Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Flash point

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
flash point of flammable liquids
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
5 October 2017 - 9 November 2017
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method A.9 (Flash-Point)
Version / remarks:
March 04, 2016
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
ISO 2719 (Determination of flash point - Pensky-Martens closed cup method)
Version / remarks:
2002
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
ASTM D93 (Standard test methods for flash point by pensky-martens closed cup tester)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of method:
closed cup
Flash point apparatus:
other: Eraflash flash-point tester
Specific details on test material used for the study:
SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No. of test material: 1704HH0700/0
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 29th April 2018
- Purity test date: Not indicated

STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: Room temperature
- Stability under test conditions: No specific conditions required
Remarks on result:
no flash point according to standard method
Remarks:
No flash-point was observed below the temperature at which reaction and/or degradation of the test item occurred.

The test cup was heated at a rate of 5 ± 0.5°C/minute. Starting at 25°C, an attempt was made to ignite the vapour of the test item for every 2°C temperature rise.

No flash-point was observed below the temperature at which reaction and/or degradation of the test item (i.e. 175°C) occurred. Therefore the preliminary test was repeated. The temperature of the test item at the start of the additional test was 20°C. Starting at 25°C the ignition source was applied for every 2°C temperature rise.

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
No flash-point was observed below the temperature at which reaction and/or degradation of the test item occurred.
Executive summary:

Reingruber (2017) is a GLP-compliant study following standard test guidelines. The closed cup method was applied for the determination of the flash-point of the test item. The study is considered to be reliable without restrictions (Klimisch 1). No flash-point was observed below the temperature at which reaction and/or degradation of the test item occurred.

Description of key information

No flash-point was observed below the temperature at which reaction and/or degradation of the test item occurred.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Additional information

Reingruber (2017) is a GLP-compliant study following standard test guidelines. The closed cup method was applied for the determination of the flash-point of the test item. The study is considered to be reliable without restrictions (Klimisch 1). No flash-point was observed below the temperature at which reaction and/or degradation of the test item occurred.