Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 271-559-8 | CAS number: 68585-53-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Skin irritation / corrosion
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- August 31 - October 10, 2016
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 016
- Report date:
- 2016
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
- Version / remarks:
- 28 July 2015
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Thiocyanic acid, (1,3,8,10-tetrahydro-1,3,8,10-tetraoxoanthra[2,1,9-def:6,5,10-d'e'f']diisoquinoline-2,9-diyl)di-3,1-phenylene ester, reaction products with sodium sulfide (Na2(Sx))
- EC Number:
- 271-559-8
- EC Name:
- Thiocyanic acid, (1,3,8,10-tetrahydro-1,3,8,10-tetraoxoanthra[2,1,9-def:6,5,10-d'e'f']diisoquinoline-2,9-diyl)di-3,1-phenylene ester, reaction products with sodium sulfide (Na2(Sx))
- Cas Number:
- 68585-53-5
- Molecular formula:
- not applicable
- IUPAC Name:
- Reaction product of thiocyanic acid, (1,3,8,10-tetrahydro-1,3,8,10-tetraoxoanthra[2,1,9-def:6,5,10-d'e'f']diisoquinoline-2,9-diyl)di-3,1-phenylene ester with sodium sulfide
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
- Details on test material:
- Test item: Leuco Sulfur Red 14
Appearance: light red solid
CAS No: 68585-53-5
EC No: 271-559-8
Constituent 1
In vitro test system
- Test system:
- human skin model
- Source species:
- human
- Cell type:
- non-transformed keratinocytes
- Cell source:
- skin obtained from plastic surgery from multiple donors
- Justification for test system used:
- The EPISKIN model has been validated for irritation testing in an international trial. After a review of scientific reports and peer reviewed publications on the EPISKIN method, it showed evidence of being a reliable and relevant stand-alone test for predicting rabbit skin irritation, when the endpoint is evaluated by MTT reduction and for being used as a replacement for the Draize Skin Irritation test (OECD TG 404 and Method B.4 of Annex V to Directive 67/548/EEC) for the purposes of distinguishing between skin irritating and
no- skin irritating test substances (STATEMENT OF VALIDITY OF IN-VITRO TESTS FOR SKIN IRRITATION; ECVAM; Institute for Health & Consumer Protection; Joint Research Centre; European Commission; Ispra; 27 April 2007). - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on test system:
- RECONSTRUCTED HUMAN EPIDERMIS (RHE) TISSUE
- Model used: EpiSkinTM Small Model (EpiSkinTMSM)
- Tissue batch number: 16-EKIN-037
TEMPERATURE USED FOR TEST SYSTEM
- Temperature used during exposure: room temperature
- Temperature of post-treatment incubation: 37 °C
REMOVAL OF TEST MATERIAL AND CONTROLS
-Volume and number of washing steps: After the incubation time the EpiSkinTMSM units were removed and rinsed thoroughly with approximately 25 mL PBS 1x solution to remove all of the test material from the epidermal surface.
- Observable damage in the tissue due to washing: No
MTT DYE USED TO MEASURE TISSUE VIABILITY AFTER TREATMENT / EXPOSURE
- MTT concentration: 0.3 mg/mL
- Incubation time: 3 h
- Spectrophotometer: 96-well plate spectrophotometer
- Wavelength: 570 nm
FUNCTIONAL MODEL CONDITIONS WITH REFERENCE TO HISTORICAL DATA
see "Any other information on Materials and Methods"
NUMBER OF REPLICATE TISSUES:
3 replicates per test item and 3 replicates negative controls, 3 replicates positive controls,
CONTROL TISSUES USED IN CASE OF MTT DIRECT INTERFERENCE
- Fresh tissues and killed tissues
- Procedure used to prepare the killed tissues: freezing
- N. of replicates : 2 replicates color controls and 2 replicates non-specific colour control were used. Furthermore, 3 killed treated tissues and 3 killed negative control tissues are used for the MTT evaluation.
- Method of calculation used:
Data calculation for normal test items
Blank
– The mean of the 6 blank OD values is calculated:
Negative control
– Individual negative control OD values are corrected with the mean blank OD: :
OD Negative Control (ODNC) = ODNCraw – ODblank mean
– The corrected mean OD of the 3 negative control values are calculated: this corresponds to 100% viability
Positive control
– Individual positive control OD values are corrected with the mean blank OD: :
OD Positive Control (ODPC) = ODPCraw – ODblank mean
– The corrected mean OD of the 3 positive control values are calculated
– The % viability for each positive control replicate is calculated relative to the mean negative control:
% Positive Control 1 = (ODPC1 / mean ODNC) ×100
% Positive Control 2 = (ODPC2 / mean ODNC) ×100
% Positive Control 3 = (ODPC3 / mean ODNC) ×100
– The mean value of the 3 individual viability % for positive control is calculated:
Mean PC % = (%PC1 + %PC2 + %PC3) / 3
Test item
– Individual test item OD values are corrected with the mean blank OD: :
OD Treated Tissue (ODTT) = ODTTraw – ODblank mean
– The corrected mean OD of the 3 test item values are calculated
– The % viability for each test item replicate is calculated relative to the mean negative control:
% Treated Tissue 1 = (ODTT1 / mean ODNC) ×100
% Treated Tissue 2 = (ODTT2 / mean ODNC) ×100
% Treated Tissue 3 = (ODTT3 / mean ODNC) ×100
– The mean value of the 3 individual viability % for test item is calculated
Mean TT % = (%TT1 + %TT2 + %TT3) / 3
Data calculation for MTT-interacting items
Test items that interfere with MTT can produce non-specific reduction of the MTT. It is necessary to evaluate the OD due to non-specific reduction and to subtract it before calculations of viability %.
– Non-specific MTT reduction calculation (NSMTT):
NSMTT = [(ODKT - ODKNC) / ODNC] × 100
ODKNC: negative control treated killed tissues OD (mean)
ODKT: test item treated killed tissues OD (mean)
ODNC: negative control OD (mean)
If NSMTT is > 50% relative to the negative control: additional steps must be undertaken if possible, or the test item must be considered as incompatible with the test.
– True MTT metabolic conversion (TODTT) is undertaken if NSMTT is < 50%:
TODTT = [ODTT – (ODKT – ODKNC)]
ODTT: test item treated viable tissues
– The % relative viability (% RV) for each test item replicate is calculated relative to the mean negative control:
% RV 1 = [TODTT1 / ODNC] × 100
% RV 2= [TODTT2 / ODNC] × 100
% RV 3 = [TODTT3 / ODNC] × 100
– The mean value of the 3 individual relative viability % for test item is calculated
Mean Relative Viability % = (% RV 1 + % RV 2 + % RV 3) / 3
Data calculation for dyes and chemicals able to colour the tissue
For test items detected as able to stain the tissues the non-specific OD is evaluated due to the residual chemical colour (unrelated to mitochondrial activity) and subtracted before calculation of the “true” viability %.
– Non Specific Colour % (NSC %):
NSC % = (mean ODCT / mean ODNC) × 100
ODCT: test item treated tissues (not incubated with MTT)
ODNC: negative control OD (incubated with MTT)
– True MTT metabolic conversion (TODTT) is undertaken if NSC % is > 5 % and ≤ 50 %.
TODTT = [ODTV – mean ODCT]
ODTV: test item-treated tissues (incubated with MTT)
ODCT: test item-treated tissues (not incubated with MTT)
– The % relative viability (% RV) for each test substance replicate is calculated relative to the mean negative control:
% RV 1 = [TODTT1 / ODNC] × 100
% RV 2= [TODTT2 / ODNC] × 100
% RV 3 = [TODTT3 / ODNC] × 100
– The mean value of the 3 individual relative viability % for test substance is calculated:
Mean Relative Viability % = (% RV 1 + % RV 2 + % RV 3) / 3
– If NSC % is ≤ 5 % then the normal calculation mode is used.
– If NSC % is > 50 % relative to the negative control, additional steps must be undertaken if possible, or the test item must be considered as incompatible with the test.
NUMBER OF INDEPENDENT TEST SEQUENCES / EXPERIMENTS TO DERIVE FINAL PREDICTION:
1
PREDICTION MODEL / DECISION CRITERIA (choose relevant statement)
- The test substance is considered to be irritating or corrosive to skin if the viability after exposure is less than or equal to 50 %.
- The test substance is considered to be non-corrosive to skin if the viability after exposure is greater than 50 %. - Control samples:
- yes, concurrent negative control
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- yes, concurrent positive control
- yes, concurrent MTT non-specific colour control
- Amount/concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount applied: 10 mg of the test item was applied evenly to the epidermal surface.
NEGATIVE CONTROL
- Amount applied: 10 µL
- Concentration: 1x PBS
POSITIVE CONTROL
- Amount applied: 10 µL
- Concentration: 5 % aq. solution - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 15 minutes (± 0.5 min) at room temperature.
- Duration of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):
- 42 hours (± 1h) at 37 °C in an incubator with 5 % CO2, ≥95 % humidified atmosphere.
- Number of replicates:
- In this assay 3 replicates per test item and 3 replicates negative controls, 3 replicates positive controls, 2 replicates color controls and 2 replicates non-specific colour control were used. Furthermore, 3 killed treated tissues and 3 killed negative control tissues are used for the MTT evaluation.
Results and discussion
In vitro
Results
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Run / experiment:
- 1-3
- Value:
- >= 115 - <= 144
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: mean viability 128%
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- - OTHER EFFECTS:
- Visible damage on test system: No
- Direct-MTT reduction: As the test item has an intrinsic colour (light red), the check-method for possible direct MTT reduction with test item was impossible. The direct interaction with MTT was not defined. However, to avoid the effect of possible interactions with the MTT, an additional control was necessary.
The non-specific MTT reduction (NSMTT) was determined (0%)*, the correction of viability percentage was not necessary
- Colour interference with MTT: Yes, as the test item has an intrinsic colour (light red), two additional test item-treated tissues were used for the non-specific OD evaluation. Mean OD (measured at 570 nm) of these tissues was determined as 0.012. The Non Specific Colour % (NSC %) was calculated as 1.4 %. Therefore additional data calculation was not necessary. A false estimation of viability can be precluded.
ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: Yes
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: Yes
- Acceptance criteria met for variability between replicate measurements: Yes
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 2: OD values and viability percentages of the controls
Substance |
Optical Density (OD) |
Viability (%) |
|
Negative Control: |
1 |
1.018 |
117 |
2 |
0.823 |
95 |
|
3 |
0.765 |
88 |
|
mean |
0.869 |
100 |
|
standard deviation (SD) |
15.22 |
||
Positive Control: |
1 |
0.167 |
19 |
2 |
0.168 |
19 |
|
3 |
0.072 |
8 |
|
mean |
0.136 |
16 |
|
standard deviation (SD) |
6.34 |
Table 3: OD values and viability percentages of the test item
Test Item |
Optical Density (OD) |
Viability (%) |
|
1 |
1.000 |
115 |
|
2 |
1.073 |
124 |
|
3 |
1.253 |
144 |
|
mean |
1.109 |
128 |
|
standard deviation (SD) |
14.93 |
Table 4: OD values of additional controls for MTT-interacting test item
Additional controls |
Optical Density (OD) |
|
Negative control killed tissues: |
1 |
0.065 |
2 |
0.078 |
|
3 |
0.079 |
|
mean |
0.074 |
|
Test item treated killed tissues: |
1 |
0.048 |
2 |
0.053 |
|
3 |
0.045 |
|
mean |
0.048 |
Table 5: OD values and NSC % of additional control:
Additional colour control |
Optical Density (OD) |
Non Specific Colour % (NSC %) |
|
(test item treated tissueswithout MTT incubation) |
1 |
0.012 |
1.4 |
2 |
0.013 |
||
mean |
0.012 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- The results obtained from this in vitro skin irritation test, using the EPISKIN model according to OECD guideline 439, indicated that the test item reveals no skin irritation potential under the utilised testing conditions. The test item is considered to be non-irritant to skin and is therefore not classified (UN GHS No Category).
- Executive summary:
In an in vitro skin irritation test (EpiSkin SM) according to OECD guideline 492, the skin irritating potential of the test item was assessed.
Disks of EPISKIN (three units) were treated with test item and incubated for 15 minutes at room temperature. SDS (5 % aq.) and 1× PBS treated (three units / positive and negative control) epidermis were used as positive and negative controls respectively. For each treated tissue viability was expressed as a percentage relative to negative control. The test item has an intrinsic colour (light red), therefore two additional test item treated tissues were used for the non-specific OD evaluation.
Exposure of test material was terminated by rinsing with PBS 1x solution. Epidermis units were then incubated for 42 hours in an incubator at 37°C with 5 % CO2. The viability of each disk was assessed by incubating the tissues for 3 hours with MTT solution at 37 °C in 5 % CO2, protected from light. The precipitated formazan was then extracted using acidified isopropanol and quantified spectrophotometrically.
The test item is a possible MTT-reducer, therefore additional controls (test item treated killed tissues and negative control treated killed tissues) were used to detect and correct for test substance interference with the viability measurement.
The test item is a possible MTT-reducer and has an intrinsic colour (light red). To avoid a possible double correction [TODTT (MTT and NSC)] for colour interference, a third control for non-specific colour in killed tissues (NSCkilled) was performed. Two killed treated tissues were used to avoid a possible double correction for colour interference.
The test chemical is identified as requiring classification and labelling according to UN GHS (Category 2 or Category 1), if the mean relative viability after 15 minutes exposure and 42 hours post incubation is less or equal (≤) to 50% of the negative control.
In this in vitro skin irritation test using the EPISKIN model, the test item did not significantly reduce cell viability in comparison to the negative control (mean viability: 128 %). All obtained test item viability results were above 50 % when compared to the viability values obtained from the negative control. Therefore the test item was considered to be non-irritant to skin.
Positive and negative controls showed the expected cell viability values within acceptable limits. The experiment was considered to be valid.
The results obtained from this in vitro skin irritation assay, using the EPISKIN model, indicated that the test item reveals no skin irritation potential under the utilised testing conditions. The test is considered to be not irritating to skin and is therefore not classified (UN GHS No Category).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
