Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 439-510-7 | CAS number: 149048-48-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
In vitro:
Gene mutation (Bacterial reverse mutation assay / Ames test): negative
with and without metabolic activation in S. typhimurium TA 1535,
TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2 (equivalent to OECD 471) (BML
Inc., 1997).
Cytogenicity in mammalian
cells: negative with and without metabolic activation in Chinese hamster
lung cells (OECD 473) (JBS Inc., 2007).
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 12/08/1997 to 02/10/1997
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Remarks:
- The study was conducted according to a protocol that is similar to the appropriate OECD test guideline, with acceptable restrictions. The restrictions were that only duplicate plates were used.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: "Standards for Mutagenicity Tests using Microorganisms" (Notification No. 77, Ministry of Labour, Japan, September 1, 1988
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Only duplicate plates tested
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- Histidine (Salmonella strains) and tryptophan (E. coli strain)
Base-pair substitution type: Salmonella typhimurium TA100, TA1535, and Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA.
Frame-shift type: Salmonella typhimurium TA98, TA1537. - Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- phenobarbital and 5,6-benzoflavene induced rat
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 1.2, 4.9, 20, 78, 313, 1250 and 5000 µg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- Test substance
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO.
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: None given.
Positive controls
- AF-2, ICR-191, 2AA and B[a]P: DMSO.
- sodium azide: distilled water. - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-(2-furyl)-3-(5-nitro-2-furyl)acrylamide (AF-2)
- Remarks:
- -MA: TA 100, WP2 uvrA - 0.01 µg/plate; TA 98 - 0.1 µg/plate
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- Remarks:
- -MA: TA 1535 - 0.5 µg/plate
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-Methoxy-6-chloro-9-[3-(2-chloroethyl)aminopropylamino]acridine·2HCl (ICR-191)
- Remarks:
- -MA: TA 1537 - 1.0 µg/plate
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- +MA: TA 1535 - 2.0 µg/plate; WP2 uvrA - 10.0 µg/plate
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- no
- True negative controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- no
- Positive control substance:
- benzo(a)pyrene
- Remarks:
- +MA: TA 100, TA 98, TA 1537 - 5.0 µg/plate
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- ACTIVATION:
Composition of S9 mix (per 1 ml):
Water: 0.9 mL
S9: 0.1 mL
MgCl2: 8.0 µmol
KCl: 33.0 µmol
G-6-P: 5.0 µmol
NADPH: 4.0 µmol
NADH: 4.0 µmol
Na-phosphate buffer (pH 7.4): 100.0 µmol
METHOD OF APPLICATION: preincubation
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 20 minutes at 37°C
- Exposure duration: 48 hours at 37°C
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): minimal glucose agar
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: duplicate plates. An initial dose range-finding study was followed by two further independent experiments.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY: reduction in number of revertant colonies - Evaluation criteria:
- If the number of revertant colonies on the test plates increased significantly in comparison with that on the control plates (based on twice as many as that of the negative control), and dose-response and reproducibility were also observed, the test substance was judged to be positive.
- Statistics:
- No statistical analysis done.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RANGE-FINDING STUDY: Growth inhibition was determined for seven concentrations of test substance: 1.2, 4.9, 20, 78, 313, 1250 and 5000 µg/plate.
Growth inhibition was observed as follows:
≥4.9 µg/plate for TA1537 without S9.
≥20 µg/plate for TA100, TA1535 and TA98 without S9.
≥78 µg/plate for E.coli WP2 uvrA without metabolic activation.
Hence, the highest concentrations of test substance used in the main test were as follows:
S. typhimurium TA1537 without S9: 4.9 µg/plate.
S. typhimurium TA100, TA1535, TA98 without S9: 20 µg/plate.
E. coli WP2 uvrA without S9: 78g µg/plate.
All S. typhimurium strains with S9: 313 µg/plate.
E. coli WP2 uvrA with S9: 1250 µg/plate. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Conclusions:
- The submission substance has been tested for mutagenicity to bacteria in a study conducted according to a protocol that is similar to OECD 471. No evidence for a test substance induced increase in the number of revertants was observed when tested up to cytotoxic concentrations with and without metabolic activation in S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2 using the preincubation method in the initial and the repeat experiment. Appropriate positive and solvent controls were included and gave expected results. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for mutagenicity under the conditions of the test.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 05/04/2007 to 12/07/2007
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 1997
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Target gene:
- N/A
- Species / strain / cell type:
- other: CHO/IU
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: liquid medium of Eagle's MEM supplemented with 10% of dehydrated HPLC grade dimethylsulfoxide
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: yes
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: yes - Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: None given. - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- benzo(a)pyrene
- mitomycin C
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- ACTIVATION:
S9 mix included 30% S9 fraction, MgCl2, KCl, glucose-6-phosphate and NADP. The final concentration of S9 was 5%
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 6 h with and without metabolic activation; 24 hours without metabolic activation
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 18 hours (following 6 h treatment)
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 24 hours
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): colcemid
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Giesma
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: The initial pulse treatment with and without metabolic activation was followed by 24 and 28 hour exposure without metabolic activation. Duplicate cultures do not appear to have been used.
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 100 metaphases per slide (200 at each dose level) evaluated for chromosome aberrations;
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: other: cell viability
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: yes
- Determination of endoreplication: yes - Evaluation criteria:
- The test substance was judged positive for clastogenicity when a clear dose-related increase in the frequency of the aberrant cells and 10% or more increase in the frequency of the aberrant cells were both observed.
- Statistics:
- No statistical analysis was done.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mammalian cell line, other: Chinese hamster lung cell line CHL/IU.
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Remarks:
- 50% viability occurred between 0.74 and 1.11 mg/ml -MA and 1.11 and 1.67 mg/mg +MA, 6 hour treatment
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH:
- Effects of osmolality:
- Evaporation from medium:
- Water solubility:
- Precipitation: precipitation occurred but did not interfere.
- Other confounding effects: pH was raised, but not to a level which caused an increase in chromosome aberrations
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY: - Conclusions:
- The submission substance has been tested in an in vitro cytogenicity assay conducted in accordance with OECD 473 (1997) and in compliance with GLP. No test substance induced increase in the frequency of structural or numerical aberrations was observed when the substance was tested in the presence and absence of metabolic activation up to cytotoxic concentrations in Chinese hamster lung cells. Appropriate positive and solvent controls were included and gave expected results. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for the induction of chromosome aberrations under the conditions of the test.
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 1: Results of chromosome aberration test - Treatment condition 6-18 with and without metabolic activation
Dose (mg/ml) |
Number of structural aberrations |
Viability of cells (%) |
Number of numerical aberrations |
|||
-MA |
+MA |
-MA |
+MA |
-MA |
+MA |
|
Vehicle control |
5 |
1 |
100 |
100 |
0 |
1 |
0.33 |
4 |
- |
93 |
- |
4 |
- |
0.49 |
4 |
2 |
81 |
97 |
2 |
3 |
0.74 |
4 |
4 |
82 |
86 |
3 |
0 |
1.11 |
* |
3 |
35 |
88 |
* |
3 |
1.67 |
* |
* |
19 |
30 |
* |
* |
2.50 |
* |
* |
0 |
0 |
* |
* |
Positive control |
39 |
117 |
92 |
74 |
5 |
0 |
*TOX: metaphase cells were not observed
Table 2: Results of chromosome aberration test - Treatment condition 24-0 without metabolic activation
Dose (mg/ml) |
Number of structural aberrations |
Viability of cells (%) |
Number of numerical aberrations |
Vehicle control |
4 |
100 |
1 |
0.33 |
5 |
93 |
3 |
0.49 |
5 |
85 |
1 |
0.74 |
3 |
71 |
0 |
1.11 |
* |
31 |
* |
1.67 |
* |
0 |
* |
Positive control |
28 |
99 |
2 |
*TOX: metaphase cells were not observed
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
The submission substance has been tested for mutagenicity to bacteria in a study conducted according to a protocol that is similar to OECD 471 (BML Inc., 1997). No evidence for a test substance induced increase in the number of revertants was observed when tested up to cytotoxic concentrations with and without metabolic activation in S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2 using the preincubation method in the initial and the repeat experiment. Appropriate positive and solvent controls were included and gave expected results. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for mutagenicity under the conditions of the test.
The submission substance has been tested in an in vitro cytogenicity assay conducted in accordance with OECD 473 (1997) and in compliance with GLP (JBS Inc., 2007). No test substance induced increase in the frequency of structural or numerical aberrations was observed when the substance was tested in the presence and absence of metabolic activation up to cytotoxic concentrations in Chinese hamster lung cells. Appropriate positive and solvent controls were included and gave expected results. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for the induction of chromosome aberrations under the conditions of the test.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available in vitro genotoxicity data, the submission substance does not require classification for mutagenicity according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.