Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Genetic toxicity in vitro

Description of key information

The test substance fatty acid, tall oil, reaction products with diethylenetriamine, maleic acid, tetraetyhlenpentamine and triethylenetetramine was assessed in three in vitro mutagenicity studies, namely according to OECD 471, 473 and 476, and was found negative in all three studies for mutagenicity. The results on the source substance can be used to assess the mutagenic potential of the target substance fatty acids, tall-oil, reaction products with maleic anhydride and triethylenetetramine, which is a main component of the source substance, and thus, also the target substance can be considered negative for mutagenicity.

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Justification for type of information:
REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH

1. HYPOTHESIS FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
The target substance Fatty acids, tall-oil, reaction products with maleic anhydride and triethylene-tetramine (TOFA-MA-TETA) and the source substance Fatty acids, tall-oil, reaction products with di-ethylenetriamine (DETA), maleic anhydride, tetraethylenepentamine (TEPA) and triethylenetetramine (TETA) are characterised by the same starting materials: the hydrophobic part from fatty acids and the hydrophilic part from the polyethyleneamines.
The source substance is a mixture of ethyleneamines of different lengths (DETA, TETA and TEPA). The target substance contains only one ethyleneamine: TETA.
The source and the target substance show therefore the same reactive groups and a similar composition with the absence of two original ethyleneamines (DETA and TEPA) as biggest difference. A read-across to the source is therefore justified.

2. SOURCE AND TARGET CHEMICAL(S) (INCLUDING INFORMATION ON PURITY AND IMPURITIES)
The target substance actually is manufactured from the same starting materials of the source:
Fatty acids, tall-oil and maleic anhydride. TOFA is reacted with maleic anhydride to make a Diels-Alder intermediate which is a tri-acid. This is reacted with the TETA to produce a mixture of amido-amine & oligomeric UVCB constituents. The source substance also contains two other ethyleneamines: di-ethylenetriamine and tetraethylenepentamine.
The source substance has been registered already and was found not being genotoxic in a bacterial genetic toxicity test in vitro. The same conclusion is applied to the target substance.

3. ANALOGUE APPROACH JUSTIFICATION
The target substance is one of the constituent of the UVCB source substance and thus read-across from the bigger compound Fatty acids, tall-oil, reaction products with diethylenetriamine, maleic anhydride, tetraethylenepentamine and triethylenetetramine to TOFA-MA-TETA is common practice and justified.

4. DATA MATRIX
Whereas the source substance is a Fatty acids, tall-oil, reaction products with di-ethylenetriamine (DETA), maleic anhydride, tetraethylenepentamine (TEPA) and triethylenetetramine (TETA), hence using a mixture of DETA, TETA and TEPA as reactant, the target substance uses pure TETA (triethylenetetramine) instead, being a more purified (narrower cut distillation) form of DETA/TETA/TEPA resulting in a name change of the target substance, being Fatty acids, tall-oil, reaction products with maleic anhydride and triethylenetetramine (TETA).
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 97
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
at >3 mg/plate in absence of S9 and at 5 mg/plate in presence of S9
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
at >3 mg/plate in absence of S9 and at 1 mg/plate in presence of S9
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 102
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
at 5 mg/plate in the initial assay and at 3 mg/plate in the repeat assay, in absence of S9. At > 3 mg/plate in presence of S9.
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Conclusions:
There was no evidence of an increase in the number of revertant colonies that exceeded twice background in any of the five tester strains examined at dose levels up to 5 mg/plate in the presence or absence of a metabolic activation source (S9). The lack of a mutagenic response indicates that the source substance fatty acid, tall oil, reaction products with diethylenetriamine, maleic anhydride, tetraetyhlenpentamine and triethylenetetramine as well as the target substance fatty acid, tall oil, reaction products with maleic anhydride and triethylenetetramine is non genotoxic in tester strains TA97a, TA98, TA100, TA102 and TA1535 under the conditions employed. Based on these results, Polyamide is not likely to be carcinogenic.
Endpoint:
in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Justification for type of information:
REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH

1. HYPOTHESIS FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
The target substance Fatty acids, tall-oil, reaction products with maleic anhydride and triethylene-tetramine (TOFA-MA-TETA) and the source substance Fatty acids, tall-oil, reaction products with di-ethylenetriamine (DETA), maleic anhydride, tetraethylenepentamine (TEPA) and triethylenetetramine (TETA) are characterised by the same starting materials: the hydrophobic part from fatty acids and the hydrophilic part from the polyethyleneamines.
The source substance is a mixture of ethyleneamines of different lengths (DETA, TETA and TEPA). The target substance contains only one ethyleneamine: TETA.
The source and the target substance show therefore the same reactive groups and a similar composition with the absence of two original ethyleneamines (DETA and TEPA) as biggest difference. A read-across to the source is therefore justified.

2. SOURCE AND TARGET CHEMICAL(S) (INCLUDING INFORMATION ON PURITY AND IMPURITIES)
The target substance actually is manufactured from the same starting materials of the source:
Fatty acids, tall-oil and maleic anhydride. TOFA is reacted with maleic anhydride to make a Diels-Alder intermediate which is a tri-acid. This is reacted with the TETA to produce a mixture of amido-amine & oligomeric UVCB constituents. The source substance also contains two other ethyleneamines: di-ethylenetriamine and tetraethylenepentamine.
The source substance has been registered already and considered to be non-clastogenic in a chromosome aberration test. The same conclusion is applied to the target substance.

3. ANALOGUE APPROACH JUSTIFICATION
The target substance is one of the constituent of the UVCB source substance and thus read-across from the bigger compound Fatty acids, tall-oil, reaction products with diethylenetriamine, maleic anhydride, tetraethylenepentamine and triethylenetetramine to TOFA-MA-TETA is common practice and justified.

4. DATA MATRIX
Whereas the source substance is a Fatty acids, tall-oil, reaction products with di-ethylenetriamine (DETA), maleic anhydride, tetraethylenepentamine (TEPA) and triethylenetetramine (TETA), hence using a mixture of DETA, TETA and TEPA as reactant, the target substance uses pure TETA (triethylenetetramine) instead, being a more purified (narrower cut distillation) form of DETA/TETA/TEPA resulting in a name change of the target substance, being Fatty acids, tall-oil, reaction products with maleic anhydride and triethylenetetramine (TETA).
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.10 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.5375 - In vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Species / strain:
Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
at 1 mg/mL in experiment II without S9, a relevant decrease of the relative mitotic index (<70%) was noted
Vehicle controls validity:
not specified
Untreated negative controls validity:
not specified
Positive controls validity:
not specified
Remarks on result:
other: all strains/cell types tested
Conclusions:
The test item fatty acids, tall-oil, reaction products with diethylenetriamine, maleic anhydride, tetraethylenepentamine and triethylenetetramine, the source substance, is considered to be non-clastogenic and as this is also considered for the target substance fatty acids, tall-oil, reaction products with maleic anhydride and triethylenetetramine.

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Justification for type of information:
REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH

1. HYPOTHESIS FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
The target substance Fatty acids, tall-oil, reaction products with maleic anhydride and triethylene-tetramine (TOFA-MA-TETA) and the source substance Fatty acids, tall-oil, reaction products with di-ethylenetriamine (DETA), maleic anhydride, tetraethylenepentamine (TEPA) and triethylenetetramine (TETA) are characterised by the same starting materials: the hydrophobic part from fatty acids and the hydrophilic part from the polyethyleneamines.
The source substance is a mixture of ethyleneamines of different lengths (DETA, TETA and TEPA). The target substance contains only one ethyleneamine: TETA.
The source and the target substance show therefore the same reactive groups and a similar composition with the absence of two original ethyleneamines (DETA and TEPA) as biggest difference. A read-across to the source is therefore justified.

2. SOURCE AND TARGET CHEMICAL(S) (INCLUDING INFORMATION ON PURITY AND IMPURITIES)
The target substance actually is manufactured from the same starting materials of the source:
Fatty acids, tall-oil and maleic anhydride. TOFA is reacted with maleic anhydride to make a Diels-Alder intermediate which is a tri-acid. This is reacted with the TETA to produce a mixture of amido-amine & oligomeric UVCB constituents. The source substance also contains two other ethyleneamines: di-ethylenetriamine and tetraethylenepentamine.
The source substance has been registered already and it has been considered to be non mutagenic in the mouse lymphoma thymidine kinase locus using the cell line L5178Y. The same conclusion is applied to the target substance.

3. ANALOGUE APPROACH JUSTIFICATION
The target substance is one of the constituent of the UVCB source substance and thus read-across from the bigger compound Fatty acids, tall-oil, reaction products with diethylenetriamine, maleic anhydride, tetraethylenepentamine and triethylenetetramine to TOFA-MA-TETA is common practice and justified.

4. DATA MATRIX
Whereas the source substance is a Fatty acids, tall-oil, reaction products with di-ethylenetriamine (DETA), maleic anhydride, tetraethylenepentamine (TEPA) and triethylenetetramine (TETA), hence using a mixture of DETA, TETA and TEPA as reactant, the target substance uses pure TETA (triethylenetetramine) instead, being a more purified (narrower cut distillation) form of DETA/TETA/TEPA resulting in a name change of the target substance, being Fatty acids, tall-oil, reaction products with maleic anhydride and triethylenetetramine (TETA).
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
GLP compliance:
yes
Species / strain:
mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
Growth inhibition was observed in exp I and II with and without metabolic activation.
Vehicle controls validity:
not specified
Untreated negative controls validity:
not specified
Positive controls validity:
not specified
Conclusions:
The test substance fatty acids, tall-oil, reaction products with diethylenetriamine, maleic anhydride, tetraethylenepentamine and triethylenetetramine is considered to be non mutagenic in the mouse lymphoma thymidine kinase locus using the cell line L5178Y, and likewise the same is assumed for fatty acids, tall-oil, reaction products with maleic anhydride and triethylenetetramine (the target substance).
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (negative)

Additional information

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on three negative in vitro mutagenicity studies, the substance is considered non-mutagenic and thus, no classification for mutagenic potential according to CLP (Regulation EC No 1272/2008) is required.