Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
Reaction mass of 1,5-Naphthalenedisulfonic acid, 3,3'-[(4-methyl-1,2-phenylene)bis[imino(6-chloro-1,3,5-triazine-4,2-diyl)imino[2-(acetylamino)-5-methoxy-4,1-phenylene]-2,1-diazenediyl]]bis-, sodium salt (1:4) and 1,5-Naphthalenedisulfonic acid, 3,3'-[(3-methyl-1,2-phenylene)bis[imino(6-chloro-1,3,5-triazine-4,2-diyl)imino[2-(acetylamino)-5-methoxy-4,1-phenylene]-2,1-diazenediyl]]bis-, sodium salt (1:4)
EC number: 947-857-5 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Biodegradation in water: screening tests
Some information in this page has been claimed confidential.
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From November 25, 1988 to April 24, 1989
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 989
- Report date:
- 1989
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: EEC directive 84/449/EEC
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.5 (Degradation: Biochemical Oxygen Demand)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
Test material
- Test material form:
- solid
Constituent 1
Study design
- Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Inoculum or test system:
- activated sludge, domestic (adaptation not specified)
- Duration of test (contact time):
- 5 d
Initial test substance concentration
- Initial conc.:
- 1.11 g/L
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Details on study design:
- 5-day Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD5): This was carried out at 25 times dilution and a 250 times dilution of the standard solution of the test substance. The procedure used was the internal protocol (Brixham laboratory version (SOP BI23))). In outline this procedure involved incubating the sample in a completely full and stoppered bottle using a dilution medium consisting of deionised water containing prescribed inorganic salts and a bacterial inoculum
Prepared from a treated domestic sewage effluent. The incubation was carried out at a nominal 20˚C and BOD5 calculated at the end of 5 day by measuring the dissolved oxygen in bottles in comparison with controls.
Chemical oxygen demand (COD): The procedure involves refluxing an aliquot of the test substance standard solution with excess of acidified potassium dichromated in the presence of silver sulphate and mercury sulphate. After cooling the excess dichromate was titrated with ferrous ammonium sulphate using a ferrous phenanthroline indicator.
Results and discussion
% Degradation
- Key result
- Parameter:
- other: BOD5/COD
- Remarks:
- % degradation
- Value:
- 8.85
- Sampling time:
- 5 d
- Remarks on result:
- other: Not readily biodegradable
BOD5 / COD results
BOD5 / CODopen allclose all
- Key result
- Parameter:
- BOD5
- Value:
- < 0.1 g O2/g test mat.
- Key result
- Parameter:
- COD
- Value:
- 1.13 g O2/g test mat.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Results:
BOD5: The results at the 25 times dilution showed a mean difference of 0.53 mg/L between the test sample and controls, and at the 250 times dilution a mean difference of 1.33 mg/L. These differences corresponded to BOD5 of the test substance of 0.01 g O2/g and O.30 g O2/g respectively. It is considered unlikely that a dyestuff with the structure of the test substance would give BOD5 and the result at 25 times dilution is therefore considered more reliable and the BOD5 of the test substance recorded as < 0.1 g O2/g of substance.
COD: The result shows that the test substance standard solution had a COD strength of 1124 O2/L corresponding to COD of 1.01 g O2/g or1.13 g O2/g test substance.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Interpretation of results:
- not readily biodegradable
- Conclusions:
- Under the experimental conditions, biodegradation of the test substance was equivalent to 8.85%. The substance was therefore not considered to be readily biodegradable.
- Executive summary:
A study was conducted to determine the biodegradability of the test substance based on BOD and COD in a 5 d study. The test involved measuring reduction in dissolved oxygen in the presence of the test substance. Biological inoculum was obtained from a river, downstream of a treatment plant handling mainly domestic sewage. A bottle was set up containing dilution water seeded with the bacteria (blank). An aliquot of the test substance stock solution was added to the dilution water to give the required concentration for the study. The dissolved oxygen concentration was measured in all bottles at test start (Day 0) and after 5 d. Oxygen consumption was calculated by comparing dissolved oxygen (DO) loss in the test substance samples versus controls. The BOD of the sample was calculated in g O2 consumed per g of test substance and degradation was reported as a percentage of sample COD. The COD involves oxidation of the test substance under standard conditions by acidified dichromate and titration of the residual dichromate with ferrous ammonium sulphate solution. Under the experimental conditions, biodegradation of the test substance was equivalent to 8.85%. The substance was therefore not considered to be readily biodegradable (Brown, 1989).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
Welcome to the ECHA website. This site is not fully supported in Internet Explorer 7 (and earlier versions). Please upgrade your Internet Explorer to a newer version.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.
Find out more on how we use cookies.