday. After the incubation, the growth inhibition of bacterial strain and the precipitation were examined, and the revertant colonies were counted.
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 20 minutes
- Exposure duration: 48h
- Selection time: 48h (simultaneous with exposure)
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): histidine (S. typhimurium); tryptophan (E. coli)
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: duplicate at each dose level; triplicate for negative control
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: growth inhibition (dose-related)
COLONY COUNTING:
Revertant colonies within a circle with about 80 mm diameter on a plate with 86 mm diameter (inner diameter: 84 mm) were counted with an automatic colony counter. The count data was corrected based on the area for uncounted colonies by using a personal computer. The revertant colonies at 1250 μg/plate or more under the conditions of S9 (±) could not be counted by the automatic colony counter due to the test substance precipitation; therefore, the colonies were counted manually. By manual counting,all number of revertant colonies were counted without correction.
OTHER:
- For all plates, the growth inhibition of bacterial strain was observed with a stereoscopic microscope (40-fold magnification) and the precipitation was observed by unaided eyes.
- For each dose, the mean number of revertant colonies on two or more plates was calculated and rounded off to an integral number. - Evaluation criteria:
- When the number of revertant colonies on the test substance treatment plate is increased 2-fold or more compared to the negative control value, and the increase is dose-dependent and reproducible between the dose-finding assay and the main assay, the test substance is judged to be positive for mutagenicity. Otherwise, the test substance is judged as negative. When the test substance is judged to be positive, the activity of mutagenicity is calculated.
- Statistics:
- No statistical analysis is performed for data analysis.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Water solubility: Information about solubility and stability of the test substance in water is not provided.
- Precipitation: In the dose-finding assay, white precipitates of the test substance were observed at 20 μg/plate or more (without S9) and at 78 μg/plate or more (with S9); In the main assay, white precipitates of the test substance were observed at 156 μg/plate or more (with and without S9).
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
In the dose-finding assay, 5000 μg/plate was set as the maximum dose, which is recommended by the guideline, and a total of 7 doses were set with a common ratio of 4. Based on the results of the dose-finding assay, the highest dose in the main assay was set at 5000 μg/plate, and a total of 6 doses were set with a common ratio of 2, including at lease one dose producing precipitation.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
In the dose-finding assay and the main assay, the negative control values were within the acceptable range (mean± 2.5SD) specified based on the historical data of the test facility. The positive controls induced revertant colonies more than 2-fold of the negative control value in each strain. No bacterial growth due to contamination was observed in the sterility tests. These results indicated the assays were performed properly.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY: No growth inhibition of bacteria by the test substance was observed in any of the two experiments. - Remarks on result:
- other: Dose-finding assay
Any other information on results incl. tables
Validity of assays
In the dose-finding assay and the main assay, the negative control values were within the acceptable range (mean±2.5SD) specified based on the historical data of the test facility. The positive controls induced revertant colonies more than 2-fold of the negative control value in each strain. No bacterial growth due to contamination was observed in the sterility tests. These results indicated the
assays were performed properly.
Maximum mutagenic activity
The maximum mutagenic activity was 5.64×10 rev./mg (at 5000 μg/plate in TA100 without S9 in the dose-finding assay).
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results:
negative with metabolic activation
negative without metabolic activation
Based on the results, it was concluded that T003063 was negative for mutagenicity under the test conditions of this study.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.