Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
From April 23, 2008 to April 24, 2008
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2008
Report date:
2008

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
The body weight of the animal was not determined after sacrifice. Evaluation: Sufficient data was available to assess the possible irritation or corrosion potential of the test substance. The study integrity was not adversely affected by the deviations.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
The body weight of the animal was not determined after sacrifice. Evaluation: Sufficient data was available to assess the possible irritation or corrosion potential of the test substance. The study integrity was not adversely affected by the deviations.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.2400 (Acute Eye Irritation)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
The body weight of the animal was not determined after sacrifice. Evaluation: Sufficient data was available to assess the possible irritation or corrosion potential of the test substance. The study integrity was not adversely affected by the deviations.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: JMAFF guidelines (2000) including the most recent partial revisions
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
The body weight of the animal was not determined after sacrifice. Evaluation: Sufficient data was available to assess the possible irritation or corrosion potential of the test substance. The study integrity was not adversely affected by the deviations.
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Quaternary ammonium compounds, C20-22-alkyltrimethyl, chlorides
EC Number:
271-756-9
EC Name:
Quaternary ammonium compounds, C20-22-alkyltrimethyl, chlorides
Cas Number:
68607-24-9
Test material form:
solid

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan France SARL, Gannat, France
- Age at study initiation: 10-12 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: 2215 g
- Housing: Individually in labeled cages with perforated floors (dimensions 56x44x37.5 cm).
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Pelleted diet for rabbits approximately 100 grams per day. Hay was provided at least three times a week
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Free access to tap water
- Acclimation period: 5 days before start of treatment under laboratory conditions


ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20.3 – 21.3
- Humidity (%): 45 - 55
- Air changes (per hr): 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: The other eye remained untreated and served as the reference control
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 64.9 mg (volume of approx. 0.1mL)
Duration of treatment / exposure:
24 h
Observation period (in vivo):
1 and 24 hours after instillation of the test substance
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
1 (male)
Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): not done

SCORING SYSTEM: Draize scoring system

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Remarks:
opacity
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
other: 1 h
Score:
1
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not reversible
Remarks:
Within 24 h
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Remarks:
opacity
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24 h
Score:
2
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks:
within 24 h
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
other: 1 h
Score:
1
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
not reversible
Remarks:
within 24 h
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24 h
Score:
1
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
not reversible
Remarks:
within 24 h
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
redness
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
other: 1 h
Score:
3
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
not reversible
Remarks:
within 24 h
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
redness
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24 h
Score:
3
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
not reversible
Remarks:
within 24 h
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
chemosis
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
other: 1 h
Score:
4
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not reversible
Remarks:
within 24 h
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
chemosis
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24 h
Score:
4
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not reversible
Remarks:
within 24 h
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
discharge
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
other: 1 h
Score:
3
Reversibility:
not reversible
Remarks:
within 24 h
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
discharge
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24 h
Score:
3
Reversibility:
not reversible
Remarks:
within 24 h
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
48 h
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
72 h
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
48 h
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
72 h
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
48 h
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
72 h
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Instillation of approximately 65 mg of the test substance (a volume of approximately 0.1 mL) into an eye of one rabbit resulted in effects on the cornea, iris and conjunctivae. The corneal injury consisted of opacity (maximum grade 2) and epithelial damage (100% of the corneal area). Iridial irritation grade 1 was observed and the irritation of the conjunctivae consisted of redness, chemosis and discharge. Grey/white discoloration of the eyelids and nictating membrane (a sign of necrosis) was noted. Erythema and oedema of the outside of the eyelids was noted. Based on the severity of the ocular lesions observed during the study, the animal was sacrificed for ethical reasons immediately after the 24 hours observation and the two further rabbits assigned to the study were not treated.
Other effects:
Remnants of the test substance were present in the eye on Day 1. No staining of (peri) ocular tissues by the test substance was observed. No symptoms of systemic toxicity were observed in the animal until the animal was sacrficed due to severe ocular effects.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: Eye Damage 1 (causes serious eye damage) based on CLP criteria
Conclusions:
Under the study conditions, the test substance was considered to be causes serious eye damage to rabbit eyes.
Executive summary:

A study was conducted to determine the eye irritation/corrosion of the test substance, C20-22 TMAC (active: 97.8%), according to OECD Guideline 405 and EU Method B.5, in compliance with GLP. In the study, 65 mg (approx. 0.1mL) of the test substance was instilled into an eye of one rabbit. The test sites were examined for evidence of irritation and scored according to Draize method. Observations were made 1 and 24 h after instillation. Instillation of the test substance resulted in effects on the cornea, iris and conjunctivae. The corneal injury consisted of opacity (maximum grade 2) and epithelial damage (100% of the corneal area). Iridial irritation grade 1 was observed and the irritation of the conjunctivae consisted of redness, chemosis and discharge. Grey/white discoloration of the eyelids and nictating membrane (a sign of necrosis) was noted. Erythema and oedema of the outside of the eyelids was noted. Based on the severity of the ocular lesions observed during the study, the animal was sacrificed for ethical reasons immediately after the 24 h observation and the two further rabbits assigned to the study were not treated. Under the study conditions, the test substance was considered to be causes serious eye damage to rabbit eyes (Stitzinger, 2008).