Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-694-5 | CAS number: 109-67-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Experiment 1: 24-27 August 2010. Experiment 2: 07-10 August 2010
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study under GLP with full documentation.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 201 (Alga, Growth Inhibition Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- The pH values of the controls and the temperature in the main study and in the reference study did not comply with OECD 201 Guideline. Because the controls showed a normal exponential growth, this can be stated as un-critical.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.3 (Algal Inhibition test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- See deviation to OECD 201 Guideline. Furthermore, the composition of stock solution II is taken from OECD Guideline 201. As in EU-Method C.3, a different composition (80 mg FeCl3*6H2O/L) is stated, this is stated as a deviation from the EU Method.
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- A sample quantity of 1 ml test solution was taken with a syringe and transferred into a GC vial. The vials were immediately closed. After 15 minutes at 20 °C, a sample volume of 50 µl was taken from the headspace and measured via GC/FID.
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- Pre-culture-medium and Nutrient-medium were prepared according to OECD 201 test guideline
- Test organisms (species):
- Desmodesmus subspicatus (previous name: Scenedesmus subspicatus)
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Strain: CHODAT
- Method of cultivation: Four days before the start of each test, an aliquot of the stock culture containing a few cells was brought into pre-culture medium and incubated for 96 hours. The resulting cul-ture is growing exponentially.
Before usage, the culture was checked on the absence of cell aggregates. After the ad-justment to a cell concentration of about 6*10e+4/mL through photometric measurement and addition of algal medium, the culture was usable for the test. The adjusted pre-culture was mixed with the same amount of 10-fold-nutrient solution. This mixture was the test culture. - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 72 h
- Post exposure observation period:
- None
- Hardness:
- not reported
- Test temperature:
- 24 – 25 °C experiment 1, 23 – 24 °C experiment 2
- pH:
- 7.0 +/- 0.2
Because the test was performed in a closed system due to the volatility of the test item, the test medium was buffered with NaHCO3 (50 g/L). - Dissolved oxygen:
- not reported
- Salinity:
- not reported
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- TEST ITEM
Treatments tested Exp. 1: 0 (control), 10, 22, 46, 100 mg/L
Treatments tested Exp. 2: 0 (control), 13, 18 mg/L
Number of replicates: six replicates for the control, three replicates for each treatment
REFERENCE SUBSTANCE
Treatments tested: 0.04, 0.063, 0.1, 0.16, 0.25, 0.4, 0.63, 1.0, 1.6 mg/L
Number of replicates: six replicates for the control, three replicates for each treatment - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: closed glass flasks closed with Teflon seals and lids, total volume 310 mL
- Type: closed
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: Total volume 310 mL, fill volume 310 mL
- Aeration: no
- Initial cells density: The algal concentration was adjusted to about 6*10e+4/mL through photometric measurement and addition of algal medium
GROWTH MEDIUM
- Standard medium used: yes
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Sterile test conditions: no
- Adjustment of pH: pH adjusted to 7.0 +/- 0.2 with HCl
- Photoperiod: continuous illumination
- Light intensity and quality: 4440 – 8880 Lux
PERFORMANCE OF THE MAIN STUDY (exp. 1 and 2)
The vessels were immediately closed after addition of the test medium, test item and algae, and incubated closed for 72 hours, shaken on an orbital shaker in the lighting incu-bator. To avoid sedimentation of the algal cells, a marble was put into the test vessels. Before start of incubation and every 24 hours, the values of the absorption were recorded. For photometric measurement the seal was transfixed and a volume of 1 ml test solution was taken with a syringe and transferred into a glass cuvette. The hole for sampling was paste up. After photometric measurement the aliquot of the test solution was discarded. After the test, the pH values of the treatments and the control were measured again.
At the end of the test, treatments and control were inspected microscopically in order to verify the appearance of the algae.
The content of the test item in the test vessels was measured at the start and at the end of the test. - Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- K2Cr2O7 (CAS No. 7778-50-9)
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- <= 15 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 27 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Key result
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 79 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 34 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Results with reference substance (positive control):
- - Results with reference substance valid? Yes
- 72h EC50 (growth rate): 0.75 mg/L
- 72h EC50 (biomass): 0.26 mg/L
- 72h EC50 (yield): 0.34 mg/L - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- Toxicity of 1-Pentene to Desmodesmus subspicatus according to OECD 201 resp. EU C.3 was determined. The experiment is valid according to the validity criteria of these guidelines.
The 72h-EC50 (growth rate) is 79 mg/L. The 72h-NOEC is <= 15 mg/L. According to the regulation (CE) 1272/2008, 72h-EC50 (growth rate) should be used for classification. - Executive summary:
Two valid experiments were performed.
Due to the volatility of the test item, the test was performed in a closed system and the nominal load of test item was directly injected into the test vessels.
The first experiment was performed using four concentrations ranging from 10 to 100 mg/L. The second experiment was performed using the concentrations 13 and 18 mg/L. The treatments were used to incubate the unicellular freshwater green algaDesmodesmus subspicatusfor a period of 72 hours. The cell concentration of each replicate was determined by measuring the absorption at 440 nm every 24 hours with a spectral photometer. With these measured values, the number of cells was calculated (linear correlation between cell concentration and absorption given). Then the growth rate µ, the area under the growth curve (AUC[1]) and the Yield[2]were determined.
At the start and at the end of the test, the content of the test item in the test solutions was determined using GC. The measured values at the end of the test were in the expected range, but at the beginning, the measured values in three treatments were partly too high because of insufficient homogenisation in the completely filled test vessels: a verification experiment in the daphnia study under the same test conditions showed, that after an equilibration time of one hour, test item concentrations in the range of the nominal concentration were determined. Therefore, the determination of the biological results was based on the measured concentration at the end of the test.
The EC50s of potassium dichromate were tested in a current reference test. The values lay within the normal range of the laboratory.
The following results for the test itemPentene-1were determined:
Endpoint
NOEC
LOEC
EC50
Growth Rate
15 mg/L
27 mg/L
79 mg/L
AUC
15 mg/L
27 mg/L
35 mg/L
Yield
15 mg/L
27 mg/L
34 mg/L
[1]AUC1 (Area Under Curve according to EU Method C.3) means the integral of the biomass. Calculation see under 8.2.
[2]Yield (according to OECD Guideline 201) is defined as the biomass at the end of the exposure period minus the biomass at the start of the exposure period. Calculation see under 8.3
Reference
STABILITY OF THE TEST ITEM IN TEST MEDIUM
The stability in test medium was determined by spiking 259 ml test medium with 0.5 µl (conc. 1.2 mg/L) and 16 µL (conc. 98 mg/L) Pentene-1. After 0 and 3 days storage at room temperature, respectively, 1 ml test solution (two replicates) was collected. A sample volume of 50 µL was taken from the headspace and measured threefold via GC/FID. The solutions in the vials were temperate for 15 minutes at 20°C before measurement. The measured areas at the end of the storage period were compared with the mean areas from the beginning. For each concentration three replicates were analysed.
The results are presented in the following table:
Table 1 Stability in Test Medium at concentration 1.2 mg/L
Time |
Area1_1 |
Area1_2 |
Area2_1 |
Area2_2 |
Area3_1 |
Area3_2 |
Area mean |
0 days |
4.10 |
4,80 |
5,79 |
6,48 |
6,60 |
5,86 |
5,61 |
3 days |
3.76 |
4,36 |
3,67 |
3,91 |
4,62 |
5,22 |
4,26 |
Recovery after 3 days |
75.9 % |
Table 2 Stability in Test Medium at concentration 98 mg/L
Time |
Area1_1 |
Area1_2 |
Area2_1 |
Area2_2 |
Area3_1 |
Area3_2 |
Area mean |
0 days |
566.12 |
586,36 |
622,11 |
494,46 |
634,49 |
666,79 |
595,06 |
3 days |
362.84 |
316,40 |
669,35 |
474,41 |
496,71 |
500,88 |
470,10 |
Recovery after 3 days |
79.0 % |
Due to the high volatility of the test item, no better stability could be determined.
RESULTS OF THE MEAIN STUDY WITH THE TEST ITEM
- MAIN STUDY, EXPERIMENT 1
The cell numbers were determined by photometric measurement of optical density. Cell numbers of individual replicates are given in the annex, also. The means and standard deviations of the cell numbers of the control and the treatments are presented in the following table:
Table 3 Cell Number/mL Main Study Exp. 1
Nominal Concentration in mg/L |
Parameter |
Cell Number/mL |
|||
|
|
0 h |
24 h |
48 h |
72 h |
0 |
Mean |
7354 |
46575 |
215717 |
807714 |
0 |
SD |
0 |
3798 |
24902 |
78988 |
10 |
Mean |
7354 |
39221 |
223071 |
818745 |
10 |
SD |
0 |
4246 |
23640 |
21229 |
22 |
Mean |
7354 |
44124 |
164239 |
671665 |
22 |
SD |
0 |
7354 |
11233 |
55196 |
46 |
Mean |
7354 |
19611 |
85797 |
286806 |
46 |
SD |
0 |
11233 |
4246 |
48223 |
100 |
Mean |
7354 |
12257 |
17159 |
24513 |
100 |
SD |
0 |
4246 |
4246 |
4246 |
SD = Standard Deviation
The pH values in the control ranged from 7.2 to 10.1. The light intensity was in a range of 5200 – 5300 lux. Temperature range was 24 – 25oC.
In the following table the appearance of the alga at the end of the test were stated:
Table 4 Microscopical Observation Main Study
Nom. Conc. in mg/L |
Observation |
0 |
Normal growth |
10 |
Normal growth |
22 |
Normal growth |
46 |
Smaller cells |
100 |
No cells |
Because of insufficient homogenisation at the beginning of the test, no test item could be detected in treatment 10 mg/L, whereas the measured concentration in treatment 100 mg/L was much too high. After 72 hours, the measured concentrations were in the expected range. The measured concentration in treatment 10 mg/L was still much higher than expected. As no inhibition in that treatment had been observed, this treatment wasn’t necessary for evaluation of the results.
Therefore, the measured concentrations at the end of the study were used for the determination of the results.
The details are given in the following table:
Table 5 Measured Concentrations in mg/L and corresponding Recovery Rates in % Exp. 1
Nom. Conc. |
Measured Conc 0 h |
% Nom Conc. |
Measured Conc 72 h |
% Nom Conc. |
% Recovery |
geom. Mean. |
mg/L |
mg/L |
% |
mg/L |
% |
% |
mg/L |
0 |
n. d. |
-- |
n. d. |
-- |
-- |
-- |
10 |
n. d. |
-- |
18.7 |
187 % |
-- |
-- |
22 |
16.9 |
77 % |
26.9 |
122 % |
159 % |
21.3 |
46 |
37.8 |
82 % |
38.3 |
83 % |
101 % |
38.1 |
100 |
282.4 |
282 % |
125.5 |
125 % |
44 % |
188.2 |
n. d. = not detectable
From the cell numbers, the Growth Rate µ, the Area under the Curve AUC, and the Yield were calculated. The means and standard deviations at the end of the test are given in the following table:
Table 6 Growth Rate µ, Area under the Curve AUC, Yield Main Study Exp. 1
Nom. Concentration in mg/L |
Meas. Concentration in mg/L |
|
Growth Rate [day-1] |
AUC |
Yield |
0 |
-- |
Mean |
1.56 |
647765 |
800360 |
SD |
0.03 |
58943 |
78988 |
||
10 |
19 |
Mean |
1.57 |
653280 |
811391 |
SD |
0.01 |
33364 |
21229 |
||
22 |
27 |
Mean |
1.50 |
525811 |
664311 |
SD |
0.03 |
31416 |
55196 |
||
46 |
38 |
Mean |
1.22 |
230425 |
279452 |
SD |
0.06 |
24483 |
48223 |
||
100 |
125 |
Mean |
0.40 |
23288 |
17159 |
SD |
0.06 |
7654 |
4246 |
SD = Standard Deviation
The following mean inhibition values were calculated for the Growth Rate µ, the Area under the Curve AUC, and the Yield. Individual inhibition values are given in the annex.
Table 7 Inhibition Values Main Study Exp. 1
Nom. Concentration in mg/L |
Meas. Concentration in mg/L |
% Inhibition |
||
Growth Rate µ |
Area under the Curve AUC |
Yield |
||
0 |
0 |
0! |
0! |
0! |
10 |
19 |
-0.37 |
-0.85 |
-1.38 |
22 |
27 |
3.89 |
18.83 |
17.00 |
46 |
38 |
22.18 |
64.43 |
65.08 |
100 |
125 |
74.56 |
96.40 |
97.86 |
- MAIN STUDY (EXPERIMENT 2)
The cell numbers were determined by photometric measurement of optical density. Cell numbers of individual replicates are given in the annex, also. The means and standard deviations of the cell numbers of the control and the treatments are presented in the following table:
Table 8 Cell Number/mL Main Study Exp. 2
Nominal Concentration in mg/L |
Parameter |
Cell Number/mL |
|||
|
|
0 h |
24 h |
48 h |
72 h |
0 |
Mean |
7354 |
69863 |
291709 |
960923 |
0 |
SD |
0 |
10137 |
34073 |
174937 |
13 |
Mean |
7354 |
58832 |
286806 |
877577 |
13 |
SD |
0 |
14708 |
65364 |
292069 |
18 |
Mean |
7354 |
51478 |
245133 |
769719 |
18 |
SD |
0 |
0 |
25826 |
128713 |
SD = Standard Deviation
The pH values in the control ranged from 7.0 to 9.8. The light intensity was in a range of 5200 – 5300 lux. Temperature range was 23 – 24oC.
The appearance of the alga at the end of the test were "Normal" for the controls and different treatments
Because of insufficient homogenisation the measured concentration at the beginning was much too high. After 72 hours the measured concentrations were in the expected range. The measured concentration in treatment 13 mg/L was marginally higher than measured concentration in treatment 18 mg/L.
The measured concentration at the end of the study was used for the determination of the results.
The details are given in the following table:
Table 9 Measured Concentrations in mg/L and corresponding Recovery Rates in % Exp. 2
Nom. Conc. |
Measured Conc. 0 h |
% Nom Conc. |
Measured Conc. 72 h |
% Nom Conc. |
% Recovery |
geom. Mean. |
mg/L |
mg/L |
% |
mg/L |
% |
% |
mg/L |
0 |
n. d. |
-- |
n. d. |
-- |
-- |
-- |
13 |
32.1 |
247% |
17.5 |
135% |
55% |
23.7 |
18 |
34.8 |
193% |
15.0 |
83% |
43% |
22.8 |
n. d. = not detectable
From the cell numbers, the Growth Rate µ, the Area under the Curve AUC, and the Yield were calculated. The means and standard deviations at the end of the test are given in the following table:
Table 10 Growth Rate µ, Area under the Curve AUC, Yield Main Study Exp. 2
Nom. Concentration in mg/L |
Meas. Concentration in mg/L |
|
Growth Rate [day-1] |
AUC |
Yield |
0 |
-- |
Mean |
1.62 |
823648 |
953569 |
SD |
0.05 |
118191 |
174937 |
||
13 |
18 |
Mean |
1.58 |
766042 |
870223 |
SD |
0.13 |
225149 |
292069 |
||
18 |
15 |
Mean |
1.55 |
663086 |
762365 |
SD |
0.06 |
81587 |
128713 |
SD = Standard Deviation
The following mean inhibition values were calculated for the Growth Rate µ, the Area under the Curve AUC, and the Yield. Individual inhibition values are given in the annex.
Table 11 Inhibition Values Main Study Exp. 2
Nom. Concentration in mg/L |
Meas. Concentration in mg/L |
% Inhibition |
||
Growth Rate µ |
Area under the Curve AUC |
Yield |
||
0 |
0 |
0! |
0! |
0! |
13 |
18 |
2.52 |
6.99 |
8.74 |
18 |
15 |
4.51 |
19.49 |
20.05 |
RESULTS OF THE REFERENCE STUDY
The cell numbers were determined by photometric measurement of optical density. Cell numbers of individual replicates are given in the annex, also.
The following mean inhibition values were calculated for the Growth Rate µ, the Area under the Curve AUC, and the Yield. Individual inhibition values are given in the annex.
Table 12 Inhibition Values Reference Study
Nominal Concentration in mg/L |
% Inhibition |
||
Growth Rate µ |
Area under the Curve AUC |
Yield |
|
0 |
0! |
0! |
0! |
0.04 |
-1.23 |
-0.07 |
-4.98 |
0.063 |
-0.77 |
8.84 |
-2.99 |
0.1 |
-0.47 |
-7.88 |
-1.66 |
0.16 |
1.65 |
5.96 |
7.42 |
0.25 |
11.57 |
38.04 |
40.20 |
0.4 |
24.10 |
63.13 |
65.67 |
0.63 |
44.08 |
85.47 |
86.27 |
1.0 |
62.90 |
93.97 |
94.68 |
1.6 |
81.36 |
98.36 |
98.23 |
The pH values in the control ranged from 8.4 to 8.9. The light intensity was 6200 – 6500 lux. Temperature was 27 °C.
The appearance of the alga at the end of the test were stated. Normal growth was assessed for concentrations <= 0.4 mg/L. No cells were present for concentrations of 0.63 mg/L and above.
Description of key information
Toxicity to aquatic algae:
OECD 201, GLP, key study, validity 2:
72h-EC50 (growth rate) = 79 mg/L
72h-NOEC (growth rate) <= 15 mg/L
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- EC50 for freshwater algae:
- 79 mg/L
- EC10 or NOEC for freshwater algae:
- 15 mg/L
Additional information
Two valid experiments were performed.
Due to the volatility of the test item, the test was performed in a closed system and the nominal load of test item was directly injected into the test vessels.
The first experiment was performed using four concentrations ranging from 10 to 100 mg/L. The second experiment was performed using the concentrations 13 and 18 mg/L. The treatments were used to incubate the unicellular freshwater green algaDesmodesmus subspicatusfor a period of 72 hours. The cell concentration of each replicate was determined by measuring the absorption at 440 nm every 24 hours with a spectral photometer. With these measured values, the number of cells was calculated (linear correlation between cell concentration and absorption given). Then the growth rate µ, the area under the growth curve (AUC[1]) and the Yield[2]were determined.
At the start and at the end of the test, the content of the test item in the test solutions was determined using GC. The measured values at the end of the test were in the expected range, but at the beginning, the measured values in three treatments were partly too high because of insufficient homogenisation in the completely filled test vessels: a verification experiment in the daphnia study under the same test conditions showed, that after an equilibration time of one hour, test item concentrations in the range of the nominal concentration were determined. Therefore, the determination of the biological results was based on the measured concentration at the end of the test.
The EC50s of potassium dichromate were tested in a current reference test. The values lay within the normal range of the laboratory.
The 72h-EC50 (growth rate) is 79 mg/L. The 72h-NOEC (growth rate) is <= 15 mg/L. According to the regulation (CE) 1272/2008, 72h-EC50 (growth rate) should be used for classification.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.