Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 205-766-1 | CAS number: 150-68-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- First-instar daphnids were used (the age was not reported).
25 first-instar daphnids were added to a 100 mL glass beaker filled with 50 mL dilution water (incl. 1 ppm Tween 20 as surfactant).
A series of concentrations was set up (no details provided).
The substance Monuron was added as 50 µL stock solution to the dilution medium. It is not specified if the monuron stock solution was prepared in water or acetone. The test solution was swirled for thorough mixing.
The evaluation of immobilization was performed after 26 hours.
The IC50 (based on immobilization) was determined by plotting the percentage of immobility versus log concentration on log-probit paper to provide a median immobilization concentration (IC50). The immpobization reading was performed three times. - GLP compliance:
- no
- Analytical monitoring:
- not specified
- Vehicle:
- not specified
- Remarks:
- it is not clear if the stock solution has been prepared in water or acetone
- Test organisms (species):
- Daphnia magna
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Daphnia magna
- Strain/clone: pathogenetic stock cultured for more than 50 generations under constant conditions
- Source: not provided
- Age of parental stock (mean and range, SD): not provided
- Feeding during test: no
- Food type for daphnia stock culture: crushed baker's yeast cake.
- Amount:1.5 ml offreshly prepared 3.3 percent suspension (weight to volume)
- Frequency: Culture animals were fed twice daily, by pipette
ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: not needed, the first instar daphnids were held for 2.5 hours without food before beeing used for testing.
- Acclimation conditions (same as test or not): yes (except that the test daphnids were not fed)
- Health during acclimation (any mortality observed): not reported, daphnids that have moulted during the acclimation period were removed one hour prior to starting the test.
METHOD FOR PREPARATION AND COLLECTION OF EARLY INSTARS OR OTHER LIFE STAGES:
In order to obtain test organisms, nylon net was cemented across a flexible circle of plastic tubing so that the resulting disc fitted tightly into each culture jar at a distance of approximately 8 cm above the bottom. Within 15 minutes the normally photopositive first-instar daphnids ascended through the 30-mesh net which excluded almost all larger individuals, and culture water and animals above each net were siphoned into a single reservoir and randomized by agitation. Most of the water was then siphoned back into the original jar through a glass-tipped, 25-mm-diameter tube closed by the 40- to 50-mesh net which excluded all Daphnia. Young daphnids were washed several times with boiled deep-well water, held without food for about 21/2 hours, and, about 1 hour prior to tests, were passed again through 30-mesh net to remove any that had moulted during the preparation. - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 26 h
- Hardness:
- deep-well tap water having the following constituents, in milligrams per liter: Ca (as CaCO3), 40; Mg (as MgCO3), 80;
- Test temperature:
- 21.1 ± 0.05°C
- pH:
- 8.12
- Conductivity:
- conductivity (,umhos at 25°C): 493
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- not reported
- Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: 100 mL glass beakers
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: 50 mL fill volume
- Aeration: not reported
- No. of organisms per vessel: 25
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): since no further informationwas provided it is assumed that for each concentration one vessel (replicate) has been set up.
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): since no further informationwas provided it is assumed that one control vessel (replicate) has been set up.
- No. of vessels per vehicle control (replicates): No information
- Biomass loading rate: not reported
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: deep-well tap water having the following constituents, in milligrams per liter:
Ca (as CaCO3), 40;
Mg (as MgCO3), 80;
Cl, 24;
S04, 37;
B, 0.64;
SiO2, 28;
Na, 81;
K, 2.2; and
Fe 0.0;
- Conductivity: 493 umhos at 25°C
- Salinity:
- Culture medium different from test medium: Yes , Tests were performed in boiled deep-well tap water to which commercial nonionic surfactant (Tween 20) was added to provide a concentration of 1 part per million (ppm).
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH: not reported
- Photoperiod: constant illumination
- Light intensity: approximately 1100 lu/m² from daylight-type fluorescent lamps
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) :
Immobilization after 26 hours
After 26 hours, mobility was observed under strong illumination from above and then by illumination from below. Unaffected Daphnia swam vigorously toward the light; those that were unable to swim vertically 1 cm or more were considered immobile. Measurement at each concentration was replicated at least three times.
VEHICLE CONTROL PERFORMED: unclear (except the the controls contained also Tween20. It is not clear if a acetone control has been set up as well - if acetone should have been used for the stock solution preparation. if water should have been used, no further vehicle control was needed.
- Key result
- Duration:
- 26 h
- Dose descriptor:
- IC50
- Effect conc.:
- 106 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: Immobilization
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- 26-hour IC50: 106 mg/L
- Executive summary:
To determine the acute toxicity of Monuron to Daphnia magna, Crosby and Tucker (l966) exposed first-instar daphnids for 26 hours to various concentration of monuron. Tween 20 was added to deep-well water to a final concentration of 1 ppm. This dilution water was used for controls and test solutions. 25 first instar daphnids were added to 50 mL test solution. After 26 hours the activity of the daphnids after intensive light expsosure was determined. Daphnids not able to swim more than 1 cm were considered immobile. based on that information, the median immobilization concentration for 50% of the Daphnia magna (IC50) was calculated. For monuron the IC50 for daphnids was reported to be 106 ppm (=106 mg/L).
The study is not following all aspects of the modern test design for acute daphnia studies. As major deviations, no dose verification was performed and the observation period was only 26 hours instead of 48 hours. Minor deviation were that the daphnids were not selected by having an age of < 24 hours (but the daphnids were considered to be first instar, which is considered acceptable), the test vessels were not replicated (but the number of daphnids exposed per level were higher than prescribed in modern guidelines) and the need of a solvent control is not clear,
Especially the lack of dose verification and the shorter exposure duration are considered to be relevant for the question if the study can be used for the risk assessment. Since monuron was used at concentrations well below the water solubility and monuron is biologically and hydrologically relative stable the lack of dose verification analysis is considered not to invalidate the results from this study. It is scientifically very unklikely that the prolongation of the exposure from 26 to 48 hours will change the IC50 considerably which means in this context by at least an order of magnitude. Considering the high toxicity to algae (orders of magnitudes more sensitive than daphnids), the toxicity of monuron to daphnids is of less relevance for the environmental risk assesment of monuron. Therefore, the results reported by Crosby and Tuckler are considered to be reliable with restriction.
To conclude, the IC50 (=EC50) of 106 mg/L is considered reliable with restrictions for the further assessment.
Reference
Description of key information
26 -hour EC50: 106 mg/L
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Fresh water invertebrates
Fresh water invertebrates
- Effect concentration:
- 106 mg/L
Additional information
To determine the acute toxicity of Monuron to Daphnia magna, Crosby and Tucker (l966) exposed first-instar daphnids for 26 hours to various concentration of monuron. Tween 20 was added to deep-well water to a final concentration of 1 ppm. This dilution water was used for controls and test solutions. 25 first instar daphnids were added to 50 mL test solution. After 26 hours the activity of the daphnids after intensive light expsosure was determined. Daphnids not able to swim more than 1 cm were considered immobile. based on that information, the median immobilization concentration for 50% of the Daphnia magna (IC50) was calculated. For monuron the IC50 for daphnids was reported to be 106 ppm (=106 mg/L).
The study is not following all aspects of the modern test design for acute daphnia studies. As major deviations, no dose verification was performed and the observation period was only 26 hours instead of 48 hours. Minor deviation were that the daphnids were not selected by having an age of < 24 hours (but the daphnids were considered to be first instar, which is considered acceptable), the test vessels were not replicated (but the number of daphnids exposed per level were higher than prescribed in modern guidelines) and the need of a solvent control is not clear,
Especially the lack of dose verification and the shorter exposure duration are considered to be relevant for the question if the study can be used for the risk assessment. Since monuron was used at concentrations well below the water solubility and monuron is biologically and hydrologically relative stable the lack of dose verification analysis is considered not to invalidate the results from this study. It is scientifically very unklikely that the prolongation of the exposure from 26 to 48 hours will change the IC50 considerably which means in this context by at least an order of magnitude. Considering the high toxicity to algae (orders of magnitudes more sensitive than daphnids), the toxicity of monuron to daphnids is of less relevance for the environmental risk assesment of monuron. Therefore, the results reported by Crosby and Tuckler are considered to be reliable with restriction.
To conclude, the IC50 of 106 mg/L is considered reliable with restrictions for the further assessment.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
