Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 947-397-5 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 997
- Report date:
- 1997
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.10 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Version / remarks:
- Official Journal of European Communities No L383A/148, 29 December 1992
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Department of Toxicology of BASF SE, Ludwigshafen/Rhein, Germany
- Type of assay:
- other: chromosome aberration test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- reaction mass of disodium;3-[2-(2-carboxylatoethylamino)-ethylamino]propanoate and sodium 3-[(2-aminoethyl)amino]propanoate
- Molecular formula:
- C5H11N2O2Na and C8H14N2O4Na2
- IUPAC Name:
- reaction mass of disodium;3-[2-(2-carboxylatoethylamino)-ethylamino]propanoate and sodium 3-[(2-aminoethyl)amino]propanoate
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: 34-0725
Method
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor 1254-induced rat liver S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 1st experiment (with/without S9 mix, 18 h harvest):
962.5, 1925, 3850 µg/mL (based on the aqueous test substance)
[385.0, 770.0, 1540.0 µg/mL (based on the active ingredient)]
2nd experiment (without S9 mix, 18 harvest):
1925, 2887.5, 3850 µg/mL (based on the aqueous test substance)
[770.0, 1155.0, 1540.0 µg/mL (based on the active ingredient)]
3rd experiment (with/without S9 mix):
18 h harvest: 1925, 2887, 3850 µg/mL (based on the aqueous test substance)
[770.0, 1155.0, 1540.0 µg/mL (based on the active ingredient)]
28 h harvest: 3850 µg/mL (based on the aqueous test substance)
[1540.0 µg/mL (based on the active ingredient)] - Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Minimal essential medium (MEM including glutamine)
Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Due to the good solubility of the test substance in water, the aqueous culture medium (MEM) was selected as the vehicle.
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation, 0.350 mg/mL
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- with metabolic activation, 0.0005 mg/mL
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: In medium
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 4 h with S9 mix
- Exposure duration: 18 and 28 hours
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 24 and 30 hours
SPINDLE INHIBITOR: Two - three hours before each preparation time (18 and 28 hours after the beginning of treatment) 0.2 µg colcemide/mL culture medium was added to each well to arrest mitosis in the metaphases. The medium was removed and replaced with 5 mL of a hypotonic solution (0.4 % KCI in dist . water) pre-warmed to 37°C for about 20 min. Thereafter the cells were fixed with 5 mL of ice-cold fixative (methanol : glacial acetic acid = 3 : 1).
STAIN: 10 min in a solution of Giemsa and Titrisol (15 mL Giemsa, 185 mL Titrisol, pH 7.2)
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Two independent experiments were performed.
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: first 100 consecutive well spread metaphases of each culture (20 - 22 chromosomes).
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index (1000 ceels/culture)
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: Yes - Evaluation criteria:
- The test chemical is to be considered positive in this assay if the following criteria are met :
- a dose-related and reproducible significant increase in the number of structural chromosomal aberrations .
- the proportion of aberrations exceeded both the concurrent negative control range and the negative historical control range .
A test substance is generally considered nonclastogenic in this test system if :
- there was no significant increase in the number of chromosomally damaged cells at any dose above concurrent control frequencies .
- the aberration frequencies were within the historical control range . - Statistics:
- The proportion of metaphases with aberrations was calculated for each group. A comparison of each dose group with the vehicle control group was carried outusing Fisher's exact test for the hypothesis of equal proportions. This test was Bonferroni-Holm corrected versus the dose groups separately for each time and was performed one-sided.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- 1st experiment:
With 7.5% there was a slight increase in the number of aberrant cells at the highest dose of 3850 µg/mL in the experimental part without metabolic activation after a harvest time of 18 hours . However, this figure which slightly exceeded the upper value of the historical control range, i .e .5.5% was influenced by only one out of the two cultures.
With S9 mix an increase in the number of aberrant metaphases was not observed.
2nd experiment:
For confirmation/substantiation of the findings of the 1st experiment the 2nd experiment was limited to the experimental part without S9 mix only but selecting closer doses to demonstrate a possible dose-response relationship. However, the results of the 1st experiment could not be confirmed, i. e. the number of chromosomally damaged cells was within the range of the concurrent negative control and within the range of the historical control data.
3rd experiment:
In the 3rd experiment including an additionally harvest time of 28 hours a clastogenic activity could not be observed after any of the experimental conditions.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Experiment 1, harvest time 18 hours, treatment 18 h (-S9 mix) or 4 h (+S9 mix), mean of two cultures
|
|
|
Metaphases with aberrations |
|
|
||||
conc. [µg/mL] |
S9 mix |
Mitotic index % (mean) |
Incl. gap |
Excl.gap |
Exchanges |
Mul. Aber. |
Chr. Dis. |
Aneupl. |
Polypl. |
Vehicle control (MEM) |
- |
6.8 |
18 |
6 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
962.5# |
- |
5.6 |
20 |
7 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1925.0 |
- |
6.1 |
13 |
8 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3850.0 |
- |
6.9 |
16 |
13 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Positive control (EMS) 350.0 |
- |
5.7 |
16 |
13 |
9 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vehicle control (MEM) |
+ |
11.5 |
12 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
962.5 |
+ |
12.8 |
17 |
6 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1925.0 |
+ |
10.6 |
9 |
6 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3850.0 |
+ |
12.8 |
15 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Positive control (CPP) 0.5 |
+ |
7.0 |
21 |
18 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
# concentrations related to aqueous test substance, MEM = Minimal essential medium, EMS = ethyl methane sulfonate, CCP = Cyclophosphamide, Incl. = Including, Excl. = excluding, Mul. = multiple, Aber.= aberrations, Chr. = chromosome, Dis. = disintegration, aneupl. = aneuploidy, Polypl. = polyploidy |
Table 2: Experiment 2, harvest time 18 hours, treatment 18 h (-S9 mix), mean of two cultures
|
|
|
Metaphases with aberrations |
|
|
||||
conc. [µg/mL] |
S9 mix |
Mitotic index % (mean) |
Incl. gap |
Excl.gap |
Exchanges |
Mul. Aber. |
Chr. Dis. |
Aneupl. |
Polypl. |
Vehicle control (MEM) |
- |
5.2 |
14 |
7 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1925# |
- |
4.9 |
17 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2887.5 |
- |
7.2 |
11 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3850.0 |
- |
6.0 |
22 |
6 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
Positive control (EMS) 350.0 |
- |
3.8 |
25 |
13 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
# concentrations related to aqueous test substance, MEM = Minimal essential medium, EMS = ethyl methane sulfonate, CCP = Cyclophosphamide, Incl. = Including, Excl. = excluding, Mul. = multiple, Aber.= aberrations, Chr. = chromosome, Dis. = disintegration, aneupl. = aneuploidy, Polypl. = polyploidy |
Table 3: Experiment 3, harvest time 18 hours, treatment 18 h (-S9 mix) or 4 h (+S9 mix), mean of two cultures
|
|
|
Metaphases with aberrations |
|
|
||||
conc. [µg/mL] |
S9 mix |
Mitotic index % (mean) |
Incl. gap |
Excl.gap |
Exchanges |
Mul. Aber. |
Chr. Dis. |
Aneupl. |
Polypl. |
Vehicle control (MEM) |
- |
6.5 |
15 |
6 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1925# |
- |
4.6 |
15 |
8 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2887.5 |
- |
4.2 |
15 |
9 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3850.0 |
- |
5.7 |
13 |
7 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Positive control (EMS) 350.0 |
- |
4.7 |
14 |
14 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vehicle control (MEM) |
+ |
8.3 |
11 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1925# |
+ |
13.5 |
20 |
9 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2887.5 |
+ |
7.5 |
11 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3850.0 |
+ |
7.7 |
8 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Positive control (CPP) 0.5 |
+ |
5.6 |
18 |
16 |
7 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
# concentrations related to aqueous test substance, MEM = Minimal essential medium, EMS = ethyl methane sulfonate, CCP = Cyclophosphamide, Incl. = Including, Excl. = excluding, Mul. = multiple, Aber.= aberrations, Chr. = chromosome, Dis. = disintegration, aneupl. = aneuploidy, Polypl. = polyploidy |
Table 4: Experiment 3, harvest time 28 hours, treatment 18 h (-S9 mix) or 4 h (+S9 mix), mean of two cultures
|
|
|
Metaphases with aberrations |
|
|
||||
conc. [µg/mL] |
S9 mix |
Mitotic index % (mean) |
Incl. gap |
Excl.gap |
Exchanges |
Mul. Aber. |
Chr. Dis. |
Aneupl. |
Polypl. |
Vehicle control (MEM) |
- |
9.8 |
6 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3850.0# |
- |
9.1 |
14 |
8 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vehicle control (MEM) |
+ |
8.9 |
14 |
6 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3850.0 |
+ |
14.5 |
12 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
# concentrations related to aqueous test substance, MEM = Minimal essential medium, EMS = ethyl methane sulfonate, CCP = Cyclophosphamide, Incl. = Including, Excl. = excluding, Mul. = multiple, Aber.= aberrations, Chr. = chromosome, Dis. = disintegration, aneupl. = aneuploidy, Polypl. = polyploidy |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
