Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 232-796-2 | CAS number: 9025-49-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 016
- Report date:
- 2016
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- 2-AA inadvertently not added to WP2uvrA in the presence of S9. However, tester strain responded as expected to positive control in non-activated condition. All other tester strains responded as expected to 2-AA in the presence of S9.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- 2-AA inadvertently not added to WP2uvrA in the presence of S9. However, tester strain responded as expected to positive control in non-activated condition. All other tester strains responded as expected to 2-AA in the presence of S9.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5100 - Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test (August 1998)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- 2-AA inadvertently not added to WP2uvrA in the presence of S9. However, tester strain responded as expected to positive control in non-activated condition. All other tester strains responded as expected to 2-AA in the presence of S9.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Toxicological Principles for the Safety Assessment of Food Ingredients (Redbook 2000)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- 2-AA inadvertently not added to WP2uvrA in the presence of S9. However, tester strain responded as expected to positive control in non-activated condition. All other tester strains responded as expected to 2-AA in the presence of S9.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Active enzyme protein of Aspergillopepsin I (EC no. 232-796-2, CAS no. 9025-49-4, EC name: Proteinase, Aspergillus acid, Enzyme Class no. 3.4.23.18)
- Molecular formula:
- Not applicable, see remarks
- IUPAC Name:
- Active enzyme protein of Aspergillopepsin I (EC no. 232-796-2, CAS no. 9025-49-4, EC name: Proteinase, Aspergillus acid, Enzyme Class no. 3.4.23.18)
- Reference substance name:
- Protein as a constituent of enzyme deriving from the fermentation or extraction process
- Molecular formula:
- Not available
- IUPAC Name:
- Protein as a constituent of enzyme deriving from the fermentation or extraction process
- Reference substance name:
- Inorganic salts as a constituent of enzyme deriving from the fermentation or extraction process
- Molecular formula:
- Not available. See remarks.
- IUPAC Name:
- Inorganic salts as a constituent of enzyme deriving from the fermentation or extraction process
- Reference substance name:
- Carbohydrates constituent of enzyme deriving from the fermentation or extraction process
- Molecular formula:
- Not available. See remarks.
- IUPAC Name:
- Carbohydrates constituent of enzyme deriving from the fermentation or extraction process
- Reference substance name:
- Lipids as a constituent of enzyme deriving from the fermentation or extraction process
- Molecular formula:
- Not available. See remarks.
- IUPAC Name:
- Lipids as a constituent of enzyme deriving from the fermentation or extraction process
- Test material form:
- liquid
- Details on test material:
- - Lot/batch No.:2016208-00335
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
Constituent 3
Constituent 4
Constituent 5
Method
- Target gene:
- histidine or tryptophan operons
Species / strainopen allclose all
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S-9 mix prepared form Aroclor®-1254-induced rat livers
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Toxicity Mutation test: 33.3, 66.7, 100, 333, 667, 1000, 3333, and 5000 μg per plate
Mutagenicity test: 333, 667, 1000, 3333, and 5000 µg/plate
The highest dose level tested is the maximum required by the OECD Guideline 471 for materials of low toxicity. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: sterile water
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- sterile water
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- 2-nitrofluorene
- sodium azide
- other: see remarks
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- A single pre-incubation treatment tube was prepared for each replicate group that was plated. The appropriate volume of each component of the treatment mixture was determined by multiplying the volume required per plate by the number of replicates plus one. Each tube was capped and incubated at approximately 37°C and 150 rpm, for a 60-minute treatment period. At the end of this treatment period the treatment mixture was transferred to a centrifuge. If a wash step was deemed necessary it was added prior to centrifugation. Treatment tubes were centrifuged for 10 minutes at 1500 rcf. The supernatant was aspirated down to ~50 μL. The pelleted bacteria were re-suspended with enough nutrient broth to match the original volume of bacterial culture. Plates were prepared by transferring 100 μL of re-suspended bacteria to a pre-heated (45-48°C) glass culture tube containing 2.5 mL of selective top agar. The bacteria were mixed with the agar by vortexing and then overlaid onto the surface of minimal glucose agar plates.
The positive control for WP2uvrA in the presence of S9 activation was tested using the plate incorporation method. One hundred 100 μL of the positive control was added to pre-heated (45-48°C) glass culture tubes containing 2 mL of selective top agar, followed by 100 μL of tester strain and 0.5 mL of S9 mix. The mixture was vortexed and overlaid onto the surface of a minimum glucose agar plate.
After the overlay solidified, the plates were inverted and incubated for approximately 48-52 hours at 37 ± 2°C. Plates that were not counted immediately following the incubation period were stored at 5 ± 3°C. All toxicity-mutation test dose preparations of negative (vehicle) controls, test substance, and positive controls were plated in duplicate. All mutagenicity test dose preparations of negative (vehicle) controls, test substance, and positive controls were plated in triplicate. - Rationale for test conditions:
- The test was conducted using the treat and plate modification of the pre-incubation method. This method was selected due to the potential of the test substance to interfere with the selective conditions of the assay, potentially leading to false positive results.
- Evaluation criteria:
- Criteria for a positive response:
1. Strains TA1535 and TA1537: Data were judged positive if the increase in mean revertants at the highest numerical dose response was ≥ 3.0-fold the mean concurrent negative control value (vehicle control). This increase in the mean number of revertants per plate must be accompanied by a dose response associated with increasing concentrations of the test substance unless observed at the top dose level only.
2. Strains TA98, TA100 and WP2uvrA: Data sets were judged positive if the increase in mean revertants at the highest numerical dose response was ≥ 2.0-fold the mean concurrent negative control value (vehicle control). This increase in the mean number of revertants per plate must be accompanied by a dose response associated with increasing concentrations of the test substance unless observed at the top dose level only.
A data set may be judged equivocal if there is a biologically relevant increased response that only partially meets criteria for a positive response. A response was evaluated as negative if it is neither positive nor equivocal. - Statistics:
- For all replicate plates, the results were presented as the mean revertants per plate and standard deviation.
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- No appreciable toxicity or test substance precipitation was observed
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- No appreciable toxicity or test substance precipitation was observed
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- No appreciable toxicity or test substance precipitation was observed
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- No appreciable toxicity or test substance precipitation was observed
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- No appreciable toxicity or test substance precipitation was observed
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- In the toxicity-mutation test, no positive mutagenic responses were observed at any dose level in any tester strain in the absence or presence of S9 metabolic activation. No appreciable toxicity or test substance precipitation was observed. A >50% reduction in the mean number of revertant colonies was observed with tester strain TA1537 in the absence of S9 activation at 100 and 667 μg/plate; however, this reduction occurred at intermediate dose levels with no dose related correlation and is not considered to be biologically relevant.
In the mutagenicity test, no positive mutagenic responses were observed at any dose level or with any tester strain in either the absence or presence of S9 metabolic activation. No appreciable toxicity or test substance precipitation was observed.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Mutagenicity test without S9 activation |
||||||
Strain |
Test substance |
Dose level µg/plate |
Mean revertants/ plate |
Standard deviation |
Ratio treated/ solvent |
Individual revertant colony counts and plate codes |
WP2urvA |
Water |
- |
46 |
5 |
- |
50, 47, 40 |
|
Test substance |
333 |
47 |
9 |
1.0 |
54, 49, 37 |
|
|
667 |
42 |
6 |
0.9 |
36, 44, 47 |
|
|
1000 |
50 |
8 |
1.1 |
43, 59, 48 |
|
|
3333 |
41 |
3 |
0.9 |
40, 39, 44 |
|
|
5000 |
41 |
5 |
0.9 |
47, 37, 40 |
|
4NQO |
0.5 |
410 |
67 |
9.0 |
361, 383, 487 |
TA98 |
Water |
- |
26 |
6 |
- |
26, 20, 31 |
|
Test substance |
333 |
26 |
7 |
1.0 |
20, 23, 34 |
|
|
667 |
21 |
5 |
0.8 |
21, 17, 26 |
|
|
1000 |
30 |
6 |
1.2 |
26, 36, 27 |
|
|
3333 |
46 |
5 |
1.8 |
42, 46, 51 |
|
|
5000 |
18 |
6 |
0.7 |
12, 21, 22 |
|
2NF |
2.0 |
286 |
3 |
11.2 |
288, 283, 288 |
TA100 |
Water |
- |
101 |
12 |
- |
105, 111, 88 |
|
Test substance |
333 |
99 |
10 |
1.0 |
102, 107, 88 |
|
|
667 |
94 |
6 |
0.9 |
87, 96, 98 |
|
|
1000 |
102 |
10 |
1.0 |
107, 109, 91 |
|
|
3333 |
103 |
4 |
1.0 |
102, 99, 107 |
|
|
5000 |
96 |
7 |
0.9 |
100, 99, 88 |
|
4NQO |
0.5 |
3525 |
59 |
34.8 |
3485, 3592, 3497 |
TA1535 |
Water |
- |
11 |
5 |
- |
16, 11, 7 |
|
Test substance |
333 |
12 |
6 |
1.1 |
13, 18, 6 |
|
|
667 |
11 |
2 |
1.0 |
9, 11, 13 |
|
|
1000 |
14 |
3 |
1.3 |
16, 16, 11 |
|
|
3333 |
12 |
4 |
1.0 |
7, 15, 13 |
|
|
5000 |
14 |
4 |
1.2 |
9, 17, 16 |
|
MNNG |
0.5 |
217 |
32 |
19.1 |
205, 253, 192 |
TA1537 |
Water |
- |
5 |
5 |
- |
10, 4, 1 |
|
Test substance |
333 |
6 |
2 |
1.1 |
6, 4, 7 |
|
|
667 |
6 |
3 |
1.3 |
6, 9, 4 |
|
|
1000 |
5 |
3 |
1.1 |
2, 7, 7 |
|
|
3333 |
8 |
3 |
1.6 |
11, 6, 7 |
|
|
5000 |
6 |
2 |
1.3 |
9, 5, 5 |
|
ICR |
0.2 |
4695 |
30 |
938.9 |
4717, 4706, 4661 |
MMNG: N-Methyl, N’-Nitro-Nitrosoguanidine ICR: Acridine ICR 191 4NQO: 4-Nitroquinoline-oxide 2NF: 2-Nitrofluorene |
Mutagenicity test with S9 activation |
||||||
Strain |
Test substance |
Dose level µg/plate |
Mean revertants/ plate |
Standard deviation |
Ratio treated/ solvent |
Individual revertant colony counts and plate codes |
WP2urvA |
Water |
- |
52 |
4 |
- |
49, 51, 56 |
|
Test substance |
333 |
50 |
12 |
1.0 |
54, 36, 59 |
|
|
667 |
38 |
3 |
0.7 |
34, 40, 40 |
|
|
1000 |
45 |
2 |
0.9 |
45, 47, 43 |
|
|
3333 |
44 |
7 |
0.9 |
36, 49, 48 |
|
|
5000 |
48 |
8 |
0.9 |
40, 48, 55 |
|
2AA |
25 |
222 |
22 |
4.3 |
239, 198, 230 |
TA98 |
Water |
- |
28 |
4 |
- |
24, 31, 29 |
|
Test substance |
333 |
30 |
5 |
1.1 |
33, 24, 33 |
|
|
667 |
21 |
10 |
0.8 |
33, 13, 18 |
|
|
1000 |
24 |
12 |
0.8 |
17, 37, 17 |
|
|
3333 |
27 |
6 |
1.0 |
34, 24, 24 |
|
|
5000 |
31 |
2 |
1.1 |
29, 32, 32 |
|
2AA |
10 |
1357 |
85 |
48.5 |
1285, 1450, 1335 |
TA100 |
Water |
- |
106 |
16 |
- |
92, 103, 124 |
|
Test substance |
333 |
120 |
11 |
1.1 |
119, 131, 109 |
|
|
667 |
122 |
17 |
1.2 |
132, 103, 132 |
|
|
1000 |
122 |
12 |
1.1 |
135, 118, 113 |
|
|
3333 |
118 |
19 |
1.1 |
111, 14, 103 |
|
|
5000 |
129 |
21 |
1.2 |
136, 146, 105 |
|
2AA |
10 |
2760 |
815 |
26.0 |
2404, 2183, 3692 |
TA1535 |
Water |
- |
17 |
1 |
- |
17, 18, 16 |
|
Test substance |
333 |
13 |
3 |
0.8 |
15, 10, 15 |
|
|
667 |
14 |
3 |
0.8 |
16, 15, 11 |
|
|
1000 |
18 |
3 |
1.1 |
20, 20, 15 |
|
|
3333 |
12 |
3 |
0.7 |
9, 13, 15 |
|
|
5000 |
17 |
1 |
1.0 |
16, 17, 18 |
|
2AA |
10 |
126 |
10 |
7.4 |
119, 138, 121 |
TA1537 |
Water |
- |
10 |
3 |
- |
12, 12, 6 |
|
Test substance |
333 |
6 |
5 |
0.6 |
10, 6, 1 |
|
|
667 |
10 |
1 |
1.0 |
11, 10, 9 |
|
|
1000 |
9 |
2 |
0.9 |
10, 11, 7 |
|
|
3333 |
11 |
2 |
1.1 |
10, 10, 13 |
|
|
5000 |
12 |
3 |
1.2 |
13, 15, 9 |
|
2AA |
10 |
87 |
9 |
8.7 |
77, 91, 93 |
2AA: 2-Amino-anthracene |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The test substance was negative with or without S-9 activation.
- Executive summary:
The test substance was evaluated for mutagenicity in the Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test using the treat and plate modification of the pre-incubation method. Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, and TA1537 and Escherichia coli strain WP2uvrA were tested in the absence and presence of an exogenous metabolic activation system (Aroclor-induced rat liver S9) in accordance with OECD Guideline 471. The test was performed in 2 phases. The first phase was the toxicity-mutation test, which established the dose range for the mutagenicity test, and provided a preliminary mutagenicity evaluation. The second phase was the mutagenicity test, which evaluated and confirmed the mutagenic potential of the test substance. The sponsor reported the total protein of the test substance to be 222.71 mg/mL. All test substance concentrations were prepared based on the total protein concentration. The test substance was dispensed volumetrically and formulated in sterile water. The tests substance formed a clear amber solution in sterile water at 50 mg of total protein /mL, the highest stock concentration prepared for use on this study. All reported dose concentrations represent the amount of total protein per unit.
In the toxicity-mutation test, the maximum dose evaluated was 5000 μg/plate for tester strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, and WP2uvrA in the absence and presence of S9 metabolic activation. This dose was achieved using a concentration of 50 mg/mL and a 100 μL plating aliquot. The dose levels used in this test were 33.3, 66.7, 100, 333, 667, 1000, 3333, and 5000 μg/plate. No positive mutagenic responses were observed at any dose level in any tester strain in the absence or presence of S9 metabolic activation. No appreciable toxicity or test substance precipitation was observed.
Based on the toxicity-mutation test, the maximum dose evaluated in the mutagenicity test was 5000 μg/plate for tester strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, and WP2uvrA in the absence and presence of S9 metabolic activation. This dose was achieved using a concentration of 50 mg/mL and a 100 μL plating aliquot. The dose levels used in this test were 333, 667, 1000, 3333, and 5000 μg/plate for all tester strains. No positive mutagenic responses were observed at any dose level or with any tester strain in either the absence or presence of S9 metabolic activation. No appreciable toxicity or test substance precipitation was observed.
All criteria for a valid study were met. Under the conditions of this study, the test substance showed no evidence of mutagenicity in the Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test either in the absence or presence of Aroclor-induced rat liver S9. It was concluded that the test substance was negative in this in vitro test.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.