Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

5 male and female (number not defined) Wistar rats were dosed orally by gavage. The oral LD50of REG 1 was higher than 5,110 mg/kg.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Acute toxicity: via oral route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1982
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Non-GLP study with deficiencies (e.g body weights not reported)
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to other study
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 420 (Acute Oral Toxicity - Fixed Dose Method)
Deviations:
not specified
GLP compliance:
no
Test type:
fixed dose procedure
Limit test:
yes
Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Sex:
male/female
Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
other: Tragant (0,5 %)
Doses:
5110 mg/kg
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5 per dose
Control animals:
yes
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 5 110 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Interpretation of results:
practically nontoxic
Remarks:
Migrated information
Executive summary:

5 male and female (number not defined) Wistar rats were dosed orally by gavage. The oral LD50of REG 1 was higher than 5,110 mg/kg.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Value:
5 110 mg/kg bw

Acute toxicity: via inhalation route

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Acute toxicity: via dermal route

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

Justification for selection of acute toxicity – oral endpoint

Only one study available

Justification for selection of acute toxicity – inhalation endpoint

data waiving, see chapter 5.2.1.2 of CSR or chapter 7.2.2 of IUCLID data set

Justification for selection of acute toxicity – dermal endpoint

data waiving, see chapter 5.2.1.3 of CSR or chapter 7.2.3 of IUCLID data set

Justification for classification or non-classification

The respective citeria are not met.

As a result the substance has not to be classified according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP/GHS).