Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 947-842-3 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to reproduction
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2012
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Cross-reference
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- assessment report
Reference
- Endpoint:
- screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2012
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- Justification for read-across is provided in chapter 13 as separate statement
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 421 (Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Limit test:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Composition of the test material:
68.1 % N-cocoyl glycine sodium salt
19.6% Sodium chloride
4.4 % Glycine
6.9% Fatty acid - Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Laboratories BV
- Age at study initiation: approx. 7 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 199 - 233 g (males), 133 - 154 g (females)
- Fasting period before study: yes (overnight)
- Housing: in groups of 5 in Makrolon type-4 cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: yes
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 +/- 3 °C
- Humidity (%): 30 - 70 %
- Air changes (per hr): 10 - 15 per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hour dark / light cycle - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- water
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
DIET PREPARATION
- Rate of preparation of diet (frequency): n.a.
- Mixing appropriate amounts with (Type of food): n.a.
- Storage temperature of food: n.a.
VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): purified water
- Concentration in vehicle: 0 - 100 mg/mL
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 10 mL (dose volume) - Details on mating procedure:
- - M/F ratio per cage: 1:1
- Length of cohabitation: until evidence of copulation (up to 14 days pairing period)
- Proof of pregnancy: vaginal plug / sperm in vaginal smear referred to as day 0 of pregnancy
- After 14 days of unsuccessful pairing replacement of first male by another male with proven fertility.
- Further matings after two unsuccessful attempts: no
- After successful mating each pregnant female was caged: individually
- Any other deviations from standard protocol: no - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Males: minimum 4 weeks
Females: approximately 7 weeks - Frequency of treatment:
- once daily
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 62.5 mg/kg bw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 250 mg/kg bw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 11 per sex per group
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: Based on dose-range-finding study
- Rationale for animal assignment: random - Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: twice daily
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: daily
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: daily from start of treatment to day of necropsy
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study): n.a.
WATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if drinking water study): n.a. - Sperm parameters (parental animals):
- Parameters examined in [all/P/F1/F2] male parental generations:
No abnormal microscopic findings during sperm staging regarding completeness of stages and maturation of cell populations. - Litter observations:
- PARAMETERS EXAMINED
The following parameters were examined in [F1 / F2 / F3] offspring:
number and sex of pups, stillbirths, live births, postnatal mortality, presence of gross anomalies, weight gain, physical or behavioural abnormalities
GROSS EXAMINATION OF DEAD PUPS:
yes, for external and internal abnormalities; possible cause of death was determined for pups born or found dead - Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- SACRIFICE
- Male animals: All surviving animals after treatment for 28 days.
- Maternal animals: All surviving animals on day 21 post coitum (if birth did not occur at that day, the dam was sacrificed on day 25 post coitum).
GROSS NECROPSY
- Gross necropsy consisted of external and internal examinations including the cervical, thoracic, and abdominal viscera.
HISTOPATHOLOGY / ORGAN WEIGHTS - Postmortem examinations (offspring):
- SACRIFICE
The F1 offspring were sacrificed at 4 days of age.
GROSS NECROPSY
No test item related findings in any pubs at any dose level observed. - Clinical signs:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- At the dose level of 1000 mg/kg bw/day, bedding in mouth was observed in all males starting from day 5 of the treatment and in all females starting from day 8 of the treatment until the completion of the treatment.
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Males:
At the dose level of 1000 mg/kg bw/day, statistically significant reduction in body weights and body weight gains were noted in males. Reduction in body weights was noted from day 5 of the pre-pairing period until the completion of the study, reduction in body weight gain was noted from day 5 to 14 of the pre-pairing period. During pairing period, body weight gain of males at the high dose level was similar to the body weight gain in the control group.
Females:
At the dose level of 1000 mg/kg bw/day, lower body weights (not statistically significantly) and lower body weight gain (statistically significant on individual days) were noted during gestation.
The effect found for food consumption and body weight were considered as treatment related but not adverse, because the relative differecen to terminal body were not severe (less than 10%) and seemed to stagnate with the progression of the treatment. - Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- For males in pre-pairing Period:
At the dose level of 1000 mg/kg bw/day, statistically significant reduction in food consumption was noted in males. Mean food consumption over the pre-pairing period was 21.2 g/animal/day compared to 25.2 g/animal/day in the control group.
For females in pre-pairing, gestation and lactation periods:
At the dose level of 1000 mg/kg bw/day, statistically significant reduction in food consumption was noted in females during the pre-pairing and gestation periods. During the lactation period, food consumption remained lower but not statistically significantly. Mean food consumption during the pre-pairing, gestation and lactation periods was at the high dose level: 16.0, 19.8 and 21.7 g/animal/day, compared to the respective values of 18.3, 22.9 and 25.0 g/ animal/day in the
control group.
The effect found for food consumption and body weight were considered as treatment related but not adverse, because the relative differecen to terminal body were not severe (less than 10%) and seemed to stagnate with the progression of the treatment. - Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- no effects observed
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- no effects observed
- Reproductive performance:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- At dose of 1000 mg/kg/day the number of pups born alive and the number of pups on LD4 were reduced.
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 250 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- body weight and weight gain
- food consumption and compound intake
- reproductive performance
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- The findings of reduced number of alive pups at first check and on lactation day 4 are not considered as evidence of reproduction toxicity of sodium cocoyl glycinate. - At dose of 1000 mg/kg/day, the body weight and the food consumption of males and females were reduced. These effects were considered as not adverse nature for parental animals, because the relative difference of body weight to the control values were within 10% and seemed to stagnate with the treatment progression. Nevertheless, it is reasonable to consider the reduced viability of offspings as the consequence of reduced food uptake during pregnancy and laction of dams. - The test material contained 20% NaCl and the animals were in fact treated with NaCl up to 200 mg/kg/day. It is well-known that high salt maternal intake is associated with adverse effects on the offspring (i.e. Maruyama K et al., Lif Sci.2015 Sep 1; 136:42-51). The reduced viability of offsprings could be related to the high salt intake of dams as well. In conclusion, the effects found at 1000 mg/kg/day is not to be interpreted as the evidence of reproduction toxicity of sodium cocoyl glycinate.
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality / viability:
- mortality observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- At 1000 mg/kg bw/day, the numbers of pups alive at first check and on LD4 were reduced.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 250 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- viability
- mortality
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- The findings of reduced number of alive pups at first check and on lactation day 4 are not considered as evidence of reproduction toxicity of sodium cocoyl glycinate. - At dose of 1000 mg/kg/day, the body weight and the food consumption of males and females were reduced. These effects were considered as not adverse nature for parental animals, because the relative difference of body weight to the control values were within 10% and seemed to stagnate with the treatment progression. Nevertheless, it is reasonable to consider the reduced viability of offspings as the consequence of reduced food uptake during pregnancy and laction of dams. - The test material contained 20% NaCl and the animals were in fact treated with NaCl up to 200 mg/kg/day. It is well-known that high salt maternal intake is associated with adverse effects on the offspring (i.e. Maruyama K et al., Lif Sci.2015 Sep 1; 136:42-51). The reduced viability of offsprings could be related to the high salt intake of dams as well. In conclusion, the effects found at 1000 mg/kg/day is not to be interpreted as the evidence of reproduction toxicity of sodium cocoyl glycinate.
- Key result
- Reproductive effects observed:
- yes
- Lowest effective dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Treatment related:
- yes
- Relation to other toxic effects:
- reproductive effects as a secondary non-specific consequence of other toxic effects
- Dose response relationship:
- yes
- Relevant for humans:
- no
- Conclusions:
- The reproduction toxicity the registration substance sodium N-lauroyl glutamate is derived based on the read-across sodium N-cocoyl glycinate. No significant potential for reproduction toxicity can be reliably derived.
- Executive summary:
The reproduction toxicity of the registration substance "sodium N-lauroyl glutamte" was evaluated based on the read-across approach using the reproduction toxicity data for sodium N-cocoyl glycinate.
The registration substance and the read-across sources are amides of fatty acids and amino acids and can be characterized as "N-fatty acyl amino acids", of which endogeous occurence and metabolism are known. Based on the comparable chemical structure, comparable phys-chem data and expected comparable metabolism, these compound are likely exhibit comparable toxicity profiles.
The reproduction toxicity of sodium cocoyl glycinate was investigated according to the Guideline OECD 421. The test material, composed of 70% sodium cocoyl glycinate and 20 % sodium chloride, was dissolved in water and was administered to rats via gavage at dosages of 0, 62.5, 250, and 1000 mg/kg bw/day, corresponding to up to 700 mg/kg bw/day of sodium cocoyl glycinate. It was given to male rats for 28 days and to female rats for 14 days prior to pairing, through the pairing and gestation periods until the offsprings reached day 4 post partum.
At high dose, the body weight and the food consumption of males and females were reduced. These effects were considered as not adverse nature for parental animals, because the relative difference to the control values were within 10% and seemed to stagnate with the treatment progression. No other effect was noted for parental animals.
With respecto the reproduction performance no effects on mating performance, fertility, corpora lutea count or duration of gestation were observed at any dose level. At high dose, the numbers of alive pups at first check and on lactation day 4 were reduced. This effect was considered as consequence of reduced food uptake and/or high salt content of the test material and therefore not considered as evidence of specific reproduction toxicity of sodium cocoyl glycinate.
The NOAEL of 250 mg/kg bw/day was established for reproduction toxicity of the test material.
Likewise, the registration substance "sodium N-lauroyl glutamate" is considered as ot low reproduction toxicity.
Table 1: Summary of Food Consumption of Males
Doses [mg/kg /day] |
|
Food Consumption of Males [g]; n = 11 |
|
Pre-paring Day 1-8 |
Pre-paring Day 8-14 |
||
0 |
Mean |
24.9 |
25.5 |
S.D. |
1.4 |
1.5 |
|
62.5 |
Mean |
24.7 |
24.8 |
S.D. |
2.4 |
2.3 |
|
250 |
Mean |
24.2 |
23.8 |
S.D. |
2.4 |
2.5 |
|
1000 |
Mean |
20.7 ** |
21.7 ** |
S.D. |
3.7 |
3.4 |
*/**: DUNNETT-Test based on pooled variance sig. at 5% (*), 1% (**)
Table2: Summary of Food Consumption of Females; Prepairing, Gestation and Lactation
Doses [mg/kg /day] |
|
Food Consumption of Females [g] |
|||||||
Pre-pairing |
|
Gestation |
|
Lactation |
|||||
Day 1-8 |
Day 8-14 |
GD 0-7 |
GD 7-14 |
GD 14-21 |
LD 1-4 |
||||
0 |
Mean |
18.1 |
18.4 |
22.8 |
23.5 |
22.4 |
25.0 |
||
S.D. |
1.3 |
1.6 |
1.7 |
1.9 |
1.4 |
6.7 |
|||
n |
11 |
11 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
9 |
|||
62.5
|
Mean |
17.8 |
18.2 |
21.8 |
22.4 |
21.1 |
26.2 |
||
S.D. |
1.3 |
1.1 |
1.2 |
0.7 |
1.0 |
4.4 |
|||
n |
11 |
11 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
11 |
|||
250 |
Mean |
18.4 |
18.7 |
22.3 |
23.1 |
21.5 |
26.9 |
||
S.D. |
2.7 |
1.9 |
2.2 |
2.2 |
2.4 |
3.4 |
|||
n |
11 |
11 |
11 |
11 |
11 |
11 |
|||
1000 |
Mean |
15.6 * |
16.4 * |
19.6 ** |
20.0 ** |
19.8 * |
21.7 |
||
S.D. |
2.0 |
1.7 |
2.2 |
2.9 |
2.2 |
5.6 |
|||
n |
11 |
11 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
*/**: DUNNETT-Test based on pooled variance sig. at 5% (*), 1% (**)
Table 3: Summary of Body Weights of Males
Doses [mg/kg /day] |
|
Body weight of males [g]; n = 11 |
|||||
Pre-pairing period |
Pairing period |
||||||
1d |
8d |
14d |
1d |
8d |
15d |
||
0 |
Mean |
311 |
335 |
354 |
350 |
367 |
381 |
S.D. |
8 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
13 |
|
62.5 |
Mean |
310 |
332 |
349 |
348 |
362 |
379 |
S.D. |
8 |
7 |
11 |
13 |
13 |
12 |
|
250 |
Mean |
310 |
330 |
345 |
343 |
360 |
376 |
S.D. |
8 |
12 |
15 |
14 |
18 |
21 |
|
1000 |
Mean |
310 |
318** |
332** |
328** |
346* |
363* |
S.D. |
8 |
17 |
19 |
19 |
18 |
18 |
*/**: DUNNETT-Test based on pooled variance sig. at 5% (*), 1% (**)
Table 4: Summary of Body Weights of Females; Pre-mating
Doses [mg/kg /day] |
|
Body weight [g]; n = 11 |
||
1d |
8d |
14d |
||
0 |
Mean |
195 |
203 |
209 |
S.D. |
8 |
10 |
10 |
|
62.5 |
Mean |
194 |
204 |
211 |
S.D. |
6 |
8 |
11 |
|
250 |
Mean |
196 |
205 |
210 |
S.D. |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
1000 |
Mean |
197 |
201 |
207 |
S.D. |
8 |
11 |
11 |
*/**: DUNNETT-Test based on pooled variance sig. at 5% (*), 1% (**)
Table 5: Summary of Body Weights of Females; Gestation and Lactation
Doses [mg/kg /day] |
|
Body weight [g] |
||||||
GD0 |
GD7 |
GD14 |
GD21 |
|
LD1 |
LD4 |
||
0 |
Mean |
211 |
240 |
268 |
345 |
|
240 |
252 |
S.D. |
11 |
16 |
15 |
19 |
|
14 |
17 |
|
n |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
|
9 |
9 |
|
62.5
|
Mean |
211 |
240 |
268 |
337 |
|
244 |
256 |
S.D. |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
|
15 |
13 |
|
n |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
11 |
11 |
|
250 |
Mean |
216 |
244 |
269 |
334 |
|
245 |
258 |
S.D. |
11 |
10 |
13 |
22 |
|
16 |
10 |
|
n |
11 |
11 |
11 |
11 |
|
11 |
11 |
|
1000 |
Mean |
214 |
234 |
261 |
329 |
|
238 |
251 |
S.D. |
15 |
14 |
16 |
16 |
|
18 |
15 |
|
n |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
10 |
10 |
One female group 1 and one female group 2: mating not detected, therefore body weight for gestation missing
Table 6. Summary of reproductive parameters
Dose (mg/kg bw) |
0 |
62.5 mg/kg/day |
250 mg/kg/day |
1000 mg/kg/day |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of females paired
|
11 |
11 |
11 |
11 |
Number of females mated (confirmed by vaginal smear) |
10 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
Number of females pregnant (confirmed at littering/necropsy) |
9 |
11 |
11 |
10 |
Dystocia death |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Number of females with live litters |
9 |
11 |
11 |
10 |
Precoital interval (days) |
2.4 ± 1.3 (n = 10) |
2.4 ± 1.0 (n = 10) |
4.3 ± 3.3 (n = 11) |
4.7 ± 4.0 (n = 11) |
Gestation length (days) |
21.6± 0.5(n= 8) |
21.3± 0.5(n=10) |
21.5 ± 0.5(n= 11) |
21.6 ± 0.5(n = 10) |
Corpora lutea |
14.1 ± 1.2 (n= 9) |
14.0 ± 1.3 (n=11) |
14.3 ± 1.4 (n= 11) |
14.2± 1.9 (n=10) |
Implantation sites |
13.8 ± 1.3 (n= 9) |
13.0 ± 1.1 (n=11) |
13.1 ± 3.2 (n= 11) |
13.3 ± 2.3 (n=10) |
Post implantation loss |
0.6 ± 0.7(n= 9) |
0.7 ± 1.1(n= 11) |
1.5 ± 2.1(n= 11) |
2.7 ± 2.8(n= 10) |
Viable litter size at first check |
13.2 ± 1.4(n= 9) |
12.3 ± 1.6(n= 11) |
11.6 ± 3.7(n= 11) |
10.6 ± 2.0(n= 10) * |
Dead pups at first check |
0.0 |
0.1 ± 0.3(n= 11)a |
0.0 |
0.6 ± 1.9(n= 10)b |
Viable litter size LD4 |
13.2 ± 1.4(n= 9) |
11.9 ± 1.8(n= 11) |
11.5 ± 3.6(n= 11) |
9.4 ± 3.3(n= 10) * |
|
|
|
|
|
Total number born alive pups at first check |
119 |
135 |
128 |
106 |
% of males/females of born alive pups at first check |
54/46 |
49/51 |
50/50 |
42/58 |
Total number alive pups on LD 4 |
119 |
131 |
127 |
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
Body weight of pups (g) on LD1 |
5.9 ± 0.7 (n = 9) |
5.7 ± 0.6 (n = 11) |
6.0 ± 0.6 (n= 11) |
5.7 ± 0.9 (n = 10) |
Body weight of pups (g) on LD4 |
8.1 ± 1.4 (n = 9) |
8.6 ± 1.0 (n = 11) |
8.8 ± 1.3 (n = 11) |
8.2 ± 1.5 (n = 10) |
|
|
|
|
|
One female group 1 and one female group 2: mating not detected, therefore gestation length missing
*/**: Steel Test, significant at 5% (+), 1% (++)
a) One pup found dead.
b) Six pups found dead, whereas only one litter (animal no. 83) was affected. Additionally eight alive pups were found at first check for this litter.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 012
- Report date:
- 2013
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 421 (Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Sodium cocoyl glycinate (SCG) [INCI]
- IUPAC Name:
- Sodium cocoyl glycinate (SCG) [INCI]
- Details on test material:
- Stability of Test Item: Stable under storage conditions
Stability of Test Item Dilution: Unknown in PEG 300; excluded from the statement of compliance.
Storage Conditions: At room temperature (range of 20 ± 5 °C, provided by Harlan Laboratories Ltd.), light protected.
Safety Precautions: Routine hygienic procedures were used to ensure the health and safety of the personnel.
Description: Colorless solid
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Composition of the test material:
68.1 % N-cocoyl glycine sodium salt
19.6% Sodium chloride
4.4 % Glycine
6.9% Fatty acid
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Laboratories BV
- Age at study initiation: approx. 7 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 199 - 233 g (males), 133 - 154 g (females)
- Fasting period before study: yes (overnight)
- Housing: in groups of 5 in Makrolon type-4 cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: yes
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 +/- 3 °C
- Humidity (%): 30 - 70 %
- Air changes (per hr): 10 - 15 per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hour dark / light cycle
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- water
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
DIET PREPARATION
- Rate of preparation of diet (frequency): n.a.
- Mixing appropriate amounts with (Type of food): n.a.
- Storage temperature of food: n.a.
VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): purified water
- Concentration in vehicle: 0 - 100 mg/mL
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 10 mL (dose volume) - Details on mating procedure:
- - M/F ratio per cage: 1:1
- Length of cohabitation: until evidence of copulation (up to 14 days pairing period)
- Proof of pregnancy: vaginal plug / sperm in vaginal smear referred to as day 0 of pregnancy
- After 14 days of unsuccessful pairing replacement of first male by another male with proven fertility.
- Further matings after two unsuccessful attempts: no
- After successful mating each pregnant female was caged: individually
- Any other deviations from standard protocol: no - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Males: minimum 4 weeks
Females: approximately 7 weeks - Frequency of treatment:
- once daily
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 62.5 mg/kg bw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 250 mg/kg bw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 11 per sex per group
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: Based on dose-range-finding study
- Rationale for animal assignment: random
Examinations
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: twice daily
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: daily
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: daily from start of treatment to day of necropsy
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study): n.a.
WATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if drinking water study): n.a. - Sperm parameters (parental animals):
- Parameters examined in [all/P/F1/F2] male parental generations:
No abnormal microscopic findings during sperm staging regarding completeness of stages and maturation of cell populations. - Litter observations:
- PARAMETERS EXAMINED
The following parameters were examined in [F1 / F2 / F3] offspring:
number and sex of pups, stillbirths, live births, postnatal mortality, presence of gross anomalies, weight gain, physical or behavioural abnormalities
GROSS EXAMINATION OF DEAD PUPS:
yes, for external and internal abnormalities; possible cause of death was determined for pups born or found dead - Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- SACRIFICE
- Male animals: All surviving animals after treatment for 28 days.
- Maternal animals: All surviving animals on day 21 post coitum (if birth did not occur at that day, the dam was sacrificed on day 25 post coitum).
GROSS NECROPSY
- Gross necropsy consisted of external and internal examinations including the cervical, thoracic, and abdominal viscera.
HISTOPATHOLOGY / ORGAN WEIGHTS - Postmortem examinations (offspring):
- SACRIFICE
The F1 offspring were sacrificed at 4 days of age.
GROSS NECROPSY
No test item related findings in any pubs at any dose level observed.
Results and discussion
Results: P0 (first parental generation)
General toxicity (P0)
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- At the dose level of 1000 mg/kg bw/day, bedding in mouth was observed in all males starting from day 5 of the treatment and in all females starting from day 8 of the treatment until the completion of the treatment.
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Males:
At the dose level of 1000 mg/kg bw/day, statistically significant reduction in body weights and body weight gains were noted in males. Reduction in body weights was noted from day 5 of the pre-pairing period until the completion of the study, reduction in body weight gain was noted from day 5 to 14 of the pre-pairing period. During pairing period, body weight gain of males at the high dose level was similar to the body weight gain in the control group.
Females:
At the dose level of 1000 mg/kg bw/day, lower body weights (not statistically significantly) and lower body weight gain (statistically significant on individual days) were noted during gestation.
The effect found for food consumption and body weight were considered as treatment related but not adverse, because the relative differecen to terminal body were not severe (less than 10%) and seemed to stagnate with the progression of the treatment. - Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- For males in pre-pairing Period:
At the dose level of 1000 mg/kg bw/day, statistically significant reduction in food consumption was noted in males. Mean food consumption over the pre-pairing period was 21.2 g/animal/day compared to 25.2 g/animal/day in the control group.
For females in pre-pairing, gestation and lactation periods:
At the dose level of 1000 mg/kg bw/day, statistically significant reduction in food consumption was noted in females during the pre-pairing and gestation periods. During the lactation period, food consumption remained lower but not statistically significantly. Mean food consumption during the pre-pairing, gestation and lactation periods was at the high dose level: 16.0, 19.8 and 21.7 g/animal/day, compared to the respective values of 18.3, 22.9 and 25.0 g/ animal/day in the
control group.
The effect found for food consumption and body weight were considered as treatment related but not adverse, because the relative differecen to terminal body were not severe (less than 10%) and seemed to stagnate with the progression of the treatment. - Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
Reproductive function / performance (P0)
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- no effects observed
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- no effects observed
- Reproductive performance:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- At dose of 1000 mg/kg/day the number of pups born alive and the number of pups on LD4 were reduced.
Effect levels (P0)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 250 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- body weight and weight gain
- food consumption and compound intake
- reproductive performance
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- The findings of reduced number of alive pups at first check and on lactation day 4 are not considered as evidence of reproduction toxicity of sodium cocoyl glycinate. - At dose of 1000 mg/kg/day, the body weight and the food consumption of males and females were reduced. These effects were considered as not adverse nature for parental animals, because the relative difference of body weight to the control values were within 10% and seemed to stagnate with the treatment progression. Nevertheless, it is reasonable to consider the reduced viability of offspings as the consequence of reduced food uptake during pregnancy and laction of dams. - The test material contained 20% NaCl and the animals were in fact treated with NaCl up to 200 mg/kg/day. It is well-known that high salt maternal intake is associated with adverse effects on the offspring (i.e. Maruyama K et al., Lif Sci.2015 Sep 1; 136:42-51). The reduced viability of offsprings could be related to the high salt intake of dams as well. In conclusion, the effects found at 1000 mg/kg/day is not to be interpreted as the evidence of reproduction toxicity of sodium cocoyl glycinate.
Results: F1 generation
General toxicity (F1)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality / viability:
- mortality observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- At 1000 mg/kg bw/day, the numbers of pups alive at first check and on LD4 were reduced.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
Effect levels (F1)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 250 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- viability
- mortality
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- The findings of reduced number of alive pups at first check and on lactation day 4 are not considered as evidence of reproduction toxicity of sodium cocoyl glycinate. - At dose of 1000 mg/kg/day, the body weight and the food consumption of males and females were reduced. These effects were considered as not adverse nature for parental animals, because the relative difference of body weight to the control values were within 10% and seemed to stagnate with the treatment progression. Nevertheless, it is reasonable to consider the reduced viability of offspings as the consequence of reduced food uptake during pregnancy and laction of dams. - The test material contained 20% NaCl and the animals were in fact treated with NaCl up to 200 mg/kg/day. It is well-known that high salt maternal intake is associated with adverse effects on the offspring (i.e. Maruyama K et al., Lif Sci.2015 Sep 1; 136:42-51). The reduced viability of offsprings could be related to the high salt intake of dams as well. In conclusion, the effects found at 1000 mg/kg/day is not to be interpreted as the evidence of reproduction toxicity of sodium cocoyl glycinate.
Overall reproductive toxicity
- Key result
- Reproductive effects observed:
- yes
- Lowest effective dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Treatment related:
- yes
- Relation to other toxic effects:
- reproductive effects as a secondary non-specific consequence of other toxic effects
- Dose response relationship:
- yes
- Relevant for humans:
- no
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Summary of Food Consumption of Males
Doses [mg/kg /day] |
|
Food Consumption of Males [g]; n = 11 |
|
Pre-paring Day 1-8 |
Pre-paring Day 8-14 |
||
0 |
Mean |
24.9 |
25.5 |
S.D. |
1.4 |
1.5 |
|
62.5 |
Mean |
24.7 |
24.8 |
S.D. |
2.4 |
2.3 |
|
250 |
Mean |
24.2 |
23.8 |
S.D. |
2.4 |
2.5 |
|
1000 |
Mean |
20.7 ** |
21.7 ** |
S.D. |
3.7 |
3.4 |
*/**: DUNNETT-Test based on pooled variance sig. at 5% (*), 1% (**)
Table2: Summary of Food Consumption of Females; Prepairing, Gestation and Lactation
Doses [mg/kg /day] |
|
Food Consumption of Females [g] |
|||||||
Pre-pairing |
|
Gestation |
|
Lactation |
|||||
Day 1-8 |
Day 8-14 |
GD 0-7 |
GD 7-14 |
GD 14-21 |
LD 1-4 |
||||
0 |
Mean |
18.1 |
18.4 |
22.8 |
23.5 |
22.4 |
25.0 |
||
S.D. |
1.3 |
1.6 |
1.7 |
1.9 |
1.4 |
6.7 |
|||
n |
11 |
11 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
9 |
|||
62.5
|
Mean |
17.8 |
18.2 |
21.8 |
22.4 |
21.1 |
26.2 |
||
S.D. |
1.3 |
1.1 |
1.2 |
0.7 |
1.0 |
4.4 |
|||
n |
11 |
11 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
11 |
|||
250 |
Mean |
18.4 |
18.7 |
22.3 |
23.1 |
21.5 |
26.9 |
||
S.D. |
2.7 |
1.9 |
2.2 |
2.2 |
2.4 |
3.4 |
|||
n |
11 |
11 |
11 |
11 |
11 |
11 |
|||
1000 |
Mean |
15.6 * |
16.4 * |
19.6 ** |
20.0 ** |
19.8 * |
21.7 |
||
S.D. |
2.0 |
1.7 |
2.2 |
2.9 |
2.2 |
5.6 |
|||
n |
11 |
11 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
*/**: DUNNETT-Test based on pooled variance sig. at 5% (*), 1% (**)
Table 3: Summary of Body Weights of Males
Doses [mg/kg /day] |
|
Body weight of males [g]; n = 11 |
|||||
Pre-pairing period |
Pairing period |
||||||
1d |
8d |
14d |
1d |
8d |
15d |
||
0 |
Mean |
311 |
335 |
354 |
350 |
367 |
381 |
S.D. |
8 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
13 |
|
62.5 |
Mean |
310 |
332 |
349 |
348 |
362 |
379 |
S.D. |
8 |
7 |
11 |
13 |
13 |
12 |
|
250 |
Mean |
310 |
330 |
345 |
343 |
360 |
376 |
S.D. |
8 |
12 |
15 |
14 |
18 |
21 |
|
1000 |
Mean |
310 |
318** |
332** |
328** |
346* |
363* |
S.D. |
8 |
17 |
19 |
19 |
18 |
18 |
*/**: DUNNETT-Test based on pooled variance sig. at 5% (*), 1% (**)
Table 4: Summary of Body Weights of Females; Pre-mating
Doses [mg/kg /day] |
|
Body weight [g]; n = 11 |
||
1d |
8d |
14d |
||
0 |
Mean |
195 |
203 |
209 |
S.D. |
8 |
10 |
10 |
|
62.5 |
Mean |
194 |
204 |
211 |
S.D. |
6 |
8 |
11 |
|
250 |
Mean |
196 |
205 |
210 |
S.D. |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
1000 |
Mean |
197 |
201 |
207 |
S.D. |
8 |
11 |
11 |
*/**: DUNNETT-Test based on pooled variance sig. at 5% (*), 1% (**)
Table 5: Summary of Body Weights of Females; Gestation and Lactation
Doses [mg/kg /day] |
|
Body weight [g] |
||||||
GD0 |
GD7 |
GD14 |
GD21 |
|
LD1 |
LD4 |
||
0 |
Mean |
211 |
240 |
268 |
345 |
|
240 |
252 |
S.D. |
11 |
16 |
15 |
19 |
|
14 |
17 |
|
n |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
|
9 |
9 |
|
62.5
|
Mean |
211 |
240 |
268 |
337 |
|
244 |
256 |
S.D. |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
|
15 |
13 |
|
n |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
11 |
11 |
|
250 |
Mean |
216 |
244 |
269 |
334 |
|
245 |
258 |
S.D. |
11 |
10 |
13 |
22 |
|
16 |
10 |
|
n |
11 |
11 |
11 |
11 |
|
11 |
11 |
|
1000 |
Mean |
214 |
234 |
261 |
329 |
|
238 |
251 |
S.D. |
15 |
14 |
16 |
16 |
|
18 |
15 |
|
n |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
10 |
10 |
One female group 1 and one female group 2: mating not detected, therefore body weight for gestation missing
Table 6. Summary of reproductive parameters
Dose (mg/kg bw) |
0 |
62.5 mg/kg/day |
250 mg/kg/day |
1000 mg/kg/day |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of females paired
|
11 |
11 |
11 |
11 |
Number of females mated (confirmed by vaginal smear) |
10 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
Number of females pregnant (confirmed at littering/necropsy) |
9 |
11 |
11 |
10 |
Dystocia death |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Number of females with live litters |
9 |
11 |
11 |
10 |
Precoital interval (days) |
2.4 ± 1.3 (n = 10) |
2.4 ± 1.0 (n = 10) |
4.3 ± 3.3 (n = 11) |
4.7 ± 4.0 (n = 11) |
Gestation length (days) |
21.6± 0.5(n= 8) |
21.3± 0.5(n=10) |
21.5 ± 0.5(n= 11) |
21.6 ± 0.5(n = 10) |
Corpora lutea |
14.1 ± 1.2 (n= 9) |
14.0 ± 1.3 (n=11) |
14.3 ± 1.4 (n= 11) |
14.2± 1.9 (n=10) |
Implantation sites |
13.8 ± 1.3 (n= 9) |
13.0 ± 1.1 (n=11) |
13.1 ± 3.2 (n= 11) |
13.3 ± 2.3 (n=10) |
Post implantation loss |
0.6 ± 0.7(n= 9) |
0.7 ± 1.1(n= 11) |
1.5 ± 2.1(n= 11) |
2.7 ± 2.8(n= 10) |
Viable litter size at first check |
13.2 ± 1.4(n= 9) |
12.3 ± 1.6(n= 11) |
11.6 ± 3.7(n= 11) |
10.6 ± 2.0(n= 10) * |
Dead pups at first check |
0.0 |
0.1 ± 0.3(n= 11)a |
0.0 |
0.6 ± 1.9(n= 10)b |
Viable litter size LD4 |
13.2 ± 1.4(n= 9) |
11.9 ± 1.8(n= 11) |
11.5 ± 3.6(n= 11) |
9.4 ± 3.3(n= 10) * |
|
|
|
|
|
Total number born alive pups at first check |
119 |
135 |
128 |
106 |
% of males/females of born alive pups at first check |
54/46 |
49/51 |
50/50 |
42/58 |
Total number alive pups on LD 4 |
119 |
131 |
127 |
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
Body weight of pups (g) on LD1 |
5.9 ± 0.7 (n = 9) |
5.7 ± 0.6 (n = 11) |
6.0 ± 0.6 (n= 11) |
5.7 ± 0.9 (n = 10) |
Body weight of pups (g) on LD4 |
8.1 ± 1.4 (n = 9) |
8.6 ± 1.0 (n = 11) |
8.8 ± 1.3 (n = 11) |
8.2 ± 1.5 (n = 10) |
|
|
|
|
|
One female group 1 and one female group 2: mating not detected, therefore gestation length missing
*/**: Steel Test, significant at 5% (+), 1% (++)
a) One pup found dead.
b) Six pups found dead, whereas only one litter (animal no. 83) was affected. Additionally eight alive pups were found at first check for this litter.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The reproduction toxicity of sodium N-cocoyl glycinate was investigated according to the Guideline OECD 421. No significant potential of reproducton toxicity was found for sodium N-cocoyl glycinate.
- Executive summary:
The reproduction toxicity of sodium cocoyl glycinate was investigated according to the Guideline OECD 421. The test material, composed of 70% sodium cocoyl glycinate and 20 % sodium chloride, was dissolved in water and was administered to rats via gavage at dosages of 0, 62.5, 250, and 1000 mg/kg bw/day, corresponding to up to 700 mg/kg bw/day of sodium cocoyl glycinate. It was given to male rats for 28 days and to female rats for 14 days prior to pairing, through the pairing and gestation periods until the offsprings reached day 4 post partum.
At high dose, the body weight and the food consumption of males and females were reduced. These effects were considered as not adverse nature for parental animals, because the relative difference to the control values were within 10% and seemed to stagnate with the treatment progression. No other effect was noted for parental animals.
With respecto the reproduction performance no effects on mating performance, fertility, corpora lutea count or duration of gestation were observed at any dose level. At high dose, the numbers of alive pups at first check and on lactation day 4 were reduced. This effect was considered as consequence of reduced food uptake and/or high salt content of the test material and therefore not considered as evidence of specific reproduction toxicity of sodium cocoyl glycinate.
The NOAEL of 250 mg/kg bw/day was established for reproduction toxicity of the test material.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.