Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 264-867-9 | CAS number: 64396-12-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 2008
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study without detailed documentation
- Justification for type of information:
- Succinic acid may be used as an analogue for alkylsuccinic acid as this is the potentially biologically cative part of the molecule.
Dicarboxylic acids are naturally occurring metabolic products of fatty acid oxidation, and are rapidly beta-oxidised. A category approach for short-medium chain dicarboxylic acids, including malonic acid and succinic acid, has been validated and used by various bodies including the Cosmetics Ingredient Review Panel and the European Food Safety Authority.The study was carried out to provide a comparison between the LLNA and GPMT tests, rather than to investigate the properties of the test materials, nevertheless it follows standard OECD guidelines and was carried out in accordance with GLP.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 008
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of study:
- guinea pig maximisation test
- Justification for non-LLNA method:
- The tes was carried out as part of a study to compare the suitability of the LLNA and GPMT methods to detect sensitisation potential.
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Succinic acid
- EC Number:
- 203-740-4
- EC Name:
- Succinic acid
- Cas Number:
- 110-15-6
- Molecular formula:
- C4H6O4
- IUPAC Name:
- succinic acid
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Succinic acid (Aldrich No. 398055), purity 99%, was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Munich, Germany)
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- other: SPF-Hsd Poc: DH guinea pig
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- Non-pregnant, nulliparous female SPF-Hsd Poc: DH guinea pigs (300–500 g at the commencement of the study) were purchased from Harlan Winkelmann(Borchen, Germany). The guinea pigs were housed in groups in Terluran cages on Altromin saw fiber bedding or Lignocel bedding. The animals were barrier-maintained (semi-barrier) in an air conditioned room (temperature 22 ± 3 C, relative humidity 55 ± 10%) with a 12-h light/dark cycle and air change rate of at least 10x/h. The acclimatization period was at least five days. Food (Altromin 3122 maintenance diet for guinea pigs or ssniff Ms-H, 4mm V2233-000 complete diet for guinea pigs, rich in crude fiber, totally-pathogen-free) and tap water were provided ad libitum.
Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Induction
- Route:
- intradermal and epicutaneous
- Vehicle:
- other: Isotonic saline (NaCl 0.9%)
- Concentration / amount:
- 0.5% intradermal25% topical
- Day(s)/duration:
- Intradermal injection (day 0), topical application (day 7)
- Adequacy of induction:
- non-irritant substance, but skin pre-treated with 10% SDS
Challengeopen allclose all
- No.:
- #1
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Concentration / amount:
- 0.5 g test substance
- Day(s)/duration:
- Day 20
- Adequacy of challenge:
- not specified
- No.:
- #2
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Concentration / amount:
- 0.5 g test substance
- Day(s)/duration:
- Day 28
- Adequacy of challenge:
- not specified
- No. of animals per dose:
- 10 test animals and 5 controls
- Details on study design:
- , a gauze patch with 0.5 g of thetest compound was applied to the clipped skin and held under occlusionfor 48 h. Control animals received the vehicle without test compound.After a resting period, topical challenge treatments were performed on day20 and on day 28 by applying 0.5 g test compound for 24 h under occlusiononto the clipped skin of both test and control animals.Approximately 21 h after removal of the challenge patch, the skin areawas cleaned and cleared of hair. About 24 and 48 h after removal of thepatch, the skin reaction was observed and recorded. In addition to the requirements of the OECD guideline,an additional reading of skin reactions was performed at 72 h after patchremoval.RANGE FINDING TESTS: A range finding for the test concentrations was performed in a preliminary experiment assessing the irritant effects of the test compounds after intradermal and topical application. MAIN STUDY A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE - No. of exposures: 2 - Test groups: The animals received two induction treatments, an intradermal injection (day 0) and a topical application (day 7). The intradermalinduction comprised three pairs of injections of 0.1 ml each of the test compound in vehicle, the test compound in a 1:1 (v/v) mixture of FCA/physiological saline and a 1:1 (v/v) mixture of FCA/physiological saline without test compound. Approximately 24 h before the topical induction treatment (day 6) the test animals received a topical application of 0.5 ml of 10% sodium lauryl sulphate in Vaseline in order to create a mild local skin irritation. - Control group: The control animals received applications without test substance. B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE - No. of exposures: 2 - Day(s) of challenge: Day 20 and 28 - Test groups: topical challenge treatments were performed by applying 0.5 g test compound for 24 h under occlusion onto the clipped skin of both test and control animals. - Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24, 48, 72 h
Results and discussion
- Positive control results:
- Positive control not needed as a range of substances were being tested, some of which gave clear positive results.
In vivo (non-LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 10%
- No. with + reactions:
- 1
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 10%
- No. with + reactions:
- 1
- Total no. in group:
- 5
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 10%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 10%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 5
- Reading:
- other: 3rd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 72
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 10%
- No. with + reactions:
- 1
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Reading:
- other: 3rd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 72
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 10%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 5
- Reading:
- rechallenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 10%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Reading:
- rechallenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 10%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 5
- Reading:
- rechallenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 10%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Reading:
- rechallenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 10%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 5
- Reading:
- rechallenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 72
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 10%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Reading:
- rechallenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 72
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 10%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 5
Any other information on results incl. tables
Results of the guinea pig maximization tests
Test substance |
Number of test animals showing skin reaction grade P 1 (reactions in control group) |
Number of animals showing reproducible skin reactions in both challenges |
|||||
|
First challenge |
Re-challenge |
|||||
|
Reading time (h) |
Reading time (h) |
|||||
|
24 |
48 |
72 |
24 |
48 |
72 |
|
Succinic acid |
1/10 (1/5) |
0/10 (0/5) |
1/10 (0/5) |
0/10 (0/5) |
0/10 (0/5) |
0/10 (0/5) |
0 |
Succinic acid caused skin reactions in two animals of the treatment group, one showing a reaction only at 24 h after patch removal and another only at 72 h. Moreover, one animal of the control group showed a skin reaction of the same grade and time course, i.e., a grade 1 reaction at 24 h, but not at 48 and 72 h. Neither of the two animals of the treatment group displayed a skin reaction upon re-challenge, supporting the conclusion that the reactions in these animals (as that of the control group) were non-specific, i.e., not caused by a specific immune reaction.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Test results in the guinea pig maximisation test for succinic acid were negative and the substance is not classified as a sensitiser.
- Executive summary:
The skin sensitization potential of eight unsaturated and one saturated lipid (bio)chemicals was tested in both the LLNA and the GPMT to address the hypothesis that chemicals with unsaturated carbon–carbon double bonds may result in a higher number of unspecific (false positive) results in the LLNA compared to the GPMT. In this test series, succinic acid gave clearly negative results and was not considered sensitising.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.