Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
10 August 2016 - 16 August 2016
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2016
Report date:
2016

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Version / remarks:
Due to technical reasons, the actual maximum relative humidity was 88 % instead of 70 %
and the actual maximum temperature was 25.8 °C instead of 22 ± 3 °C as it was indicated in
the Study Plan. Due to a new Certificate of Analysis an incorrect purity data of the test item
showed in the Study Plan. The Draft Report was issued later than indicated in the Study Plan.
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
These deviations are considered not to adversely affect the results or integrity of the study.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.42 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Version / remarks:
Due to technical reasons, the actual maximum relative humidity was 88 % instead of 70 %
and the actual maximum temperature was 25.8 °C instead of 22 ± 3 °C as it was indicated in
the Study Plan. Due to a new Certificate of Analysis an incorrect purity data of the test item
showed in the Study Plan. The Draft Report was issued later than indicated in the Study Plan.
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
These deviations are considered not to adversely affect the results or integrity of the study.
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
2λ⁵,11,20,29,38,39λ⁵,40,41-octaaza-1-cupradodecacyclo[19.17.1.1¹,¹².1³,³⁷.0²,¹⁰.0⁴,⁹.0¹³,¹⁸.0²²,²⁷.0²⁸,³⁹.0³⁰,³⁸.0³¹,³⁶.0¹⁹,⁴¹]hentetraconta-2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18,20,22,24,26,28(39),29,31,33,35,37(40)-nonadecaene-2,39-bis(ylium)-1,1-diuide
EC Number:
908-081-2
IUPAC Name:
2λ⁵,11,20,29,38,39λ⁵,40,41-octaaza-1-cupradodecacyclo[19.17.1.1¹,¹².1³,³⁷.0²,¹⁰.0⁴,⁹.0¹³,¹⁸.0²²,²⁷.0²⁸,³⁹.0³⁰,³⁸.0³¹,³⁶.0¹⁹,⁴¹]hentetraconta-2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18,20,22,24,26,28(39),29,31,33,35,37(40)-nonadecaene-2,39-bis(ylium)-1,1-diuide
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Batch number: 150205
Description: Blue powder
Expiry date: 05 February 2019
Purity1: As a UVCB, purity is considered as 100%
Storage conditions: Controlled room temperature (15-25°C, below 70% RH%)

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
CBA/Ca
Remarks:
CBA/CaOlaHsd mice
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Females (if applicable) nulliparous and non-pregnant: yes
- Age at study initiation:10 weeks old (age-matched, within one week)
- Weight at study initiation: 20.6 – 21.9 grams
- Housing: polypropylene / polycarbonate cages and bedding was available to animals during the study
- Enrichment: mice were provided with glass tunnel tubes
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 21 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19.0 - 25.8°C
- Humidity (%): 30 - 88 %
- Air changes (per hr): 15-20 air exchanges/hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours daily, from 6.00 a.m. to 6.00 p.m.

Study design: in vivo (LLNA)

Vehicle:
acetone/olive oil (4:1 v/v)
Concentration:
Test item concentration: 2.5, 5 and 10 %(w/v)
No. of animals per dose:
4
Details on study design:
PRE-SCREEN TESTS:
- Compound solubility: formulations at 100 % (w/v) concentrations were not achievable
- Irritation: no
- Systemic toxicity: no
- Ear thickness measurements: ear thickness values and ear punch weights were within the acceptable range

MAIN STUDY

ANIMAL ASSIGNMENT AND TREATMENT
- Name of test method: LLNA
- Criteria used to consider a positive response:
That exposure to at least one concentration of the test item resulted in an incorporation of 3 HTdR at least 3-fold or greater than recorded in control mice, as indicated by the stimulation index.
The data are compatible with a conventional dose response, although allowance must be made (especially at high topical concentrations) for either local toxicity or immunological suppression.

TREATMENT PREPARATION AND ADMINISTRATION:
Topical application: on the dorsal surface of each ear. Each animal was dosed once a day for three consecutive days
Positive control substance(s):
hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
No mortality, cutaneous reactions or signs of toxicity were observed for the positive control substance in the study. A lymphoproliferative response in line with historic positive control data (stimulation index value of 15.6*) was noted for HCA in the main experiment. This value was considered to confirm the appropriate performance of the assay.
*The stimulation index (SI) value was slightly above the upper limit of the historic positive control data, however it has not affect to the results.

In vivo (LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
1.3
Test group / Remarks:
2.5 % (w/v) in acetone:olive oil 4:1 (v:v) mixture
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
1.3
Test group / Remarks:
5 %(w/v) in acetone:olive oil 4:1 (v:v) mixture
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
1.2
Test group / Remarks:
10 %(w/v) in acetone:olive oil 4:1 (v:v) mixture
Cellular proliferation data / Observations:
DETAILS ON STIMULATION INDEX CALCULATION
SI = DPN value of a treated group divided by the DPN value of the negative control group) for each treatment group was also calculated. A stimulation index of 3 or greater is an indication of a positive result.

CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS:
No mortality or signs of systemic toxicity were observed during the study. Test item precipitate or minimal amount of test item precipitate was observed for all animals of the 10% (w/v), for all animals of the 5% (w/v) and for all animals of the 2.5% (w/v) dose groups on Days 1-6. There were no indications of any irritancy at the site of application.

BODY WEIGHTS
Marked body weight loss (>5% reduction of body weight) was observed for one animal of the negative control group, positive control group and 2.5% (w/v) dose group, for two animals of the 10 % (w/v) dose group; for three animals of the 5% (w/v) dose group, thus the mean body weight loss of the 5% (w/v) dose group was more than 5 %. However there was no clear dose relationship and all changes were considered as individual variability.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
In conclusion, under the conditions of the present assay, the test item, tested in a suitable vehicle, was shown to have no sensitisation potential (non-sensitizer) in the Local Lymph Node Assay.

The following classification/labelling is triggered:
Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP) / GHS (rev. 6) 2015: none.