Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 07 August 2014 to 07 November 2014
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 015
- Report date:
- 2015
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.10 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- JAPAN: Guidelines for Screening Mutagenicity Testing Of Chemicals
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Hexadecyl acetate
- EC Number:
- 211-103-7
- EC Name:
- Hexadecyl acetate
- Cas Number:
- 629-70-9
- Molecular formula:
- C18H36O2
- IUPAC Name:
- hexadecyl acetate
1
Method
- Target gene:
- NA
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- lymphocytes:
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Cells were grown in Eagle's minimal essential medium with HEPES
buffer (MEM), supplemented "in-house" with L-glutamine, penicillin/ streptomycin, amphotericin B and 15% foetal calf serum
- Cytokinesis block (if used):
- yes, democolcine
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- phenobarbitone/β-naphthoflavone induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment 1 (μg/ml) without S9: 0, 5.63, 11.25, 22.5, 45, 90, 180 0, 5.63, Experiment 1 (μg/ml) with S9: 11.25, 22.5, 45, 90, 180 μg/ml
Experiment 2 (μg/ml) without S9: 0, 5.63, 11.25, 22.5, 45, 90, 180, 360
Experiment 2 (μg/ml) with S9: 0, 5.63, 11.25, 22.5, 45, 90, 180, 360 - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: acetone
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The test item was not sufficiently soluble in water or DMSO.
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- acetone
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- not specified
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium; preincubation; in suspension; as impregnation on paper disk
With Metabolic Activation: Cultures were established approximately 48 hours prior to treatment. Cultures were incubated at 37°C for 4 hours in the presence of the test material prior to washing.
Without Metabolic Activation: Cultures were established approximately 48 hours prior to treatment. In Experiment 1, cultures were incubated at 37°C for 4 hours in the presence of the test material prior to washing. In Experiment 2, the cultures were incubated in the presence of the substance at 37°c for 24 hours
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 48
- Exposure duration: 4 or 24 hours
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 20 or 0 hours
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): N/A
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): Mitosis was arrested by addition of democolcine two hours prior to the required harvest time and the cells were harvested and fixed
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): N/A
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): yes
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): 5% Gurrs Giemsa
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Treatments performed in duplicate.
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: A total of 2000 lymphocyte cell nuclei were counted and the number of cells in metaphase recorded and expressed as the mitotic index and as a percentage of the vehicle control value. Where possible the first 100 consecutive well-spread metaphases from each culture were counted.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: Yes in comparison to controls
- Determination of endoreplication: If the chromosomes are arranged in closely apposed pairs, ie. 4 chromatids instead of 2, the cell is scored as endoreduplicated - Evaluation criteria:
- A positive response was recorded for a particular treatment if the % cells with aberrations, excluding gaps, markedly exceeded that seen in the concurrent control, either with or without a clear dose relationship.
For modest increases in aberration frequency a dose response relationship is generally required and appropriate statistical tests may be applied in order to record a positive response. - Statistics:
- The frequency of cells with aberrations excluding gaps and the frequency of polyploid cells was compared, where necessary, with the concurrent vehicle control value using Fisher's Exact test.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes: primary culture
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- concentrations limited by the presence of precipitate, see text
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- Preliminary Toxicity Test
The dose range for the Preliminary Toxicity Test was 0, 11.11, 22.23, 44.45, 88.91, 177.81, 355.63, 711.25, 1422.5, 2845 μg/ml.
The maximum dose was the 10 mM concentration. A precipitate of the test item was observed at and above 44.45 μg/ml in both non-S9 exposure groups and at and above 88.91 ug/ml in the with-S9 exposure group.
Microscopic assessment of the slides prepared from the exposed cultures showed that metaphase cells were present at up to 2845 ug/mL in both of the 4(20)-hour exposure groups. In the 24-hour exposure group metaphase cells were present up to 2845 ug/mL. The selection of the
maximum dose level was based on toxicity and also on the onset of the formation of a greasy/oily precipitate, where it was considered that the maximum exposure to the test material was occurring.
Experiment 1
No inhibition of mitotic index was observed in the absence of 2% S9 or in the presence of S9. All of the vehicle control cultures had frequencies of cells with chromosome aberrations within the expected range. The positive control items induced statistically significant increases in the frequency of cells with aberrations indicating that the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the S9-mix were validated. The test item did not induce any statistically significant increases in the frequency of cells with aberrations, either in the absence or presence of metabolic activation. There was no significant increase in the incidence of polyploidy.
Experiment 2
A dose-related inhibition of mitotic index was observed in both exposure groups. In the absence of S9, 25% mitotic inhibition was observed at 180 ug/mL. In the presence of 1% S9, a maximum of 28% mitotic inhibition was achieved at 90 ug/mL. The maximum dose level selected for metaphase analysis was based on toxicity and precipitate in both exposure groups.
Results
All vehicle (acetone) controls had frequencies of cells with aberrations within the range expected for normal human lymphocytes. All the positive control items induced statistically significant increases in the frequency of cells with aberrations indicating that the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of theS9-mix were validated. The test item was slightly toxic and exposure was limited by the solubility of the test substance. The test substance did not induce any statistically significant increases in the frequency of cells with aberrations, in either of two separate experiments.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The test item was considered to be non-clastogenic to human lymphocytes in vitro.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
