Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 610-522-6 | CAS number: 503155-49-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to reproduction
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- fertility, other
- Remarks:
- Combined repeated dose and carconogenicity test
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- data from handbook or collection of data
- Justification for type of information:
- data is from peer reviewed journal.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Chronic Toxicity of the given test chemical to Rats
- Author:
- K. J. DAVIS ET AL.
- Year:
- 1 966
- Bibliographic source:
- TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARAMACOLOGY
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Combined Repeated Dose and Carcinogenicity
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Combined Repeated Dose and Carcinogenicity was performed to determine the toxic nature of the test chemical in Osborne Mendel rats
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Limit test:
- no
- Justification for study design:
- not specified
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Disodium 3-[(2,4-dimethyl-5-sulphonatophenyl)azo]-4-hydroxynaphthalene-1-sulphonate
- EC Number:
- 224-909-9
- EC Name:
- Disodium 3-[(2,4-dimethyl-5-sulphonatophenyl)azo]-4-hydroxynaphthalene-1-sulphonate
- Cas Number:
- 4548-53-2
- Molecular formula:
- C18H16N2O7S2.2Na
- IUPAC Name:
- Disodium 3-[(2,4-dimethyl-5-sulphonatophenyl)azo]-4-hydroxynaphthalene-1-sulphonate
- Test material form:
- solid
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Ponceau SX
- Molecular formula : C18H16N2O7S2.2Na
- Molecular weight : 480.4276 g/mol
- Smiles notation: [Na+].[Na+].Cc1cc(C)c(cc1N=Nc2cc(c3ccccc3c2O)S(=O)(=O)[O-])S(=O)(=O)[O-]
- InChl :1S/C18H16N2O7S2.2Na/c1-10-7-11(2)16(28(22,23)24)8-14(10)19-20-15-9-17(29(25,26)27)12-5-3-4-6-13(12)18(15)21;;/h3-9,21H,1-2H3,(H,22,23,24)(H,25,26,27);;/q;2*+1/p-2/b20-19+;;
- Substance type: Organic
- Physical state: Solid
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Osborne-Mendel
- Details on species / strain selection:
- No Data Available
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Rats were caged individually.
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: feed
- Type of inhalation exposure (if applicable):
- not specified
- Vehicle:
- other: Commercial Laboratory Chow diet
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
DIET PREPARATION
The test chemical was mixed into a commercial laboratory chow diet for each feeding study. - Details on mating procedure:
- Mating was not performed
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- not specified
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- No Data Available
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- two-years
- Frequency of treatment:
- daily
- Details on study schedule:
- no data available
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- 0, 500, 1000 mg/kg bw/day
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- control - 200(100/ sex)
500 mg/kgbw/day - 100 (50/sex)
1000 mg/kgbw/day - 100 (50/sex) - Control animals:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Details on study design:
- Two-year tests were run in which 400 rats were distributed into various treatment groups. The test chemical was mixed into a commercial laboratory chow diet for each feeding study.Rats were individually caged. Each animal received in the Pathology Laboratory was given a careful gross examination, and all lesions were recorded. Of those not received, most were discarded because of advanced postmortem autolysis. So far as can be determined, none of the discarded animals had tumors. Lesions which could not clearly be identified as neoplastic or nonneoplastic, and tumors, the type of which was uncertain or uncommon, were also sectioned and examined microscopically. Tissues sectioned include the following: liver, lung, heart, spleen, pancreas, stomach, small intestine, colon, kidney, adrenal, thyroid, testis (or ovary and uterus), leg muscles, leg bones with included marrow, and any tumor or other unusual condition.Sections of the mamary glands were also observed for tumours.
- Positive control:
- no data available
Examinations
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- no data available
- Oestrous cyclicity (parental animals):
- no data available
- Sperm parameters (parental animals):
- no data available
- Litter observations:
- no data available
- Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- Each animal received in the Pathology Laboratory was given a careful gross examination, and all lesions were recorded. Of those not received, most were discarded because of advanced postmortem autolysis. So far as can be determined, none of the discarded animals had tumors. Lesions which could not clearly be identified as neoplastic or nonneoplastic, and tumors, the type of which was uncertain or uncommon, were also sectioned and examined microscopically.
Tissues sectioned include the following: liver, lung, heart, spleen, pancreas, stomach, small intestine, colon, kidney, adrenal, thyroid, testis (or ovary and uterus), leg muscles, leg bones with included marrow, and any tumor or other unusual condition.Sections of the mamary glands were also observed for tumours. - Statistics:
- no data available
- Reproductive indices:
- no data available
- Offspring viability indices:
- no data available
Results and discussion
Results: P0 (first parental generation)
General toxicity (P0)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The ingestion of the test chemical had no effect on survival, growth, or weights at autopsy of heart, liver, kidney, spleen, or testes in the test animals
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not specified
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Description (incidence):
- The ingestion of the test chemical had no effect on survival, growth, or weights at autopsy of heart, liver, kidney, spleen, or testes in the test animals
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The ingestion of the test chemical had no effect on survival, growth, or weights at autopsy of heart, liver, kidney, spleen, or testes in the test animals
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not specified
- Food efficiency:
- not specified
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not specified
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not specified
- Haematological findings:
- not specified
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not specified
- Urinalysis findings:
- not specified
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not specified
- Immunological findings:
- not specified
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Findings, such as liver enlargement, abscesses, distendedurinary bladders, ovarian cysts, distended uteri, enlarged parathyroids, enlargement of seminal vesicles and other miscellaneous changes, were present in approximately equal incidence and degree in test and control rats. No effect due to ingestion of the test chemical on either tumor incidence or tumor type was noted in Osborne Mendel strain on this two-year experiment.
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No effect due to ingestion of the test chemical on either tumor incidence or tumor type was noted in Osborne Mendel rats on this two-year experiment. Rats of the Osborne- Mendel strain had more tumors (especially mammary).Incidence of tumor formation in mammary glands were found to be in control and treatment groups. Thus, they are considered to be incidemtal and non treatment related in nature and strain specific.
- Other effects:
- not specified
Reproductive function / performance (P0)
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- not specified
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- not specified
- Reproductive performance:
- not specified
Effect levels (P0)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- gross pathology
- histopathology: non-neoplastic
- histopathology: neoplastic
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable due to absence of adverse toxic effects
Results: P1 (second parental generation)
Effect levels (P1)
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
Results: F1 generation
Effect levels (F1)
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
Results: F2 generation
General toxicity (F2)
- Other effects:
- not specified
Developmental neurotoxicity (F2)
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not specified
Developmental immunotoxicity (F2)
- Developmental immunotoxicity:
- not specified
Effect levels (F2)
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
Overall reproductive toxicity
- Reproductive effects observed:
- no
- Treatment related:
- no
Any other information on results incl. tables
Lesions observed in the 2 year feeding study
Parameter |
Control |
1% |
2% |
Number of rats started |
200 |
100 |
100 |
Number of survivors at 80 weeks |
158 |
75 |
78 |
Number received by pathology |
171 |
89 |
89 |
Number of males with tumors |
25 |
9 |
10 |
Number of females with tumors |
42 |
14 |
22 |
Total number of rats with tumors |
67 |
23 |
32 |
Tumor type in each rat |
|
|
|
Fibroadenoma, mammary |
19 |
9 |
12 |
Adenocarcinoma |
18 |
6 |
7 |
Lymphosarcoma |
18 |
7 |
5 |
Lymphoblastoma |
5 |
0 |
0 |
Fibrosacroma |
0 |
0 |
4 |
Interstitial cell tumor |
5 |
4 |
2 |
Endometrial sarcoma |
3 |
1 |
0 |
Other tumors |
10 |
1 |
5 |
Other pathology |
|
|
|
Chronic pneumonia |
34 |
18 |
16 |
Granular kidneys |
49 |
23 |
23 |
Splenic enlargement |
27 |
16 |
13 |
Splenic atrophy |
17 |
16 |
9 |
Testicular atrophy |
8 |
8 |
4 |
Adrenal enlargement |
5 |
2 |
3 |
Chronic arteritis |
2 |
2 |
0 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Findings, such as liver enlargement, abscesses, distended urinary bladders, ovarian cysts, distended uteri, enlarged parathyroids, enlargement of seminal vesicles and other miscellaneous changes, were present in approximately equal incidence and degree in test and control rats. No effect due to ingestion of the test chemical on either tumor incidence or tumor type was noted in Osborne Mendel strain on this two-year experiment.Considering all the observations, the No Observed Adverse Effect Level was considered to be 1000 mg/kgbw/day in Osborne Mendel rats.
- Executive summary:
Combined Repeated Dose and Carcinogenicity was performed to determine the toxic nature of the test chemical in Osborne Mendel rats. Two-year tests were run in which 400 male and female Osborne Mendel rats were distributed into various treatment groups. The treatment groups were - 100 rats/dose (50/sex) and 100 rats/sex for controls. The test chemical (500 mg/kg bw/day, 1000 mg/kg bw/day) was mixed into a commercial laboratory chow diet for each feeding study. Rats were individually caged. Each animal received in the Pathology Laboratory was given a careful gross examination, and all lesions were recorded. Of those not received, most were discarded because of advanced postmortem autolysis. So far as can be determined, none of the discarded animals had tumors. Lesions which could not clearly be identified as neoplastic or non-neoplastic, and tumors, the type of which was uncertain or uncommon, were also sectioned and examined microscopically. Tissues sectioned include the following: liver, lung, heart, spleen, pancreas, stomach, small intestine, colon, kidney, adrenal, thyroid, testis (or ovary and uterus), leg muscles, leg bones with included marrow, and any tumor or other unusual condition. Sections of the mammary glands were also observed for tumors. Findings, such as liver enlargement, abscesses, distended urinary bladders, ovarian cysts, distended uteri, enlarged parathyroid, enlargement of seminal vesicles and other miscellaneous changes, were present in approximately equal incidence and degree in test and control rats. Rats of the Osborne- Mendel strain had more tumors (especially mammary).Incidence of tumor formation in mammary glands were found to be in control and treatment groups. Thus, they are considered to be incidental and non-treatment related in nature and strain specific. No effect due to ingestion of the test chemical on either tumor incidence or tumor type was noted in Osborne Mendel strain on this two-year experiment. Considering all the observations, the No Observed Adverse Effect Level was considered to be 1000 mg/kg bw/day in Osborne Mendel rats.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.