Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-252-3 | CAS number: 56-04-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Ames test (similair to OECD 471): non-mutagenic with or without metabolic activation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Bacterial cultures were grown overnight at 37C with shaking in Oxoid 2 broth supplemented wiht biotin (0.8 ug/ml) and histidine (40ug/ml). For metabolic activation S-9 Aroclor 1254-induced, male Sprague-Dawley rat and Syrian hamster livers were used. The top agar was added and poured onto surface of petri dishes containing Vogel-Bonner medium. Histidine-independent colonies arising on these plates were counted following two days incubation at 37C. Plates were machine counted. The test chemical was initially tested in the preincubation test at half-log dose intervals up to a dose tha elicited toxicity, or to a dose immedelately below on the was toxic in the preliminary toxicity procedure. Test item was tested as triplicates. Concurrent solvent and positive controls were run at each trial.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- 6-Methyl-2-thiouracil, CAS nro.56-04-2. Supplier: Aldric. Analyzed purity 99%.
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1538
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 10,33, 100, 333, 1000, 333, 10000 ug/plate. Bacterial toxicity was used as a selection of top dose
- Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- sodium azide
- methylmethanesulfonate
- mitomycin C
- other: 4-nitro-o-phenylenediamine
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- The initial test of a chemical was done without activation and with 10% S-9. If a positive result was obtained, the postitive trials were repeated. If trials were negative the chemical was retested without S-9 and with 30% S-9. Tf all trials were negative, no further testing was performed.
- Evaluation criteria:
- Individual trials were judged mautgenic, weakly mutagenic, questionable or nonmutagenic, depending on the magnitude of His+ revertants, and the shape of the dose-response. A trial was considered questionable if the dose-response was judged insufficientrly high to support a call of weakly mutagenic, if only a single dose was elevated over the control, or if a weak increase was not dose-related. The distinctions betweem a questionable response and a nonmutagenic or weakly mutagenic response, and between a weak mutagenic response, and betweem and between a weak mutagenic respons and mutagenic respons are highlty subjective. It was not necessary for a response to reach two-fold over nackground for a trial to be judged mutagenic.
A chemical was judged mutagenic or weakly mutagenic if it produced a reproducible, dose-related response over hte solvent control, under a single metabolic activation condition, in replicate trials. A chemical was judged questionable if the results of individual trials were not reproducible, if increases in His+ revertants did not meet the criteria for a weakly mutagenic response, or if only single doses produceed increases in His+ revertants in repeated trials. Chemicals were judged nonmutagenic if they did not meet the criteria for a mutagenic or questionable response. - Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- not specified
- Genotoxicity:
- not determined
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not determined
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 97
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- In Salmonella mutation test with methylthiouracil no revertant mutations was observed.
- Executive summary:
Salmonella mutation test was performed using strains TA 97, TA 97, TA 100 and TA 1535 with concentrations 10, 33, 100, 33, 1000, 3333, and 10 000 ug/plate.
Compared to the solvent control no two-fold or more in number of revertant clones were observed in any strains and concentrations tested.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available (further information necessary)
Additional information
In the report of Zeiger et al. (1992) in vitro salmonella mutation test for 6-methyl-2 -thiouracil is described. The test was performed using strains TA 97, TA 97, TA 100 and TA 1535 with concentrations 10, 33, 100, 33, 1000, 3333, and 10 000 ug/plate. Compared to the solvent control no two-fold or more in number of revertant clones were observed in any strains and concentrations tested.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the results of in vitro bacterial gene mutation study, no classification is proposed for genotoxicity according to the criteria of CLP regulation 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.