Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 947-452-3 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- other: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Remarks:
- Study performed on the analogue substance; the read across justification is detailed in section 13. The Reliability of the Source Study is 2.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 989
- Report date:
- 1989
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- May 26, 1983
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Similar Substance 01
- IUPAC Name:
- Similar Substance 01
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
Constituent 1
Method
Species / strainopen allclose all
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: hisG46 base-pair substitution
- Remarks:
- Additional mutations: rfa, gal, chl, bio, uvrB
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: hisC3076 frameshift
- Remarks:
- Additional mutations: rfa, gal, chl, bio, uvrB
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: hisD3052/R-factor frameshift
- Remarks:
- Additional mutations: rfa, gal, chl, bio, uvrB
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: hisG46/R-factor base-pair substitution
- Remarks:
- Additional mutations: rfa, gal, chl, bio, uvrB
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Rat microsomal fraction S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- -Experiment concentrations: 100, 333, 1000, 3330, 5000 µg/plate
Selection of an adequate range of doses was based on a preliminary toxicity test with strain TA100, both with and without S9-mix. Nine concentrations have been tested in duplicate for toxicity. The highest concentration of test substance used in the subsequent mutagenesis assay was that which gave a reduced survival on the non-selective plates. If no toxicity was observed, the highest dose level used in the mutagenesis assay was 5 mg/plate unless the test substance exhibited limited solubility or was not uniformly dispersible in the solvent of choice. - Vehicle / solvent:
- Milli-Q water (Millipore Corp.,Bedford, Mass., USA)
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- sodium azide
- other: daunomycine and methylmethanesulfonate
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- with metabolic activation
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
-Source: Dr. Bruce N. Ames, University of California at Berkeley, U.S.A. (1987)
-Storage: stock cultures of the four strains in liquid nitrogen (-196°C).
-Check: strains regularly checked for their histidine-requirement, crystal violet sensitivity, ampicillin resistance (TA98 and TA100), UV-sensitivity and the number of spontaneous revertants.
CELL CULTURE
-Preparation of bacterial cultures: samples of frozen stock cultures of bacteria transferred into enriched nutrient broth (Oxoid no. 2) and incubated in a shaking bath (37 °C, 150 spm), until the cultures reached an O.D. of 0.4 at 700 nm (109 cells/ml). Freshly grown cultures of each strain used for a test.
-Agar plates: 0 9 cm, contained 25 ml glucose agar medium. Glucose agar medium contained per liter: 18 g purified agar (Oxoid, code L28) in Vogel-Bonner Medium E (Acetylornithinase of Escherichia coli: partial purification and some properties. J. Biol. Chem. 218, 1956, 97-106), 10 g glucose, 0.5 mg biotin and 0.6 mg histidine.
-Top agar: Vogel-Bonner Medium E containing 0.6% (w/v) purified agar was heated to dissolve the agar. Samples of 3 ml top agar were transferred into 10 ml glass tubes with metal caps. Top agar tubes were autoclaved for 20 min at 120 °C. Prior to the viability determination the top agars were supplemented with 1.55 mg histidine per top agar.
-Environmental conditions: all incubations have been carried out in the dark at 37°C. The temperature was monitored during the experiment.
METABOLIC ACTIVATION SYSTEM
-Preparation of S9-homogenate: rat liver microsomal enzymes were routinely prepared from adult male Wistar or Sprague Dawley rats, which were obtained from Charles River Wiga, Sulzfeld, F.R.G. The animals were housed at RCC NOTOX in a special room under standard laboratory conditions. The rats were injected intraperitoneally with a solution (20% w/v) of Aroclor 1254 (500 mg/kg body weight) in corn oil. Five days later, they were killed by decapitation; (they were denied access to food for at least 12 hours preceding sacrifice). The livers of the rats were removed aseptically, and washed in cold (0°C) sterile 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 0.1 mM Na2-EDTA. Subsequently the livers were minced in a blender and homogenized in 3 volumes of phosphate buffer with a Potter homogenizer. The homogenate was centrifuged for 15 min at 9000 g. The supernatant (S9) was transferred into sterile ampules, which were stored in liquid nitrogen (-196 °C).
-Preparation of S9-mix: prepared immediately before use and kept on ice during the test. S9-mix contained per 10 ml: 30 mg NADP and 15.2 mg glucose-6-phosphate in 5.5 ml aqua bidest; 2 ml 0.5 M sodium phosphate buffer pH 7.4; 1 ml 0.08 M MgCl2 solution; 1 ml 0.33 M KCl solution, and 0.5 ml S9. The above solutions were mixed and filter (0.22 µm)-sterilised (apart from the S9-fraction, which was added after filter-sterilisation of the S9-mix components). - Evaluation criteria:
- No formal hypothesis testing has been done.
A test substance was considered:
-negative (not mutagenic) in the Ames test if:
a) The total number of revertants in any tester strain at any concentration was not greater than two times the solvent control value, with or without metabolic activation.
b) The negative response should be reproducible in at least one independently repeated experiment.
-positive (mutagenic) in the Ames test if:
a) It induced at least a 2-fold, dose related increase in the number of revertants with respect to the number induced by the solvent control in any of the tester strains, either with or without metabolic activation. However, any mean plate count of less than 20 was considered to be not significant. If the test substance showed in the first test only a positive response at one or two concentrations, the assay was repeated with doses just below and exceeding those showing positive effects in the first test.
b) The positive response should be reproducible in at least one independently repeated experiment. The preceding criteria were not absolute and other extenuating factors might enter into the final evaluation decision.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100 bacteria
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TOXICITY OF THE TEST SUBSTANCE
The survival of the TA100 culture is determined by comparing the number of colonies on the plates containing the test substance with those on the solvent control plate. Both in the absence and presence of S9-mix the survival of strain TA100 is not reduced up to test substance concentrations of 5000 µg/plate. Based on these data, the test substance was tested up to a concentration of 5000 µg/plate in the absence and presence of S9-mix.
THE AMES SALMONELLA/MICROSOME PLATE TEST
All bacterial strains showed negative responses over the entire dose range of the test substance, i.e. no dose-related, two-fold, increase in the number of revertants in two independently repeated experiments. The negative and strain-specific positive control values fell within laboratory background historical ranges, indicating that the test conditions were optimal and that the metabolic activation system functioned properly.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The test substance can be considered as not mutagenic in this Ames Salmonella assay.
- Executive summary:
The test substance was tested for mutagenic effects with an in vitro bacterial reverse mutation assay, according to the OECD Guideline 471 (1983). The test was performed without and with metabolic activation in the range of concentration of 100 - 5000 μg/plate, using strains of Salmonella typhimurium (TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535 and TA 1537). Each concentration and controls were tested in triplicate. The test substance did not induce a dose-related increase in the number of revertant (His+) colonies in each of the tester strains. These results were confirmed in an independently repeated experiment. Therefore, test substance can be considered as not mutagenic in this test system.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.