Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2017-08-22 to 2017-08-31
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2017
Report date:
2017

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Version / remarks:
adopted 21st July, 1997
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
Version / remarks:
dated May 30, 2008
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.5100 - Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test (August 1998)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
3-tert-butyladipic acid
EC Number:
233-759-3
EC Name:
3-tert-butyladipic acid
Cas Number:
10347-88-3
Molecular formula:
C10H18O4
IUPAC Name:
3-tert-butylhexanedioic acid
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Specific details on test material used for the study:
SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and batch No.of test material: Changzhou Sunlight Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., China; 20170601
- Expiration date of the batch: June 2018
- Purity test date: 99.72 %

STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: at room temperature
- Stability under test conditions: stable

Method

Target gene:
The Salmonella typhimurium histidine (his) reversion system measures his- → his+ reversions. The Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA (trp) reversion system measures trp– → trp+ reversions.
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not applicable
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
S9 mix (fraction of Phenobarbital (PB) and β-naphthoflavone (BNF) induced rat liver)
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
5, 16, 50, 160, 500, 1600, 5000 µg/plate ± S9 mix
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The pre-tests resulted in a good solubility of the test substance.
Controlsopen allclose all
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Remarks:
NPD
Positive control substance:
other: 4-nitro-1,2-phenylene-diamine
Remarks:
without S9 mix (4 μg/plate, TA 98)
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Remarks:
SAZ
Positive control substance:
sodium azide
Remarks:
Without S9 mix (2 µg/plate; TA100, TA1535)
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Remarks:
9AA
Positive control substance:
9-aminoacridine
Remarks:
Without S9 mix (50 µg/plate; TA 1537)
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Remarks:
MMS
Positive control substance:
methylmethanesulfonate
Remarks:
Without S9 mix (2 µL/plate, E. coli)
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Remarks:
2AA
Positive control substance:
other: 2-aminoanthracene
Remarks:
with S9 mix (2 µg/plate, all Salmonella strains; 50 µg/plate, E.coli)
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation); preincubation

DURATION
- Preincubation period: 20 min at 37 °C
- Exposure duration: 48 hours at 37 °C in the dark

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth
Evaluation criteria:
A test item is considered mutagenic if:
- a dose-related increase in the number of revertants occurs and/or;
- a reproducible biologically relevant positive response for at least one of the dose groups occurs in at least one strain with or without metabolic activation.

An increase is considered biologically relevant if:
- in strain Salmonella typhimurium TA100 the number of reversions is at least twice as high as the reversion rate of the vehicle control
- in strain Salmonella typhimurium TA98, TA1535, TA1537 and Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA the number of reversions is at least three times higher than the reversion rate of the vehicle control.
According to the guidelines, the biological relevance of the results was the criterion for the interpretation of results. A statistical evaluation of the results was not regarded as necessary.

Criteria for a Negative Response:
A test item is considered non-mutagenic in this bacterial reverse mutation assay if it produces neither a dose-related increase in the number of revertants nor a reproducible biologically relevant positive response at any of the dose groups, with or without metabolic activation.

Results and discussion

Test resultsopen allclose all
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1537
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
not valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: No
- Effects of osmolality: No
- Evaporation from medium: No
- Water solubility: No
- Precipitation: No

RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
The revertant colony numbers of vehicle control plates in both strains with and without S9 mix in the pre test were in line with the corresponding historical control data ranges. The positive control treatments showed the expected, biological relevant increases in induced revertant colonies in both tester strains.
In the Informatory Toxicity Test, inhibitory effects of the test item were not observed. The colony and background lawn development were not affected in any case. All of the obtained slight revertant colony number decreases or increases (compared to the revertant colony numbers of the vehicle control) remained within the biological variability range of the applied test system.
No precipitation of the test item was observed on the plates in the examined bacterial strains at any examined concentration level (±S9 Mix).

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table Results

Experiment 1 (SPT)

Dose (µg/plate)

Mean number of revertant colonies/3 replicate plates with different strains of Salmonella typhimurium and E. coli

 

TA1535

TA1537

TA98

TA100

WP2 uvrA

 

 

 

Results with S9

Untreated control

11.7

7.7

23

99.7

29

DMSO control

12

7.7

23.7

91.3

34.7

Ultrapure Water Control

-

-

-

-

-

5000

18.7

6

32.3

107

42

1600

14.3

6.3

31.3

99

32.7

500

11

7.3

24.7

112

29.3

160

11.7

8

28.7

111.7

32.3

50

10

6.3

24.3

107.7

42

16

13.7

8.3

25

116.3

27.7

Positive control

187.3

188.7

1217.3

2053.3

220.7

 

 

 

Results without S9

Untreated control

13

6.7

27.3

102.3

32

DMSO control

13.3

8.3

21.3

93.3

25

Ultrapure Water Control

12.7

-

-

92.7

29.3

5000

12.3

9.7

21.3

101.3

28

1600

12.3

8.3

19.7

97.7

30.3

500

13.7

9

19.3

94.7

32

160

13.7

8.7

22

94

32.7

50

11.7

7.3

18

92.7

33.3

16

10.3

7

22

93.9

26.3

Positive control

901.3

607.3

332

1172.3

773.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

Experiment 2 (PIT)

Dose (µg/plate)

Mean number of revertant colonies/3 replicate plates with different strains of Salmonella typhimurium and E. coli

TA1535

TA1537

TA98

TA100

WP2 uvrA

 

 

 

Results with S9

Untreated control

12

7.3

27.7

99.7

43

DMSO control

14.7

7.7

21

100.3

42.3

Ultrapure Water Control

-

-

-

-

-

5000

12.7

6

23

105.3

34.7

1600

14.7

6

20.7

106.7

41

500

13

9.3

19.3

98

33.3

160

10.3

7.3

25

110

30

50

13.3

7.3

24

108

29.3

16

13

6.7

20.3

110

26.7

Positive control

232.7

182

1672

2933.3

164.3

 

 

 

Results without S9

Untreated control

10.7

9

20.7

94

37.3

DMSO control

12

8.3

20

92.3

32.3

Ultrapure Water Control

13.3

-

-

93.7

41.7

5000

10.7

8.3

27

91.7

43

1600

10.7

8

26.3

82.7

44.7

500

12.7

8.7

24.3

84.3

48.7

160

10.7

9.3

20.7

83.3

56.3

50

11

7.7

17

80.3

48

16

11.3

10

20

77.7

54

Positive control

2072

574.7

294.7

1912

1757.3

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Under the conditions of the above assay, the test substance tested formulated in a suitable vehicle (DMSO) did not show any mutagenic potential.
Executive summary:

In a reverse mutation assay in bacteria according to OECD guideline 471, strains TA98, TA1537, TA1535 and TA100of S. typhimuriumand Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA were investigated. The test item was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and concentrations of 5000, 1600, 500; 160; 50 and 16 μg/plate were examined.

Five bacterial strains were used to investigate the mutagenic potential of the test substance in two independent experiments, in a plate incorporation test (experiment I, Initial Mutation Test) and in a pre-incubation test (experiment II, Confirmatory Mutation Test). Each assay was conducted with and without metabolic activation (±S9 Mix). The concentrations, including the controls, were tested in triplicate. In the performed experiments positive and negative (vehicle) controls were run concurrently.

In the performed experiments all of the validity criteria regarding the investigated strains, negative (vehicle) and positive controls, S9 activity and number of investigated analyzable concentration levels were fulfilled.

No substantial increases were observed in revertant colony numbers of any of the five test strains following treatment with the test substance at any concentration level, either in the presence or absence of metabolic activation (S9 Mix).

Sporadic increases in revertant colony numbers compared to the vehicle control values were observed in both independently performed main experiments. They were mostly within the actual historical control data ranges. Furthermore, there was no tendency of higher mutation rates with increasing concentrations beyond the generally acknowledged border of biological relevance in the performed experiments.

In the performed experiments an inhibitory effect of the test item (decreased number of revertant colony numbers and/or affected background lawn development) was not observed in any case. No precipitation of the test item was observed on the plates in the examined bacterial strains at any examined concentration level (±S9 Mix) throughout the study.

The reported data of this mutagenicity assay show, that under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did not induce gene mutations by frameshift or base-pair substitution in the genome of the tester strains used. Therefore, the test substance is considered non-mutagenic in this bacterial reverse mutation assay.