Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 233-866-5 | CAS number: 10402-16-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Water solubility
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- water solubility
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2018-11-30 to 2019-01-17
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 105 (Water Solubility)
- Version / remarks:
- 1995
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Two vessels were set up in a parallel design, each vessel was sampled several times instead of sampling one vessel at every point in time/ exclusion of O2 and CO2, under inert gas (argon)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method A.6 (Water Solubility)
- Version / remarks:
- 2008
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Two vessels were set up in a parallel design, each vessel was sampled several times instead of sampling one vessel at every point in time/ exclusion of O2 and CO2, under inert gas (argon)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- 2019-07-15
- Type of method:
- flask method
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Appearance: highly viscous, sticky, green-blue
Storage conditions: Keep container tightly closed, in a dry place at room temperature - Water solubility:
- 8.33 mg/L
- Conc. based on:
- test mat. (dissolved fraction)
- Loading of aqueous phase:
- 100 mg/L
- Incubation duration:
- >= 36 - <= 44 d
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- pH:
- >= 5.2 - <= 5.9
- Remarks on result:
- other: S.D.: ± 1.40 mg/L
- Remarks:
- calculated based on a copper content of 9.6 %
- Water solubility:
- 800 µg/L
- Conc. based on:
- element (dissolved fraction)
- Remarks:
- copper
- Loading of aqueous phase:
- 100 mg/L
- Incubation duration:
- >= 36 - <= 44 d
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- pH:
- >= 5.2 - <= 5.9
- Remarks on result:
- other: S.D.: ± 135 μg/L
- Details on results:
- Observations
In the preliminary test undissolved substance (probably test item) adhered to the bottom of the vessels, whereas in the main test the substance adhered to the sample boats. Sample boats were transferred inside the test vessels prior to start. For the method blank vessels, blank sample boats were added to the ultrapure water.
Temperature and oxygen
The mean temperatures were 20.1 ± 0.2 °C and 20.2 ± 0.1 °C during the test after the pre saturation phase at 30.0 ± 2.0 °C. A peak at 18.1 ° C was observed on January 10, 2019. The reason for this was that the data logger had to be removed from the incubation cabinet due to a battery change. This has no influence on the validity and integrity of the study.
No oxygen was detectable during the experimental study phase.
pH values
The pH of test item solutions ranged between 5.2 and 5.9 whereas the pH of method blanks remained within 6.9 and 7.7.
Turbidity
The turbidity in samples from the test was always < 1 NTU indicating that filtered solutions did not contain any undissolved material.
Analytical measurements
The calculated amount of test item dissolved is based on the amount of dissolved copper. The measured background concentrations were less than LOD and far below the measured copper concentrations in test item solution. Hence, no background correction was performed. - Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of this test (under exclusion of C02 and 02, under inert gas; flask method; loadings of ~100 mg/L test item in triplicate vessels a solubility equilibrium (difference in concentrations between two subsequent sampling points has to be less than 15 % and no observed increase of metal concentration) was observed after 36 days of testing. The mean measured content of dissolved copper at 20.0 ± 1.0 °C is 800 ± 135 μg/L (determined as dissolved copper on days 36, 37, 38, 42, 43, 44, separated by filtration (0.2 μm) from undissolved test item). This corresponds to a water solubility of oleic acid, copper salt of 8.33 ± 1 .40 mg/L, calculated on a copper content of 9.6 %.
The pH of test item solutions ranged between 5.2 and 5.9 whereas the pH of method blanks remained within 6.9 and 7.7.
Reference
ICP-OES measurement with corresponding LOD/LOQ, correlation coefficient and sum of quality assurance samples and recovery (non GLP preliminary test).
Calibration [µg/L] – lowest and highest calibration point |
Chosen wavelength [nm] |
LOD |
LOQ |
Correlation coefficient |
Sum of quality assurance samples |
Recovery of quality assurance samples [%] |
February 19, 2018 measurement of samples from non GLP preliminary test |
||||||
1.0 – 1000 (total of 13 calibration points, 13 used + blank) |
213.598 |
0.285 |
0.856 |
0.99979 |
24 |
100 |
December 17, 2018; measurement of method blanks (days 8, 9, 10) |
||||||
2.5 – 1000 (total of 13 calibration points, 12 used + blank) |
327.395 |
1.79 |
5.37 |
1.00000 |
16 |
100 |
December 18, 2018; measurement of test item loaded samples (days 8, 9, 10) |
||||||
2.5 – 1000 (total of 13 calibration points, 12 used + blank) |
327.395 |
2.05 |
6.15 |
1.00000 |
15 |
100 |
January 11, 2019; measurement of test samples and method blanks (days 36, 37, 38) |
||||||
5 – 1000 (total of 13 calibration points, 11 used + blank) |
327.395 |
0.626 |
1.88 |
0.99993 |
19 |
100 |
January 17, 2019; measurement of test samples and method blanks (days 42, 43, 44) |
||||||
2.5 – 1000 (total of 13 calibration points, 12 used + blank) |
213.598 |
0.601 |
1.80 |
0.99995 |
19 |
100 |
Copper recovery/validation data of measurement series
Element Cu |
Recovery [%] |
SD [%] |
n (total) |
n (valid) |
February 19, 2018 (non GLP preliminary test) |
||||
Quality control standard (Roth) 75 µg/L |
106 |
1 |
4 |
4 |
TMDA-70.2 (lot 0916, dilution factor 10), nominal value Cu: 407 µg/L – diluted 40.7 µg/L |
101 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
Recalibration standard 250 µg/L |
101 |
1 |
4 |
4 |
TMDA-70.2 (lot 0916) nominal value Cu: 407 µg/L |
111 |
1 |
4 |
4 |
Quality control standard (Roth) 750 µg/L |
106 |
<1 |
4 |
4 |
December 17, 2018 |
||||
Quality control standard (Roth) 100 µg/L |
104 |
1 |
4 |
4 |
TMDA-70.2 (lot 0618, dilution factor 2) nominal value Cu: 406 µg/L – diluted 203 µg/L |
105 |
1 |
4 |
4 |
Recalibration standard 500 µg/L |
98.8 |
0.9 |
4 |
4 |
Quality control standard (Roth) 750 µg/L |
103 |
1 |
4 |
4 |
December 18, 2018 |
||||
Quality control standard (Roth) 75 µg/L |
104 |
<1 |
3 |
3 |
TMDA-70.2 (lot 0618, dilution factor 2), nominal value Cu: 406 µg/L – diluted 203 µg/L |
106 |
<1 |
3 |
3 |
Recalibration standard 100 µg/L |
106 |
<1 |
3 |
3 |
Quality control standard (Roth) 750 µg/L |
105 |
<1 |
3 |
3 |
January 11, 2019 |
|
|
|
|
Quality control standard (Roth) 75 µg/L |
101 |
1 |
4 |
4 |
TMDA-70.2 (lot 0618, dilution factor 2), nominal value Cu: 406 µg/L – diluted 203 µg/L |
102 |
1 |
4 |
4 |
Recalibration standard 100 µg/L |
99.3 |
1.2 |
4 |
4 |
Quality control standard (Roth) 750 µg/L |
101 |
1 |
4 |
4 |
January 17, 2019 |
||||
Quality control standard (Roth) 75 µg/L |
101 |
1 |
4 |
4 |
TMDA-70.2 (lot 0618, dilution factor 2), nominal value Cu: 406 µg/L – diluted 203 µg/L |
104 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
Recalibration standard 100 µg/L |
97.4 |
0.6 |
4 |
4 |
Quality control standard (Roth) 750 µg/L |
102 |
1 |
4 |
4 |
Fortification of measurement series on December 18, 2018
Sample |
Element |
Measured concentration [µg/L] |
Calculated level after addition [µg/L] |
Recovery |
December 18, 2018 |
||||
Vessel 3 sample a 8d (dilution 10-fold) – 1 mL sample 4 mL 250 µg/L standard |
Cu |
83.0 |
217 |
216 / 99.9 |
Vessel 4 sample a 9d (dilution 10-fold) – 1 mL sample 4 mL 500 µg/L standard |
Cu |
101 |
420 |
423 / 101 |
Vessel 5 sample a 10d (18Y0233; dilution 10-fold) – 1 mL sample 4 mL 750 µg/L standard |
Cu |
104 |
621 |
626 / 101 |
January 11, 2018 |
||||
Vessel 3 sample a 27d (dilution 10-fold) – 1 mL sample 4 mL 250 µg/L standard |
Cu |
62.7 |
213 |
211 / 99.4 |
Vessel 4 sample a 38d (dilution 10-fold) – 1 mL sample 4 mL 500 µg/L standard |
Cu |
92.9 |
419 |
421 / 101 |
Vessel 5 sample a 38d (dilution 10-fold) – 1 mL sample 4 mL 750 µg/L standard |
Cu |
79.9 |
616 |
632 / 103 |
January 17, 2018 |
||||
Vessel 3 sample a 43d (dilution 2-fold) – 1 mL sample 4 mL 500 µg/L standard |
Cu |
334 |
467 |
469 / 100 |
Vessel 4 sample a 44d (dilution 2-fold) – 1 mL sample 4 mL 1000 µg/L standard |
Cu |
485 |
897 |
905 / 101 |
Vessel 5 sample a 45d (dilution 2-fold) – 1 mL sample 4 mL 750 µg/L standard |
Cu |
425 |
685 |
677 / 98.8 |
A solubility equilibrium (difference in concentrations between two subsequent sampling points has to be less than 15 %) was already observed in the beginning of the test. However, increasing concentrations were measured. No increasing in copper concentrations and a difference of less than 15 % was determined from 36 d until test end (44 d). Thus, the validity criteria as foreseen in OECD 105 guideline are fulfilled.
Therefore, the determination of the water solubility of Oleic acid, copper salt is based on mean dissolved Cu concentrations of sampling days (36, 37, 38, 42, 43 and 44 d) and a copper amount of 9.6 % in the test item:
Mean Cu concentrations:
Vessel 3: 636 ± 21 μg/L
Vessel 4: 955 ± 23 μg/L
Vessel 5: 808 ± 29 μg/L
Mean: 800 ± 135 μg/L
The water solubility of Oleic acid, copper salt is calculated as follows: Mean of concentration x 100 % / 9.6 %:
Vessel 3: 6.62 ± 0.22 mg/L
Vessel 4: 9.95 ± 0.23 mg/L
Vessel 5: 8.42 ± 0.30 mg/L
Mean: 8.33 ± 1 .40 mg/L
The measured dissolved copper concentrations in test item solution vary within vessels. This is probably due to the highly viscous, sticky test item. It cannot be guaranteed that the exposed surface area of the test item weight in at the beginning of testing is the same for each test vessel. As dissolution also depends on surface area this might be the reason.
Description of key information
Oleic acid, copper salt has a water solubility of 8.33 mg/L at 20 °C.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Water solubility:
- 8.33 mg/L
- at the temperature of:
- 20 °C
Additional information
Under the conditions of this test (under exclusion of C02 and 02, under inert gas; flask method; loadings of ~100 mg/L test item in triplicate vessels a solubility equilibrium (difference in concentrations between two subsequent sampling points has to be less than 15 % and no observed increase of metal concentration) was observed after 36 days of testing. The mean measured content of dissolved copper at 20.0 ± 1.0 °C is 800 ± 135 μg/L (determined as dissolved copper on days 36, 37, 38, 42, 43, 44, separated by filtration (0.2 μm) from undissolved test item). This corresponds to a water solubility of oleic acid, copper salt of 8.33 ± 1 .40 mg/L, calculated on a copper content of 9.6 %.
The pH of test item solutions ranged between 5.2 and 5.9 whereas the pH of method blanks remained within 6.9 and 7.7.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.