Registration Dossier

Ecotoxicological information

Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae

Administrative data

Endpoint:
toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
from 2017-11-01 to 2017-12-08, with the definitive exposure phase from 2017-11-29 to 2017-12-06.
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2018
Report Date:
2018

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 221 (Lemna sp. Growth Inhibition Test)
Version / remarks:
2006
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Reference
Name:
Unnamed
Type:
Constituent
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder

Sampling and analysis

Analytical monitoring:
yes
Details on sampling:
Determination of the test item
All test item concentrations and the control were analytically verified via HPLC-DAD at the start (0 day, fresh medium) and at the end of the exposure (7 days, old medium).

Test solutions

Vehicle:
no
Details on test solutions:
Preparation of the A stock solution with a nominal concentration of 100 mg test item/L
Test item solution was freshly prepared with dilution water and agitated until the solution was visually clear.

Test concentrations Out of the stock solution six dilution levels were prepared in a geometrical series with a separation factor of 4 and tested as follows: 0.00977 - 0.0391 – 0.156 – 0.625 – 2.50 – 10.0 mg/L, corresponding to the geometric mean measured test item concentration of: 0.00610 - 0.0119 – 0.112 – 0.558 – 2.32 – 9.47 mg/L.

Control Six replicates (without test item) were tested under the same test conditions as the test vessels.

Test organisms

Test organisms (species):
Lemna gibba
Details on test organisms:
Test organism
Duckweed, Lemna gibba, Lemnaceae, Arales, Arecidae, Monocotyledonae
Young, rapidly growing plants without visible lesions or discolouration (chlorosis) were used for the test.

Reason for the selection of the test organism
According to the guideline, Lemna gibba is a suitable species because it is a representative of temperate areas commonly used for toxicity tests.

Origin
EUROFINS-GAB GMBH, Eutinger Str. 24, 75223 Niefern-Öschelbronn, Germany

Date of receipt
2008-02-26

Cultivation at test facility
The species is cultured in the test facility. Density is kept low to prevent conglomerates of plants on the surface. At least once per week, plants are transferred to freshly prepared growth medium. Growth media and culturing vessels are autoclaved before use to enable the breeding of axenic cultures.

Breeding vessels
Crystallisation dishes of glass, vol. 900 mL, filled with ca. 500 mL growth medium, covered with glass tops

Medium
20X-AAP-medium (Algal Assay Procedure medium),
pH-value 7.5 ± 0.1, see dilution water

Temperature 24 ± 2 °C

Light regime
Continuous fluorescent light, 1100 – 4440 lux

Acclimatization of the test system
The test system (the test organism) was held for 7 days under test conditions to acclimatize. These acclimatized plants were used in the test.

Study design

Test type:
static
Water media type:
freshwater
Limit test:
no
Total exposure duration:
7 d

Test conditions

Hardness:
not measured
Test temperature:
see any other information on materials and methods
pH:
see any other information on materials and methods
Dissolved oxygen:
not measured
Salinity:
not measured
Conductivity:
not measured
Details on test conditions:
Test method
Static procedure

Test duration
7 days

Replicates
3 replicates per concentration level, 6 for the control

Test vessels/test volumes
Crystallisation dishes with a volume of 500 mL, covered with glass tops and filled with 200 mL test solution were used in the test. The test vessels were placed on a black non-reflective surface to avoid stray light.

Dilution water
20X-AAP-medium according to the guideline.

Composition of Dilution water
Component Concentration in stock solution [g/L] Concentration in prepared medium [mg/L]
NaNO3 26 510
MgCl2  6 H2O 12 240
CaCl2  2 H2O 4.4 90
MgSO4  7 H2O 15 290
K2HPO4 · 3 H2O 1.4 30
NaHCO3 15 300
H3BO3 0.19 3.7
MnCl2  4 H2O 0.42 8.3
FeCl3  6 H2O 0.16 3.2
Na2-EDTA · 2 H2O 0.30 6.0
ZnCl2 3.3 mg/L 66 µg/L
CoCl2  6 H2O 1.4 mg/L 29 µg/L
Na2MoO4  2 H2O 7.3 mg/L 145 µg/L
CuCl2  2 H2O 0.012 mg/L 0.24 µg/L
pH-value 7.5 ± 0.1
The pH of the test medium had to be 7.5  0.1 and was adjusted prior to testing with the addition of 1 N NaOH and HCl.

Application
Static with application of the test item at test start. At the start of the exposure, 4 uniform, healthy plants (colonies of 3 fronds each), were introduced into each test vessel containing the test media. The initial frond number per test vessel was 12. The initial numbers of colonies and fronds were the same in each test vessel.

Temperature (Target)
24 ± 2 °C

Light regime (Target)
Continuous, fluorescent light, 6500 to 10000 lux on the surface of the test medium (difference of light intensity at any measured incubation place < 15 % from the mean value)

Placement of the test vessels
A randomised placement of the test vessels was carried out.

Type and frequency of measurements
The numbers of plants and fronds were determined at the start and the end of the exposure. The number of fronds was determined every 2 - 3 days from each replicate of the control and the test concentrations. Every frond that visibly projected beyond the edge of a parent frond was counted as a separate frond. Fronds that lost their pigmentation were not counted.
Observations of frond size, appearance, indication of necrosis, chlorosis or gibbosity, colony break-up or loss of buoyancy, of root length and appearance, as well as of change in colour and destruction of roots, were made on every determination day and at the end of the exposure.
After 7 days, the determination of dry weight was carried out from 3 replicates per test concentration and 6 control replicates. Colonies from each test vessel were collected, rinsed with deionised water and then dried at 60 °C to a constant weight. Any root fragments were included. The dry weight was expressed to an accuracy of 0.1 mg.
The dry weight of the starting biomass was determined based on a sample of fronds (same number of fronds as in the test vessels) taken from the same batch used to inoculate the test vessels.

Physico-chemical Parameters
The pH-values were measured in the freshly prepared solutions before distribution into the replicates. The pH-values of the aged solution were measured from pooled replicates per concentration and control. The temperature of the medium in a surrogate vessel held under the same conditions in the growth room was recorded daily. The light intensity was measured prior to the start of the exposure at positions which had the same distance from the light source as the Lemna fronds.
Reference substance (positive control):
yes

Results and discussion

Effect concentrationsopen allclose all
Duration:
7 d
Dose descriptor:
NOEC
Effect conc.:
0.006 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (geom. mean)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
other: growth rate and yield (Frond number)
Duration:
7 d
Dose descriptor:
NOEC
Effect conc.:
0.012 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (geom. mean)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
other: growth rate and yield (dry weight)
Duration:
7 d
Dose descriptor:
EC50
Effect conc.:
0.781 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (geom. mean)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
other: growth rate (frond number)
Remarks on result:
other: Cl: 0.505 - 1.18
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EC50
Effect conc.:
0.032 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (geom. mean)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
other: frond number yield
Remarks on result:
other: CI: 0.0254 - 0.0426
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EC50
Effect conc.:
1.47 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (geom. mean)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
other: dry weight growth rate
Remarks on result:
other: Cl: 1.02 - 2.06
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EC50
Effect conc.:
0.07 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (geom. mean)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
other: Yield dry weight
Remarks on result:
other: Cl: 0.0378 - 0.136
Details on results:
The environmental conditions (pH-value, room temperature, light intensity) were determined to be within the acceptable limits.
Results with reference substance (positive control):
The acute toxicity of 3,5-Dichlorophenol (SIGMA, batch number MKBZ0947V, purity 100.0 area %, CAS RN 591-35-5) to the monocotyledonous aquatic plant Lemna gibba was determined over a period of 7 days from 2017-10-06 to 2017-10-13 according to OECD Guideline 221. The plants used in the reference test were taken from the same laboratory culture as was used to determine the effects of Acid Red 337.

EC50-Values of the Reference Item
based on the nominal concentrations [mg/L], (0-7 days)
Current Study Valid Range (average ± 3 x SD)
Growth rate inhibition (number of fronds)
ErC50 6.76 5.71 ± 2.95
95% confidence interval 4.62 – 7.87
Yield inhibition (number of fronds)
EyC50 5.80 4.65 ± 2.96
95% confidence interval 4.50 – 7.05
Growth rate inhibition (dry weight)
ErdwC50 6.36 5.61 ± 2.76
95% confidence interval 5.14 – 7.12
Yield inhibition (dry weight)
EydwC50 5.39 4.67 ± 2.37
95% confidence interval 4.86 – 6.07
SD = standard deviation

The observed responses to the reference item were within the valid range, confirming the normal sensitivity of the test system used in the study with the test item.

Reported statistics and error estimates:
Sample size for statistics For the determination of NOEC, LOEC and EC-values, three replicates were included for the test concentrations and six replicates for the control.

NOEC, LOEC and statistical analyses
The NOEC and LOEC were determined by calculation of statistically significant differences of growth rates and yield.
The following statistical tests were conducted:

Shapiro-Wilk’s test on normal distribution was done with a significance level of 0.01.

Levene’s test on variance homogeneity was done with a significance level of 0.01.

Monotonicity of concentration/response was done by trend analysis by contrasts (significance level 0.05).

William’s multiple sequential t-test was carried out with a significance level of 0.05.



EC-values and statistical EC10-, EC20- and EC50-values (0 - 7 d) of the growth rate and yield
analyses (frond number and dry weight) inhibition were calculated by sigmoidal dose-response regression. Calculations of the confidence intervals of EC10-, EC20- and EC50-values were carried out from the best fit values, the standard error and the t-distribution with the software GraphPad Prism. The concentrations enclosed to the EC10-value for Inhibition of yield for frond numbers and dry weight were chosen as lower confidence limits.

Software The data for the tables in this report were computer-generated and rounded for presentation from the fully derived data. Consequently, if calculated manually based on the given data, minor deviations may occur from these figures.
Calculations were carried out using the following software:
- Excel, MICROSOFT CORPORATION
- SigmaPlot, SPSS INC.
- GraphPad Prism, GRAPHPAD SOFTWARE, INC.
- ToxRat Version 3.2.1, ToxRat Solutions GmbH

Any other information on results incl. tables

Frond Numbers

Geometric mean measured test item concentration
[mg/L]

Repl.

No.

Frond numbers per study day

0 days*

2 days

5 days

7 days

9.47

1

12

16

17

17

2

12

14

18

18

3

12

15

18

18

Mean

12

15

18

18

2.32

1

12

17

27

27

2

12

17

28

32

3

12

19

30

32

Mean

12

18

28

30

0.558

1

12

18

33

41

2

12

18

34

37

3

12

17

33

40

Mean

12

18

33

39

0.112

1

12

21

40

51

2

12

17

35

42

3

12

19

36

46

Mean

12

19

37

46

0.0119

1

12

21

56

85

2

12

22

54

88

3

12

23

55

91

Mean

12

22

55

88

0.00610

1

12

21

71

116

2

12

20

71

123

3

12

21

63

105

Mean

12

21

68

115

Control

1

12

21

67

124

2

12

20

69

120

3

12

22

64

121

4

12

20

60

105

5

12

19

63

110

6

12

19

63

112

Mean

12

20

64

115

* = 4 colonies with 3 fronds each per replicate were inoculated at start of the exposure

Repl. No. = replicate number

Growth Rate and Yield Inhibition based on Fronds after 7 d

               Statistically significant differences of growth rates and yield

               compared to control values are marked (+) and non-significant differences are marked (-).

                                               

Geometric mean measured test item concentration
[mg/L]

Repl.

No.

Average growth rate

[d-1]

Inhibition of average growth rate
[%]

Yield


[fronds]

Inhibition of yield

[%]

Doubling time

[d]

9.47

1

 

0.0498

85

 

5

95

13.93

2

 

0.0579

82

 

6

94

11.97

3

 

0.0579

82

 

6

94

11.97

Mean

(+)

0.0550

83

(+)

6

95

12.62

2.32

1

 

0.116

64

 

15

85

5.98

2

 

0.140

57

 

20

81

4.95

3

 

0.140

57

 

20

81

4.95

Mean

(+)

0.132

59

(+)

18

82

5.29

0.558

1

 

0.176

46

 

29

72

3.95

2

 

0.161

50

 

25

76

4.31

3

 

0.172

47

 

28

73

4.03

Mean

(+)

0.169

48

(+)

27

74

4.10

0.112

1

 

0.207

36

 

39

62

3.35

2

 

0.179

45

 

30

71

3.87

3

 

0.192

41

 

34

67

3.61

Mean

(+)

0.193

40

(+)

34

67

3.61

0.0119

1

 

0.280

13

 

73

29

2.48

2

 

0.285

12

 

76

26

2.44

3

 

0.289

10

 

79

24

2.39

Mean

(+)

0.285

12

(+)

76

26

2.44

0.00610

1

 

0.324

0

 

104

-1

2.14

2

 

0.332

-3

 

111

-7

2.08

3

 

0.310

4

 

93

10

2.24

Mean

(-)

0.322

0

(-)

103

1

2.15

Control

1

 

0.334

 

 

112

 

2.08

2

 

0.329

 

 

108

 

2.11

3

 

0.330

 

 

109

 

2.10

4

 

0.310

 

 

93

 

2.24

5

 

0.317

 

 

98

 

2.19

6

 

0.319

 

 

100

 

2.17

Mean

 

0.323

 

 

103

 

2.15

Repl. No. = replicate number

 

 


Specific Growth Rate and Yield Inhibition of Dry Weight after 7 d

                               Statistically significant differences of specific growth rates and yield

                               compared to control values are marked (+) and non-significant differences are marked (-).

 

Geometric mean measured test item concentration
[mg/L]

Repl.

No.

Dry weight


[mg]

Specific dry weight

growth rate

[d-1]

Inhibition of specific dry weight growth rate
[%]

Yield of dry weight


[mg]

Inhibition of yield dry weight
 
[%]

9.47

1

2.3

 

0.0709

79

 

0.9

94

2

2.4

 

0.0770

77

 

1.0

93

3

2.5

 

0.0828

76

 

1.1

92

Mean

2.4

(+)

0.0770

78

(+)

1.0

93

2.32

1

3.5

 

0.131

62

 

2.1

85

2

4.2

 

0.157

54

 

2.8

80

3

4.4

 

0.164

52

 

3.0

78

Mean

4.0

(+)

0.150

56

(+)

2.6

81

0.558

1

5.8

 

0.203

41

 

4.4

68

2

6.0

 

0.208

39

 

4.6

67

3

5.5

 

0.195

43

 

4.1

71

Mean

5.8

(+)

0.202

41

(+)

4.4

69

0.112

1

8.9

 

0.264

23

 

7.5

46

2

7.0

 

0.230

33

 

5.6

60

3

8.4

 

0.256

25

 

7.0

50

Mean

8.1

(+)

0.250

27

(+)

6.7

52

0.0119

1

11.9

 

0.306

11

 

10.5

24

2

10.3

 

0.285

17

 

8.9

36

3

13.6

 

0.325

5

 

12.2

12

Mean

11.9

(+)

0.305

11

(+)

10.5

24

0.00610

1

16.3

 

0.351

-3

 

14.9

-7

2

16.7

 

0.354

-4

 

15.3

-10

3

14.3

 

0.332

3

 

12.9

7

Mean

15.8

(-)

0.346

-1

(-)

14.4

-3

Control

1

15.4

 

0.343

 

 

14.0

 

2

16.0

 

0.348

 

 

14.6

 

3

16.0

 

0.348

 

 

14.6

 

4

15.1

 

0.340

 

 

13.7

 

5

14.8

 

0.337

 

 

13.4

 

6

14.5

 

0.334

 

 

13.1

 

Mean

15.3

 

0.342

 

 

13.9

 

The initial biomass dry weight was 1.4 mg per replicate.

Repl. No. = replicate number

 


 Colony Number (Plants) on Days 0 and 7

 

Geometric mean measured test item concentration
[mg/L]

Replicate

No.


Colony number

Day 0

Day 7

9.47

1

3

6

2

3

7

3

3

7

Mean

3

7

2.32

1

3

5

2

3

5

3

3

4

Mean

3

5

0.558

1

3

4

2

3

4

3

3

4

Mean

3

4

0.112

1

3

6

2

3

4

3

3

5

Mean

3

5

0.0119

1

3

7

2

3

12

3

3

9

Mean

3

9

0.00610

1

3

8

2

3

12

3

3

7

Mean

3

9

Control

1

3

13

2

3

11

3

3

13

4

3

7

5

3

10

6

3

10

Mean

3

11


 Further Observations on Days 2, 5 and 7

Geometric mean measured test item concentration
[mg/L]

Observations on day

2

5

7

9.47

2.3 +
2.4 +
3.3 ++
4.1 +

2.3 ++
2.4 ++
3.3 +++
4.1 ++

2.3 ++
2.4 ++
3.1 +
3.3 +++
4.1 ++

2.32

2.3 +
3.3 +

2.3 ++
3.3 ++

2.3 ++
2.4 +
3.3 ++

0.558

1

2.3 +

2.3 ++
2.4+
3.3 +

0.112

1

1

1

0.0119

1

1

1

0.00610

1

1

1

Control

1

1

1

Observations were made compared to the appearance of control colonies (plants) and test media

 

1      = no observedeffects

2.3   = gibbosity

2.4   = discoloration of the fronds

3.1  =roots shortened

3.3   = discoloration of roots

4.1   = Break up of plants

+      = slight effects

++    = medium effects

+++  = strong effects

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Conclusions:
In this study, Basic Red 29 was found to inhibit the growth of the monocotyledonous aquatic plant Lemna gibba after 7-day exposure under static conditions, with the following effect values (geometric mean measured test item concentrations): The EC50-values for inhibition of the specific growth rate of fronds (ErC50) and dry weight (ErdwC50) were 0.781 (0.505 – 1.18) and 1.47 (1.02 – 2.06) mg/L, respectively. The EC50-values for inhibition of yield (fronds, EyC50) and dry weight inhibition of yield (EydwC50) with 95% confidence intervals were 0.0321 (0.0254 – 0.0426) mg/L and 0.0702 (0.0378 – 0.136) mg/L, respectively. For further values (EC10-values, EC20-values and NOEC/LOEC) of the test item Basic Red 29.
Executive summary:

The effects of the test itemBasic Red29 on the growth of the monocotyledonous aquatic plant speciesLemna gibbawas determined according to the principles of OECD 221 and Council Regulation No. 761/2009 Method C.26 atthe test facilityfrom2017-11-01 to 2017-12-08, with the definitive exposure phase from 2017-11-29 to 2017-12-06.

 

Lemna gibbawas exposed to the test item for 7 days under static conditions. Based on a preliminary test and the first definitive test, 6 nominal test item concentration levels were tested in a geometrical series with a dilution factor of 4:0.00977 - 0.0391 - 0.156 - 0.625 - 2.50 - 10.0 mg/L, corresponding to the geometric mean measured test item concentrations: 0.00610 – 0.0119 – 0.112 – 0.558 - 2.32 – 9.47 mg/L. Three replicates were investigated for each test concentration and six for the control. Frond numbers were assessed on days 0, 2, 5 and 7. Environmental parameters (light, pH and temperature) were within the acceptable limits. The test solutions were clear and concentration related red coloured throughout exposure.The validity criteria of the test guideline were fulfilled.

 

The concentrations ofthe test itemBasic Red29and the controlwere analysed via HPLC-DAD at the beginning and end of the exposure. Details of the analytical method are presented in section 13.

The measured concentrations at the start of the exposure ofBasic Red29were in the range of 95 and 101% of the nominal values.At the end of the exposure the measured concentrations were between < LOQ and 94% of the nominal concentrations. This non-dose related decrease in test item concentration may be caused by uptake of the test item inside the plant tissue. All effect values are given based on thegeometric mean measuredtest item concentrations.

 

 NOEC-, LOEC-, EC-Values and 95 % Confidence Intervals ofBasic Red29
after 7 Days of Exposure

                  (based on thegeometric mean measureditem concentration [mg/L])

Frond number

Dry weight

Growth Rate Inhibition [mg/L]

NOEC

0.00610

NOEC

0.00610

LOEC

0.0119

LOEC

0.0119

ErC10

0.00984 (0.00866 – 0.0113)

ErdwC10

0.0134 (0.00996 – 0.0203)

ErC20

0.0172 (0.0144 – 0.0215)

ErdwC20

0.0382 (0.0231 – 0.0684)

ErC50

0.781 (0.505 – 1.18)

ErdwC50

1.47 (1.02 – 2.06)

Inhibition of Yield [mg/L]

NOEC

0.00610

NOEC

0.00610

LOEC

0.0119

LOEC

0.0119

EyC10

0.00760 (0.00682 – 0.00839)

EydwC10

0.00857 (0.00654 – 0.0109)

EyC20

0.0101 (0.00907 – 0.0112)

EydwC20

0.0127 (0.00989 – 0.0178)

EyC50

0.0321 (0.0254 – 0.0426)

EydwC50

0.0702 (0.0378 – 0.136)