Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
Experiment start: 04/3/2018 Experiment end: 04/[3/2018
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2018

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
other: Test No. 432: In Vitro 3T3 NRU Phototoxicity Test
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Test type:
other: Test No. 432: In Vitro 3T3 NRU Phototoxicity Test
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Hydrolyzed Quinoa
EC Number:
825-815-6
Cas Number:
227025-12-9
IUPAC Name:
Hydrolyzed Quinoa
Constituent 2
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Water
EC Number:
231-791-2
EC Name:
Water
Cas Number:
7732-18-5
Molecular formula:
H2O
IUPAC Name:
Water
Test material form:
liquid
Details on test material:
dark clear liquid

Test animals

Species:
other: Mouse fibroblast cell line, Balb/3T3 clone A31
Strain:
not specified
Sex:
not specified

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
other: 96-well microplates
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)

Results and discussion

Effect levelsopen allclose all
Key result
Sex:
not specified
Dose descriptor:
other: Cmax
Remarks:
(-UV)
Effect level:
1 000 other: µg/ml
Based on:
test mat.
Key result
Sex:
not specified
Dose descriptor:
other: Cmax
Remarks:
(+UV)
Effect level:
1 000 other: µg/ml
Based on:
test mat.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Conc. (µg/ml) 100 133 178 237 316 422 563 750 1000
(-UV) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0%
(+UV) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

No significant cytototoxic effect was recorded as well without UVA exposure as after exposure to UVA. The concentration resulting in 50% reduction of cell viability with and without UVA can not be calculated. Therefore, the Cmax (-UV) was estimated to 1000 µg/ml. The Cmax (+UV) was estimated to 1000 µg/ml.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
No significant cytototoxic effect was recorded as well without UVA exposure as after exposure to UVA. The concentration resulting in 50% reduction of cell viability with and without UVA can not be calculated. Therefore, the Cmax (-UV) was estimated to 1000 µg/ml. The Cmax (+UV) was estimated to 1000 µg/ml.