Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1994
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1994
Report date:
1994

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Version / remarks:
1992
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
Existing study

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Dihydrogen bis[monoperoxyphthalato(2-)-O1,OO1]magnesate(2-)
EC Number:
279-013-0
EC Name:
Dihydrogen bis[monoperoxyphthalato(2-)-O1,OO1]magnesate(2-)
Cas Number:
78948-87-5
Molecular formula:
C16H8MgO10.2H
IUPAC Name:
Dihydrogen bis[monoperoxyphthalato(2-)-O1,OO1]magnesate(2-)

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Dunkin-Hartley
Sex:
male
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Møllegaard Breeding Centre Deutschland GmbH, D-16352 Schönwalde
- Age at study initiation:7-8 weeks
- Weight at study initiation:285-377 g
- Housing: co-housing 2-3 animals
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 d


ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21+/-3
- Humidity (%): 55+/-15
- Air changes (per hr):10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light):12/12

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
intradermal
Vehicle:
water
Concentration / amount:
0.5%
Day(s)/duration:
0
Route:
epicutaneous, semiocclusive
Vehicle:
water
Concentration / amount:
50%
Day(s)/duration:
7-9
Challenge
No.:
#1
Route:
epicutaneous, semiocclusive
Vehicle:
water
Concentration / amount:
50%
Day(s)/duration:
21-22
No. of animals per dose:
20 in test group, 10 in control group
Positive control substance(s):
no

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Key result
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
50%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Key result
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
50%
No. with + reactions:
1
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:
one animal showed a slight erythema
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Key result
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
not indicated
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Key result
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
positive control
Dose level:
not indicated
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Remarks:
positive control not used

Any other information on results incl. tables

No positive skin reactions were observed in any of the control- or test group animals following challenge administration. One animal in the test group showed a slight erythema after 48h.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
In a study according to OECD 406 in guinea pigs, MMPP was not sensitizing.
Executive summary:

The study was performed in year 1994 according to OECD 406 and GLP. No positive skin reactions were observed in any of the control-or test group animals following challenge administration.

One animal in the test group showed a slight erythema after 48h. The test item was not sensitizing in guinea pigs.