Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 229-858-6 | CAS number: 6789-99-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
The test article was nut mutagenic in an Ames test.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 03 Feb 2017 - 16 Feb 2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- 1997
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Version / remarks:
- 2008
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5100 - Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test (August 1998)
- Version / remarks:
- 1998
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- his, trp
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- liver S9 mix from induced rats
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0; 33; 100; 333; 1000; 3000 and 6000 μg/plate
Due to the purity of the test substance 6.0 mg/plate was used as top dose in all experiments. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO;
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Due to the insolubility of the test substance in water, DMSO was used as vehicle, which had been demonstrated to be suitable in bacterial reverse mutation tests and for which historical control data are available - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- sterility control
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: see below
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation); preincubation
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 20 min
- Exposure duration: 48 – 72 hours in the dark
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3 test plates per dose or per control
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- decrease in the number of revertants (factor ≤ 0.6)
- clearing or diminution of the background lawn
POSITIVE CONTROLS
With S9 mix
• 2-aminoanthracene (2-AA)
- 2.5 μg/plate, dissolved in DMSO, strains: TA 1535, TA 100, TA 1537, TA 98
- 60 μg/plate, dissolved in DMSO, strain: Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA
Without S9 mix
• N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG)
- 5 μg/plate, dissolved in DMSO, strains: TA 1535, TA 100
• 4-nitro-o-phenylenediamine (NOPD)
- 10 μg/plate, dissolved in DMSO, strain: TA 98
• 9-aminoacridine (AAC)
- 100 μg/plate, dissolved in DMSO, strain: TA 1537
• 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide (4-NQO)
- 5 μg/plate, dissolved in DMSO, strain: E. coli WP2 uvrA - Evaluation criteria:
- The test substance was considered positive in this assay if the following criteria were met:
• A dose-related and reproducible increase in the number of revertant colonies, i.e. at least doubling (bacteria strains with high spontaneous mutation rate, like TA 98, TA 100 and E.coli WP2 uvrA) or tripling (bacteria strains with low spontaneous mutation rate, like TA 1535 and TA 1537) of the spontaneous mutation rate in at least one tester strain either without S9 mix or after adding a metabolizing system.
A test substance was generally considered non-mutagenic in this test if:
• The number of revertants for all tester strains were within the range of the historical negative control data under all experimental conditions in at least two experiments carried out independently of each other. - Species / strain:
- other: S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: No test substance precipitation was found with and without S9 mix.
HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA
The number of revertant colonies in the negative controls with and without S9 was within the range of the historical negative control data for each tester strain. In addition, the positive control substances with and without S9 mix induced a significant increase in the number of revertant colonies within the range of the historical positive control data.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
A weak bacteriotoxic effect (slight decrease in the number of his+ revertants) was observed in the standard plate test only with S9 mix using the tester strains TA 1537 from about 3000 μg/plate onward and TA 98 at a concentration of 6000 μg/plate. In the preincubation assay bacteriotoxicity (slight decrease in the number of his+ revertants) was observed using TA 1537 without S9 mix at a concentration of 6000 μg/plate. - Conclusions:
- Under the experimental conditions of this study, the test substance is not mutagenic in the Salmonella typhimurium/Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay in the absence and the presence of metabolic activation.
- Executive summary:
The test substance was tested for its mutagenic potential based on the ability to induce point mutations in selected loci of several bacterial strains, i.e. Salmonella typhimurium TA 1535, TA 100, TA 1537, TA 98 and Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA. The dose range tested was 33 μg - 6000 μg/plate both in the standard plate test and in the preincubation assay both with and without metabolic activation (liver S9 mix from induced rats). No precipitation of the test substance was found with and without S9 mix. A weak bacteriotoxic effect was occasionally observed depending on the strain and test conditions from about 3000 μg/plate onward. A biologically relevant increase in the number of his+ or trp+ revertants (factor ≥ 2: TA 100, TA 98 and E.coli WP2 uvrA or factor ≥ 3: TA 1535 and TA 1537) was not observed in the standard plate test or in the preincubation test without S9 mix or after the addition of a metabolizing system. Thus, under the experimental conditions of this study, the test substance is not mutagenic in the Salmonella typhimurium/Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay in the absence and the presence of metabolic activation.
Reference
EXPERIMENTAL RESULT
Standard Plate Test
Mean revertants per plate | ||||||||||
Strain | TA 1535 | TA 100 | TA 1537 | TA 98 | WP2uvrA | |||||
Dose (µg/plate) | -S9 | +S9 | -S9 | +S9 | -S9 | +S9 | -S9 | +S9 | -S9 | +S9 |
DMSO | 10.7 | 10.3 | 96.0 | 106.7 | 7.7 | 12.0 | 21.3 | 31.3 | 23.3 | 21.0 |
33 | 10.3 | 8.3 | 108.3 | 111.7 | 10.3 | 12.0 | 16.7 | 25.7 | 27.0 | 26.0 |
100 | 11.7 | 10.3 | 113.7 | 118.7 | 7.3 | 9.7 | 17.7 | 34.7 | 20.3 | 23.7 |
333 | 13.7 | 12.7 | 100.3 | 118.7 | 10.3 | 9.3 | 16.0 | 19.3 | 22.7 | 29.3 |
1000 | 13.0 | 13.0 | 106.0 | 104.0 | 10.7 | 9.7 | 24.3 | 27.7 | 23.3 | 22.0 |
3000 | 14.0 | 14.0 | 115.3 | 107.3 | 7.7 | 7.0 | 21.7 | 21.3 | 22.7 | 28.3 |
6000 | 13.7 | 14.7 | 136.0 | 115.0 | 9.7 | 7.0 | 22.3 | 20.3 | 26.7 | 21.7 |
positive control | 5382.7 | 188.7 | 4366.0 | 1330.3 | 1210.7 | 123.3 | 656.0 | 2513.0 | 1026.3 | 116.0 |
Preincubation Test
Mean revertants per plate | ||||||||||
Strain | TA 1535 | TA 100 | TA 1537 | TA 98 | WP2uvrA | |||||
Dose (µg/plate) | -S9 | +S9 | -S9 | +S9 | -S9 | +S9 | -S9 | +S9 | -S9 | +S9 |
DMSO | 7.7 | 10.3 | 80.3 | 94.7 | 6.7 | 8.7 | 20.0 | 32.3 | 23.0 | 23.7 |
33 | 10.7 | 5.0 | 86.0 | 86.0 | 6.3 | 11.0 | 18.3 | 36.7 | 30.3 | 18.7 |
100 | 8.7 | 9.3 | 94.3 | 85.0 | 7.0 | 8.7 | 19.0 | 23.7 | 23.7 | 17.3 |
333 | 9.7 | 9.3 | 86.0 | 89.0 | 7.3 | 11.3 | 20.0 | 31.3 | 16.7 | 24.0 |
1000 | 14.0 | 8.3 | 94.7 | 98.0 | 9.7 | 6.3 | 23.3 | 28.0 | 15.0 | 19.0 |
2600 | 14.3 | 13.0 | 85.7 | 103.3 | 6.7 | 11.0 | 15.7 | 27.0 | 20.7 | 24.3 |
5200 | 16.7 | 16.3 | 100.7 | 112.3 | 3.7 | 5.7 | 15.3 | 21.3 | 22.7 | 17.7 |
positive control | 3495.3 | 228.3 | 2569.7 | 2330.7 | 1062.7 | 146.0 | 593.0 | 1850.0 | 606.3 | 103.0 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
The test substance was tested for its mutagenic potential based on the ability to induce point mutations in selected loci of several bacterial strains, i.e. Salmonella typhimurium TA 1535, TA 100, TA 1537, TA 98 and Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA. The test was performed according to OECD guideline 471 and under GLP. The dose range tested was 33 μg - 6000 μg/plate both in the standard plate test and in the preincubation assay both with and without metabolic activation (liver S9 mix from induced rats). A weak bacteriotoxic effect (slight decrease in the number of his+ revertants) was observed in the standard plate test only with S9 mix using the tester strains TA 1537 from about 3000 μg/plate onward and TA 98 at a concentration of 6000 μg/plate. In the preincubation assay bacteriotoxicity (slight decrease in the number of his+ revertants) was observed using TA 1537 without S9 mix at a concentration of 6000 μg/plate. The test substance did not lead to a biologically relevant increase in the number of revertant colonies without S9 mix or after adding a metabolizing system in two experiments carried out independently of each other (standard plate test and preincubation assay). The results of the negative as well as the positive controls performed in parallel corroborated the validity of this study, since the values fulfilled the acceptance criteria. In this study with and without S9 mix, the number of revertant colonies in the negative controls was within the range of the historical negative control data for each tester strain. In addition, the positive control substances with and without S9 mix induced a significant increase in the number of revertant colonies within the range of the historical positive control data. In conclusion, under the experimental conditions chosen here, it is concluded that is not a mutagenic test substance in the bacterial reverse mutation test in the absence and the presence of metabolic activation.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Classification, Labeling, and Packaging Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008
The available experimental test data are reliable and suitable for classification purposes under Regulation 1272/2008. As a result the substance is not considered to be classified for genotoxicity under Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.