Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 285-397-0 | CAS number: 85085-75-2 Extractives and their physically modified derivatives such as tinctures, concretes, absolutes, essential oils, oleoresins, terpenes, terpene-free fractions, distillates, residues, etc., obtained from Thymus zygis, Labiatae.
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Thyme essential oil had no mutagenic or DNA-damaging activity in either the Ames test (strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100, with and without metabolic activation, 0.25 and 0.5 µl essential oil/plate) or Bacillus subtilis rec-Assay (10 µl and 30 µl essential oil)(Zani et al., 1991). Although the Ames test lacked one of the currently used strains the negative result could be regarded reliable, because the paper contains adequate description of findings and because the Ames test is supplemented by the rec-assay. This was confirmed by Shoeibi et al., 2009: Thyme essential oil in concentrations of 50–2000 µg/ml did not show signs of mutagenicity in an Ames test using Salmonella typhymurium strain TA100 with and without rat liver S9.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 2009
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- data from handbook or collection of data
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Thymus vulgaris essential oil (Thyme oil)
- Target gene:
- The test strain used for the Ames test was Salmonella typhymurium strains TA100 (hisG46/rfa/∆ uvrB/pKM101), developed by Dr B.N.Ames of the university of California, Berkeley.
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 50, 100, 200, 300, 500, 1000 and 2000 µg/ml
- Vehicle / solvent:
- A mixture containing each test component in 0.1 ml of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- 0.1 ml of the test strain cell culture in the early stationary phase and 0.5 ml of S9 mix was incubated at 37 °C for 20 min in each test tube with a shaking frequency of 120 strokes per minute. After incubation, 2 ml of 0.05 mM L-histidine/0.05 mM biotin molten top agar were added to each test tube, mixed and poured onto the surface of minimal glucose agar medium. The plate was incubated for 48 h at 37°C and the number of reverent colonies was counted.
The Ames test using the S9 fraction and without S9 mix (phosphate buffer in place of the S9 mix) for all the test compounds was performed on the same occasion. The S9 mix (0.5 ml) contained 0.05 ml of the S9 fraction and 0.45 ml of a cofactor solution (ISO 16240,. 2005.04.01).The S9 mix composed of 8 mM MgCl2, 33 mM KCl, 5 mM glucose-6-phosphate, 4 mM NADPH, 4mM NADH, and 100 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.4). The protein amount of each S9 fraction that was used was 1 mg/plate. - Evaluation criteria:
- By using TA100, the mean values of negative controls were within the range of 80-180 mutant colonies per plate, the mean values of positive controls showed at least the induction rate of +100 colonies.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- All 4 essential oils in all 7 tested (Eugenia caryophyllata (Clove), Cinnamum zeylanicum (Cinnamon), Thymus vulgaris (Thyme) and Zataria multiflora) dilutions were negative in the Ames Salmonella reversion assay without S9 (microsomal mutagenesis assay), induction rates were from 0 to 13.
However all 3 essential oils in each 7 tested dilution except for Clove oil (Eugenia caryophyllata) were negative in the Ames Salmonella reversion assay with S9 (microsomal mutagenesis assay), induction rates were from 0 to 15. - Conclusions:
- Thyme essential oil in concentrations of 50–2000 µg/ml did not show signs of mutagenicity in an Ames test using Salmonella typhymurium strain TA100 with and without rat liver S9.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 1991
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- data from handbook or collection of data
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0.25 and 0.5 µl essential oil / plate
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Additional information on results:
- Although the Ames test lacked one of the currently used strains the negative result could be regarded reliable, because the paper contains adequate description of findings and because the Ames test is supplemented by the rec-assay.
- Conclusions:
- Thyme essential oil had no mutagenic or DNA-damaging activity in either the Ames test (strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100, with and without metabolic activation, 0.25 and 0.5 µl essential oil/plate) or Bacillus subtilis rec-Assay (10 µl and 30 µl essential oil)(Zani et al., 1991).
Although the Ames test lacked one of the currently used strains the negative result could be regarded reliable, because the paper contains adequate description of findings and because the Ames test is supplemented by the rec-assay.
Referenceopen allclose all
Mutagenicity test results of Thyme |
||||||
with S9 |
without S9 |
|||||
conc (µg/ml) | Mean* | SD | Induction rate | Mean | SD | Induction rate |
50 | 92 | 2.64 | -1 | 81 | 4 | 1 |
100 | 93 | 2.00 | 0 | 81 | 1.73 | 1 |
200 | 93 | 1.00 | 0 | 81.3 | 6.65 | 1.3 |
300 | 100 | 5.56 | 7 | 82 | 2.64 |
2 |
400 | 102 | 1.00 | 9 | 83 | 4.35 |
3 |
500 | 105 | 3.60 | 12 | 82 | 3.00 | 2 |
1000 | 105 | 5.56 | 12 | 83 | 3.60 | 3 |
2000 | 105 | 5.19 | 12 | 85 | 2.64 | 5 |
* Mean: Average of colonies in triplicate plates
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.